Nominee for South Carolina's top doctor toppled by lingering COVID anger
A South Carolina Senate committee rejected the Republican governor's nominee to be the state's top doctor after hours of hearings dominated by the state's response to the COVID pandemic.
Just one of 13 Republicans on the Senate Medical Affairs Committee voted for Dr. Edward Simmer 's nomination to lead the new Department of Public Health — in contrast to the Republican-dominated Senate's overwhelming endorsement of Simmer in 2001 as head of the state's old public health and environmental agency.
Thursday's vote reflected lingering anger over his handling of South Carolina's response to the pandemic. Simmer recommended people get the COVID vaccine, and he often wore masks well after the worst of the pandemic had passed, saying he wanted to protect his wife, who has a compromised immune system.
Simmer defended his record, pointing out that in two years under his leadership of the old agency, South Carolina improved from 45th to 37th among U.S. states in overall public health measures and that COVID now takes up only a tiny percentage of his time.
'Sometimes a small amount of people can make a lot of noise. I think that's what we're seeing here," Simmer said. 'But I also hope you can look at my overall record, where we are going as a state."
The Department of Public Health was created last year, and Gov. Henry McMaster nominated Simmer, a retired U.S. Navy psychiatrist, to run it. But the governor's support came with a backhanded knock on the federal government's COVID response
'He's not a Dr. Fauci,' McMaster said, referring to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the infectious disease expert who advised Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden on the pandemic.
Several Republicans aggressively questioned Simmer, reading aloud excerpts from his email in which he strongly encouraged people in 2021 to get the COVID vaccine and wear masks. Simmer said he was only following the best science at the time and said he never thought anyone should be required to be vaccinated.
Sen. Matt Leber asked why Simmer didn't push back on schools buying Plexiglas barriers or grocery stores putting arrows on floors to encourage one-way traffic up aisles. 'Sometimes where there is chaos there is a vacuum of leadership,' Leber said.
Simmer's critics both at the Statehouse and on social media have derisively called him a 'double masker' for wearing two face masks even after he explained that his wife has underlying medical conditions that make COVID especially dangerous for her.
He was maskless for hearings both last month and on Thursday but said he 'will wear a mask again without hesitation if that is what it takes to protect the woman I love.'
The lone Republican to vote for Simmer asked his colleagues to go back to 2020 and 2021 when many of them also organized COVID testing and made sure their constituents could find places with COVID vaccines.
Sen. Tom Davis said punishing Simmer for what could only be known at the time was a terrible precedent. 'If he's guilty of some dereliction of duty in that regard, then I am derelict as well,' Davis said.
The Senate's longest serving member, Republican Harvey Peeler, asked if Simmer would be willing to run the state Department of Mental Health if his nomination failed.
'Fauci blew up. You got hit by the shrapnel,' said Peeler, a senator since 1981. 'You talk to my constituents. They see you, they think Dr. Fauci.'
The vote doesn't kill Simmer's nomination. But the full Senate, dominated by Republicans, would have to vote to pull it out of committee and send it to the floor.
The only real mention of anything other than COVID during the hearing came from Democrats.
One questioned him about how South Carolina was monitoring measles outbreaks in other states.
A second asked about a mobile maternity care center set to hit the road in 2026. South Carolina is near the bottom in the nation in infant and maternity deaths and has a number of poorer counties where getting to the nearest obstetrician can involve at least a 50-mile (80-kilometer) drive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
UK households rush to 'hold physical cash' as warning issued to millions
Households are seeking a safety net in time of global volatility, according to the Bank of England's chief cashier UK households have been issued a warning to "hoard physical cash" as Brits scramble to respond amidst economic uncertainty and fear of shortages. According to the Bank of England's chief cashier, households are seeking a safety net during this period of global volatility. Victoria Cleland stated on Tuesday that UK households were creating a cash contingency fund, similar to their actions during the Covid and cost of living crises. She noted that the Bank had observed a significant rise in the number of banknotes in circulation in recent months. "At a time of uncertainty, at a time of crisis, people do move to cash. They want to make sure they have literally got something under the mattress," said Ms Cleland. "Even in the UK, there will be times where networks are down and you can only be paying in cash." Cleland mentioned that consumers want cash "to be there but they're not necessarily using it". Last year, Ron Delnevo, chair of the Payment Choice Alliance, which advocates for the long-term future of cash services, declared it was "completely unacceptable" that some shops were refusing cash. "The vast majority of the public want cash to be honoured as a payment," he stated. "These businesses are letting down the public." Kate Osborne, the Labour Party MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, who has signed the early day motion, expressed: "It is a fundamental right that people should be able to use cash as a legal tender. "When you are trying to budget, particularly if you are on a low income, cash is a simple way of doing it. I understand that many people are not using cash much of the time, but there should be choice for all. "We are seeing more and more retailers offering card-only payments, and it causes problems in constituencies like mine where we've got a high number of people who are digitally excluded or may choose not to do electronic banking." The Bank of England has suggested that in the coming years, alternative digital payment methods will likely become increasingly accepted and utilised, reports Birmingham Live. In 2017, debit cards surpassed cash as the most frequently used payment method in the UK.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Why millions in the UK are stashing cash ‘under the mattress' again
