‘Calm him down' – Lukashenko on Armenian PM's EU tilt
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is leading his nation towards disaster, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko told a press conference on Sunday. Yerevan's
'pandering to the EU'
is a
'most dangerous game,'
said Lukashenko, who won his seventh term as the Belarusian leader in the presidential election over the weekend, according to exit polls.
'Calm him down,'
the president said, referring to Pashinyan.
'He will destroy Armenia.'
Lukashenko was referring to Pashinyan's plans to seek closer ties with Brussels. Earlier this month, the Armenian media reported that the government was preparing to hold a referendum on whether to apply for EU membership.
Under Pashinyan's leadership, Yerevan has also been looking to deepen relations with individual Western nations. France reportedly offered to provide security for the small landlocked nation that borders its regional rival, Azerbaijan. Armenia has also been seeking to reduce Russia's role as a security provider in the region, such as by forgoing the services of Russian troops guarding its border with Iran.
Read more
Ex-Soviet state moves closer to EU membership bid
In June 2024, Armenia and the US also stated that they intended to upgrade their bilateral relations to the level of
'strategic partnership,'
with Washington pledging to help Yerevan in its
'defense transformation.'
According to Lukashenko, seeking favor from faraway nations and alienating neighbors is a mistake on Yerevan's part.
'He [Pashinyan] has a problem… in the east and a problem in the west. Now, he is pitting Russia against himself as well,'
the Belarusian president said, adding that the Armenian prime minister
'has surrounded himself with enemies,'
and the EU would hardly be able to aid him in any way.
Relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan remain strained after Baku retook the breakaway region of Karabakh by force in the autumn of 2023 after which most of the territory's predominantly ethnic Armenian population fled to Armenia. Yerevan's relations with Georgia and Türkiye – a traditional backer of Azerbaijan – are strained as well.
Read more
US pushing ex-Soviet state to 'suicide' – Russian intel agency
'A war in the Caucasus should be prevented,'
Lukashenko said, warning that Armenia's actions could lead to another conflict in the region. The Belarusian president also dismissed accusations from Yerevan that he supported Azerbaijan in its conflict with Armenia.
Minsk
'supported common sense'
and wanted a war in the region to be averted, the president said, adding that he had sought to play the role of mediator during the crisis and warned Pashinyan that his actions would lead Armenia to war.
'That is exactly what happened,'
he stated. Lukashenko also said that he liked the Armenian people and called on them to
'keep what they have.'
Russia has also previously warned the Armenian people not to trust Western intentions, saying that Washington and its allies don't have the interests of their country at heart. Armenia
'will have to renounce its own traditions, national societal norms, and stable commercial ties'
with other countries in the region to realign itself with the West, thus committing
'national suicide,'
the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service said in November 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
15 hours ago
- Russia Today
Polish president-elect opposes Ukrainian EU membership
Poland's newly elected president, Karol Nawrocki, has stressed that Warsaw's continued support for Kiev in its conflict with Russia does not override Polish national interests, and is contingent on reaching 'compromise and consensus' over historical and economic disputes. In an interview with Hungarian magazine Mandiner published on Saturday, Nawrocki raised long-standing issues such as the exhumation of Poles killed by Ukrainian Nazi collaborators during the 1940s Volyn massacres, as well as trade practices that he says harm Polish farmers and truckers. 'At the moment, I am opposed to Ukraine's accession into the European Union,' Nawrocki said. 'I look at Ukraine as a country that, although it defends itself very boldly against Russia, must also respect the interests of other countries who, by the way, support Ukraine.' 