Anthropic CEO says AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said AI could soon eliminate 50% of entry-level office jobs.
The AI CEO said that companies and the government are "sugar coating" the risks of AI.
Recent data shows Big Tech hiring of new grads has dropped 50% since pre-pandemic, partly due to AI.
After spending the day promoting his company's AI technology at a developer's conference, Anthropic CEO issued a warning: AI may eliminate 50% of entry level white-collar jobs in the next one to five years.
"We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Dario Amodei told Axios in an interview published Wednesday. "I don't think this is on people's radar."
The 42-year-old CEO added that unemployment could spike between 10% and 20% in the next one to five years. He told Axios he wanted to share his concerns to get the government and other AI companies to prepare the country for what's to come.
"Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen," Amodei said. "It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it."
Amodei said his concerns come from the rapid advancement of large language models that are increasingly capable of matching and exceeding human performance. He added that as models continue to develop, the US government has remained largely quiet out of concern of instilling fear among workers or falling behind China in the AI race.
Meanwhile, business leaders are seeing savings from AI while most workers remain unaware of the changes that are evolving, Amodei said.
He added that AI companies and the government need to stop "sugar coating" the risks of mass job elimination in fields including technology, finance, law, and consulting. He said entry-level jobs are especially at risk.
Amodei's comments also come as Big Tech firms' hiring of new grads dropped 50% compared to pre-pandemic levels, according to a new report by venture capital firm SignalFire. The report said it's at least partially due to AI.
A round of brutal layoffs swept wholesale across the industry in 2023, with hundreds of thousands of jobs eliminated as companies slashed costs. While SignalFire's report said hiring for mid and senior-level roles saw an uptick in 2024, entry-level positions never quite bounced back.
In 2024, early-career candidates accounted for 7% of total hires at Big Tech firms, down by 25% from 2023, the report said. At startups, that number is just 6%, down by 11% from the year prior.
SignalFire's findings suggest that tech companies are prioritizing hiring more seasoned professionals, and often filling posted junior roles with senior candidates.
Heather Doshay, a partner leading the people and recruiting programs at SignalFire told Business Insider that "AI is doing what interns and new grads used to do."
"Now, you can hire one experienced worker, equip them with AI tooling, and they can produce the output of the junior worker on top of their own — without the overhead," Doshay said.
AI can't entirely account for the sudden shrinkage in early-career prospects. According to the report, negative perceptions of Gen Z employees and tighter budgets across the industry — particularly the latter — are also contributing to tech's apparent reluctance to onboard new grads.
"AI isn't stealing job categories outright — it's absorbing the lowest-skill tasks," Doshay said. "That shifts the burden to universities, bootcamps, and candidates to level up faster."
To adapt to the rapidly changing times, she suggests new grads think of AI as a collaborator, rather than a competitor.
"Level up your capabilities to operate like someone more experienced by embracing a resourceful ownership mindset and delegating to AI," Doshay said. "There's so much available on the internet to be self-taught, and you should be sponging it up."
The CEO's chilling message comes after the company recently revealed that its chatbot Claude Opus 4 portrayed "extreme blackmail behavior" after gaining access to fictional emails that said it would be shut down. While the company was transparent with the public about it, it still released the next version of the chatbot.
It's not the first time Amodei has warned the public about the risks of AI. On an episode of the New York Times' "Hard Fork" podcast in February, the CEO said the possibility of "misuse" by bad actors could threaten millions of lives. He said the risk could come as early as "2025 or 2026," though he didn't know exactly when it would present "real risk."
Anthropic has emphasized the importance of third-party safety assessments and regularly shares the risks uncovered by its red-teaming efforts. Other companies have taken similar steps, relying on third-party evaluations to test their AI systems. OpenAI, for example, says on its website that its API and ChatGPT business products undergo routine third-party testing to "identify security weaknesses before they can be exploited by malicious actors."
Amodei acknowledged to Axios the irony of the situation — as he shares the risks of AI, he's simultaneously building and selling the products he's warning about. But he said the people who are most involved in building AI have an obligation to be upfront about its direction.
"It's a very strange set of dynamics, where we're saying: 'You should be worried about where the technology we're building is going,'" he said.
Anthropic did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Northern Star Resources Limited (ASX:NST) Stock Is Going Strong But Fundamentals Look Uncertain: What Lies Ahead ?
