logo
New mixed-use residential along the Foss? Property for sale is being marketed for such

New mixed-use residential along the Foss? Property for sale is being marketed for such

Yahoo10-03-2025

A Tacoma waterfront property long planned for apartment or condo development is on the market.
The property referenced as Foss Harbor Marina Site 11 is along the Foss Waterway at 821 Dock St. It is owned by an entity affiliated with local investors Ted Johnson and Herb Simon.
Dave Speers is executive vice president of Kidder Mathews and has the site listing. He told The News Tribune in response to questions that Wednesday was its initial marketing day.
'The owners acquired a last segment of the property last year and decided it's time to sell,' Speers said via email.
The two-parcel site is 1.7 acres, 74,722 square feet adjacent to the 416 slip Foss Harbor Marina. It is zoned for high-density residential development and could accommodate 'at least 260 units over commercial and parking elements,' according to a sales flyer.
Renderings show a proposed five floors of residential units over two podium levels of parking accommodating 1.5 stalls per unit, along with ground floor of commercial space.
The asking price is $8 million.
The property is part of multiple decades-long effort to redevelop along the Thea Foss Waterway, on parcels both north and south of the Murray Morgan bridge. The waterway is part of the larger Commencement Bay Superfund site, and redevelopment was managed by the Foss Waterway Development Authority for more than 20 years.
FWDA's operating agreement expired at the end of 2020, and its work was absorbed by the city and Metro Parks Tacoma (now Parks Tacoma).
At the end of 2020, FWDA owned 10.07 acres of property. Of that, 5.64 acres transferred to Metro Parks Tacoma, 2.4 acres were intended for private development and 2 acres serve as home to the Foss Waterway Seaport museum.
The transferred park sites include the newly developed Melanie Jan LaPlant Dressel Park, which opened last year, and the planned Waterway Park, which is across the water from The Henry apartments, and George H. Weyerhaeuser Jr. Park, 2101 Dock St.
In 2021, Foss Harbor LLC came to the city with a proposal to partner with a third-party developer for a mixed-use project on Sites 10 and 11 north of the bridge.
The plan at that time was for approximately 330 market-rate apartments, 563 parking stalls, 145 parking stalls for the marina, 18,060 square feet of commercial space, resident amenity spaces, construction of the waterfront esplanade and view corridor enhancements.
The city would construct a seawall replacement already funded in the Capital Improvement Plan and scheduled for 2022.
Foss Harbor LLC also planned for a separate, three-story mixed-use development on Site 9, south of the bridge, it would develop on its own.
Up for council approval at that time were purchase-and-sale agreements between the city and Foss Harbor for Foss Waterway Sites 9 and 10, which the city owned, and development agreement for Foss Waterway Sites 9, 10 and 11. (The developers already owned Site 11).
The City Council approved the measure in June 2021, and the purchase-and-sale agreement was executed in July 2022.
At the time then-council member Lillian Hunter put into perspective how long it had taken just to get to that point in the process.
'The vision for this development really predates 2001,' she said. 'When Kelso Gillenwater came to town ... and he was the publisher of The News Tribune, we walked that area, and he had put dibs on one of the first townhouses that was going to be constructed at that time.
'And there was great energy for that,' she added, but noted that Gillenwater 'sadly passed in 1999. He never got to see his townhouse.'
Johnson at the meeting noted, 'This has been a long project for sure. We've gone through three different Foss Waterway Development Authority directors, two planning directors, three economic development directors and three city managers.'
In early 2023, Foss Harbor LLC came back seeking a proposed six-month extension to the due diligence tied to the purchase-and-sale agreement for Sites 9 and 10, because of reconfiguration of Site 10 from the new seawall.
The six months were added 'to allow time for a redesign of the Site 10 project,' according to the city's action memorandum.
According to city media representative Maria Lee, the city eventually closed on the sale of Foss Waterway Sites 9 and 10 to Foss Harbor in December 2024, for $1.97 million.
'The sites will be developed for support uses for the Foss Harbor Marina,' she said via email. 'This made way for marketing Site 11 for mixed-use development.'
Two sites remaining with the city include Site 8 (1131 Dock St.), which was the former Sea Scouts site, and Site 12 (535 Dock St.), a parking lot north of the Seaport Museum.
Among other nearby waterfront sites awaiting development is 1179 Dock St., next to Melanie Dressel Park. The property consists of three parcels and is privately owned. That site is on the market for $3.65 million. Its marketing material says, 'Potential may be a hotel, multifamily building, condos, marina and more.'
Another vacant lot, 1543 Dock St., is next to Thea's Landing. That site is owned by an entity affiliated with Hollander Properties of Bellingham and has long been planned for a hotel but has yet to move forward. The last development pre-application on file with the city for that parcel dates to 2018, which proposed a Homewood Suites valued at $35 million.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City says restoration of historic Providence City Hall will cost $40 million
City says restoration of historic Providence City Hall will cost $40 million

