Earth nears 1.5°C threshold as global heatwave persists through April 2025
April 2025 was the second-hottest on record, continuing a streak of extreme global heat that has defied expectations even after El Niño faded.
Scientists warn the world is on track to exceed the 1.5°C warming limit within four years, with some saying the target is no longer achievable.
Experts remain concerned that rapid warming, driven by fossil fuel use and other factors, could trigger long-lasting climate consequences.
PARIS, May 8 — Global temperatures were stuck at near-record highs in April, the EU's climate monitor said on Thursday, extending an unprecedented heat streak and raising questions about how quickly the world might be warming.
The extraordinary heat spell was expected to subside as warmer El Niño conditions faded last year, but temperatures have stubbornly remained at record or near-record levels well into this year.
'And then comes 2025, when we should be settling back, and instead we are remaining at this accelerated step-change in warming,' said Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research.
'And we seem to be stuck there. What this is caused by — what is explaining it — is not entirely resolved, but it's a very worrying sign,' he told AFP.
In its latest bulletin, the Copernicus Climate Change Service said that April was the second-hottest in its dataset, which draws on billions of measurements from satellites, ships, aircraft and weather stations.
All but one of the last 22 months exceeded 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the warming limit enshrined in the Paris Agreement, beyond which major and lasting climate and environmental changes become more likely.
Missed target
Many scientists believe this target is no longer attainable and will be crossed in a matter of years.
A large study by dozens of pre-eminent climate scientists, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, recently concluded that global warming reached 1.36°C in 2024.
Copernicus puts the current figure at 1.39°C and projects 1.5°C could be reached by mid-2029 or sooner, based on the warming trend over the last 30 years.
'Now it's in four years' time. The reality is we will exceed 1.5 degrees,' said Samantha Burgess of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, which runs Copernicus.
'The critical thing is to then not latch onto two degrees, but to focus on 1.51,' the climate scientist told AFP.
The photo taken on July 6, 2024 shows an aerial view of a partially submerged Guanyin temple in floodwaters in the swollen Yangtze River, in Ezhou, in central China's Hubei province. — AFP pic
Julien Cattiaux, a climate scientist at the French research institute CNRS, said 1.5°C 'would be beaten before 2030', but that was not a reason to give up.
'It's true that the figures we're giving are alarming: the current rate of warming is high. They say every tenth of a degree counts, but right now, they're passing quickly,' he told AFP.
'Despite everything, we mustn't let that hinder action.'
'Exceptional'
Scientists are unanimous that burning fossil fuels has largely driven long-term global warming that has made extreme weather disasters more frequent and intense.
But they are less certain about what else might have contributed to this persistent heat event.
Experts think changes in global cloud patterns, airborne pollution, and Earth's ability to store carbon in natural sinks like forests and oceans could also be factors contributing to the planet overheating.
The surge pushed 2023 and then 2024 to become the hottest years on record, with 2025 tipped to be third.
'The last two years... have been exceptional,' said Burgess.
'They're still within the boundary — or the envelope — of what climate models predicted we could be in right now. But we're at the upper end of that envelope.'
She said that 'the current rate of warming has accelerated, but whether that's true over the long term, I'm not comfortable saying that', adding that more data was needed.
Copernicus records go back to 1940, but other sources of climate data — such as ice cores, tree rings and coral skeletons — allow scientists to expand their conclusions using evidence from much further into the past.
