Selby: Trebling of housing target sees Local Plan dropped
The trebling of a target for new houses in North Yorkshire has prompted council chiefs to halt work on a fresh Local Plan for Selby.North Yorkshire Council members have agreed to stop the preparation of the document, which would have provided a blueprint for development in the town until 2040.The authority's executive heard on Tuesday that the government target for housebuilding in the county had gone from 1,300 units a year to 4,077.Councillor Mark Crane said: "We feel this is the right time to stop."
He added: "Unfortunately the figures from the government would have such an impact on any Local Plan that we no longer feel it's worth going ahead."We would have to go about consultation and find significant extra sites in order to reach the number of houses that Selby would require to deliver to get to North Yorkshire's 4,077," he said.Crane said work already completed on the plans would not be lost, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.He added: "It will now be subsumed into the new North Yorkshire Local Plan and so the money spent, and the time spent so far, will not have been wasted."
Housing shortfall
A report to councillors advised that the plan could not be submitted to the Secretary of State for final approval without further time and money being spent on the document.The emerging Local Plan worked on the assumption that 368 new houses in the Selby area would be needed every year to meet demand.However, using calculations in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which was released by the government in December, between 483 and 561 properties a year would now be needed, meaning a shortfall of up to 2,895 houses over the plan's lifespan.For the plan to be approved, further work would have been needed to allocate new sites for housing, including more public consultation exercises.Council officers estimated that it would cost around £180,000 to ensure the plan was legally sound.Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
Inside the battle for North Sea control: How oil giants like BP lobbied over emission restrictions
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The North Sea oil regulator weakened environmental requirements designed to control greenhouse gas emissions after being lobbied by oil and gas companies including energy giant BP, a new investigation has revealed. The findings have heightened concerns over the level of influence large oil firms have over independent UK agencies charged with managing the sector. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A general view of the BP ETAP (Eastern Trough Area Project) oil platform in the North Sea, around 100 miles east of Aberdeen. Picture: Andy Buchanan -| Getty Images Documents obtained by The Scotsman through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request, in partnership with the investigative organisation Point Source, show BP pushed back against a wide range of proposed requirements that had been drafted by the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) as part of their Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) Plan. These included requirements to reduce the 'emissions intensity' of offshore oil platforms, as well as requirements to 'secure substantial and consistent total emissions reductions'. The scope of the North Sea consultation The NSTA received 32 responses from respondents that included industry bodies, relevant persons, energy transition companies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Outside of BP, the list of respondents also included Shell, Ithaca Energy - the company pushing to extra oil from the Rosebank field, west of Shetland - and Harbour Energy, which last month announced it was cutting a further 250 jobs in Aberdeen. The two-month consultation closed on November 30, 2023. People protest against the Rosebank offshore development off Shetland (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images The Scotsman was denied a request to access unredacted consultation responses from other companies outside of BP involved in the consultation, with confidentiality exemptions cited. BP responses - and how the regulator adapted the oil plan In the wake of BP's communications with the NSTA, a requirement to reduce the emissions intensity was removed from the strategy document, along with a series other concessions that included relaxing requirements for the electrification of offshore platforms. Pushing back on an NSTA drive to shut down low-production fields that have high emissions intensity that was outlined in a draft plan, BP said the NSTA needed to take into consideration wider implications of shutting down these assets such as 'investor confidence' and 'risk of company defaults'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After changes were made to the OGA plan, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) said in its newsletter for members the consultation had led to the NSTA "softening" the language within the document. The trade association body said: "The plan originated from the position that the offshore industries own, and will continue to own, the agenda". Mark Wilson, OEUK's HSE and operations director, added: "Regulatory intervention should only be available as a backstop if required." Lang Banks, the director of the environmental group WWF Scotland, said: 'The influence that oil companies have over the supposedly independent North Sea Transition Authority means that instead of helping to support a planned and fair transition away from fossil fuels it prioritises watering down requirements that would reduce polluting emissions. This delays action on climate change, and stalls progress on green job opportunities. 