logo
UK says equalities law defines women as only those born biologically female

UK says equalities law defines women as only those born biologically female

Euronews16-04-2025

ADVERTISEMENT
The United Kingdom Supreme Court has ruled that the definition of a woman under the country's equalities law refers to someone born biologically female.
This definition would reject the Scottish government's argument that it should include transgender women. According to Justice Patrick Hodge, five judges at the court ruled unanimously in favour of this decision.
This means that a transgender person with a certificate recognising them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes.
The court did emphasise that the ruling "does not remove protection from trans people," who are "protected from discrimination on the ground of gender reassignment."
The case stems from a 2018 law passed by the Scottish Parliament stating that there should be a 50% female representation on the boards of Scottish public bodies.
Transgender women were to be included in meeting the quota.
Feminist groups that had challenged the Scottish government hailed Wednesday's ruling as a victory.
"The court has given us the right answer: the protected characteristic of sex — male and female — refers to reality, not to paperwork," said Maya Forstater of the group Sex Matters.
For Women Scotland, a women's rights group that says they "believe that there are only two sexes," brought the legal challenge.
They argued that the Scottish officials' redefinition of woman went beyond parliament's powers. But Scottish officials then issued new guidance stating that the definition of woman included someone with a gender recognition certificate.
The challenge was rejected by a court in 2022, but the group was granted permission last year to take its case to the Supreme Court.
Aidan O'Neill, a lawyer for FWS, told the Supreme Court judges — three men and two women — that under the Equality Act, "sex" should refer to biological sex and as understood "in ordinary, everyday language".
The Scottish Greens have criticised the ruling, with MSP Maggie Chapman saying it is "deeply concerning for human rights" in a post on X.
Amnesty International said excluding transgender people from sex discrimination protections conflicted with human rights laws.
Amnesty submitted a brief in court saying it was concerned about the deterioration of the rights of trans people in the UK and abroad.
ADVERTISEMENT
"A blanket policy of barring transwomen from single-sex services is not a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim," the human rights group said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Macron's outburst on environmental issues
Macron's outburst on environmental issues

LeMonde

time10 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Macron's outburst on environmental issues

For four days, President Emmanuel Macron sought to restore his environmental credentials, launching a full-scale counteroffensive on diplomatic, media and political fronts. ON Tuesday, June 10, he vigorously defended the United Nations Ocean Conference, which France co-chaired in Nice with Costa Rica. On Saturday, in an interview with the regional daily press, he publicly rebuked both the government and Parliament, slamming the "enormous mistake" of those seeking to undermine "the priority given to climate in public debate," as key measures of the environmental transition are under attack. Since François Bayrou's appointment as prime minister, the president's tone had never been so forceful. It is in proportion to the possibility that Macron's initial ambitions might be reduced to almost nothing. Amid the many difficulties he faced toward the end of his term, Macron's predecessor, Socialist François Hollande, could at least point to the success of the 2015 Paris Climate Conference (COP21). By contrast, what we are witnessing today is the dismantling of the 2021 Climate and Resilience Law, with the rollback of the zero net land artificialization target, the elimination of low-emission zones and the loosening of environmental standards. Similarly, the temporary reintroduction of a neonicotinoid pesticide banned since 2020 and the early June announcement of the provisional suspension of one of the government's main programs to support household energy renovation (MaPrimeRénov') on the grounds that it allegedly attracted too much fraud, have fueled the impression of a major step backward. Avoiding a criminal waste of time Macron's determination to defend a path that runs counter to the climate skepticism of the far right and at odds with the anti-growth movement that is flourishing among some on the left is unmistakable. Neither accusations of never doing enough, nor the strong public backlash against the proposed carbon tax at the start of his first term (which led to the Yellow Vest protests), nor the current setbacks, seemed to have deterred him from pursuing what he called, in September 2023, "Ecologie à la française" or French-style ecology: science-driven, compatible with economic growth, innovative, competitive, able to boost the country's energy sovereignty and leaving no one behind. The sense of failure is no less real, however, as the promise, induced by environmental planning, to bring about a genuine change in lifestyles over the long term and with minimal social upheaval has not been kept. Budget reversals, the loss of an absolute majority in the Assemblée Nationale after his reelection in 2022 and the rise of the far right across France and Europe, amid farmers' protests and backlash against regulations, have derailed the ambitions set at the start of Macron's second five-year term (he can't run a third time). The president's outburst was not just an attempt to salvage his record two years before the end of his term. It is also a warning for the future. The many would-be successors – both on the right and among Macronists – who are unraveling his policies or letting them slide must pull themselves together, as threats to food, health, biodiversity, water, and the climate are accelerating and multiplying. Assuming they do wake up, the main challenge will not be to announce their intentions, but to build a consensus around a method to avoid backtracking and wasting time, which would be criminal. At this point, this is wishful thinking, given how divided and short-sighted France's political landscape appears to be.

