logo
‘Public policy failure': number of public school students in Australia falls to record low

‘Public policy failure': number of public school students in Australia falls to record low

The Guardian17-02-2025

The proportion of students enrolled in public schools has fallen to another record low, new data shows, placing Australia at risk of a 'full blown flight' from the sector.
Of the 45,008 students who enrolled at schools in 2024, only 5,419 went to government schools while 39,589 went to the private sector.
Overall, some 63.4% of students were enrolled in government schools in 2024, Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data released on Monday said, representing a drop of 0.6 percentage points since 2023 and six percentage points since 2000.
The decline comes amid an increase in independent school enrolments.
Over the five years to 2024, independent school enrolments surged 18.5%, while Catholic school enrolments increased by 6.6% and public school enrolments rose by just 1%.
The only states where enrolments to government schools grew in 2024 were Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia - all by less than 2%. At the same time, enrolments in independent schools grew by 3.9% nationwide, equivalent to 25,729 more students.
Greens spokesperson for schools, Senator Penny Allman-Payne, said every proportional increase in private school enrolments was a 'public policy failure'.
'We shouldn't sugar coat it,' she said. 'We are at risk of a full-blown flight of parents and kids out of a public system that is being left to rot, while money pours into the pockets of the richest private schools.'
Secondary school enrolments in government schools increased marginally in 2024, the data showed, by 0.9% or 9,731 more students, while non-government secondary school enrolments grew by 3.3% (25,418 more students).
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
At primary schools, government school enrolments went backwards, declining by 0.3% (4,312 fewer students) while non-government primary enrolments grew by 2% (14,171 more students).
The convenor of Save Our Schools, Trevor Cobbold, said decades of 'massive under-funding of public schools', together with 'generous over-funding of private schools by governments', was taking its toll.
'As parents seek education advantage for their children they should carefully consider their choices,' he said.
'Research studies and the latest Pisa results show that private schools do not deliver better results than public schools after adjusting for family background and school composition.'
In New South Wales, independent school enrolments grew by a single year record of 8,547 students while government school enrolments fell by 5,511.
Independent schools have enrolled almost two-thirds of all the new students in NSW since 2000, and now educate 19.5% of students, up from 13.1% in 2000.
Association of Independent Schools NSW chief executive, Margery Evans, said the figures were 'remarkable', attributing much of the growth to low and mid-fee Christian, Islamic and Anglican schools, which cater to low to middle income families in outer Sydney.
'In spite of cost-of-living pressures, families still prefer their children to have an education that reflects their beliefs, values and philosophies,' Evans said.
'The sector's growth may well have been even higher were it not for enrolment caps … demand for places continues to exceed supply.'
Independent Schools Australia chief executive officer, Graham Catt, said the figures showed families were prepared to 'make significant sacrifices' for the education they believed was best for their children.
Finnish education expert Pasi Sahlberg, now a professor of educational leadership at the University of Melbourne, said Australia had a larger proportion of students in non-government schools than 'most other OECD countries'.
Sahlberg said school funding deals were 'necessary, but not sufficient' to improve the status of public education, adding it came alongside rapidly growing homeschooling rates, declining school attendance and weakening student engagement.
'This shift from government schools has promoted growing concentration of socio-educationally disadvantaged students in schools that have already high proportions of disadvantaged students,' he said.
'If this downward trend continues … departments of education should be worried.'
The ABS figures also showed the proportion of students staying in school until year 12 increased annually for the first time since 2017, and student-to-teacher ratios fell to a 2006 low of 12.9 students to one teacher.
About 79.9% of students stayed at school from year 7 until year 12, up from 79.1% the previous year, but still below a 2017 high of 84.8%.
The education minister, Jason Clare, described the figures as 'good news', but said there was 'a lot more to do'.
'We are starting to see things heading in the right direction for the first time in almost a decade,' he said.
There were 4.1 million students enrolled in 9,653 schools in 2024, a 1.1% rise on the previous year.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander school student enrolments were up 3.7% on the previous year, and made up 6.6% of all school students.
Retention rates were 2.7 percentage points less than a decade ago (56.7% in 2024 compared with 59.4% in 2014).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GRAHAM GRANT: With ideas so barmy even Lord Sugar would sack her, next year Scots voters will have their own chance to tell Kate Forbes and the SNP...'YOU'RE FIRED!'
GRAHAM GRANT: With ideas so barmy even Lord Sugar would sack her, next year Scots voters will have their own chance to tell Kate Forbes and the SNP...'YOU'RE FIRED!'