'As we head towards the Holyrood elections next year, we need all political parties to commit to ensuring Scotland and the wider UK reaps the multiple benefits that will come from a properly planned and fair transition to clean energy.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour candidate Davy Russell wins the by-election and celebrates alongside party leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy Jackie Baillie. | Lisa Ferguson Consultation documents obtained by The Scotsman under FOI legislation show BP called for deadlines to be abolished for requirements to electrify oil platforms, a move that was intended to reduce the reliance on burning oil and gas to provide power for platforms. Following the consultation, the NSTA scrapped its proposed target of making all platforms 'fully electrified' by January 1, 2030 and replaced it with a requirement for platforms to be either fully electrified or 'run on alternative low carbon power with near equivalent emission reductions' by the same date. Ahead of the publication of the final OGA Plan, BP also criticised a proposed requirement that would force oil companies to carry out an assessment of 'potential emissions savings' that was based on 'the societal cost of emissions'. The oil and gas company said that including an assessment of this kind was a departure from 'traditional practice' and could cause market distortion. After receiving submissions, the NSTA removed the phrase 'based on the societal cost of emissions' from the finished version of the plan, which was published in March last year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The consultation documents also reveal BP pushed back against a proposal that would require oil companies to execute emissions reduction initiatives aimed at reducing the 'emissions intensity' of an asset over a reasonable time scale and a requirement to deliver 'secure substantial and consistent total emissions reductions'. BP called these requirements 'impractical'. The NSTA changed the wording for both parts of the OGA Plan following the consultation, making the requirements less onerous for oil and gas companies. BP lowered its outlook for gas production in the first quarter of 2025. Picture: Yui Mok/PA Wire The NSTA replaced the phrase 'emissions intensity' with 'emissions' in the first paragraph, and said companies needed to 'secure substantial and emission reductions', removing the requirement for consistent improvements in the second paragraph. BP's position A BP spokesperson said: 'BP, similar to many organisations, engages appropriately with policymakers, industry groups and non-governmental organisations to offer feedback, expertise and insights into the policy-making process. This includes responses to public consultations. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Our aim is to inform the development of balanced and practical policy and regulation that promotes shared objectives across the industry.' The company's view on flaring The consultation documents also show BP criticised proposals that would require oil companies to put in place plans to deliver 'continuous improvements in flaring and venting reductions' as well as a proposed requirement that 'all assets must deliver zero routine flaring and venting by 2030'. Flaring is the practice of burning off methane that is produced alongside oil and venting is when methane is released into the atmosphere without being burned. In 2023, oil and gas companies operating in the North Sea flared and vented enough gas to heat more than 700,000 homes, representing a lost market value of £250 million, according to the NSTA's 2024 emissions monitoring report. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad BP pushed back against the proposed requirements for 'continuous improvements' in flaring and venting saying this was not 'technically feasible', according to communications obtained by The Scotsman. The oil company also stated dissatisfaction with plans to require oil companies to reduce gas leaks, also known as 'fugitive emissions', on a yearly basis. BP said: 'Due to the nature of leaks and seeps, continuous reduction is unachievable as they are by their nature ad hoc.' Louis-Maxence Delaporte, an energy sector analyst at the campaign group Reclaim Finance, said: "This investigation puts the spotlight once again on BP's weak climate strategy, which relies even more heavily on oil and gas than previously. "BP has severely reduced its planned investment in so-called 'low carbon' activities, it has increased its 2030 oil and gas production trajectory and abandoned its critical target for reducing scope 3 emissions. Far from being in transition, BP is building a fossil future.