Why millions in the UK are stashing cash 'under the mattress' again There is more cash than normal in circulation right now according to the Bank of England and this is the reason why People are said to be hoarding cash in the UK (Image: PA ) Households across the UK are said to have been hoarding physical cash amidst escalating economic uncertainty and worries over power outages. The Bank of England's chief cashier, Victoria Cleland, has observed a surge in people creating a financial buffer, just as they did during the Covid and cost-of-living crises. She revealed that there had been a noticeable climb in the amount of banknotes in circulation recently. She said: "At a time of uncertainty, at a time of crisis, people do move to cash. They want to make sure they have literally got something under the mattress." Cleland pointed out that even in the UK, there could be situations where payment networks failed, and cash was the only solution. Nevertheless, Cleland noted that while consumers desired the availability of cash, it was not always actively used by them. Payment methods other than cash are likely to be used more over the years, according to the Bank of England (Image: KALA STUDIO via Getty Images ) "Even in the UK, there will be times where networks are down and you can only be paying in cash," said Cleland, adding that people wanted cash "to be there but they're not necessarily using it". For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here Article continues below Last year Ron Delnevo, chair of the Payment Choice Alliance, a campaign group that works for the long-term future of cash services, was critical of retailers refusing cash payments, reports Birmingham Live. Delnevo said it was "completely unacceptable" that certain stores were rejecting cash. "The vast majority of the public want cash to be honoured as a payment," he declared. "These businesses are letting down the public." Labour MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, Kate Osborne, who backed an early day motion, emphasised: "It is a fundamental right that people should be able to use cash as a legal tender. "When you are trying to budget, particularly if you are on a low income, cash is a simple way of doing it. "I understand that many people are not using cash much of the time, but there should be choice for all. "We are seeing more and more retailers offering card-only payments, and it causes problems in constituencies like mine where we've got a high number of people who are digitally excluded or may choose not to do electronic banking." In the coming years, the Bank of England has suggested that alternative digital payment methods will likely become increasingly accepted and utilised. Indeed, as early as 2017, debit cards surpassed cash as the most frequently used payment method in the UK. Article continues below
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
New GOP bill would protect AI companies from lawsuits if they offer transparency
Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., is introducing legislation Thursday that would shield artificial intelligence developers from an array of civil liability lawsuits provided they meet certain disclosure requirements. Lummis' bill, the Responsible Innovation and Safe Expertise Act, seeks to clarify that doctors, lawyers, financial advisers, engineers and other professionals who use AI programs in their decision-making retain legal liability for any errors they make — so long as AI developers publicly disclose how their systems work. 'This legislation doesn't create blanket immunity for AI — in fact, it requires AI developers to publicly disclose model specifications so professionals can make informed decisions about the AI tools they choose to utilize,' Lummis, a member of the Commerce Committee, said in a statement first shared with NBC News. 'It also means that licensed professionals are ultimately responsible for the advice and decisions they make. This is smart policy for the digital age that protects innovation, demands transparency, and puts professionals and their clients first.' Lummis' office touted the bill as the first piece of federal legislation that offers clear guidelines for AI liability in a professional context. The measure would not govern liability for other AI elements, such as self-driving vehicles, and it would not provide immunity when AI developers act recklessly or willfully engage in misconduct. 'AI is transforming industries — medicine, law, engineering, finance — and becoming embedded in professional tools that shape critical decisions,' her office said in a release. 'But outdated liability rules discourage innovation, exposing developers to unbounded legal risk even when trained professionals are using these tools.' Exactly who is liable when AI is used in sensitive medical, legal or financial situations is a bit of a gray area, with some states seeking to enact their own standards. The House-passed 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which is advancing through Congress and supported by President Donald Trump, includes a provision that would ban states from enacting any AI regulations for 10 years. Senate Republicans last week proposed changing the provision to instead block federal funding for broadband projects to states that regulate AI. Both Democratic and Republican state officials have criticized the effort to prohibit state-level regulations over the next decade, while AI executives have argued that varying state laws would stifle industry growth when the United States is in stiff competition with countries like China.
