logo
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10 billion lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence

Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10 billion lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a $10 billion lawsuit Mexico filed against top firearm manufacturers in the U.S. alleging the companies' business practices have fueled tremendous cartel violence and bloodshed.
The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely shield gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime.
Big-name manufacturers like Smith & Wesson had appealed to the justices after a lower court let the suit go forward under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law.
Mexico had asked the justices to let the case play out, saying it was still in its early stages.
The case began in 2021, when the Mexican government filed a blockbuster suit against some of the biggest gun companies, including Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Colt and Glock.
Mexico has strict gun laws and has just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year.
The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States. The lawsuit claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market.
The companies reject Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence.
A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices.
That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings.
Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch: Bondi gives remarks as Kilmar Abrego Garcia set to return to US
Watch: Bondi gives remarks as Kilmar Abrego Garcia set to return to US

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Watch: Bondi gives remarks as Kilmar Abrego Garcia set to return to US

Attorney General Pam Bondi gave remarks Friday afternoon after news broke that Kilmar Abrego Garcia — the man mistakenly deported to El Salvador earlier this year — would be returned to the U.S. Abrego Garcia's case has sparked controversy amid President Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. The man, who had been living in Maryland under a protective order, was accused by the administration of having ties to the MS-13 gang and was deported to El Salvador's most notorious prison in March. He and his wife have denied the gang claims. Several Democratic lawmakers have made trips to visit him in the Central American nation amid the battle. The Supreme Court earlier this year ordered the administration to facilitate his return, but Trump and Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele both signaled they didn't have the authority to do so. Last month, the White House formerly invoked the state secrets privilege to avoid handing over documents in the legal battle over Abrego Garcia. The press conference was scheduled to begin at 3:45 p.m. EDT. Watch the video replay above. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump Is Bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia Back—but It's Not All Good
Trump Is Bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia Back—but It's Not All Good

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Is Bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia Back—but It's Not All Good

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man wrongfully deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador, is back in the United States to face criminal charges alleging that he transported undocumented immigrants around the country, the attorney general announced Friday. Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed in a press conference that Abrego Garcia had landed back in the U.S., after the government presented El Salvador with an arrest warrant for him. Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele had initially balked at the idea that he would ever return Abrego Garcia, saying in April that he would not 'smuggle' a 'terrorist' back into the U.S. Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia had a 'significant role' in a smuggling ring that moved people, as well as firearms and narcotics, and said that the illegal transport of undocumented immigrants was his 'full-time job.' 'This is what American justice looks like,' Bondi said, seemingly referring to due process, which she conveniently ignored for the last three months. Bondi said that if Abrego Garcia is convicted, the government plans to return him to El Salvador after he completes his sentence, once again violating a judge's order preventing his removal. Bondi also mentioned a number of accusations from his alleged co-conspirators that were not included in the indictment. She claimed that co-conspirators had alleged Abrego Garcia had 'abused' women 'under his control,' while another had said he'd solicited nude images from minors, and yet another said he had played a role in a murder. The Trump administration repeatedly insisted that there was no way to return Abrego Garcia, even though he had been deported as the result of an 'administrative error,' according to one ICE official. Instead of facilitating his safe return, as ordered to do by the Supreme Court, administration officials set about smearing him as a dangerous 'convicted' criminal and MS-13 gang member despite their thin evidence. But last month, the government filed a two-count indictment under seal in Tennessee alleging that Abrego Garcia was involved in a yearslong conspiracy to transport undocumented immigrants from Texas. The government has been quietly investigating a 2022 traffic stop, where Abrego Garcia was pulled over by Tennessee Highway Patrol for speeding and discovered to have eight passengers in the car. All of the men were Hispanic, and none possessed identification. Abrego Garcia told the officers they were working construction in Missouri, and he was let off with a warning. The government spoke with a man named Jose Ramon Hernandez-Reyes in Alabama, who is currently serving a 30-month sentence for illegally reentering the country following a felony conviction for illegal transportation of undocumented immigrants. After being granted limited immunity, Hernandez-Reyes said that he'd met Abrego Garcia in Baltimore, and claimed to have hired him multiple times to help move undocumented immigrants across the country, ABC News reported. While Abrego Garcia's return demonstrates yet again that Donald Trump's tough talk is subject to rollbacks, it has no tangible ramifications for the hundreds of other people subject to hasty and inhumane removals by the Trump administration. It may appear to be a positive step toward undocumented immigrants receiving due process, but that will have to be seen in court. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had previously claimed that Abrego Garcia was 'engaged in human trafficking' without offering any evidence to support that assertion. She and other members of the Trump administration have fought hard to oppose the U.S. judicial system, which has overwhelmingly opposed Abrego Garcia's removal. This story has been updated.

SCOTUS allows DOGE access to Social Security systems with personal data on millions of Americans
SCOTUS allows DOGE access to Social Security systems with personal data on millions of Americans

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SCOTUS allows DOGE access to Social Security systems with personal data on millions of Americans

The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The court majority sided with the Trump administration in its first Supreme Court appeal involving DOGE, the team once led by billionaire Elon Musk. The three liberal justices dissented. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The high court halted an order from a judge in Maryland restricting the team's access to the Social Security Administration under federal privacy laws. The agency holds sensitive data on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, salary details and medical information. The Trump administration says DOGE needs access to carry out its mission of targeting waste and fraud in the federal government. Musk had been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The billionaire entrepreneur, who has stepped back from his work with DOGE, has described it as a " Ponzi scheme " and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a 'fishing expedition' based on 'little more than suspicion' of fraud, and allowing unfettered access puts Americans' private information at risk. Her ruling did allow access to anonymous data for staffers who have undergone training and background checks, or wider access for those who have detailed a specific need. The Trump administration has said DOGE can't work effectively with those restrictions. Solicitor General John Sauer also argued that the ruling is an example of federal judges overstepping their authority and trying to micromanage executive branch agencies. The plaintiffs say it's a narrow order that's urgently needed to protect personal information. An appeals court previously refused to immediately to lift the block on DOGE access, though it split along ideological lines. Conservative judges in the minority said there's no evidence that the team has done any 'targeted snooping' or exposed personal information. The lawsuit was originally filed by a group of labor unions and retirees represented by the group Democracy Forward. It's one of more than two dozen lawsuits filed over DOGE's work, which has included deep cuts at federal agencies and large-scale layoffs. The nation's court system has been ground zero for pushback to President Donald Trump's sweeping conservative agenda, with about 200 lawsuits filed challenging policies on everything from immigration to education to mass layoffs of federal workers. TRENDING STORIES: 17-year-old missing after boat found circling on Allatoona Lake Family of twins found dead on Bell Mountain dispute findings, say they were killed GA ringleader of fraud scheme sentenced for creating fake recruiting websites to steal identities [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store