Scientists say the current period is likely to be the warmest the Earth has been for the last 125,000 years. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
TotalEnergies on trial: Greenwashing claims could set legal precedent in France
PARIS, June 6 — Environmental groups took TotalEnergies to court yesterday in a landmark Paris trial, accusing the French oil and gas giant of misleading consumers with ads that overstate its climate commitments and fossil fuel transition. It is the first such case in France targeting a major energy company and could set a legal precedent for corporate environmental advertising, which is starting to face tighter regulations in the European Union. The civil case stems from a March 2022 lawsuit by three environmental groups accusing TotalEnergies of 'misleading commercial practices' for saying it could reach carbon neutrality while continuing oil and gas production. The plaintiffs took that legal route as 'greenwashing', or the act of claiming to be more environmentally responsible than in reality, is not specifically covered under French law. Starting in May 2021, TotalEnergies advertised its goal of 'carbon neutrality by 2050' and touted gas as 'the fossil fuel with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions'. At the time, the company had changed its name from Total to TotalEnergies to emphasise its investments in wind turbines and solar panels for electricity production. The plaintiffs allege that TotalEnergies made around 40 'false advertisements' in their lawsuit. 'For the average consumer, it is impossible to understand that TotalEnergies is actually expanding fossil fuel production,' said Clementine Baldon, a lawyer for the NGOs. The company's strategy 'will not help the energy transition', Baldon told the court. 'It delays it, even prevents it, and it contributes to putting the objectives of the Paris accord at risk,' she added, referring to the international agreement aimed at curbing climate change. TotalEnergies maintains it has not engaged in misleading commercial practices. 'Greenwashing would be to promise that the petrol sold in service stations is carbon neutral,' said the company's lawyer, Francoise Labrousse. TotalEnergies had 'never said its products are good for the climate', she added. TotalEnergies also insisted that the messages are part of its institutional communications regulated by financial authorities and not consumer law. It also argued the NGOs are misusing consumer protection rules to challenge its corporate strategy, and that no consumer organisation is party to the case. The NGOs want the Paris court to rule on the legality of ads presenting natural gas as essential to the energy transition. Climate experts say methane leaks from the gas industry have a powerful warming effect on the atmosphere. But TotalEnergies noted Greenpeace Belgium had previously considered natural gas useful for the energy transition and noted the group still uses fossil fuels in its boats. Correcting ads Environmental groups in recent years have turned to the courts to establish case law on companies misleading consumers by appearing more eco-friendly than they are. In Europe, courts ruled against Dutch airline KLM in 2024 and Germany's Lufthansa in March over misleading consumers about their efforts to reduce the environmental impact of flying. In Spain, utility Iberdrola failed to secure a conviction against Spanish oil and gas company Repsol over similar allegations of 'false' environmental claims. A greenwashing case against Australian oil and gas producer Santos, challenging its claim to be a 'clean fuels' company, has been ongoing since 2021. Other fossil fuel companies, under pressure from advertising regulators or legal complains, have had to scrap or correct ad campaigns. Shell, for example, received a warning in the UK and had to stop promoting 'carbon-neutral' gasoline in several countries, including Germany, the Netherlands and Canada. New European laws now ban vague, generic environmental claims such as 'green' or '100 per cent natural' product, and aim to require brands to more strictly substantiate environmental claims on labels and in advertising. TotalEnergies has said it plans to show that its messages 'about its name change, strategy and role in the energy transition are reliable and based on objective, verifiable data'. At the end of the hearing, the judge said a ruling would be given on October 23. — AFP
Free Malaysia Today
2 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
In a hotter future, what comes after coral reefs die?
When stressed in hotter ocean waters, corals expel the microscopic algae that provides their characteristic colour and food source. Without respite, bleached corals slowly starve. (AFP pic) PARIS : The fate of coral reefs has been written with a degree of certainty rare in climate science: at 1.5°C of global warming, most are expected to die. This is not a far-off scenario. Scientists predict that the rise of 1.5 Celsius will be reached within a decade and that beyond that point, many coral simply cannot survive. It is important to accept this and ask what next 'rather than trying to hold onto the past', said David Obura, chair of IPBES, the UN's expert scientific panel on biodiversity. 'I wish it were different,' Obura, a Kenyan reef scientist and founding director of CORDIO East Africa, a marine research organisation, told AFP. 'We need to be pragmatic about it and ask those questions, and face up to what the likely future will be.' And yet, it is a subject few marine scientists care to dwell on. 'We are having a hard time imagining that all coral reefs really could die off,' said Melanie McField, a Caribbean reef expert, who described a 'sort of pre-traumatic stress syndrome' among her colleagues. 'But it is likely in the two-degree world we are rapidly accelerating to,' McField, founding director of the Healthy Reefs for Healthy People Initiative, told AFP. When stressed in hotter ocean waters, corals expel the microscopic algae that provides their characteristic colour and food source. Without respite, bleached corals slowly starve. At 1.5°C of warming relative to pre-industrial times, between 70-90% of coral reefs are expected to perish, according to the IPCC, the global authority on climate science. At 2°C, that number rises to 99%. Even with warming as it stands today – about 1.4°C – mass coral death is occurring, and many scientists believe the global collapse of tropical reefs may already be underway. What comes next Obura said it was not pessimistic to imagine a world without coral reefs, but an urgent question that scientists were 'only just starting to grapple with'. 'I see no reason to not be clear about where we are at this point in time,' Obura said. 