logo
'That is garbage': Mayor's office scraps change to council member communications after pushback

'That is garbage': Mayor's office scraps change to council member communications after pushback

Yahoo05-02-2025

Tensions between the mayor's office and Jacksonville City Council are once again boiling over.
This time, it's over a now-scrapped policy proposed by the mayor's office that would have restricted how council members could talk to city agencies to solve issues for constituents.
When all else fails, constituents often contact their local council members to try and get results from their local government.
Councilmember Nick Howland (R-Group 2 At-Large) argued the new communications policy put forth by the mayor's office threatened to undermine local elected officials' ability to solve those problems.
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
'They're throwing a barrier between council and the administration now and it's going to slow down productivity,' said Howland.
Citing a change in state law and a desire to track member requests, the mayor's office's proposal would have required council members to submit requests through a system similar to the MyJax city services portal.
'We put forward a plan to streamline executive and legislative branch communications around constituent needs in an effort to bring more transparency and efficiency to the process,' the mayor's office said in a statement.
Under the policy, city employees would also have to log any interactions with council members, get approval for requests that require department action, and would be instructed to 'not informally handle issues for council members'.
'When calls come in from council members, it's a distraction and they don't know what to prioritize and what have you,' said Mayor Donna Deegan's Chief of Staff Mike Weinstein during a meeting with council members on Monday.
Read: Trash hauler Meridian Waste threatens to sue the City of Jacksonville
Tensions boiled over during the meeting, with council members from both parties expressing frustration and concern the policy would hamstring their ability to get results for constituents.
'I've never felt like I was a distraction when I've communicated with your departments. That's a good thing, but I think if that's the mentality that y'all have, that needs to change. This communication process doesn't need to change, y'all's mentality needs to change. That is garbage,' said Councilmember Joe Carlucci (R-District 5).
By the end of the meeting, Weinstein ultimately agreed to rescind the policy and work with council to improve the plan.
Read: Judge tosses last charge against ex-prosecutor accused of misconduct in Ahmaud Arbery case
Still, Howland questions the need for any change.
'Council members have found ways to be effective for their constituents. I don't think there needs to be anything done and I don't understand why there had to be in the first place,' said Howland.
In a statement, the mayor's office noted after the communication plan was not well received by council members, it is now, 'Working closely with City Council on creating a policy that works for all parties'.
Read: Army helicopter, plane collide: Remains of all 67 killed recovered
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘A nightmare': Critics blast Jacksonville's new limits on aid for undocumented immigrants
‘A nightmare': Critics blast Jacksonville's new limits on aid for undocumented immigrants

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘A nightmare': Critics blast Jacksonville's new limits on aid for undocumented immigrants

Local activists are urging supporters to boycott businesses owned by Jacksonville City Council members who voted in favor of a new immigration ordinance passed Tuesday night. The bill, which restricts the use of taxpayer dollars for services to undocumented immigrants, passed 11 to 7 after hours of heated debate and multiple amendments. While supporters say it's about fiscal responsibility, critics say it unfairly targets vulnerable communities. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< 'We passed Jacksonville's first ever prohibition of spending taxpayer money on illegal immigrants for services,' said Councilman Rory Diamond, who sponsored the bill. 'My colleagues wanted some exceptions… emergency services, military members, and others to prevent unintentional consequences.' Among the changes made before passage: carveouts for pregnant women, children, military families, and victims of sex and labor trafficking. Still, the measure drew emotional responses from community advocates. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] Cuban-American community leader Clara Sowers said the bill could have a negative effect on immigrants in crisis. 'It's a nightmare,' said Sowers. 'Do you call JSO when you get beat up? Do you get in the ambulance if you're hurt? This bill stokes fear.' Now, the Jacksonville Immigrant Rights Alliance is calling for a boycott of any business tied to council members who voted yes. [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] The bill also requires the mayor's office to report on the number of undocumented immigrants receiving city-funded housing, as well as disclose data on DEI programs and federal grants. Mayor Donna Deegan has not yet signed the measure. 'She's in a tough situation,' said Sowers. 'No matter what she does, she'll be criticized.' Councilman Diamond had a message for the mayor: 'Have some guts, have some courage… sign it or veto it. Don't just play games with it.' Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.

Bill slashing ticket fees passes Pennsylvania House
Bill slashing ticket fees passes Pennsylvania House

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bill slashing ticket fees passes Pennsylvania House