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

GRAHAM GRANT: With ideas so barmy even Lord Sugar would sack her, next year Scots voters will have their own chance to tell Kate Forbes and the SNP...'YOU'RE FIRED!'

Kate Forbes showed off her renowned business acumen last week when she said businesses could avoid hefty rates by setting up in cupboards. It's a barmy idea which would see her kicked off The Apprentice – irascible Lord Sugar wouldn't put up with her weapons-grade nonsense. For bar and restaurant owners desperate for respite from a punitive rates regime, Ms Forbes's less than sage counsel was particularly galling. Operating from the confines of a cupboard is a non-starter for them, but then they've long been little more than an afterthought for the SNP. Some of them had fallen for the Deputy First Minister's act as someone who understood the needs of entrepreneurs and business owners. She was seen as the acceptable face of insular, Left-wing nationalism, as she seemed to realise that thriving firms lead to a stronger economy. After the SNP joined forces with the anti-capitalist Greens in a pact which ended in disaster, Ms Forbes was viewed as a breath of fresh air, at least by those who thought growth was a good idea. The scales fell from the eyes of those who had been hoping in vain that she would re-build bridges with Covid-battered businesses, many of them still clinging to survival, after her cupboard advice. For those who missed it, Ms Forbes was taking part in a Holyrood debate when she was asked whether the rates burden prevented companies from expanding. Ms Forbes, who is also Economy Secretary, if you can believe it, said the 'rates system often does not take into account the fact that some of the most profitable businesses are the smaller ones'. She said: 'A start-up can be launched from a cupboard, where there are no rates, while a large and perhaps less profitable business has to pay them.' Ms Forbes did concede that the rates system is 'based on an older version of the economy, in which the size of properties was linked to profitability, and that is just not the case in our new, tech-driven environment'. She might have vowed to reform the system, of course, but then it's easier just to tell people to move into cupboards, even if it does raise questions about her relationship with reality, and whether she has one. An incredulous Murdo Fraser, the Tory economy spokesman, said Ms Forbes 'might as well have claimed Narnia is at the back of the cupboard', while Glasgow-based businessman Donald MacLeod accused her of 'mind-boggling stupidity'. That's an understatement, given that Scotland is the only part of Britain not cutting business rates for shops this year. The SNP government Budget unveiled in December means retailers in Scotland are receiving less support than those in other parts of Britain. Shops will pay £9.1million more than those south of the Border, while offices will pay an additional £6.4million and hotels face an extra £2.5million bill. In its 2021 manifesto, the SNP promised to ensure that 'the largest businesses pay the same combined poundage in Scotland as in England'. Many firms are also struggling with the UK Government's hike in National Insurance employers' contributions, which began in April. For some, Ms Forbes's bizarre statement triggered flashbacks to the dark days of the Covid era when Nicola Sturgeon said the bottom of classroom doors could be sawn off to boost ventilation. Back in 2019, Ms Sturgeon had claimed Scotland remained 'imprisoned' in the UK and Boris Johnson was effectively locking the country 'in a cupboard' by refusing another referendum on breaking up Britain. Cupboards loom large in Nationalist ideology, but Ms Forbes is just as much of a true believer in independence as John Swinney and his colleagues, and everything she says about the economy must be seen through that prism. We shouldn't forget that she once described former SNP Commons group leader Ian Blackford as a pensions 'expert' after he pumped out a stream of blatant disinformation about the UK Government's supposed liability for bankrolling Scottish pensions in the event of independence. What does that say about Ms Forbes's judgment, or lack of it? She was happy enough to stand by as these distortions and untruths circulated on social media – so why should we trust anything she says now? As we reported last week, Ms Forbes also questioned why we seem to be fixated with income tax rates in Scotland. Following a keynote speech at economic think-tank Adam Smith House, she said: 'In Scotland there seems to be an obsession with income tax as though it's the only tax businesses and individuals have to grapple with.' That supposed 'obsession' shouldn't be hard to figure out, given that her party has ramped up income tax to the highest level in the UK, helping to drive away hard-working professionals. Scots economist Smith himself wrote that 'every tax ought to be so contrived as both to take out and to keep out of the pockets of the people as little as possible over and above what it brings into the public treasury of the state' – anathema to the SNP. Smith also warned that high taxes 'frequently afford smaller revenue to government than what might be drawn from more moderate taxes'. The SNP's tax-grabs are all in the name of what shamed former Finance Secretary Derek Mackay once confusingly called 'progressivity' - but the only thing the economy is progressing towards is an abyss of the SNP's own creation. Mr Mackay is remembered mainly for quitting hours before the Scottish Budget in 2020 after it emerged he had bombarded a teenage boy with inappropriate online messages. But he also admitted he'd never heard of the Laffer Curve, which dictates that revenues can go up if taxes are cut. Luckily, Tory MSP Mr Fraser was on hand to explain the concept. There's little evidence that anyone in the Cabinet has a better grasp of the basics than Mr Mackay, including Ms Forbes. Yet there's no shortage of guidance from the phalanx of spin doctors on the SNP government payroll. The average £100,000 bill for each of its 17 special advisers was slipped out under cover of the Hamilton by-election last Thursday – amounting to nearly £2million in the last financial year. Which one of them helped to craft Ms Forbes's bilge about cupboards, assuming any of them did, is unknown, but they did provide some entertainment – even if it was a blend of black comedy and high farce. The bleak punchline is that we are being led by a combination of the clueless and the incompetent. But at the Scottish election next May we'll have the chance to tell Ms Forbes and her cohorts what Lord Sugar would doubtless say, with some gusto: 'You're fired!'