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

City says restoration of historic Providence City Hall will cost $40 million

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — The first phase of $40 million in restoration work at Providence City Hall is slated to get underway next spring. Renovations to the building's exterior, which will include repairing the dome, the front two roof pavilions and masonry in that area, will cost $10 million in total, according to city spokesperson Samara Pinto. Pinto said the work will be funded through the Providence Building Authority Bond as part of the city's Capital Improvement Plan. On Monday, the Downtown Design Review Committee heard from DBVW Architects, which completed a building condition assessment on City Hall last October. Project manager Benjamin Lueck said the assessment was limited to the exterior enclosure and related water infiltration. 'First and foremost, the roofing materials are deteriorated and failed throughout. In some cases, these are original materials dating back to the 1870s,' Lueck said. 'Our report also addressed the fact that, really, all of the exterior masonry joints are also failed. In some cases, large areas of masonry joints, mortar joints, are just completely open.' Lueck said the 'most significant issue' was the building's internal roof drainage. He added that the building's conditions were 'widespread' and said that 'no specific areas that are in worse condition than other areas.' 'With that in mind, our recommendation to the city is to pursue a really holistic restoration strategy,' Lueck said. He said the goal was to make sure the building was 'weather-tight' as well as 'historically accurate.' Lueck acknowledged the building has undergone restoration work over the years, but has not had any work done since 1979. 'Nowhere on the building are you seeing exactly the original construction,' Lueck explained. 'We're trying to get as close as we can to what has been the appearance of the building for the past 100 years with the acknowledgement that it will require a little bit of … slight changes to the overall detail.' Lueck said he'd recommend removing the copper cladding and preparing the original cast iron surfaces integrated into the roof with new waterproofing. Once that's done, Lueck said new decorative copper cladding would be installed to replicate the old cast iron. Lueck told the committee that DBVW hopes to have its construction drawings complete by December in advance of the proposed bidding process in January. Construction could start as soon as March or April of 2026, he said. The rest of the proposed restoration work at City Hall could take up to five years, but Pinto said the timeline may vary due to other factors like 'project costs, supply chain and potential disruptions.' 'This restoration will return the building's exterior to a standard of quality not seen in decades, while finally addressing longstanding issues like water infiltration and the deterioration of decorative metal elements that have impacted the structure for much of its existence,' Pinto added. Pinto said future phases of work to City Hall's exterior include restoring the remaining roof systems, masonry repairs, improving the building's rainwater removal systems, and replacing the windows to improve energy efficiency, 'all while maintaining the building's historic character.' The work is expected to cost $40 million in total, according to Pinto. Alexandra Leslie (aleslie@ is a Target 12 investigative reporter covering Providence and more for 12 News. Connect with her on Twitter and on Facebook. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Plainfield's second budget vote results: What happened?
Plainfield's second budget vote results: What happened?

