Col. Co. leaders launch 'Foundations for the Future' Comprehensive Plan
EVANS, Ga. (WJBF) – Columbia County leaders are looking at ways to build a brighter future.
That was the discussion at the county library Tuesday evening, where leaders launched the 'Foundations for the Future' Comprehensive Plan.
The county is required to update the plan every 5 years, and leaders say it's time to reconvene once again.
'We continue to look at it on a daily basis as a staff. We use this as our benchmark for where we're going in terms of development and future growth potentials,' said Planning Services Director Scott Sterling.
Stakeholders, business owners and local organizations went from station to station to learn more about the county's future direction.
They also had the chance to write down what leaders are doing well, and where they see room for improvement.
'My biggest complaint is the traffic—how terrible the traffic is,' said Renee Hale. 'I live 4.9 miles away according to Google Maps, and it took me 24 minutes to get here. That's just because there's so much traffic.'
'I think I share the same concern of traffic getting tougher by the day. But, I think that's growing pains—growth has been concentrated in certain areas. So, I think as it starts to push out more, traffic may start to ease up a little bit,' said Adam Pankow.
District 4 Commissioner Alison Couch says with that growth in the area comes more opportunities to make the county better—and feedback is exactly what they're looking for.
'I think that the county has a very bright future in the next 5 to 10 years. We're really looking forward to hearing back from our constituents and citizens on the Vision 2035 Plan, and what they envision for Columbia County,' said Couch.
'Getting the community's input, being part of this, and having some investment in what the future of Columbia County will look like in the next 5, 10, 15 years. This is their best chance to really help shape the future,' Sterling said.
The county will have more meetings to discuss this plan Wednesday, March 19th, and they'll come back to do the same towards the end of May.
Here are the times for Wednesday's meetings:
Meeting with Business Community (not open to Public) from 7:30 to 9:00 AM at Columbia County Library
Meeting with Steering Committee (not open to Public) from 7:00 to 8:30 PM at Columbia County Library
Meeting at Harlem Library (open to Public) from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM
Meeting at Pollards Corner (open to Public) from 2:00 to 4:00 PM
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
16 hours ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI chairman's career advice? Remember what Eric Schmidt told Sheryl Sandberg about joining Google.
Bret Taylor, the chairman of OpenAI, believes that if you have the chance to attach yourself to success, you shouldn't let ego get in the way. "I think this is the quote I always heard, was Eric Schmidt to Sheryl Sandberg: 'If someone offers you a seat on a rocket ship, don't ask what seat,' you know? I like that philosophy of life," Taylor said on an episode of "Grit." At the time, Sandberg, who would famously later become Facebook's chief operations officer, was deciding whether or not to join a different tech company: Google. Google was a tiny fraction of the size in 2001, with fewer than 300 people. Eric Schmidt had recently been brought on by cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page to be CEO. Sandberg talked about her conversation with Schmidt during a speech to Harvard students. "So I sat down with Eric Schmidt, who had just become the CEO, and I showed him the spreadsheet and I said, this job meets none of my criteria," Sandberg recalled. "He put his hand on my spreadsheet and he looked at me and said, 'Don't be an idiot. Get on a rocket ship. When companies are growing quickly and they are having a lot of impact, careers take care of themselves. If you're offered a seat on a rocket ship, don't ask what seat. Just get on.'" Sandberg did end up taking the job, and joined as the general manager of Google's business unit, which had four people at the time. "I do think, especially in Silicon Valley, there's just unique moments, and you just have to be self-aware and aware of the market," OpenAI's Taylor said. Beyond being ready to jump at opportunity wherever it comes knocking at your door, remaining broadly flexible is also important, he added. "Most of the unhappiest people I know are rigidly following a plan and not observant of their own happiness or observant of the opportunities around them," Taylor said. "I actually think that a big part of life is recognizing when there's a unique opportunity that you didn't plan for, and asking yourself the question, ' Should I change my plans? ' Whether that's in your personal life or your professional life." Taylor's own career spans Big Tech and startups alike — from leading the team that helped create Google Maps and acting as co-CEO of Salesforce, to founding his own AI company, Sierra. "The idea of sitting on the sidelines, and drinking a mai tai on a beach, doesn't give me joy at all," he said. "I want to build." Just as Taylor was leaving Salesforce, ChatGPT was released. After a conversation over lunch with his cofounder, Clay Bavor, Taylor said the decision to start Sierra was set. But even if he wasn't heading this particular company, he added, he would still be working in an adjacent sphere. "I would be building open source software if not running a company right now, because I just want to work in the technology and help shape it," Taylor said. "Because it's the most exciting technology of my memory, and I want to play a part in shaping how we all use it." That's another key piece of Taylor's personal philosophy: being as involved as possible in shaping the trajectory of the world. "There's this Alan Kay quote: 'The best way to predict the future is to invent it.' And that is like, my operating principle," he said. "I want to impact the future, and I want to help invent it."
