NY bill would give critters due process after P'Nut the squirrel was seized, beheaded by DEC agents
Don't tread on P.
State Republicans are pushing a bill that would give animals seized by the government a stay of execution after internet-famous P'Nut the Squirrel was decapitated by the government last year.
P'Nut's grieving owners Mark and Daniela Longo joined with state Assemblyman Jake Blumencranz (R-Nassau) at the state Capitol Tuesday to unveil 'Peanut's Law: The Humane Animal Protection Act' — which would require the Department of Environmental Conservation to wait 72 hours before euthanizing any seized animals.
'I sit here trying not to cry, but passing this law will be a movement to make sure that animal rights are not overlooked anymore,' an emotional Mark Longo told a large crowd gathered at the foot of the Capitol's Million Dollar Staircase.
'I loved those animals to death,' he added, referring to P'Nut and another pet named Fred the Squirrel that was seized in the same raid and also put down. 'And today is a day that we push forward to make sure that this tragedy never happens again.'
The owner wore a tiny cowboy hat P'Nut had worn in social media posts pinned to his lapel.
The critters were housed at the Longos' upstate farm before a DEC raid on Oct. 30, 2024 that officials said was sparked by anonymous complaints of animal mistreatment.
The animals' heads were cut off by state officials within hours so their brains could be tested for rabies after the frightened squirrel allegedly bit a handler's leather glove — setting off a massive backlash to the DEC's behavior.
'His death stopped people in their tracks, from the president of the United States to the chief justice of the Supreme Court, to celebrities to everyday New Yorkers,' said Assemblyman Blumencranz, who pointed out that the tests which cost P'Nut and Fred their lives came back negative for rabies.
'They were not dangerous. They were not sick. They were not wild threats roaming the streets. They were rescues — loved, nurtured, and safe,' he said.
'Here is the cold, hard truth. It is too little, too late. Words don't save P'Nut and Fred, and words won't save the next animal, or the next family, unless we change the law.'
The bill would also require an administrative hearing before any animals can be seized or euthanized from wildlife sanctuaries, unless their is hard proof of an immediate threat to the public.
During the announcement Tuesday, Longo and other speakers stood before a lectern adorned with banner emulating the yellow Revolutionary War-era Gadsden flag — with the image of rattlesnake replaced by a squirrel perched atop the words 'Don't Tread on Me.'
There was also a picture of Fred, and one of P'Nut in his tiny one-gallon cowboy hat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's ‘Big, beautiful bill'
SALT LAKE CITY () — Utah Lawmakers have signed a letter opposing specific measures related to artificial intelligence in President Donald Trump's In a letter addressed to Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Senator John Curtis (R-Utah), state lawmakers say they are 'concerned with the proposed ten-year moratorium on state-level artificial intelligence regulation.' According to , initially the bill was and block dozens of states from enforcing preexisting AI regulations and oversight structures in any way. But on June 5, the Senate Commerce Committee altered the text on the bill. The new version would only require states not to regulate AI if they want access to federal broadband funding. The bill allocates $500 million over the next 10 years to modernize government systems with the help of AI and automation technologies. In a letter signed by nearly 50 lawmakers including House Speaker Mike Schultz (R-Hooper) and Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore (R-Draper), they claim the provision would hinder Utah's nationally recognized efforts 'to strike the right balance between innovation and consumer protection.' They add that since Utah to establish an Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy, followed by the launch of an AI learning Lab, Lawmakers say these initiatives 'allow Utah to encourage responsible AI development, empower industry leaders and shield consumers from real-world harms, all without stifling innovation.' According to , a centerpiece of the legislation is making the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent — which nonpartisan scorers and think tanks estimate would cost trillions of dollars over the next decade. Utah taxpayers may take a hit if 2017 cuts expire The bill also includes a proposal that would raise the cap for the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which would allow taxpayers — especially those in higher-tax blue states — to deduct more of their regional taxes from their federal tax bill. The bill also has major reforms to Medicaid, estimated to lead to millions of people losing coverage by 2034. Trump is pushing Congress, where Republicans have majority control, to send the final product to his desk to become law by the Fourth of July. RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' 'Somebody has to stop it:' Gov. Cox defends Trump's decision to deploy troops to LA 'We're living in the dumbest timeline' — Gov. Cox comments on SLC Sego pride flags Calif. governor asks court to block Trump administration from using troops in immigration raids Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Newsom, in California address, says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protests
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday night accused President Trump of intentionally fanning the flames of the Los Angeles protests and "pulling a military dragnet across" the city endangering peaceful protesters and targeting hardworking immigrant families. The Democratic governor's comments were a forceful rebuke to the president's claims that deploying the California National Guard and U.S. Marines to the city was necessary to control the civil unrest. "Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities — they're traumatizing our communities," Newsom said. "And that seems to be the entire point." The governor posted his video address to California on social media hours after Trump said at Ft. Bragg in North Carolina that he sent in troops to protect immigration agents from 'the attacks of a vicious and violent mob.' The picture Trump painted of the federal government's role in the protests against immigration raids marks a sharp contrast to Newsom's assertion that state and local law enforcement were successfully keeping the peace before federal authorities deployed "tear gas," "flash-bang grenades" and "rubber bullets" on Angelenos exercising their constitutional right to free speech and assembly. Then Trump "illegally" called up the California National Guard, Newsom said. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk," Newsom said. "That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose." The governor, who has become a target for Republicans and a central figure in the political and legal battle over the protests, has said for days that an "unhinged" Trump deployed troops to intentionally incite violence and chaos, seeking to divert attention away from his actions in Washington and assert his 'dictatorial tendencies.' Read more: L.A. immigration raids draw California Gov. Gavin Newsom back into the fight with Trump Newsom and state Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta filed a request for a restraining order earlier Tuesday asking a federal judge to call off the 'Department of Defense's illegal militarization of Los Angeles and the takeover of a California National Guard unit.' The request came the day after California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration alleging that the deployment of the guard without the governor's consent violated the U.S. Constitution. After returning to Washington, Trump commented on the 'good relationship' he's always had with Newsom, before blaming the governor for the unrest. 'This should never have been allowed to start, and if we didn't get involved, Los Angeles would be burning down right now,' Trump said, and then made a reference to the deadly wildfires in the Los Angeles area in January. 'Just as the houses burned down." He said the military is in the city to de-escalate the situation and control what he described as paid 'insurrectionists,' 'agitators' and 'troublemakers.' 'We have a lot of people all over the world watching Los Angeles,' Trump said. 'We've got the Olympics, so we have this guy allowing this to happen.' On Monday, Trump said his top border policy advisor Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. Newsom immediately jumped on the comment, comparing the federal administration to an 'authoritarian regime.' 'I never thought I'd hear those words. Honestly, Democrat, Republican. Never thought I'd hear those in my lifetime — to threaten a political opponent who happens to be sitting governor,' Newsom said. Read more: California asks court for restraining order to block Guard, U.S. Marine deployments in L.A. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) declined to answer a question about whether Newsom should be arrested on Tuesday and instead said the governor should be 'tarred and feathered.' Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has "completely abdicated" his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that "other states are next." "At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability," Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free-speech rights peacefully. "I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety. "What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty. Your silence. To be complicit in this moment. Do not give in to him." Times staff writer Laura Nelson and Washington bureau chief Michael Wilner contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump calls for protesters who burn the American flag to be jailed for 1 year
The Brief President Donald Trump on Tuesday called for one year in jail for protesters that burn the American flag. This comes amid five days of protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles and smaller protests that have popped up in other cities like Dallas and Austin. Flag burning is considered a form of political expression and protected under the First Amendment after the Supreme Court ruled in the 1989 Texas v. Johnson case. FORT BRAGG, N.C. - President Donald Trump called for those who burn the American flag to spend a year in jail while speaking at Fort Bragg in North Carolina on Tuesday. What they're saying "They proudly carry flags of other countries, but they don't carry the American flag. They only burn it," Trump said. "People that burn the American flag should go to jail for one year. And we'll see if we can get that done." READ MORE:Trump visits Fort Bragg amid criticism over military deployment in response to immigration protests President Trump said his administration is working with some senators to pass a law that gives jail time to flag-burning protesters. The backstory The comments come amid a series of protests against immigration raids in major cities like Dallas and Los Angeles. In Los Angeles, the city is preparing for its fifth day of anti-ICE demonstrations, which have seen cars burned down, smoke bombs deployed and pepper bullets fired. Trump ordered the deployment of 4,100 National Guard troops and 700 Marines, which he says is to protect federal officials and property. The move drew objections from California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who filed an emergency motion in federal court seeking to block the use of federal troops to assist in immigration raids. Newsom said the request was a response to a change in orders that had been issued for the Guard. In Dallas, one person was arrested after hundreds of demonstrators gathered near the Margaret Hunt Bridge on Monday night. The demonstrations were tense at times, with protesters throwing water bottles, fireworks and rocks at officers. In Austin, 12 people were arrested Monday night after protesters defaced the JJ Pickle Federal Building with graffiti. The protest started at the Texas State Capital before moving to the federal building. As officers began to break the group up, Austin police said "tensions escalated" and protesters threw rocks at officers. Officers briefly withdrew in an attempt to deescalate, but the crowd advanced, leading to officers using pepper balls and DPS using gas to disperse the crowd. Four officers were injured, and all were treated and released. Tuesday's comments weren't the first time that Trump as suggested that demonstrators be jailed for burning the American flag. In August, while on the campaign trail, Trump proposed passing a law to jail anyone who burns the flag for one year. It would be more difficult than it seems on the surface, with a 1989 Supreme Court decision, stemming from a case in Dallas, protecting the right to burn an American flag as a form of political expression under the First Amendment. In his comments in August he mentioned the constitutionality of such a law. "They say it's not constitutional," Trump said. "Well, make it constitutional." In 1989, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling in favor of Gregory Lee Johnson. Five years prior, Johnson was arrested after burning a flag outside the Republican National Convention in Dallas. Johnson was charged and later convicted of breaking a Texas law that prohibited the desecration of the flag. Johnson was sentenced to one year in prison and fined. His conviction was overturned by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, whose decision was later upheld by the Supreme Court. In the decision, the majority held that Johnson was engaging in political expression, which is protected under the First Amendment. In the years following the decision, the United States Congress passed a law banning flag burning, which was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. The Source Information on Trump's comments about jail time for protesters who burn the American flag comes from a speech given at Fort Bragg on June 10, 2025. Information on anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, Dallas and Austin comes from previous FOX 11, FOX 4 and FOX 7 reporting, respectively. Information on the Supreme Court decision in Texas v. Johnson comes from the National Constitution Center.