Yahoo

time03-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Plainfield's second budget vote results: What happened?

Even with a total reduction of $800,000, all three questions on the ballot for the Town of Plainfield's budget vote failed to pass again at the referendum vote June 2. This is the second time all three questions failed to pass at the ballot box. The majority of voters opposed all three questions at the referendum May 19. At the budget vote June 2, the proposed $14,320,593 operating budget failed, with 563 yes votes and 717 no votes. The revised operating budget was $320,000 less than the proposed budget for the May 19 referendum, which was $14,640,593. The proposed education budget was $39,327,822, a reduction of $480,00 from the May 19 budget failed June 2, with 625 yes votes and 654 no votes. The proposed education budget at the referendum was down from the $39,807,822 that was proposed for education at the budget vote May 19. The town's Capital Improvement Plan for the next and ensuing five years also failed June 2, with 562 yes votes and 701 no votes. 'I think it's probably still a little too high,' Don Kivela, of Plainfield, said regarding the town's budget. In addition to the questions on the proposed operating and education budgets as well as the Capital Improvement Plan, there was a non-binding advisory question on the ballot for the June 2 election. The question asked voters if they were in favor of having a proposed municipal solid waste to energy plant in Plainfield. The vast majority were opposed to the project, as 125 voted yes and 1,148 voted no. The public hearing on the revised budget will take place June 9 in the auditorium at Plainfield High School. The next budget referendum will be held June 16. The town is working out a polling place, as work to replace the entrance ramp at Plainfield Town Hall begins June 3. Polls will be open from 6 a.m.-8 p.m. This article originally appeared on The Bulletin: Plainfield's second round of budgets fail at the ballot box

Chesapeake wants to build a railroad crossing overpass in South Norfolk
Chesapeake wants to build a railroad crossing overpass in South Norfolk

Yahoo

time30-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Chesapeake wants to build a railroad crossing overpass in South Norfolk

CHESAPEAKE — City leaders are pursuing grant funding from the state to build an overpass bridge for the Norfolk Portsmouth Beltline Railroad on Freeman Avenue in South Norfolk. At its meeting this week, the Chesapeake City Council passed a resolution to apply for funding through Virginia Department of Transportation's Revenue Sharing Program for the project. The rail passing is nestled between Harris Street and Republic Road. The project would replace the existing at-grade railroad crossing with an overpass bridge and include associated roadway realignments and improvements. Local transportation experts have been studying traffic disruptions caused by trains across Hampton Roads in an effort to recommend solutions. The Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization collected data on more than 600 railway crossings across the region to prioritize improvements and new overpasses and underpasses projects to ease traffic congestion. The organization scored 307 public, at-grade crossings for prioritization based on several factors, including traffic and train volumes, delays, safety and roadway characteristics. The Freeman Avenue crossing came in at number 11 on the list. Norfolk railroad crossings occupied the top five spots on the list, including on Hampton Avenue at Terminal Boulevard and on Granby Street near Ward's Corner. Chesapeake has the most crossings in the region at 122, including 98 at-grade crossings, according to the HRTPO. The Freeman Avenue overpass project will feature two 12-foot lanes at a speed of 35 mph. Pedestrian and bicycle facilities won't be included, but 8-foot shoulders are proposed accommodations. Also at Tuesday's meeting, the council approved an action to acquire rights-of-way in the area required to construct the project. Construction is scheduled for the spring of 2028 and expected to span until late 2030. The city has prioritized the project as it currently has $22.5 million of funding in the city's multi-year Capital Improvement Plan in the fiscal budget, including $10.2 million from the Federal Rail Administration. An additional $24.5 million will be needed in future years, for a projected total of $47 million. The city's application for funding from VDOT requests $10 million, and if received, the city would match that — likely through bonds financed by the South Norfolk Tax Increment Financing district, according to a memo from city staff. Natalie Anderson, 757-732-1133,

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store