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Crawford County seeks community input for new growth plan
CRAWFORD CO., Mo. — Crawford County officials are asking for the community's help to create a new growth plan for the next 20 years. County commissioners and the county counselor held a public comprehensive plan and zoning meeting, Thursday evening. Nearly three dozen attended in-person and even more by livestream, to learn more about the process needed to create a new comprehensive plan. The county hasn't had a new plan since 2002, so they're asking for the community's help guiding commissioners and agencies for the next two decades. Those in attendance filled out a 12-page public input survey, focusing on land use, zoning, and wind and solar issues. There's also a survey to gather even more input. 'It's a good opportunity for them to learn about the process, encouraging people to get that survey taken, to get the results back into the commissioners, have the input they need to start the comprehensive plan process. This is our first step as the survey to gauge public opinion,' said Jim Emerson, Crawford County Counselor. Crawford County seeks community input for new growth plan New data center coming to southeast Kansas PSU's Center for Reading hosting educational summer camp for kids KDOT hosting Hwy 69 improvement meetings this week for Crawford County resident input Southeast Kansas sheriff quips, 'We saved the 4th of July' Jim Emerson says they have more than 1,000 completed surveys but are aiming for 4,000 in total. They hope to wrap up the survey process by July 1. You can find a link to that survey, here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
How faulty DOGE AI tool impacted VA contracts
The code, using outdated and inexpensive AI models, produced results with glaring mistakes. For instance, it hallucinated the size of contracts, frequently misreading them and inflating their value. It concluded more than a thousand were each worth $34 million, when in fact some were for as little as $35,000. The DOGE AI tool flagged more than 2,000 contracts for 'munching.' It's unclear how many have been or are on track to be canceled — the Trump administration's decisions on VA contracts have largely been a black box. The VA uses contractors for many reasons, including to support hospitals, research and other services aimed at caring for ailing veterans. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up VA officials have said they've killed nearly 600 contracts overall. Congressional Democrats have been pressing VA leaders for specific details of what's been canceled without success. Advertisement We identified at least two dozen on the DOGE list that have been canceled so far. Among the canceled contracts was one to maintain a gene sequencing device used to develop better cancer treatments. Another was for blood sample analysis in support of a VA research project. Another was to provide additional tools to measure and improve the care nurses provide. Advertisement ProPublica obtained the code and the contracts it flagged from a source and shared them with a half dozen AI and procurement experts. All said the script was flawed. Many criticized the concept of using AI to guide budgetary cuts at the VA, with one calling it 'deeply problematic.' Cary Coglianese, professor of law and of political science at the University of Pennsylvania who studies the governmental use and regulation of artificial intelligence, said he was troubled by the use of these general-purpose large language models, or LLMs. 'I don't think off-the-shelf LLMs have a great deal of reliability for something as complex and involved as this,' he said. Sahil Lavingia, the programmer enlisted by DOGE, which was then run by Elon Musk, acknowledged flaws in the code. 'I think that mistakes were made,' said Lavingia, who worked at DOGE for nearly two months. 'I'm sure mistakes were made. Mistakes are always made. I would never recommend someone run my code and do what it says. It's like that 'Office' episode where Steve Carell drives into the lake because Google Maps says drive into the lake. Do not drive into the lake.' Though Lavingia has talked about his time at DOGE previously, this is the first time his work has been examined in detail and the first time he's publicly explained his process, down to specific lines of code. Lavingia has nearly 15 years of experience as a software engineer and entrepreneur but no formal training in AI. He briefly worked at Pinterest before starting Gumroad, a small e-commerce company that nearly collapsed in 2015. 'I laid off 75% of my company — including many of my best friends. It really sucked,' he said. Lavingia kept the company afloat by 'replacing every manual process with an automated one,' according to Advertisement Lavingia did not have much time to immerse himself in how the VA handles veterans' care between starting on March 17 and writing the tool on the following day. Yet his experience with his own company aligned with the direction of the Trump administration, which has embraced the use of AI across government to streamline operations and save money. Lavingia said the quick timeline of Under a time crunch, Lavingia said he finished the first version of his contract-munching tool on his second day on the job — using AI to help write the code for him. He told ProPublica he then spent his first week downloading VA contracts to his laptop and analyzing them. VA press secretary Pete Kasperowicz lauded DOGE's work on vetting contracts in a statement to ProPublica. 