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Other company submissions The UK-based oil and gas company Serica was one of the other companies that responded to the consultation and pushed back against some aspects of the draft OGA Plan. The company stated that requiring yearly improvements in emissions 'may not be a useful target', adding the 'overall direction should be lowering emissions'. Serica said the proposed requirement for 'continuous improvement' to flaring and venting was 'not realistic' due to 'unforeseen disruptions to production and the time it takes to implement material flare reduction projects'. The company also called for the NSTA to make the 'intent and mechanics' clearer for its proposed methodology to determine the that date oil and gas assets should be shut down. Serica was contacted for comment by The Scotsman. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The OGA Plan was published ahead of the Court of Session in Edinburgh ruling earlier this year that permissions granted to the Rosebank oil field and the Jackdaw gas field under the previous Conservative government were unlawful and the fossil fuel giants behind the plans, Shell, Equinor and Ithaca, should have to reapply for permission. Conflicts of interest? However, significant concerns remain about the influence that large oil companies have over regulators like the NSTA, partly due to financial conflicts of interest. According to the NSTA's most recent financial results, which were published in July last year, the regulator's board members and their family members held shares in companies linked to the energy sector worth £351,258, including shares in BP. The family of the NSTA chairman Tim Eggar, who stood down in September last year, held 4,099 BP shares worth £20,331, as well as 1,875 shares in Shell worth £49,219. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Iain Lanaghan, another NSTA director held 1,017 BP shares worth £5,044 as well as 358 shares in Shell that are worth £9,398. The NSTA said that its board did not consider these holdings sufficient to 'impair their independent judgement in board discussions' An NSTA spokesperson said: 'The OGA Plan is a robust set of requirements, which demands that industry takes immediate action to reduce production emissions on the path to net zero by 2050. 'It was finalised following extensive public consultation, including responses from several operators and, as with any thorough consultation, all responses were considered.'
Business News Wales
2 days ago
- Business News Wales
Planning Reform Is Vital for Wales' Housing Future
The two governments in Westminster and Cardiff Bay have often taken very different approaches to housing and planning. While the Labour Government in England has pressed ahead with ambitious planning reforms, the Welsh Government has, until now, largely avoided such changes. Could this be about to change? There appears to be a growing recognition in Cardiff Bay that planning reforms will be needed to deliver the Welsh Government's target of 20,000 social rented homes as well as its broader housing ambitions. For instance, the First Minister, Eluned Morgan, has made speeding up planning a top priority, and a consultation earlier this year outlined plans to increase Local Planning Authority (LPA) performance and resources. The recently released Affordable Housing Taskforce report is the latest sign of a positive shift in sentiment and sets out a series of ambitious proposals for reforms to both national planning policy and the planning process. Many of the recommendations bear similarities to measures already underway in England through the Planning and Infrastructure Bill and revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). Will the Welsh Government seize the opportunities the Taskforce has set out? Affordable Housing Taskforce Chaired by backbench Member of the Senedd (MS) Lee Waters, the Taskforce aimed to identify both short- and long-term barriers to Affordable Housing delivery. HBF submitted written evidence and met with Waters to provide input. The context of the Taskforce's work is extremely challenging. Housing supply levels in Wales are falling year-on-year, and in 2023-24 just 4,771 new homes were completed – the second-lowest year on record and far below the peak of over 9,000 new homes in 2006-07. The home building industry is a major player in Affordable Housing provision, delivering 45% of all new affordable homes between 2021 and 2023 via Section 106 (S106) agreements – and so making a significant contribution to the Welsh Government's 20,000 social homes target. This is an important and often overlooked point, as with the delivery of affordable units so closely tied to private development, any fall in market housing delivery inevitably reduces the number of S106 Affordable Homes coming forward. Constraints on housing delivery previously identified To unlock housing delivery across all tenures, we have consistently highlighted several key constraints on development in Wales: • Time-expired Local Development Plans (LDPs) which contain unviable and undeliverable housing allocations.• Delays relating to statutory consultee responses and SuDS Approval Bodies (SABs).