The charts that show how the NHS has languished under Amanda Pritchard
When Amanda Pritchard took on the role as chief executive of NHS England in August 2021, she inherited a health service on the brink.
The NHS was still reeling from the worst pandemic in a century, with an abundance of structural problems, from an ageing population to rising costs, adding fuel to the fire.
As she hands in her resignation, little has changed: the system is as chaotic and near to collapse as it was on the day she took over.
This is despite a record high of £176 billion in planned spending for the service in the current financial year – up by 1.6 per cent in real terms on 2021-22 levels.
The most constant reminder of the NHS's failure to recover under Pritchard's leadership has been the constant flow of doom-laden statistics.
In her first year in office, which started five months after the end of the third national Covid lockdown, the NHS England appointment backlog increased from 5.7 million to seven million. It peaked in August 2023, almost two years after the final Covid restrictions had been removed, at 7.7 million.
Since then, patients awaiting routine appointments and check-ups at hospitals have faced glacial progress. Backlogs have effectively plateaued, with the current rate of reduction requiring 15 years to return it back to the size of the waiting list before the start of the pandemic, in March 2020.
These statistics are repeated across every part of the health care system.
At their worst, the average ambulance wait for stroke patients reached an hour, before settling at 35 minutes in January this year – exactly the same as when Pritchard took over and up from 22 minutes pre-pandemic.
More than a quarter of patients waited for more than four hours to be seen in A&E in January 2025, according to the latest figures, up from 20 per cent in August 2021. More than 61,000 patients waited in trolleys before being placed in suitable wards.
These war zone-like conditions have become the norm across the country: not one trust meets the three key targets on waiting times for A&E, cancer treatment and hospital appointments. It is unsurprising, then, that patient satisfaction has plummeted, falling from 60 per cent in 2019 to 24 per cent in 2023 – the lowest in 30 years of the King's Fund survey.
Pritchard is unlikely to be the cause of these problems, but it seems she is not the solution either.
Care away from the front lines has faced similar pressures during Pritchard's time at the helm of the NHS.
Less than half of patients found it easy to reach their practice on the phone in 2024, down from 81 per cent a decade ago, according to the long-standing GP Patient Survey. Overall patient satisfaction has plummeted from 84 per cent to just 71 per cent.
This is despite there being some progress in the recruitment crisis facing general practice. Recruitment rates under Pritchard surpassed those seen before the pandemic.
Equally, there was a surprise increase in the number of community pharmacies during Pritchard's time as chief executive, after five consecutive years of declining numbers. In 2023-24, there were 12,009 pharmacies, the highest since 2016, according to the NHS Business Services Authority.
Amanda Pritchard's tenure saw record pay rises for NHS staff, encouraged partly by strikes and reversing the impacts of coalition-era austerity cuts.
These pay rises might explain the fall in vacancy rates to their lowest levels in years.
In 2018-19, one in eight nursing roles was unfilled. By the end of last year, it had fallen to just one in 13. Turnover rates, however, remain high.
This gap has, however, been partly filled through ramped-up overseas recruitment. Since 2021, 277,255 NHS and care visas have been issued to workers, bringing with them 389,462 dependants, according to Telegraph analysis of Home Office data.
The proportion of doctors with foreign nationality increased from 28 per cent to 36 per cent – Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, criticised this over-reliance on workers from abroad, with home-grown talent increasingly lured to higher-paid jobs outside the UK.
Despite these record staff levels, the workforce is marred by inefficiency.
Official NHS productivity figures measure how effective the system is at doing its job. The statistics compare the growth in the quantity of outputs, such as the number of patients seen and treated by the health service, with inputs, from staff and medicine numbers to infrastructure spending.
Even before the pandemic, figures from the Office for National Statistics show public health care productivity in England had slumped.
Productivity did bounce back in 2021-22, the latest year for which data are available.