Northern Star Resources (ASX:NST) has had a great run on the share market with its stock up by a significant 20% over the last three months. But the company's key financial indicators appear to be differing across the board and that makes us question whether or not the company's current share price momentum can be maintained. Specifically, we decided to study Northern Star Resources' ROE in this article. Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. The formula for ROE is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Northern Star Resources is: 11% = AU$946m ÷ AU$8.9b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. So, this means that for every A$1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of A$0.11. Check out our latest analysis for Northern Star Resources Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features. At first glance, Northern Star Resources' ROE doesn't look very promising. However, given that the company's ROE is similar to the average industry ROE of 11%, we may spare it some thought. Having said that, Northern Star Resources has shown a modest net income growth of 13% over the past five years. Considering the moderately low ROE, it is quite possible that there might be some other aspects that are positively influencing the company's earnings growth. For instance, the company has a low payout ratio or is being managed efficiently. We then compared Northern Star Resources' net income growth with the industry and found that the company's growth figure is lower than the average industry growth rate of 20% in the same 5-year period, which is a bit concerning. Earnings growth is an important metric to consider when valuing a stock. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. What is NST worth today? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether NST is currently mispriced by the market. Northern Star Resources has a significant three-year median payout ratio of 59%, meaning that it is left with only 41% to reinvest into its business. This implies that the company has been able to achieve decent earnings growth despite returning most of its profits to shareholders. Moreover, Northern Star Resources is determined to keep sharing its profits with shareholders which we infer from its long history of paying a dividend for at least ten years. Upon studying the latest analysts' consensus data, we found that the company's future payout ratio is expected to drop to 39% over the next three years. The fact that the company's ROE is expected to rise to 15% over the same period is explained by the drop in the payout ratio. On the whole, we feel that the performance shown by Northern Star Resources can be open to many interpretations. While no doubt its earnings growth is pretty respectable, the low profit retention could mean that the company's earnings growth could have been higher, had it been paying reinvesting a higher portion of its profits. An improvement in its ROE could also help future earnings growth. We also studied the latest analyst forecasts and found that the company's earnings growth is expected be similar to its current growth rate. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Capricorn Metals Ltd's (ASX:CMM) Stock's On An Uptrend: Are Strong Financials Guiding The Market?
Most readers would already be aware that Capricorn Metals' (ASX:CMM) stock increased significantly by 27% over the past three months. Given that the market rewards strong financials in the long-term, we wonder if that is the case in this instance. Specifically, we decided to study Capricorn Metals' ROE in this article. Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. ROE can be calculated by using the formula: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Capricorn Metals is: 14% = AU$76m ÷ AU$535m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every A$1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn A$0.14 in profit. View our latest analysis for Capricorn Metals Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features. To start with, Capricorn Metals' ROE looks acceptable. Further, the company's ROE compares quite favorably to the industry average of 11%. This probably laid the ground for Capricorn Metals' significant 47% net income growth seen over the past five years. We reckon that there could also be other factors at play here. Such as - high earnings retention or an efficient management in place. As a next step, we compared Capricorn Metals' net income growth with the industry, and pleasingly, we found that the growth seen by the company is higher than the average industry growth of 20%. The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. What is CMM worth today? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether CMM is currently mispriced by the market. Given that Capricorn Metals doesn't pay any regular dividends to its shareholders, we infer that the company has been reinvesting all of its profits to grow its business. On the whole, we feel that Capricorn Metals' performance has been quite good. In particular, it's great to see that the company is investing heavily into its business and along with a high rate of return, that has resulted in a sizeable growth in its earnings. That being so, a study of the latest analyst forecasts show that the company is expected to see a slowdown in its future earnings growth. To know more about the latest analysts predictions for the company, check out this visualization of analyst forecasts for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Native Mineral Resources Holdings Limited's (ASX:NMR) market cap rose AU$25m last week; individual investors who hold 39% profited and so did insiders
The considerable ownership by individual investors in Native Mineral Resources Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership 36% of Native Mineral Resources Holdings is held by insiders AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Every investor in Native Mineral Resources Holdings Limited (ASX:NMR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 39% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's AU$25m market cap gain, insiders too had a 36% share in those profits. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Native Mineral Resources Holdings, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Native Mineral Resources Holdings We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common. There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Native Mineral Resources Holdings might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Native Mineral Resources Holdings. W & E Maas Holdings Pty Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. Blake Cannavo is the second largest shareholder owning 18% of common stock, and Dean Mellers holds about 3.0% of the company stock. Blake Cannavo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Native Mineral Resources Holdings Limited. Insiders own AU$59m worth of shares in the AU$165m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling. With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Native Mineral Resources Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 25%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Native Mineral Resources Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Native Mineral Resources Holdings (at least 3 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