• Under-resourced Local Planning Authorities (LPAs). • No requirement for councils to calculate a housing land supply since Technical Advice Notice 1 (TAN1) was revoked in 2020, making it very difficult to progress sites which are not allocated in LDPs. Taskforce recommendations The Taskforce's recommendations reflect many of these concerns. For instance, it recommended that land identified as suitable for housing in LDPs should have a presumption towards development. If implemented, this could be transformational and help stop allocated sites from being delayed or even refused once an application is submitted. However, there must be accompanying incentives for LDPs to be kept up to date in the first place to ensure an adequate supply of deliverable allocated sites. Many of the Taskforce's other recommendations are squarely aimed at addressing the key causes of planning delays, such as proposing that LPAs no longer wait for statutory consultees past their response deadlines and establishing multidisciplinary 'development teams' within councils to resolve delays – reflecting England's 'New Homes Accelerator' teams and statutory consultee reviews. The Taskforce also called for greater delegated powers for planning officers on smaller schemes, raising the major development threshold to 50 dwellings, and introducing a national scheme of delegation, all of which could significantly accelerate housing delivery and support SME home builders. What next? Of course, while many of the Taskforce's recommendations reflect those included in England's Planning and Infrastructure Bill, Wales' approach to housing is and will rightly continue to be distinct from that in England. For instance, it is extremely positive that the Help to Buy Wales scheme remains in place, providing vital support for first-time buyers and confidence for industry, while no such support scheme is in place in England. Furthermore, the Welsh Government's policy priority continues to be Affordable Housing, whereas in England, there is a greater focus on a general uplift in supply of all housing tenures. However, despite these differences, both governments now recognise the urgent need to deliver more homes and speed up planning. But how many of the Taskforce's recommendations will the Welsh Government implement – and when? It is positive that the Cabinet Secretary for Housing, Jayne Bryant, has accepted the recommendations that fall to her and has set up an implementation group to oversee them (although the recommendations related to planning fall under a different minister). Some recommendations could be implemented relatively quickly, while on the other hand, many of the more systemic recommendations, such as a presumption towards development for land identified in the LDP, would require new legislation and consultation, and so are unlikely to be implemented soon. As a result, with the next Senedd election due in May 2026 and the possibility of a Reform or Plaid Cymru-led government, some of the more ambitious recommendations are at risk of being delayed or shelved. What role can HBF play in these debates? Looking ahead to next year's Senedd elections, HBF is actively seeking responses from home builders on what changes the next Welsh Government can make to planning and housing policy to further support the industry, and we will continue to push for changes to boost housing delivery of all tenures in the years ahead.
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Men jailed after crack cocaine worth £30k seized in Northants
A man has been jailed for 14 years after £30k worth of class A drugs were seized at a storage facility and a pub than 80 wraps of crack cocaine which Karl Williams, 29, intended to sell in the Corby area of Northamptonshire were found in a rented Maciness, 32, who was used by Williams as a drugs runner, was sent to prison for four Police said the sentences "reflect the gravity of their offending". The activities of Williams, of no fixed address, were investigated as part of Operation Firebrand, which focused on the organised supply of class A drugs in Insp Carrie Powers, from Northamptonshire Police's serious and organised crime team, said: "The investigation identified that Williams was involved in the supply of cocaine, using the aliases and identities of other people to rent accommodation and to transfer money earned from his crimes."It was obvious Williams was living beyond his means and this was as a result of the significant amount of drugs he was supplying." Four police operations led to "significant" seizures of cocaine, cash and high-value was arrested three times throughout the took place in several places, including a storage facility in April 2023 and a pub outbuilding in November A drugs worth up to £30,365 were recovered. Williams and Maciness were both charged with being involved in the supply of Class A drugs and Williams was also accused of offences under the Proceeds of Crime pleaded guilty to all the charges and Williams was sentenced to 14 years in jail at Northampton Crown Court on 30 also of no fixed address, received a four-year Insp Powers added: "Everyone involved in this investigation has shown complete dedication and professionalism in securing the convictions of these two men and I am glad that the sentences given reflect the gravity of their offending." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