But the challenges facing the service make it unlikely that productivity has improved since then. The estimated cost of the NHS's capital maintenance backlog increased by 13.7 per cent during Pritchard's first year, staff sickness rates remain stubbornly high and the average number of patients discharged per day fell by 4 per cent last year.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Alberta premier defends charging most Albertans for COVID-19 vaccines
EDMONTON - Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her government's new policy forcing many Albertans to pay out of pocket for a COVID-19 vaccination is about focusing on those who need it the most. Smith says $135 million got 'flushed down the drain' last year from doses wasted in part because of low vaccine uptake. Her government will still pay for some, including for those who have compromised immune systems or are on social programs, to get shots. Smith says she thinks low vaccination rates for COVID-19 in Alberta last year are because the vaccine 'doesn't work particularly well.' The Opposition NDP says it's a cruel move to charge Albertans who want to protect their health and their loved ones. Public health-care experts say fewer people will get vaccinated and it could lead to higher costs for things like hospital stays. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 14, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a GP, and I'm sick of the NHS always winning
Another Spending Review, another promise of increased funding for the NHS. This week Rachel Reeves has said £30 billion will be invested over the next five years in day-to-day maintenance and repair of the health service estate. But will these cash injections ever be enough? Or is a centrally run and funded system simply no longer able to keep pace with the population's needs and demands for healthcare in our modern era? The Times has also reported on Government plans to drastically shift care from hospitals into the community, in a bid to create a 'neighbourhood health service'; with the bulk of routine specialist appointments delivered in locations such as GP surgeries and high street opticians. How GP surgeries are expected to cope with the extra demand – when many patients are already unable to secure an appointment – is not made clear. Yet the crux of the matter is not primarily where appointments take place; but individual decisions made by the public around when, where and how they use the health service. Starmer is clutching at straws to meet his manifesto pledge for 92 per cent of patients to be seen within 18 weeks after referral for non-urgent conditions. Currently only 60 per cent of patients are receiving treatment within this timeframe. However, since Labour are focussing on the wrong problem, their solution will fail. Working as a GP in the NHS, it has frequently struck me how much of the healthcare demand in the UK might disappear if the public were contributing in some way. Take the patient who calls to discuss their child's difficult bedtime routine, or one who recently asked for exceptional NHS funding to have a small fatty lump removed from their back. Day after day, GPs see patients who would not contact the health service if they even had to pay £10 for an appointment. The same is repeated in A&E departments and outpatient clinics. Demand has been spiralling for years without the counterbalance that comes from a degree of personal responsibility. The result is that patients are offered tests and investigations they don't need, hospital referrals that may offer minimal benefit, and now many simply cannot get through to their GP at all. Emergency departments in the UK mirror scenes you might expect to see in a warzone: patients covered in blood and vomit, writhing in pain, or being left for hours in hospital corridors. Nobody seems able to rationalise which services the NHS should be delivering; meanwhile the system is descending into chaos and delivering increasingly substandard care. The Amazon Prime generation expects healthcare demands to be met at the click of a button – but better still, it is free! If the NHS can offer weight loss surgery, knee replacements, diabetes medication and more; then what is the point in striving to improve your health? The British public have, to a degree, learnt to expect the health service to pick up the pieces for their poor lifestyle choices. The results are seen across society: from overweight children in our primary schools, to millions declared unfit to work due to mental health conditions. Despite healthcare expenditure continuing to increase, and accounting for a larger share of the UK's GDP; productivity in NHS hospitals has fallen, waiting times for outpatient appointments have ballooned, the UK has markedly higher cancer mortality rates than other countries, and life expectancy improvements have stalled. Coupled with the number of working-aged people who are economically inactive due to long-term sickness, it is not unreasonable to wonder how long this can continue. Labour are right to identify that too many patients currently receive hospital treatment for conditions that could be managed by GPs, but they fail to see the bigger picture on the need for healthcare reform. If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results – this seems to reflect our position on the NHS. Dr Katie Musgrave is a general practitioner Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
The reasons aren't fully clear, but overdose deaths are down in Kern, US
Overdose deaths, specifically from opioids, are on the decline across the nation and data from the Kern County Coroner's Office shows local deaths are down as well. According to KCSO, there were 189 fentanyl-related overdose deaths in Kern County in 2024, down from 297 in 2023, a roughly 36% decline. The decline is part of a broader trend nationally. Opioid overdose deaths declined sharply from 2023-2024, according to provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC, 48 states and the District of Columbia all saw decreases in overdose deaths from December 2023 to 2024, a 26% decrease nationwide. California's reported overdose deaths dropped by 24%, the most of any West Coast state. Only Nevada and South Dakota saw an increase in overdose deaths, both by less than 4%. It's not entirely clear what's driving the decline, and experts are pointing to a range of factors. "Over the past, I'd say this calendar year, we have seen an increase in the people who are coming into our treatment system," said Ana Olvera, an administrator with Kern Behavioral Health and Recovery Services. "More people have accessed our treatment system than in years past, even coming out of COVID, which is a good sign for us," Olvera said. The increased availability of treatment programs and the overdose reversal drug naloxone were likely contributors to the decrease, she said, as well as reduced stigma about seeking treatment. Olvera also pointed to the passage of Proposition 36, which increased penalties for certain crimes. "Just from that — working with the courts and people who are eligible for this program that have a treatment-mandated felony — we have seen an increase of folks who are eligible and who come into our system of care," Olvera said. BHRS and other health care providers have increased their treatment options, Olvera said. The county's 24-hour substances-use-disorder hotline, which helps connect people with treatment, has seen higher call volume over the years, she said. "The call center is how most people access treatment in our substance use system," Olvera said. The average number of calls has increased from 908 in the 2018-2019 fiscal year to 1,272 in 2023-2024. From July 2024 to April of this year, there were 1,061 calls. There's no doubt overdose deaths are dropping, but exactly why is still a matter of conjecture. The Opioid Data Lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill tracks information related to opioids and its researchers have said there's no single explanation for such a steep, nationwide decline in overdose deaths. "Ascribing a single national explanation for the drop in overdoses is not grounded in data," the lab said in a February analysis. Even with the large decline in deaths, the mortality rate from drug overdoses remains high, with most states still recording death rates higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from the CDC and the California Department of Public Health shows overdose deaths peaking in 2023 before dropping sharply in 2024. According to CDPH, Kern County's opioid-related overdose deaths reached an all-time high of 321 in 2023. That was up from 308 in 2022 and 274 in 2021. As of April 30, Kern had seen 50 fentanyl-related deaths so far this year, according to KCSO.