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — Massive ticket fees may soon be a thing of the past in Pennsylvania. The House passed a bipartisan bill Wednesday that takes aim at the ticket resale market. Known as House Bill 967, it would cap fees ticket resellers can charge at 5% for the buyer and 5% for the seller. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Reps. Mary Isaacson (D-Philadelphia) and Tom Mehaffie (R-Dauphin) proposed the bill, citing exuberant fees on some of Pennsylvania's favorite pastimes, such as Philadelphia Flyers and Pittsburgh Penguins games. Some fees cost as much as 55%, according to a co-sponsorship memo for the bill. 'These undue and extremely high fees put a burden on ticket prices and only serve as barriers for hardworking Pennsylvanians who want to cheer on their favorite sports team or see their favorite musical artist play,' Rep. Isaacson said. The representatives aren't the ones aiming for ticket fees. Last month, the Federal Trade Commission required ticket sellers to disclose total costs upfront, including fees. Pennsylvania House passes bill to expand AG oversight of health system transactions While he acknowledged companies need to make a profit, Rep. Mehaffie said, 'the reseller and company should not be setting fees so high that they are depriving others of the experience' to attend live events. The bill passed in a 108-95 vote. It now heads to the Senate for consideration. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Hegseth wavers on Russia sanctions, says US should not use ‘every tool' to end Ukraine invasion
Hegseth wavers on Russia sanctions, says US should not use ‘every tool' to end Ukraine invasion

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Hegseth wavers on Russia sanctions, says US should not use ‘every tool' to end Ukraine invasion

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth resisted senators' efforts to secure his support for a bipartisan bill that would sanction Russia for its war on Ukraine, telling an Appropriations subcommittee Wednesday that the US should not use 'every tool at our disposal' to pressure Moscow to stop its assault. Asked by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) whether Washington 'should use every tool it has at its disposal, including additional sanctions, to pressure Russia to come to the table to negotiate a just and lasting peace for the war in Ukraine,' Hegseth demurred. 'Senator, every tool at our disposal? No,' he said. 'We have a lot of tools in a lot of places.' 'We should be pursuing a cease-fire and a negotiated resolution to the war in Ukraine at any cost,' Coons responded. ''Peace through strength' means actually using our strength, continuing to support Ukraine, and securing a lasting peace. [Vladimir] Putin will only stop when we stop him.' 4 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testified Wednesday at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing. REUTERS Prior to questioning Hegseth, Coons had talked up Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal's (D-Conn.) pending bill to further sanction Russia for its continued resistance to peace in Ukraine. The legislation, backed by 80 senators, would impose sanctions on key Russian officials and economic sectors — and, critically, penalize foreign nations that do business with Moscow. Graham later followed up, urging Hegseth and the administration 'to use that tool to get the attention of China and India.' 'China buys — and India buys — 70% of Russia's oil … If they stop buying cheap Russian oil tomorrow, would that grind Putin's war machine to a halt?' Graham asked, later adding: 'We have an ability, through legislation, to get China and India's attention [and say] that if you keep buying cheap Russian oil to empower Putin to kill Ukrainian children, you're going to lose access to our markets. 'We're not going to evict every Russian from Ukraine, I'm a practical guy,' Graham added. 'But we got to end this war so we don't entice China to take Taiwan, and we don't encourage Iran to think we're just all talk [about] stopping their nuclear ambitions.' 4 Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) questions Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth during a Senate Committee on Appropriations subcommittee hearing to examine proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Defense. AP On Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported that the White House was quietly pushing Graham to water down the bill by allowing waivers to exempt certain people and entities from sanctions and to 'remove the mandatory nature' of the legislation. A White House official told the outlet that the Constitution 'vests the president with the authority to conduct diplomacy with foreign nations.' 'Any sanction package must provide complete flexibility for the president to continue to pursue his desired foreign policy,' they added. Hegseth did admit Wednesday that Russia is the 'aggressor' in Ukraine and that Chinese President Xi Jinping wants Moscow to 'win' the conflict. However, the secretary declined to answer Sen. Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) question about 'which side' he wanted to win the war. 'As we've said time and time again, this president is committed to peace in that conflict,' Hegseth said. 'Ultimately, peace serves our national interests, and we think the interests of both parties, even if that outcome will not be preferable to many in this room and many in our country.' 4 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (R) greets Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine before testifying during a hearing with the Senate Appropriations Committee on June 11. Getty Images McConnell pushed further, noting that the Russians 'don't seem to be too interested' in peace talks. The former Senate GOP leader also alleged that NATO partners increasing their defense spending at Trump's behest are now wondering 'whether we're in the midst of brokering what appears to be allowing the Russians to define victory.' 'I think victory is defined by the people that have to live there, the Ukrainians,' he said. 'And I don't think they're going to ever conclude that victory means basically adopting the Russian views on all this. ' Hegseth responded that 'no one's adopting views,' but added that the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act does not include funding of weapons for Ukraine because 'the budget reflects the reality that Europe needs to step up more for the defense of its own continent, and President Trump deserves the credit for that.' 4 Ranking member Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) speaks with subcommittee Chairman Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) during a hearing with the Senate Appropriations Committee on June 11, 2025. Getty Images McConnell agreed, noting that he had 'the same complaints' about the Biden administration not pushing hard enough for Europe to fund Ukraine's defense. Still, the Kentuckian insisted that by not standing foursquare behind the Kyiv government, 'it seems to me pretty obvious that America's reputation is on the line.' 'Will we defend democratic allies against authoritarian aggressors?' McConnell asked. 'That's the international concern that I have about this, and I think a number of my fellow members share that view.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store