'Poland has an interest in exhuming the Volyn victims, for example,' he said. "During the campaign, I did not agree, nor will I, as president, agree to unfair competition against Poland's agriculture or logistics sector with Ukraine.' Despite Warsaw being one of Kiev's key backers in its conflict with Moscow, it has consistently tied support for Ukraine's EU and NATO aspirations the recognition of the 'genocide' committed by Ukrainian nationalists. Militants with the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) slaughtered up to 100,000 Poles between 1943 and 1945 in the regions of Volhynia and Eastern Galicia, which currently belong to Ukraine. Modern Ukraine celebrates the perpetrators as 'freedom fighters' and 'national heroes.' The OUN was led by Stepan Bandera, a notorious Nazi collaborator who is widely revered in modern also protested a tariff-free EU trade scheme with Ukraine introduced in 2022. While Brussels promoted it as a vital economic lifeline for Kiev, it drew backlash from disadvantaged domestic producers across the bloc. The framework expired this week after proposed extensions and alternatives failed to secure enough support. Nawrocki, a conservative historian – currently on Russia's national wanted list for his role in the dismantling of hundreds of Soviet-era memorials – narrowly defeated liberal Warsaw mayor Rafal Trzaskowski in the June 1 presidential runoff with 50.89% of the vote. His campaign emphasized Catholic values, national sovereignty and a rebalanced relationship with the EU. Nawrocki is set to take office on August 6. While the Polish presidency is largely ceremonial, it holds veto power and influence over foreign policy.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Kiev sends the living to die, but won't accept its dead
It is sad, but peace remains elusive in the war between, on one side, Ukraine and – through Ukraine – the West and, on the other, Russia. Recently, the US has at least admitted that Moscow has plausible and important interests at stake and that the West has been using Ukraine to fight a proxy war against Russia. While very late and still incomplete, such truthfulness could help fashion the kind of realistic compromise needed to end this war. Yet Washington's European vassals have chosen this moment to discover their usually terminally atrophied capacity for talking back to the US: They clearly want the war to continue, even though that means Ukraine – about which they pretend to care – will lose even more people and territory. Against this backdrop, it was no wonder that the latest round of the renewed Istanbul talks between Russia and Ukraine produced no breakthrough, little progress, and only very modest concrete results. Also, on the eve of the talks, the Zelensky regime launched terror attacks on civilian trains in western Russia and a series of sneak drone strikes throughout the country that – in the most generous reading – involved the war crime of perfidy: That, obviously, did not help find a way forward either. Indeed, by now it is clear that Kiev's sneak drone attacks in particular have only further undermined the Zelensky regime's already fragile standing in Washington: US President Donald Trump has been explicit that he accepts Russia's right to massively retaliate, or, in the original Trumpese, 'bomb the hell' out of Ukraine. Luckily for Ukraine, Moscow is generally more restrained than America would be in a similar situation, and it should stay so. Yet the fact remains, Kiev's sneak drones have made no substantial military difference in its favor, but they have done significant political damage – to Kiev, that is. Regarding the Istanbul talks, it is likely that these assaults were meant to torpedo them. Yet Moscow did not fall for that rather transparent play. Its delegation turned up; so the Ukrainian one had to do the same. In addition, Russia ended this round of the negotiations with several good-will gestures, including an agreement to exchange POWs who are particularly young or in bad health and the offer to hand over the frozen (a common practice in war) bodies of 6,000 fallen Ukrainians. Both initiatives have run into trouble. To be precise, both are being impeded by the Ukrainian leadership. The POW swap has been delayed, and Ukrainian officials have failed to show up at the border to receive the first 1,212 of their deceased soldiers. Regarding both, Kiev has blamed Russia. Yet, remarkably, the Ukrainian statements, in reality, prove that it is indeed Kiev that is – at the very least – slowing these processes down. For what Ukrainian officials are really accusing Russia of is moving faster. The reasons for this obstructionism are unclear. The Ukrainian authorities have not shared them with the public. But there are some plausible guesses. One very likely reason why Kiev is reluctant to accept the 6,000 bodies of its own fallen soldiers is that the 'preponderant majority' of them, according to a Ukrainian member of parliament, were killed specifically during Ukraine's insane and predictably catastrophic incursion into Russia's Kursk region. Started on August 6 of last year, the operation was initially hyped by Ukrainian propagandists and their accomplices and useful idiots in the