Netanyahu faces vote to dissolve parliament over ultra-Orthodox draft law
Netanyahu faces vote to dissolve parliament over ultra-Orthodox draft law

France 24

time14 hours ago

  • France 24

Netanyahu faces vote to dissolve parliament over ultra-Orthodox draft law

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces a vote to dissolve parliament Wednesday and key coalition partners have threatened to bring down his government. Still, few think it's the end of the road for Israel's longest-serving prime minister, who has been battling corruption charges for years, or his far-right government, still in power after presiding over the security failures surrounding the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attack. The move to dissolve, called by the opposition, will only pass if Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox coalition partners break with him over the failure to pass a law exempting their community from military service, an issue that has bitterly divided Israelis, especially during the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip. The threats coming from the ultra-Orthodox could be posturing, and many expect Netanyahu to pull off a last-minute deal. But Wednesday's vote is the most serious challenge to Netanyahu's government since the war began, and the coalition's collapse could have major implications for Israel and the ongoing war. Most Jewish men are required to serve nearly three years of military service followed by years of reserve duty. Jewish women serve two mandatory years. But the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox, who make up roughly 13% of Israeli society, have traditionally received exemptions if they are studying full-time in religious seminaries. The exemptions – and the government stipends many seminary students receive through age 26 – have infuriated the general public. 02:58 After Hamas' 2023 attack, Israel activated 360,000 reservists, its largest mobilization since the 1973 Mideast war. Israel is engaged in the longest active war in the country's history, which has stretched its robust military to the breaking point. Far fewer reservists Many reserve soldiers have served multiple rounds of duty in Gaza totaling hundreds of days. Some reserve soldiers are rejecting new call-ups. The number of Israelis continuing to report for reserve duty has dropped so low that the military has taken to social media to try to recruit people to keep serving. The enlistment exemption for the ultra-Orthodox goes back to Israel's 1948 founding, when small numbers of gifted scholars were exempt from the draft in response to the decimation of Jewish scholarship during the Holocaust. But with a push from politically powerful religious parties, the numbers have swelled to tens of thousands today. Israel's Supreme Court said the exemptions were illegal in 2017, but repeated extensions and government delay tactics have prevented a replacement law from being passed. Among Israel's Jewish majority, mandatory military service is largely seen as a melting pot and rite of passage. That's exactly why some ultra-Orthodox don't want their children to serve. 'It mixes together people with very different backgrounds, very different ideas, some people with very immoral ideas,' said Rabbi Ephraim Luft, 66, from the ultra-Orthodox stronghold of Bnei Barak. Luft said the community's dedication to upholding Jewish commandments protects the country as much as military service. 'Over thousands of years, the Jewish people have stood very strongly against any kind of decrees to force them to give up their religion, they've given up their lives for this,' Luft said. 'People have to understand there's no difference between the Spanish Inquisition or the Israeli draft law.' Two parties belonging to the Haredim, or 'God-fearing' in Hebrew, are essential to Netanyahu's coalition. Both would need to vote to dissolve the government to force new elections, including Shas, which has traditionally been more supportive of Netanyahu. On Monday, a Shas spokesperson told an ultra-Orthodox radio program the party plans to vote in favor of dissolution, unless there is a breakthrough in negotiations. The other party, Degel HaTorah, has been threatening to leave the government since last week. 'Basically, they don't really care about the war and the economic situation of the state and anything else but their communal interest. And the focus of this communal interest is getting the exemption from serving in the army," said Shuki Friedman, an expert on religion and state affairs and vice president of the Jewish People Policy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank. Current system 'unsustainable' Friedman and other experts say the current system is unsustainable. With its high birthrate, the ultra-Orthodox are the fastest-growing segment of Israel's population, at about 4% annually. Each year, roughly 13,000 ultra-Orthodox men reach the conscription age of 18, but less than 10% enlist, according to parliament's State Control Committee, which held a hearing examining the issue. The shock of the Oct. 7 attack appeared to ignite some enthusiasm among the ultra-Orthodox to serve, but no large enlistment materialized. The army has repeatedly declined to comment on the ultra-Orthodox enlistment rate. 06:14 If the dissolution vote passes, it still faces a series of bureaucratic steps, including additional votes, that the government would likely drag on for weeks or months, said Gayil Talshir, a political science professor at Hebrew University. 'It will be like a gun that's been put into position, but that doesn't mean the coalition is over,' she said. Elections in Israel are scheduled for the fall of 2026. Both Talshir and Friedman believe it's unlikely the dissolution vote will pass Wednesday. If one ultra-Orthodox party is absent, the vote will not pass and another cannot be brought for six months, Talshir said. Rabbis under pressure However, there's also a 'valid possibility' the rabbis who advise the ultra-Orthodox parties will say they've waited long enough for a draft exemption law, because they are facing enormous pressure from their communities, Friedman said. On Tuesday, top Haredi rabbis issued a religious decree emphasizing their stand against military service, which complicates the Haredi politicians' ability to negotiate, Friedman added. The army has issued thousands of draft notices to the ultra-Orthodox community, and those who refuse to serve can face arrest. While only around a dozen have been arrested after being stopped for trying to leave the country or for traffic violations, the fear this has inspired is significant, he added. Netanyahu frequently cites the ongoing war as a reason Israel needs to provide a united front against its enemies. While the ultra-Orthodox parties remain part of the coalition, they want the war to end as quickly as possible, Talshir said. 'The Haredim think once the war is over, the pressure will be off them and they will be able to get their (military) exemption law,' she said.

