logo
As state, federal Medicaid cuts loom, Hoosiers anxious about impact

As state, federal Medicaid cuts loom, Hoosiers anxious about impact

Chicago Tribune26-05-2025

Jordan Musenbrock, 35, said Medicaid helped pay for her manual wheelchair and its repairs, shower chair, catheters and multiple medications.
Musenbrock, who has been wheelchair-bound since she was 17 years old following a car accident, said without Medicaid she will have to choose between a drastic decline in health, even death, or financial hardship.
'Either I won't have what I need to live or I'm going to be in debt to survive,' Musenbrock, of Michigan City, said. 'I already have the added difficulty of having a disability, and so now it's just added difficulty, added stress of will I have what I need to live.'
Over the years, Musenbrock said she has been on Medicaid either as a primary insurance or secondary insurance in various states. Currently, she's not on Medicaid because of a car accident she was in last year, she said.
After the accident, which was minor, insurance sent her money, which put her over the income limit to be eligible for Medicaid, Musenbrock said. While she's working toward spending down the money to be eligible for the program again, Musenbrock said the money she received won't cover her medical payments and has already left her in debt to her wheelchair and medical supply providers.
'Medicaid is not just health care. Medicaid is a lot of people's lifeline,' Musenbrock said. 'People with disabilities want and are a part of the community. We are only asking for our basic needs to be met so that we have the same opportunities as everyone else.'
Carrie Cool, who grew up in Hobart, said she developed psoriatic arthritis when she was 50 years old, which had resulted in many complications, surgeries and medications.
Cool, who is now 64 years old, said Medicaid has helped pay for all her surgeries and the majority of her medications. Without Medicaid, Cool said she wouldn't be able to afford to pay for her medical expenses on top of her house and bills.
Even on Medicaid and social security disability, Cool said she goes to local food pantries, has started a garden to grow some foods like lettuce and cut meat out of her diet to save money.
'I'm trying right now, but if you took away everything and I had to pay more, there's no way I could stay (in my house),' Cool said.
Every time she checks the mail, Cool said she has been stressed about getting a letter with bad news about her Medicaid coverage.
'I just wait, I wait for that letter. If I don't get a letter, everything is okay so far,' Cool said.
Senate Bill 2 — authored by Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka — places restrictions on Medicaid, including work requirements on an insurance program for Hoosiers with a medium income and between ages 19 to 64. There are 11 exemptions, including medical clearance as physically unable to work and a parent or caretaker for someone with a serious medical condition.
The bill, which was signed into law May 1, initially set a 500,000 cap on the Medicaid program. The legislature removed that portion of the bill before sending it to Gov. Mike Braun's desk for signature.
Tracey Hutchings-Goetz, an organizer with Hoosier Action, said if the cap had remained in place, about 250,000 Hoosiers would've been kicked off the program arbitrarily. Hoosier Action also worked to ensure the three-year enrollment cap was removed from the bill, Hutchings-Goetz said.
'Those two things would've been extraordinarily devastating and cruel to everyday people, and frankly destabilize our state's entire health care system,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
When the state first established the Healthy Indiana Plan as part of the Indiana Medicaid program in 2006, there were 40,000 people on the program, Mishler said. Before COVID-19, there were 390,000 on HIP and currently there are more than 700,000 people on the program, Mishler said.
Overall, Medicaid has grown by $5 billion in the last 4 years, Mishler said, and the rate of growth is greater than the state's revenue increase. In the two-year budget the legislature passed, Mishler said the majority of new revenue covered Medicaid costs.
The HIP program is 90% federally funded and 10% state funded, Hutchings-Goetz said. Braun has stated he won't end the match to HIP, Hutchings-Goetz said.
But, under the new Medicaid law, which goes into effect July 1, Hutchings-Goetz said the state's Family and Social Services Administration secretary has the authority to end the Healthy Indiana Plan.
The remaining work requirements in the law will likely see 100,000 to 150,000 people kicked off the program, Hutchings-Goetz said, while requiring FSSA to 'conduct more frequent, repetitious, expensive eligibility checks.'
'Those things definitely make the program more inefficient, more expensive and are going to contribute to the suffering of Hoosiers across the state,' Hutchings-Goetz said. 'Members of the General Assembly should hear from their constituents every time they have to deal with paperwork issues.'
Any changes to Medicaid 'which make it harder to navigate and more expensive to run are not Hoosier common sense; they are just cuts by another name,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
'Cuts to health care are deadly,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
Federal Medicaid cuts
The U.S. House of Representatives passed domestic policy bill backed by President Donald Trump after starting debate before midnight Wednesday and calling for a vote by dawn on Thursday. The vote was 215-214, with all Democrats opposing the bill.
