Angola's crossroads: Can the Lobito Corridor deliver prosperity without sacrificing public health?
Bayethe Msimang With Angola, Zambia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo rich in natural resources, the corridor offers a vital gateway for mineral exports, crucially improving access to international markets, writes Bayethe Msimang
Image: IOL
The Lobito Corridor, a transformative transnational infrastructure project, is taking shape along the Atlantic coast of Angola. This ambitious initiative, connecting Angola to Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, is more than just a blueprint. It is a testament to Africa's determination for regional integration, mineral mobility, and economic transformation. The potential benefits of this corridor, such as increased trade and economic growth, cannot be overlooked.
Yet, as the corridor advances through Angola's heartland, slicing across five of its most impoverished provinces, the promise of prosperity faces an uncomfortable truth: development without safeguards can deepen inequality, unravel communities, and cost lives.
Touted as a flagship initiative by the African Development Bank (AfDB) in its 2025 Annual Development Effectiveness Review, the Lobito Corridor is positioned as a logistical artery for the continent—a route to reroute exports, attract investment, and reduce the time it takes to move copper and cobalt from the mineral-rich interiors to global markets. With more than $1.6 billion in investment from the United States, and the European Union, it embodies the modern gospel of infrastructure-led growth.
But in Angola's Benguela, Bié, Huambo, Moxico, and Moxico Leste provinces, where the railway snakes through dense forests and forgotten villages, the lived reality is starkly different.
In many of these provinces, health services are either overstretched or virtually absent. The World Health Organization has flagged that fewer than 40% of births in some areas are attended by trained professionals. Infectious diseases such as malaria, HIV, and tuberculosis remain widespread, while testing and treatment rates are abysmally low. Hospitals are underequipped, understaffed, and, in some cases, nonexistent. Some areas have fewer than one hospital bed per 10,000 people.
In such a context, the corridor's surge in migration, construction, and commercial activity threatens to tip an already strained health system into full collapse.
According to a detailed risk analysis by the WHO and public health researchers, five primary dangers accompany the corridor's growth: overburdened health infrastructure, disease transmission, environmental degradation, social displacement, and a rise in transport-related injuries. One could easily add a sixth: the unequal distribution of benefits. While foreign investors and national elites reap profits, local communities bear the brunt of pollution, land dispossession, and exploitative labor.
The corridor, in short, risks becoming a steel-framed paradox: a route to riches that bypasses the poor.
Yet this outcome is not preordained. Angolan and its partners have an opportunity to turn the Lobito Corridor into a beacon of sustainable and inclusive development. To do that, infrastructure must be planned with health, not merely freight, in mind.
This corridor is not just about goods moving from east to west, is the sentiment of public health workers in Luanda. It's also about people about girls walking to school, about mothers giving birth, about workers breathing clean air. If those stories are missing from the planning tables, we're building a corridor of exploitation.
Already, warning signs are emerging. Along the Moxico route, air and water pollution from unregulated mining runoff has begun seeping into rivers used by local farmers and families. Temporary settlements mushrooming around construction zones have brought a spike in gender-based violence and child exploitation, mirroring patterns seen in other "boomtown" corridors across the continent. Meanwhile, traffic accidents—particularly involving heavy trucks and makeshift crossings—are on the rise, overwhelming rudimentary emergency services.
The African Development Bank's report acknowledges some of these challenges and calls for greater cross-sector collaboration between ministries of transport, health, environment, and gender. It also advocates for social investment safeguards : such as funding mobile clinics, gender-sensitive policing, and environmental health monitoring as conditions tied to infrastructure finance.
But Angola's record on multisectoral implementation remains patchy at best. For meaningful reform, the country must embrace a model of co-development, where health ministries are not afterthoughts but co-architects. Development finance institutions must do more than approve grants. They must demand health equity metrics in every contract.
This is especially urgent as Angola's oil-dependent economy diversifies. President João Lourenço has rightly staked the country's future on logistics, agriculture, and renewable energy. But none of this will succeed if Angola becomes a cautionary tale of extractive development, where resources flow outward, and trauma flows inward.
In this context, the Lobito Corridor becomes more than a rail or road, it becomes a moral test. Can Africa's new development corridors embody Ubuntu the idea that humanity is shared, and none should progress at the cost of another? Or will they follow the path of so many megaprojects, where roads to riches become pipelines of displacement and disease?