Argentine top court upholds ex-president Kirchner's prison sentence
Argentine top court upholds ex-president Kirchner's prison sentence

France 24

time20 hours ago

  • France 24

Argentine top court upholds ex-president Kirchner's prison sentence

"The sentences handed down by the previous courts were based on the abundance of evidence produced," the Supreme Court wrote in its ruling, adding that Kirchner's leave to further appeal her conviction "is dismissed." The ruling makes 72-year-old Kirchner's conviction and sentence definitive. The decision brings the curtain down on the career of one of Argentina's most polarizing leaders, who has loomed large over the South American country's political landscape for two decades, inspiring admiration on the left but revulsion on the right. Due to her age, she can potentially avoid jail by requesting to serve her sentence under house arrest. Kirchner has five days to turn herself over to the authorities. Her arch-foe, libertarian President Javier Milei, welcomed the ruling. "Justice. End," he wrote on X. Kirchner was convicted in 2022 of fraudulent administration relating to the granting of public works tenders during her 2007-2015 presidency. The case, she claims, is part of a political plot to scupper her career and unravel her legacy of protectionist economics and social programs. She is the second ex-leader since Argentina's transition from dictatorship to democracy in 1983 to be sentenced to prison after Carlos Saul Menem, who was given a seven-year sentence in 2013 for weapons trafficking. Menem never served jail time because he had immunity from prosecution as a senator. Addressing hundreds of supporters outside the headquarters of her center-left Justicialist party, Kirchner called the three Supreme Court judges "puppets acting on orders from above" -- an apparent allusion to Milei's government. Her supporters took to the streets of several Argentine cities, burning tires and cutting off some roads leading to Buenos Aires. "The sentence was already written" before her appeal, Kirchner claimed, calling her conviction "a badge of political, personal and historical dignity." Some in the crowd wept while others hugged each other. Daniel Dragoni, a councillor from Kirchner's party, told AFP he was "destroyed" by the ruling but vowed the former president's left-wing Peronist movement "will return, as always." Power couple Kirchner rose to prominence as part of a political power couple with her late husband Nestor Kirchner, who preceded her as president. After two terms at the helm herself between 2007 and 2015, she served as vice president from 2019 to 2023 in the last center-left administration before Milei took power. Milei's election was seen as a widespread rejection of the Kirchners' nationalist Peronist movement, which was accused of widespread corruption and economic mismanagement. Over the past two years, Kirchner has been one of the fiercest critics of Milei's deep cuts to public spending and deregulation. Before Tuesday's ruling, she had been planning to run for a seat in the Buenos Aires provincial legislature in September elections. Had she won, she would have gained immunity from prosecution. On the left the threat of her arrest led to a rare display of unity. But historian Sergio Berensztein said he believed the mobilization for her release would be short-lived. "Cristina today has limited leadership; she is not the Cristina of 2019," he told AFP. Lara Goyburu, a political scientist at the University of Buenos Aires, saw the ruling as a win for Milei, who promised on his election to root out "kirchnerismo" as Argentines refer to Kirchner's brand of protectionist, sometimes populist politics. 'In prison or dead' Kirchner was accused of arranging, as president, for a business associate of her and her late husband to win dozens of contracts for public works in her southern stronghold of Patagonia. Her sentence had already been upheld by a lower court of appeal in 2024. The initial call by prosecutors for her to be jailed sparked demonstrations in several cities in 2022, some of which ended in clashes with police. The following month, she survived a botched assassination attempt when a man shoved a revolver in her face and pulled the trigger -- but the gun did not fire. The gunman said he acted out of frustration with corruption. In March, the United States banned her and one of her former ministers from entering the country, accusing them of corruption.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store