The bill moves forward to the Senate, which hopes to vote on the bill by the Fourth of July holiday.
The more than 1,000-page bill focuses on changes to Medicaid and the food stamps program to make up for some of the lost tax revenue. The bill imposes work requirements on many of those receiving benefits.
Under the bill, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates 8.6 million fewer people would have health care coverage and 3 million fewer people a month would have SNAP food stamps benefits with the proposed changes.
The CBO said the tax provisions would increase federal deficits by $3.8 trillion over the decade, while the changes to Medicaid, food stamps and other services would tally $1 trillion in reduced spending. The lowest-income households in the U.S. would see their resources drop, while the highest ones would see a boost, it said.
U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, said in a statement he opposed the bill because it prioritizes tax breaks for the wealthy 'at the cruel expense of seniors, veterans, children and working families.'
'It is immoral for the powerful and politically-connected to exploit the legislative process for personal gain, and this legislation amounts to the largest transfer of wealth from the pockets of the most vulnerable and working families to the richest amongst us,' Mrvan said.
As the former North Township Trustee, Mrvan said he has 'seen the tangible value of the Medicaid program in Indiana' and how it helps seniors, people with disabilities and children.
'Throughout my career, I have worked to support all individuals when they need emergency assistance or hit a bump in the road,' Mrvan said. 'It will not only strip away these health benefits, it will also increase private healthcare costs and reduce services for everyone.'
Mrvan said he offered an amendment to the bill to study the effects of this legislation on out-of-pocket costs for healthcare services to prevent, screen for and treat cancer, but the majority did not call the amendment for consideration.
'This deal leaves everyday Americans behind, and our job is to protect and fight for them. I encourage the Senate to reject this deeply flawed legislation,' Mrvan said.
Musenbrock and Brianna Fotinos, both members of the disabilities rights organization Everybody Counts, recently attended ADAPT's protest in Washington D.C. from May 12 through May 14 to oppose cuts to Medicaid and support fair wages for people with disabilities and their care attendants and affordable, integrated and accessible housing.
The highlight of the protest, Fotinos said, was waiting outside the House Energy and Commerce meeting, where legislators were discussing cuts to Medicaid. The protestors chanted 'no cuts to Medicaid' inside the meeting and some got arrested, Fotinos said, which delayed the meeting enough that no vote was held.
The group wasn't able to talk with U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, Fotinos said. But, had they been able to talk to Johnson, she said they would have stressed that Medicaid cuts will lead to people dying and focused on the human right to shelter, fair wages and healthcare.
'These are basic human things that we're asking for, and it's up to you to also be a human being about this and see what the right choice is,' Fotinos said.
The biggest misconception about Medicaid is that it allows people to 'free load' off the government, Fotinos said.
Medicaid offers health insurance to those who need it, Fotinos said. The people on Medicaid either physically can't work or are working but don't make enough money for insurance, she said.
With the federal cuts and caps to Medicaid, Fotinos said people who physically can't work will be forced to meet a work requirement and people will be forced to live in poverty to access basic human needs.
'A system that is already being overtaxed is going to be even more overtaxed. That's the future that I'm foreseeing with these cuts. A lot of people are going to lose access to very basic needs and a lot of people are going to be left to wither away and die,' Fotinos said.
Hutchings-Goetz said the federal changes to Medicaid will cut funding that trickles down to states and enforce mandatory work reporting requirements. Studies have found that work reporting requirements lead to eligible people being kicked off the program and increases the cost of running the program, she said.
Work requirements don't help connect people with job opportunities, Hutchings-Goetz said. In the end, work requirements don't lead to an increase in employment but rather a decrease in people covered by health insurance, she said.
'They are making changes to Medicaid which will only further contribute to the cost of the program in addition to harming people by kicking them off. Fundamentally, you need health care, you need to be healthy, to be able to work,' Hutchings-Goetz said.
The federal Medicaid cuts will just force people, some with serious diagnoses or mental health challenges, to deal with complicated paperwork and bureaucracy 'at the hardest time in their life.'
'This is not going to make America healthy again. It's not going to make anyone's lives better. It is just going to increase suffering across this country and for Hoosiers in Indiana,' Hutchings-Goetz said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Soared On Thursday
Why Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Soared On Thursday