The time to make the right choice is now, as the health risks are well-documented and the development tools are available. The political will to ensure that every brick laid is linked to a life saved is not just crucial, it's urgent. We cannot afford to delay in addressing these issues.
While the health risks are well-documented and the development tools are available, what's crucial now is the political will to ensure that every brick laid is linked to a life saved.
In practical terms, this means embedding public health impact assessments into every stage of the corridor's expansion. It means mandating that contractors, foreign and domestic, to invest in local clinics, clean water infrastructure, and occupational health. It means that maternal wards must rise alongside warehouses, and that women's voices must be heard when permits are issued.
If managed correctly, the Lobito Corridor could become a global model for development, blending economic progress with social well-being. This potential for positive change should not just inspire hope and optimism, but also motivate us all to work towards it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Restructuring global health – WHO faces major challenges as foreign aid reductions take toll
While the immediate effects of the US cuts in health aid are being felt primarily by the Global South, the associated risks extend worldwide. Last week, global leaders gathered for the World Health Assembly in Geneva to address the reality that the global health landscape is being reshaped by dramatic shifts in funding, priorities, and leadership. Chief among these is the United States' decision to slash foreign aid and withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). Despite spending only 0.24% of its gross national income on foreign aid, the United States has been the largest donor to global health programmes, providing one-third of the international assistance in global health. This is not just a US issue – other countries have also signalled reductions in foreign health aid, and Argentina also recently announced it will withdraw from the WHO. These dramatic shifts have forced the WHO to plan a reduction in staff by nearly 50%, triggering massive restructuring. Non-government organisations (NGOs) are laying off large numbers of staff worldwide. While other donors and philanthropies are stepping in, they cannot fill the void alone. Meanwhile, the shock to the system is already resulting in lives lost. According to the WHO, countries such as Haiti, Kenya, Lesotho, South Sudan, Burkina Faso and Nigeria may run out of HIV antiretroviral medications within months. The Africa CDC's director-general, Dr Jean Kaseya, warned in March that 'two to four million additional Africans are likely to die annually' as a result of the aid cuts. T The continent now faces a $12-billion shortfall in healthcare financing. Substantial impacts will be felt across the globe, from Afghanistan to Lao PDR, in many low- and middle-income countries. While the immediate effects of these cuts are being felt primarily by the Global South, the associated risks extend globally. When countries become overwhelmed by preventable infections, they will lose the ability to detect and contain pathogens with epidemic potential that could cross borders in days. The current situation carries serious implications for global security as well as health. A new era needs to begin with a roadmap for sustainable domestic funding by individual nations, a strategic view of the role of WHO, and a coordinated plan among major donors. Governments must take the lead in reshaping their health budgets to reflect urgent needs while navigating competing priorities. Donors, NGOs, and multilaterals can support this shift if they embrace flexible, trust-based funding models tailored to local strategies. African health financing The desire to create long-term sustainability is apparent in the Africa CDC's strategic plan to transform health financing, which focuses on domestic resource mobilisation, diversifying funding sources, optimising health fund management and using evidence-based data for efficient resource allocation. The plan calls for member countries to meet the Abuja Declaration target of spending at least 15% of national budgets on health and explores innovative ideas such as solidarity levies and mobilising Africa's $95-billion in annual diaspora remittances. Nigeria's Basic Health Care Provision Fund, which dedicates 1% of revenue (about $150-million annually) to primary care, is a promising example. Any effort to reform global health infrastructure must prioritise resilient, widely accessible primary healthcare. Since the Alma-Ata declaration of 1978, we've known that primary care is the foundation of 'Health for All'. Doing so will not only reduce the impact of chronic and endemic infectious diseases, but also serve to enable systems that quickly identify when infectious disease outbreaks of concern appear. As the WHO recalibrates, it must assess realistically the current situation and focus on its most important core functions for the future: setting global standards, responding to emergencies and coordinating transnational responses. Routine programme implementation should be handled by individual countries, NGOs, and the private sector. The WHO can no longer afford to take on the management of basic health functions within countries. Instead, it needs to focus on maintaining surge capacity to meet needs during health emergencies and facilitate cooperation in transboundary issues. The WHO needs to prioritise doing fewer things better. Now is also the time for new global coalitions, agreements and leadership among non-government actors. The Gates Foundation has reaffirmed its commitment to address emerging challenges. Philanthropies must align their efforts to successfully cooperate, identify priorities and gaps, reduce duplication and maximise impact. Meanwhile, the private sector has a vital role to play in connecting national health priorities to new markets, innovations and partnerships. Global health needs a multisector coalition of the willing right now that is felicitous, innovative, able to learn from past mistakes and adapt to meet the world's current needs and prevent future crises. The time for action is now – the consequences of inaction are too great, and the lives lost are both predictable and preventable. DM Mitchell Wolfe is Senior Associate at the Center for Strategic Studies, Washington, DC; Nahid Bhadelia is Associate Professor at the Boston University School of Medicine; and Wilmot James is Professor and Strategic Advisor to the Pandemic Center at Brown University's School of Public Health and a former Member of Parliament (South Africa).