West. For the clear-eyed, it was obvious from the beginning that this was a mass kamikaze mission, wasting Ukrainian lives for no military or political advantage. Was the Zelensky regime trying to create a territorial 'bargaining chip'? Or once more 'shift the narrative,' as if wars are won by rewriting a movie script? Influence last year's US elections? Prepare for a possible victory by then presidential candidate Donald Trump? All of the above? We don't know. What we do know is that nothing Kiev may have fantasized about has worked. Indeed, by now the Kursk fiasco has only made Kiev's situation worse. Russia has retaken the territory in Kursk Region that Ukraine had seized and is advancing on the Ukrainian side of the border, taking settlements at an accelerating pace and getting close to the major regional city of Sumy. Clearly, those fallen during that particular suicide mission are evidence of Kiev's recklessness, hypocrisy, and incompetence. No wonder they seem to be less than welcome at home. A second reason for Kiev's reluctance may be even more sordid. There is speculation, for instance on social media, that it is financial. More importantly, a Russian diplomat, Sergei Ordzhonikidze, has made the same claim on the Telegram channel of the Izvestiia newspaper. For according to Ukrainian legislation, the families of the fallen soldiers are entitled to substantial compensation. Painful as it may be to acknowledge it, the Zelensky regime is not incapable of such a massive lack of piety. Whatever the precise reasons for Kiev's odd refusal to take back its prisoners and dead, they are certain to be base. This may jar with the West's well-organized and stubbornly delusional Zelensky fan club. But the best they could do for 'ordinary' Ukrainians is to put pressure on their worn-out idol to accept the prisoners and the fallen. And, of course to finally end the war.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Israeli cabinet minister tells banks to ignore EU sanctions
Israeli banks should provide services to settlers whom the European Union has slapped with sanctions, despite any potential repercussions, the country's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has insisted. He warned that those failing to comply could be made to pay out hefty compensations. Last July, the EU for the first time in its history imposed punitive measures on five Israeli settlers and three groups over 'serious and systematic human rights abuses against Palestinians' in the occupied West Bank, which is considered part of Palestine under international law. Apart from an EU-wide entry ban and an asset freeze, the sanctions prohibit the 'provision of funds or economic resources, directly or indirectly,' to the affected Israeli nationals. In a post on X on Wednesday, the official, who is known for his far-right views, said that he had sent a letter to the banking supervisor, Dani Khachiashvili, in which he demanded an end to 'the 'zero risk' policy on the part of banks, which leads to the abandonment of Israeli customers under the guise of compliance with foreign sanctions.' Smotrich accused Israeli financial institutions of 'small-mindedness' and unquestioning compliance with 'unjust' EU sanctions. He argued that banks in fact 'have a significant ability to act against' Brussels' punitive measures, by taking legal action and wielding their 'global economic connections.' The official threatened that if his call was not heeded, he would push for legislation that would force Israeli financial institutions to pay out sizable compensations to the affected individuals. The Israeli finance minister further wrote that he could also promote legislation that would require the Bank of Israel to 'open and manage bank accounts for citizens on whom sanctions are imposed.' Speaking to AFP last month, Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard said that Stockholm would 'push for EU sanctions against individual Israeli ministers' since there was no 'clear improvement for the civilians in Gaza.' At around the same time, her Slovenian colleague, Tanja Fajon, announced that her country was 'looking into the possibility of sanctions against Israel, alongside France and Ireland.' Also in May, the UK and Canada, which are not part of the EU, along with France, issued a joint statement condemning the ongoing Israeli military campaign in Gaza. The document accused the Israeli government of denying 'essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population' of the Palestinian enclave. London, Ottawa and Paris threatened to 'take further concrete actions,' including 'targeted sanctions,' should 'egregious actions' on the part of Israel continue. The statement also demanded that Israel halt settlement activities in the occupied West Bank.