'Let's be honest about that, and deal with the consequences.' Rather than disappear completely, coral reefs as they exist today will likely evolve into something very different, marine scientists on four continents told AFP. This would happen as slow-growing hard corals – the primary reef builders that underpin the ecosystem – die off, leaving behind white skeletons without living tissue. Gradually, these would be covered by algae and colonised by simpler organisms better able to withstand hotter oceans, like sponges, mussels, and weedy soft corals like sea fans. 'There will be less winners than there are losers,' said Tom Dallison, a marine scientist and strategic advisor to the International Coral Reef Initiative. These species would dominate this new underwater world. The dead coral beneath – weakened by ocean acidification, and buffeted by waves and storms – would erode over time into rubble. 'They will still exist, but they will just look very different. It is our responsibility to ensure the services they provide, and those that depend on them, are protected,' Dallison said. Dark horizon One quarter of all ocean species live among the world's corals. Smaller, sparser, less biodiverse reefs simply means fewer fish and other marine life. The collapse of reefs threatens in particular the estimated one billion people who rely on them for food, tourism income, and protection from coastal erosion and storms. But if protected and managed properly, these post-coral reefs could still be healthy, productive, attractive ecosystems that provide some economic benefit, said Obura. So far, the picture is fuzzy – research into this future has been very limited. Stretched resources have been prioritised for protecting coral and exploring novel ways to make reefs more climate resilient. But climate change is not the only thing threatening corals. Tackling pollution, harmful subsidies, overfishing and other drivers of coral demise would give 'the remaining places the best possible chance of making it through whatever eventual warming we have', Obura said. Conservation and restoration efforts were 'absolutely essential' but alone were like 'pushing a really heavy ball up a hill, and that hill is getting steeper', he added. Trying to save coral reefs 'is going to be extremely difficult' as long as we keep pouring carbon into the atmosphere, said Jean-Pierre Gattuso, an oceans expert from France's flagship scientific research institute, CNRS. But some coral had developed a level of thermal tolerance, he said, and research into restoring small reef areas with these resilient strains held promise. 'How do we work in this space when you have this sort of big dark event on the horizon? It's to make that dark event a little brighter,' said Dallison.
Free Malaysia Today
3 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Clean energy investment rising despite economic uncertainty, says IEA
The International Energy Agency said the shift in US policies is expected to impact investment in renewable energy. (Freepik pic) PARIS : Investment in clean energy technologies is set to strike a record this year despite global economic uncertainty, double the spending on fossil fuels that will dip for the first time since 2020, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said today. While the Trump administration has been hostile to renewable energy sources and trumpets boosting oil production, the IEA said security concerns, as well as rising demand for electricity, including from artificial intelligence (AI) and data centres, are driving investment in clean energy sources. 'Amid the geopolitical and economic uncertainties that are clouding the outlook for the energy world, we see energy security coming through as a key driver of the growth in global investment this year to a record US$3.3 trillion as countries and companies seek to insulate themselves from a wide range of risks,' executive director Fatih Birol said as the IEA published its latest annual World Energy Investment report. It expects investment in clean technologies, including nuclear and electricity distribution grids, to hit a record US$2.2 trillion this year. Meanwhile, investment in oil, natural gas and coal is set to dip to US$1.1 billion, as companies react to falling prices and lower demand expectations. Most of drop is due to investment in US oil production, while investment in liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects there and elsewhere is expected to lead to the largest-ever capacity growth in 2026-2028. Since returning to the White House, Trump has slapped a 10% tariff on most trading partners, alongside higher rates on dozens of economies, including China and the EU, that have since been reduced or put on pause until early July while negotiations are held. Earlier this week the OECD slashed its annual global growth forecast, warning that Trump's tariffs blitz would stifle the world economy. However, energy investments haven't suffered yet. 'The fast-evolving economic and trade picture means that some investors are adopting a wait-and-see approach to new energy project approvals, but in most areas we have yet to see significant implications for existing projects,' Birol said. US renewables to 'level off' However, IEA said the shift in US policies would impact investment there in renewables. 'Spending on renewables and low-emissions fuels in the US almost doubled over the last 10 years but is now set to level off as supportive policies are scaled back,' it said. The report found the rapid rise in electricity demand – for industry, cooling, electric mobility, data centres and AI – was also shaping investment trends. The sector is expected attract US$1.5 trillion in investments this year, 50% more than fossil fuels. The IEA also noted that nuclear energy has been making a comeback as electricity demand from data centres risks doubling in the next five years. While renewables are expected to meet most of that additional demand, the steady supply that nuclear plants offer have prompted a number of tech companies to enter into supply agreements. However, the Paris-based IEA, which advises industrial nations on energy policy, warned that spending on electricity grids was not keeping up with investment into generation. In addition to lengthy permitting procedures, grid expansion was also being held back by tight supply of transformers and cable, it found. Despite the rising levels of investment in renewable energy production, the IEA said it must double to achieve the goal set at the 2024 UN climate conference: a tripling of the installed renewable capacity by 2030. The urgent demand for power means new plants using dirty fuels such as coal are still being built, with a 4% increase in investment expected this year. 'In the face of rapid electricity demand growth and concerns linked to security of supply, such as various geopolitical risks as well as uncertainties over hydropower output, China and India are approving increasing amounts of new coal-fired power,' said the IEA report.