'As far as we know, this sort of review has never been done before, but we are happy to set this commonsense precedent,' he said. The VA is reviewing all of its 76,000 contracts to ensure each of them benefits veterans and is a good use of taxpayer money, he said. Decisions to cancel or reduce the size of contracts are made after multiple reviews by VA employees, including agency contracting experts and senior staff, he wrote. Advertisement Kasperowicz said that the VA will not cancel contracts for work that provides services to veterans or that the agency cannot do itself without a contingency plan in place. He added that contracts that are 'wasteful, duplicative or involve services VA has the ability to perform itself' will typically be terminated. Trump officials have said they are working toward a The VA has said it would avoid cutting contracts that directly impact care out of fear that it would cause harm to veterans. ProPublica recently reported that relatively small cuts at the agency have already The VA has not explained how it plans to simultaneously move services in-house, as Lavingia's code suggested was the plan, while also slashing staff. Many inside the VA told ProPublica the process for reviewing contracts was so opaque they couldn't even see who made the ultimate decisions to kill specific contracts. Once the 'munching' script had selected a list of contracts, Lavingia said he would pass it off to others who would decide what to cancel and what to keep. No contracts, he said, were terminated 'without human review.' 'I just delivered the [list of contracts] to the VA employees,' he said. 'I basically put munchable at the top and then the others below.' VA staffers told ProPublica that when DOGE identified contracts to be canceled early this year — before Lavingia was brought on — employees sometimes were given little time to justify retaining the service. One recalled being given just a few hours. The staffers asked not to be named because they feared losing their jobs for talking to reporters. Advertisement According to one internal email that predated Lavingia's AI analysis, staff members had to respond in 255 characters or fewer — just shy of the 280 character limit on Musk's X social media platform. Once he started on DOGE's contract analysis, Lavingia said he was confronted with technological limitations. At least some of the errors produced by his code can be traced to using older versions of OpenAI models available through the VA — models not capable of solving complex tasks, according to the experts consulted by ProPublica. Moreover, the tool's underlying instructions were deeply flawed. Records show Lavingia programmed the AI system to make intricate judgments based on the first few pages of each contract — about the first 2,500 words — which contain only sparse summary information. 'AI is absolutely the wrong tool for this,' said Waldo Jaquith, a former Obama appointee who oversaw IT contracting at the Treasury Department. 'AI gives convincing looking answers that are frequently wrong. There needs to be humans whose job it is to do this work.' Lavingia's prompts did not include context about how the VA operates, what contracts are essential or which ones are required by federal law. This led AI to determine a core piece of the agency's own contract procurement system was 'munchable.' At the core of Lavingia's prompt is the direction to spare contracts involved in 'direct patient care.' Such an approach, experts said, doesn't grapple with the reality that the work done by doctors and nurses to care for veterans in hospitals is only possible with significant support around them. Advertisement Lavingia's system also used AI to extract details like the contract number and 'total contract value.' This led to avoidable errors, where AI returned the wrong dollar value when multiple were found in a contract. Experts said the correct information was readily available from public databases. Lavingia acknowledged that errors resulted from this approach but said those errors were later corrected by VA staff. In late March, Lavingia published a version of the 'munchable' script According That openness may have eventually led to Lavingia's dismissal. Lavingia confirmed he was VA officials have declined to say whether they will continue to use the 'munchable' tool moving forward. But the administration may deploy AI to help the agency replace employees. Documents previously obtained by ProPublica show DOGE officials proposed in March consolidating the benefits claims department by relying more on AI. And the government's contractors are paying attention. After Lavingia posted his code, he said he heard from people trying to understand how to keep the money flowing. 'I got a couple DMs from VA contractors who had questions when they saw this code,' he said. 'They were trying to make sure that their contracts don't get cut. Or learn why they got cut. 'At the end of the day, humans are the ones terminating the contracts, but it is helpful for them to see how DOGE or Trump or the agency heads are thinking about what contracts they are going to munch. Transparency is a good thing.'