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR) Soared On Thursday

We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) stands against other best-performing stocks on Thursday. Oscar Health snapped a five-day losing streak on Thursday, jumping 10.6 percent to close at $15.65 apiece as investors resorted to bargain-hunting while waiting for more concrete developments on the Trump administration's Medicare Advantage review. Earlier this year, lawmakers passed a $5-trillion tax-and-spending package that shaves as much as $900 billion in Medicaid, which servers over 70 million low-income households. A close up of a patient and a healthcare professional engaging in conversation, showing the company's commitment to patient care. Now, Senate Republicans to broaden savings by looking for supposed inefficiencies in the Medicare program for senior citizens. In the first quarter of the year, Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) registered a 55-percent increase in attributable net income of $275 million versus the $177 million registered in the same period last year. Revenues rose by 42 percent to $3.046 billion from $2.142 billion year-on-year. Overall, OSCR ranks 5th on our list of best-performing stocks on Thursday. While we acknowledge the potential of OSCR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

In Lansing, Democrats warn Medicaid and SNAP cuts would be a 'perfect storm' for the poor
In Lansing, Democrats warn Medicaid and SNAP cuts would be a 'perfect storm' for the poor

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

In Lansing, Democrats warn Medicaid and SNAP cuts would be a 'perfect storm' for the poor

U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly) and U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-Bay City) at a June 6, 2025 town hall in Lansing. | Kyle Davidson Members of the Michigan Democratic Party laid out the impacts of congressional Republicans' 'big beautiful bill' at a town hall on Friday, calling on residents of Michigan's 7th Congressional District to help educate their friends and family as well. A few hundred supporters packed into the gym of Everett High School in Lansing as U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly), U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D-Bay City) and Michigan Democratic Party Chair Curtis Hertel detailed how the Trump administration's policies would impact everyone, particularly individuals with limited income. The Michigan Democratic Party has hosted several similar events in Republican districts throughout the state, Hertel said, noting House Republicans had been instructed to avoid town halls with their constituents. 'The most basic thing for a public servant is to be able to sit and answer questions. … The least someone can do is sit down with people and explain their votes' Hertel said. And the 7th Congressional District's current representative, Tom Barrett (R-Charlotte) has a lot of explaining to do, Hertel said, slamming Barrett for supporting Republican's spending plan, and arguing the representative failed to stand up to the President and make himself available to his constituents A Barrett spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. Prior to taking questions, McDonald Rivet slammed the Republican spending effort, telling audience members that it would take away healthcare and raise the cost of medicine, education and energy in order to deliver a tax break to the wealthy. 'Oh, and by the way, it's going to increase the deficit by several trillion dollars,' She said. Slotkin looked back on the president's first term, when Trump was looking to overturn the Affordable Care Act, which expanded access to Medicaid and barred insurance providers from denying people coverage or charging them due to preexisting health conditions. 'It was the first thing he talked about when he got sworn in, he even had the House of Representatives vote to repeal Obamacare. And now we not only still have it, we expanded it, and how? Because we educated people,' Slotkin said. However, rather than cutting people's healthcare outright, Slotkin argued Trump is aiming to hide those cuts by requiring individuals to reregister for Medicaid every six months, making it harder to qualify and more difficult to sign up. While the current proposal would implement work requirements for Medicaid recipients, Slotkin noted it also raises the age limit for those requirements to 64. According to KFF, an independent health policy organization, 92% of medicaid recipients under 65 are already working full or part time. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that Republican's budget plan would result in 10.9 million additional people being uninsured in 2034, with 7.8 million fewer individuals on Medicaid due to the policy's proposed work requirements. Even individuals who are not on Medicaid will feel the impacts of cuts to the program, Slotkin said, noting that nursing homes, hospitals and mental health facilities all rely on Medicaid funding. 'I would just say this bill is designed to really be a perfect storm for poor people. If you are living at or below the poverty line, you're getting hit in every direction. Medicaid, your health care; SNAP your food; a bunch of programs, right, that you depend on. … They are paying for those tax benefits for the most wealthy by really the perfect storm of cuts for the poorest among us,' Slotkin said. On top of cutting SNAP benefits by $300 billion, the Department of Government Efficiency had canceled $1 billion in funding to programs supporting school meals and food banks, McDonald Rivet said. 'So you're that hungry kid and you have lost access to a food bank. You have lost access to food at school, and now you don't have SNAP benefits. This is the America that this bill creates,' McDonald Rivet said. Alongside questions on cuts to SNAP and Medicaid, audience members asked the lawmakers about the legal challenges levied against the Trump administration, and Democrats' plans to counter Republicans heading into the 2026 mid-term election. On Friday, the Trump Administration backed down in its resistance of a Supreme Court order demanding that the administration facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongly deported to El Salvador three months ago. However, the fight goes beyond Abrego Gracia, into whether the executive branch needs to obey orders from the Supreme Court, Slotkin said. 'Now, we haven't had to deal with this issue in the years past because Democrats and Republicans have largely said, 'Huh, if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court issues a court order, we're going to follow it.' Trump is pushing the boundaries on all the democratic values and principles most of us grew up with,' Slotkin said. Should an individual defy a federal court order, U.S. marshals would eventually be sent to enforce that order, Slotkin said. However, the U.S. marshals are controlled by the United States attorney general. Should the U.S. marshals receive a request to enforce a Supreme Court order against the president, Slotkin raised the question on whether Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Trump loyalist, would approve it. 'We've needed to have this fight. We need to have it out. We need a court order that he needs to obey, and we need to precipitate this conversation on the U.S. marshals. But today was an important sign that they don't want to get to that point. They don't want to wait until the U.S. marshals are potentially getting an order to activate,' Slotkin said. In preparing to take on the Trump Administration, Slotkin said she'd gone back to her roots in national security and crafted a war plan in the form of a 17-page powerpoint, with plans to lay out her vision of the nation's future under Democratic leadership. 'It's about facing our problems head on and saying the only way we do well as a country, the only way that we have a strong middle class going forward, the American Dream going forward, is if we face these issues and have a vision. And it's economic, it's about national security, and it's about our democracy,' Slotkin said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices
Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices