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Daily News Milk Fund: Caring for the babies
In a celebratory mood are Princess Shazi, Ayanda Mdluli, Sushie Munsamy, Michelle Potgieter, Sameera Kareem, and Sarah Pratley. Image: Tumi Pakkies The Daily News Milk Fund, a community-care project that is in its 83rd year of existence, reached out to the children living at the Shepherd's Keep home on the Bluff, Durban with some essential goods on Monday. Sameera Kareem, Ayanda Mdluli, Sushie Munsamy Image: Tumi Pakkies Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Shepherd's Keep, a sanctuary in Bluff, Durban, that has been providing unconditional love and care to orphaned and abandoned babies affected by HIV/AIDS since 1998. Founded by Colin and Cheryl Pratley, the home has been a beacon of hope for the most vulnerable members of our society. Sushie Munsamy Image: Tumi Pakkies To mark World Milk Day, the Daily News Milk Fund collaborated with the facility and delivered much-needed items from the home's wish list, a gesture that brought smiles, tears, and immense gratitude. Daily News' editor Ayanda Mdluli said: "I'm proud to say that our Milk Fund is dedicated to making a real difference in the lives of disadvantaged children. Sameera Kareem Image: Tumi Pakkies

TimesLIVE
20 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Electronic death registration is a win-win: let's make it happen
A recent study found extensive underreporting of HIV as a cause of death. Only 28% of deaths that occurred in a national sample of public sector hospitals where the medical record had clear clinical indications of HIV, had HIV specified on their death notification form. Aside from ensuring that medical certification of the cause of death is part of the medical training curriculum, and that additional training is provided during internship periods, another key issue to address is that many doctors are reluctant to record HIV/Aids as a cause of death due to concerns about maintaining patient confidentiality. In 2014 a self-sealing section was added to protect information about cause of death on the death notification form, but this has clearly not had the desired effect. Following the deaths of at least 22 children from contaminated food last year, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced that the department of health would develop an electronic system for recording causes of death as one of several responses to the emergency. The move to an electronic system offers a strategic opportunity to address the challenge around confidentiality and promises far more. It allows for secure, institution-based data management that protects confidentiality, encourages accurate reporting, and strengthens the integrity of vital statistics. Benefits of this digital transition will include: Improved data quality and confidentiality, encouraging accurate reporting of sensitive conditions such as HIV/Aids; Automated validation checks, reducing certification errors at the point of data entry; Real-time access to mortality data, enabling rapid public health responses; and A platform for quality assurance and feedback, currently not possible under the paper-based system. Ultimately, moving away from a paper-based process of death registration will reduce the administrative burden and improve efficiency across the system. This presents a timely and valuable opportunity to collaborate across departments, including health, home affairs and Statistics South Africa to modernise the country's civil registration and vital statistics system. We are at a pivotal moment for such co-ordinated policy action. Investing in a robust electronic system for cause-of-death certification will strengthen South Africa's public health planning, improve disease surveillance, and increase accountability. The long-term returns — through faster, more reliable data — are substantial for both governance and health outcomes. It is a win-win situation all round. • Groenewald and Bradshaw are both with the South African Medical Research Council's Burden of Disease Research Unit.