Starmer's defence spending plans under pressure as Nato pushes for more
The Prime Minister has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034.
But Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte is thought to be pushing for allies to commit to spending 3.5% on the military with a further 1.5% on defence-related measures as the alliance responds to Russian President Vladimir Putin's actions in Ukraine.
Leaders from the alliance will meet in The Hague later this month with the total 5% spending target by 2035 set to be on the table.
But Downing Street refused to be drawn on the possible increased spending commitment, which would put a further strain on the public finances into the middle of the next decade.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get into the discussions that are ongoing, in the usual way, ahead of (the) Nato (summit).
'The UK is already the third-highest spender in Nato in cash terms behind the United States and Germany, we are one of 22 allies of the 32 in Nato that already exceed the 2% of GDP Nato target.
'But it isn't just about cash, it's about contributions to capability that each Nato ally brings.
'Whether it is our nuclear capability, whether it's our world-class carriers with fifth-generation combat aircraft, our armed forces who are some of the most advanced in the world, the UK has been a leading contributor to Nato and will remain one.'
Sir Keir and Defence Secretary John Healey have already come under pressure to spell out how the existing 3% goal could be met.
Mr Healey insisted he was '100% confident' that military funding would increase as he promised to prepare the armed forces for the future.
The Strategic Defence Review published on Monday recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets.
The authors of the review have suggested reaching that 3% target is vital to delivering their recommendations while US President Donald Trump has led the charge for Nato allies to spend 5%.
Mr Healey denied he was gambling on economic growth to meet his target, telling BBC Breakfast: 'I'm 100% confident that we'll hit that 3%.
'The important thing for now is what we can do, and we can do now more than we've been able to do before, because of an extra £5 billion the Chancellor has put in to the defence budget this year and the 2.5% that we will deliver three years earlier than anyone expected.
'It means that a £60 billion budget this year will rise throughout this parliament and beyond.'
The Ministry of Defence announced a £5 billion investment in the 'kit of the future' following the publication of the review on Monday.
The funding includes £4 billion for drones and autonomous systems, and an extra £1 billion for lasers to protect British ships and soldiers.
A new era of threat requires a new era for defence.
The Strategic Defence Review marks a landmark shift in our deterrence and defence ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/EZtoHx6PGR
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) June 2, 2025
Mr Healey said the investment would provide 'the most significant advance in UK defence technology in decades' and 'ensure our armed forces have the cutting-edge capabilities they need to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing world'.
Part of the investment will see the establishment of a new 'drone centre' to accelerate the deployment of the technology by all three branches of the armed forces.
The focus on drones comes as the technology has proved increasingly lethal on the battlefield in Ukraine, where it now kills more people than traditional artillery.
At a meeting of allied defence ministers in April, Mr Healey said the UK estimated drones were inflicting 70-80% of battlefield casualties, while on Sunday Ukraine launched a major attack on Russian airfields deep behind the front line using a fleet of small drones.
In addition to investment in drones and AI, the Government has announced an additional £1 billion for the development of 'directed energy weapons' (DEWs) during the current Parliament.
This includes the DragonFire laser scheduled to be fitted to the Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyers from 2027, with a similar system provided for the Army by the end of the decade.
DragonFire and other DEWs are intended to provide a lower-cost form of air defence against targets including drones, costing just £10 per shot compared with the thousands of pounds it costs to fire existing weapons.
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Government should 'urgently commit to spending 3% this Parliament'.
'This commitment from Nato contrasts with Labour's total failure to set out a plan to spend 3% on defence,' he said.
'As a result, their defence review has completely unravelled. The submarines and ships it promises are nothing but a fantasy fleet based on fantasy funding.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
17 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Centrica strikes £20 billion gas supply deal with Equinor
The firms said the new deal will see Centrica take delivery of five billion cubic metres of gas per year up to 2035. Chris O'Shea, boss of Centrica, said the deal ensures an improvement in UK energy security and stressed that the business is working with the Government to build further gas storage. It comes ahead of a speech from the boss of the Confederation of British Industry, who is calling on the Government to come up with a 'serious plan' to cut energy costs and invest in energy security. Rain Newton-Smith, chief executive of the business group, will say that Britain must address soaring energy tariffs as firms struggle under the weight of crippling power bills on top of tax and wage hikes, in a speech later on Thursday. Around half of all UK gas was imported from Norway last year, after a recent increase in demand following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Centrica added that the contract will also call for natural gas sales to be replaced with hydrogen in the future. Mr O'Shea said: 'Equinor is a valued partner and this landmark agreement underscores the vital role that natural gas plays as a transition fuel as we navigate towards a low carbon energy future. 'Over the last few years, we've seen first-hand how important energy security is. 'Today's deal not only ensures the UK's energy security has improved but also paves the way for a burgeoning hydrogen market. 'The deal represents a significant investment in the UK's future, showing that Centrica will make bold investments that drive forward the energy transition while delivering value for our shareholders.' Equinor's president and chief executive Anders Opedal said: 'For nearly 50 years, we have supported the UK's energy security with reliable gas supplies. 'In addition, we have advanced offshore wind and pioneered decarbonisation solutions. 'We are pleased to strengthen the energy partnership further through a new gas sales agreement with our longstanding customer and partner Centrica.'
Leader Live
17 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
The 'capability targets' lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment such as air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.
Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'What Nigel Farage can teach Keir Starmer about politics'
Winter fuel payments. National insurance increases. Cutting the benefits of the disabled. All of them hard to sell at the best of times, but currently being sold to the voter with the same élan as Del Boy trying to offload alarm clocks that run backwards. Throw into the mix some u-turns that should have involved screeching brakes and smoking tyres, but have instead become a gentle and deadly drift towards the central reservation, and you have a toxic metaphor cocktail that won't so much knock anyone's socks off as gradually remove your shoes, your wallet, and your will to live. Meanwhile a party so minor it has 14 times FEWER MPs than the Liberal Democrats is romping all over the opinion polls, grabbing all the airwaves, and highlighting all the problems. It's stealing policies from Left and Right, appealing across the social spectrum and even making Liz Truss reach for her calculator. The only thing Keir Starmer seems to be worried about is Nigel Farage's lead in the polls, but his decision to tackle the Reform leader head-on has only made the PM look weak and puffed up his opponent's importance. As usual, Keir's doing it wrong. There is an awful lot to learn from Nigel, if you just have a rummage. 1. Nigel is true to his brand. He doesn't deviate. He doesn't try to appeal to those who are opposed to him. He just doubles down, does what annoys them harder. It helps that his schtick is being a disruptive posh oik in yellow trousers, a role any idiot can play with insane ease and the right wardrobe. Plus, Britain likes an underdog - an annoying terrier on the ankles of power, a peasant's revolt, a flick at the nose of greatness. Lovely stuff, off you go Nigel and give 'em one from me. 2. Nigel rules or walks. Through sheer force of personality he's set up three political parties, and walked out of two of them when his power waned. If he ever gets to lead a Parliamentary group bigger than what can be handled by one end of the saloon bar, he'll have so many factions, rivalries and headaches he'll change his pub again. Until then, he's centre of attention, and the centre of power. Were he ever to be PM, a chief of staff would have to kowtow or hit the road. 3. Nigel has simple targets that don't cost him anything. Leave the European Union. Brexit or bust. Cut immigration and cut taxes, even if they were both high because of Brexit. Cut the green crap, even if it's the best way to capitalise on the technological revolution so many of Nigel's supporters resent. Nigel's not the first person on earth who's been able to sell stagnation and self-harm as 'reform', but imagine what he could achieve, if only he obeyed the dictionary. 4. Nigel ignores everything. Warnings. Maths.. History. Logic and facts are of as much relevance to the British Sideshow Bob as Fermat's last theorem has to a duck. If you don't let anything stop you, then eventually every obstacle disappears, through boredom or erosion or distraction. That this man and the voter are apparently in sync has nothing to do with his everyman charm, because he doesn't have any. He's succeeding only because everybody else is flailing, and even the cat has noticed. The problem for Keir is that he doesn't have a personal brand, and he's dropped the Labour one. He deviates, not to disrupt but to appease. There he is, Billy Big Majority, but he's governing like Theresa May being racked by a hung Parliament. So he's announced an expansion of free school meals, a great win for a fantastic Mirror campaign that would have delighted his party if only he'd done it last July. And he could have, as it's not being paid for by a single penny of fiscal headroom because there isn't any. Instead, it was rushed out, 10 months into a haphazard premiership, to block questions over the winter fuel u-meander, and in so doing absolutely kiboshed the headlines for a £15bn transport investment Rachel Reeves had announced not 5 minutes earlier. Two bits of good news have cancelled each other out, and the drumbeat of inevitable tax rises in the autumn to pay for it all has got louder. A win has become a political cost, with his party in despair and the voter barely aware of anything beyond the fact the PM screwed up taking away winter fuel payments and now is screwing up handing them back again. All he had to do was say the richer pensioners must pay for free school meals, and every granny in the country would have had to suck a sweet and put up with it. Keir is paying attention to everything, so decision-making slows from a crawl to a death-spiral. The one thing Keir ignores is the voter - that shallow coalition of Labour values and middle-class, urban graduates who both loathed the Tories. When the Labour manifesto held nothing of note, everyone assumed there was a grand plan too radical to reveal in full - in truth, the plan was just to not be the Tories. Even that failed, because for the past 300 or so days every Labour minister and spad has not even bothered to butt heads with the Whitehall machine. Computer said no, and politics withered on the spot. It's not small boats making Nigel stronger: it's because voting for the other guy made not a jot of difference. The solution to this is easy. Either Nigel should take over the Labour Party, or Keir has to start acting more like Nigel. For what do we think Nigel would do, if only he had Labour values at heart rather than his own? He'd lead not ask, smash the machine not file a complaint, ghost the politics reporters and go on the edgy podcasts, line up all the cuts first and then bang out the good news and wins, over and over, because someone who SOUNDS like a success IS a success. He couldn't do the same for Reform. He grifts rather than works, applies himself only to what pleases, and will ultimately always implode, either through incompetence, insanity, or in a huff. The biggest lesson Starmer can take from Farage is that he, too, has no real policies. Both Reform and its leader are empty vessels, but voters still feel it's Labour that is hollow. They committed to nothing to get elected, and now are so non-committal that it's like watching fog thicken. Who'd vote for gruel, when there's red meat on offer? Those empty entrails will choke Starmer's premiership as surely as they will one day envelop Farage. Starmer has to learn, fast, how to bottle Eau de Nigel and leave him spluttering in his wake.