A mother rushes into the emergency department cradling her 6-month-old baby. He is lethargic, seizing and in critical condition. The cause? Severely low sodium levels in his blood — a result of formula diluted with extra water to make it last longer. With grocery prices climbing and her SNAP benefits running out before the end of the month, she felt she had no other choice. This story is not an outlier. Pediatric clinicians across Wisconsin are seeing the real and devastating consequences of policies that fail to prioritize the health and well-being of children and families. And now, the situation could get worse. The Trump Administration's proposed 'skinny' budget for Fiscal Year 2026 includes deep and dangerous cuts to federal programs that form the backbone of public health in our communities. These proposed reductions include: $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health – stalling critical pediatric research and innovation $3.5 billion from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – compromising disease surveillance, immunization programs, and emergency response efforts $1.73 billion from the Health Resources and Services Administration – cutting access to essential primary and preventive care services for children and families $674 million from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services – threatening the Medicaid and CHIP programs that provide health coverage to nearly half of Wisconsin's children. Opinion: We asked readers about wake boats on Wisconsin lakes. Here's what you said. And as if that weren't enough, further reductions to SNAP and other nutrition support programs are also on the table. These aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet. These are lifelines. Vital services that help children survive and thrive. When families can't afford formula, when clinics lose funding for immunization programs, when children lose health coverage, the consequences are immediate and, in many cases, irreversible. As front-line providers, we witness this every day. We can do better. Our federal budget is a reflection of our national values. It should not balance its books on the backs of our youngest and most vulnerable. I implore Wisconsin's elected officials to reject this harmful budget proposal. Think of that infant in the emergency room. Think of the thousands of other children across our state whose health and future depend on robust public health infrastructure, access to care, and support for families in need. We urge lawmakers to work toward a bipartisan budget that invests in children, strengthens public health, and protects the building blocks of a healthy society. Wisconsin's children deserve every opportunity to grow up healthy and strong. Our chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners stands ready to partner in this effort. Let's move forward — not backward — when it comes to the health of our children. Christine Schindler is a critical care pediatric nurse practitioner at Children's WI, a clinical professor at Marquette University, and the President of the Wisconsin Chapter of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. She has been caring for critically ill and injured children for almost 30 years. All opinions expressed are her own. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Trump budget jeopardizes health of American children | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store