School loses Supreme Court bid over Christian staff member sacked for LGBT posts
School loses Supreme Court bid over Christian staff member sacked for LGBT posts

North Wales Chronicle

time12 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

School loses Supreme Court bid over Christian staff member sacked for LGBT posts

Kristie Higgs, a Christian mother of two, was sacked from her role at Farmor's School in Fairford, Gloucestershire, in 2019 for sharing Facebook posts criticising teaching about LGBT+ relationships in schools. In February, she won a Court of Appeal battle related to her dismissal, with three senior judges finding that the decision to sack her for gross misconduct was 'unlawfully discriminatory' and 'unquestionably a disproportionate response'. The school sought to appeal against the ruling at the Supreme Court in March, but three justices refused to give the school the green light to challenge the decision in the UK's highest court. In a decision on Thursday, which was published on Monday, Lord Reed, Lord Hamblen, and Lady Simler said that the school had asked for the go-ahead to appeal against the ruling on four grounds. But they said that the Supreme Court 'does not have jurisdiction' to hear three of the grounds, and the fourth 'does not raise an arguable question of law'. In response to the decision, Mrs Higgs said: 'I am relieved and grateful to the Supreme Court for this common-sense decision. 'Christians have the right to express their beliefs on social media and at other non-work-related settings without fear of being punished by their employer.' Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre – which supported Mrs Higgs' case, said: 'We welcome the Supreme Court's decision, which brings a decisive closure to this extraordinary case.' She continued: 'The Court of Appeal confirmed, loud and clear, that ideological censorship in the workplace, particularly against sincerely held Christian convictions, is illegal. 'This latest decision from the Supreme Court is further proof that our tireless work at the Christian Legal Centre, in defending so many Christian freedoms cases, has not been in vain.' Mrs Higgs, who worked as a pastoral administrator and work experience manager at the school, shared two posts on a private page under her maiden name in October 2018 to about 100 friends, which raised concerns about relationship education at her son's Church of England primary school. She either copied and pasted from another source or reposted the content, adding her own reference in one post to 'brainwashing our children'. BREAKING: The Supreme Court has today refused to hear the appeal of Farmor's School in Fairford, Gloucestershire of the landmark Kristie Higgs Court of Appeal ruling. In February 2025, in a seminal judgment for Christian freedom and free speech, the Court of Appeal had reversed… — Christian Concern (@CConcern) June 9, 2025 Pupils were to learn about the No Outsiders In Our School programme, a series of books that teach the Equality Act in primary schools. An employment tribunal found in 2020 that while Mrs Higgs' religion was a protected characteristic, her dismissal was lawful, but this decision was overturned by an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in 2023. But the EAT ruled the case should be sent back to an employment tribunal for a fresh decision, which Mrs Higgs' lawyers challenged in the Court of Appeal as 'unnecessary'. In a judgment, Lord Justice Underhill, sitting with Lord Justice Bean and Lady Justice Falk, ruled in Mrs Higgs' favour in February, stating: 'The dismissal of an employee merely because they have expressed a religious or other protected belief to which the employer, or a third party with whom it wishes to protect its reputation, objects will constitute unlawful direct discrimination within the meaning of the Equality Act.'

School loses Supreme Court bid over Christian staff member sacked for LGBT posts
School loses Supreme Court bid over Christian staff member sacked for LGBT posts

Leader Live

time13 hours ago

  • Leader Live

School loses Supreme Court bid over Christian staff member sacked for LGBT posts

Kristie Higgs, a Christian mother of two, was sacked from her role at Farmor's School in Fairford, Gloucestershire, in 2019 for sharing Facebook posts criticising teaching about LGBT+ relationships in schools. In February, she won a Court of Appeal battle related to her dismissal, with three senior judges finding that the decision to sack her for gross misconduct was 'unlawfully discriminatory' and 'unquestionably a disproportionate response'. The school sought to appeal against the ruling at the Supreme Court in March, but three justices refused to give the school the green light to challenge the decision in the UK's highest court. In a decision on Thursday, which was published on Monday, Lord Reed, Lord Hamblen, and Lady Simler said that the school had asked for the go-ahead to appeal against the ruling on four grounds. But they said that the Supreme Court 'does not have jurisdiction' to hear three of the grounds, and the fourth 'does not raise an arguable question of law'. In response to the decision, Mrs Higgs said: 'I am relieved and grateful to the Supreme Court for this common-sense decision. 'Christians have the right to express their beliefs on social media and at other non-work-related settings without fear of being punished by their employer.' Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre – which supported Mrs Higgs' case, said: 'We welcome the Supreme Court's decision, which brings a decisive closure to this extraordinary case.' She continued: 'The Court of Appeal confirmed, loud and clear, that ideological censorship in the workplace, particularly against sincerely held Christian convictions, is illegal. 'This latest decision from the Supreme Court is further proof that our tireless work at the Christian Legal Centre, in defending so many Christian freedoms cases, has not been in vain.' Mrs Higgs, who worked as a pastoral administrator and work experience manager at the school, shared two posts on a private page under her maiden name in October 2018 to about 100 friends, which raised concerns about relationship education at her son's Church of England primary school. She either copied and pasted from another source or reposted the content, adding her own reference in one post to 'brainwashing our children'. BREAKING: The Supreme Court has today refused to hear the appeal of Farmor's School in Fairford, Gloucestershire of the landmark Kristie Higgs Court of Appeal ruling. In February 2025, in a seminal judgment for Christian freedom and free speech, the Court of Appeal had reversed… — Christian Concern (@CConcern) June 9, 2025 Pupils were to learn about the No Outsiders In Our School programme, a series of books that teach the Equality Act in primary schools. An employment tribunal found in 2020 that while Mrs Higgs' religion was a protected characteristic, her dismissal was lawful, but this decision was overturned by an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in 2023. But the EAT ruled the case should be sent back to an employment tribunal for a fresh decision, which Mrs Higgs' lawyers challenged in the Court of Appeal as 'unnecessary'. In a judgment, Lord Justice Underhill, sitting with Lord Justice Bean and Lady Justice Falk, ruled in Mrs Higgs' favour in February, stating: 'The dismissal of an employee merely because they have expressed a religious or other protected belief to which the employer, or a third party with whom it wishes to protect its reputation, objects will constitute unlawful direct discrimination within the meaning of the Equality Act.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store