Smithsonian Science Curriculum + Teacher Training = Learning Gains in 3 Subjects
For 20 years, teachers in North Carolina's Caldwell County Schools relied on one textbook and their imaginations to teach elementary science.
Fourth-grade teacher Megan Lovins would study the county's curriculum guides each year to piece together the best science lessons possible. But in 2021, bulky, blue crates arrived at her classroom door in Hudson Elementary — and a new way to teach science practically fell in her lap.
Her district had agreed to participate in a multi-year trial to study the impact of new curriculum and professional development on student achievement.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
A Newton's cradle to demonstrate physics. Empty tin cans to help illustrate static electricity. Measuring cups, tape, rulers and more. As Lovins emptied the crates, she realized she had all the equipment needed to teach tangible science activities.
'I am a hands-on teacher, so I fell in love with it instantly,' she said.
The materials were part of a five-year randomized controlled study by the Smithsonian Science Education Center that launched in the 2019-20 school year. With a $4.5 million federal grant, the center provided its own high-quality science curriculum and professional development to 37 schools in North and South Carolina to study how combining the two impacted test scores.
Researchers found that pairing the curriculum, 'Smithsonian Science for the Classroom,' with high-quality professional development improved students' science, math and reading test scores. The study also showed positive results in science for students who are typically underrepresented in STEM fields, such as girls and children of color.
'There's no other randomized controlled trial study that's done this in elementary school using these standards,' said Carol O'Donnell, the center's director. 'So this is a big deal for the field.'
The trial followed 1,600 students in third through fifth grades over the course of three academic years. Of the 37 schools, 19 were classified as 'treatment' and given the Smithsonian curriculum and professional development, while 18 were assigned to a comparison group and continued like normal without any intervention.
Amy D'Amico, director of professional services for the Smithsonian center, said the pandemic made it more difficult to get schools on board. In a world that was changing daily, superintendents were being asked to say yes to hefty commitment — with no guarantee they would receive the new curriculum.
'Typically, people want to be in the intervention group,' D'Amico said. 'And we're asking people to sign on for five years, not knowing what the next week or month was going to look like.'
Lovins said that at first, she was hesitant about participating in the study. The main focus in her fourth grade classroom was to keep her students healthy during the pandemic.
'When school did go back in session, we were in session every other day with half of our students for a long period of time. That mental toll made it challenging to pick up a new curriculum,' she said. 'But I'm a huge fan now.'
Many of the schools selected were rural and high-needs, with large numbers of students who were low-income, had Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) or were classified as English learners. In Caldwell County Schools, a district of nearly 11,000 students 70 miles northwest of Charlotte, eight schools participated in the trial, including Hudson Elementary.
Because of COVID-19, the treatment schools didn't begin to receive professional development until spring 2021. At that point, teachers learned how to implement the curriculum by going through lessons as if they were students.
D'Amico said the professional learning was uncomfortable at first for some of the elementary teachers, because many didn't have a science background.
'We had to get in and get dirty and use our hands and learn those lessons,' Lovins said. 'It's amazing how many adults are scared of science — scared to teach science, because you're afraid you're going to say something wrong — so to be able to get in and use your hands to learn how to teach it made the teachers feel a lot more comfortable about implementing the curriculum in the classroom.'
The Smithsonian science curriculum was phenomena-driven, meaning students actively investigate and try to explain real-world events. They collect data, ask questions, experiment with materials and draw conclusions as part of hands-on activities.
In one elementary school lesson, students observed changes in the night sky to figure out how Earth's orbit around the sun influences which constellations are visible throughout the year.
'If students ask questions about the world around them, you will get students to improve their interest (and) their self-confidence,' O'Donnell said.
Lovins said she noticed over time that as her students used the Smithsonian lessons, they were able to retain information much more easily because they were using their hands to learn abstract concepts. She also saw a lot more joy while teaching science in the classroom.
'They would say, 'When's our next science class?' ' Lovins said. 'They were begging for the next lesson because they were having so much fun with the hands-on (activities).'
The University of Memphis Center for Research and Educational Policy evaluated the trial, testing students before and after the study while conducting classroom observations. The researchers evaluated the students' science achievement with the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT10) while assessing reading and math achievement on state tests.
At the end of the study last year, students in the treatment group showed statistically significant gains in science relative to the comparison group. Overall, the comparison group ranked in the 50th percentile while the treatment group ranked in the 57th percentile in science on the SAT10.
Girls and students of color scored 7 points higher in science than children of the same demographic in comparison schools, while low-income students scored 6 percentile points higher and children with IEPs scored 15 points higher than comparison students with the same demographics.
Students in the treatment group also scored 4 points higher in reading and 6 points higher in math on their state assessments than those in the comparison group, the researchers found.
The results suggest that student achievement in reading and math can improve through science instruction that uses real-world problems, where students have to 'read, write, argue from evidence and make calculations,' according to the study's executive summary.
But it's not just the curriculum; O'Donnell said it's important to implement the professional development piece along with it. 'Because you would never give teachers just the curriculum — the intervention is the curriculum with aligned professional learning,' she said. 'That's our expectation in the field — that teachers get the support and the development of expertise they need, as well as the materials.'
Lovins said teachers at her school are relearning Smithsonian curriculum this year to continue to implement it next fall.
'It's so good and it needs to be in every classroom,' Lovins said. 'It's a great program. I hope it stays around.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Last meal' of sauropod fossil confirms dinosaur lived on plants
(NewsNation) — Scientists have long suspected that a group of dinosaurs known as sauropods subsisted on a diet of plants, but they had no evidence proving their theory. Now they do. Paleontologists in Australia have discovered a layer of plant matter in the stomach contents of a 36-foot-long juvenile sauropod. According to Smithsonian Magazine, the young Diamantinasaurus matildae was unearthed in 2017 in the Winton Formation, a geologic formation in central-western Queensland. The fossil, nicknamed 'Judy,' was discovered by paleontologist Stephen Poropat of Curtin University and his colleagues. The scientists' subsequent findings about the animal's diet were published Monday in the journal Current Biology. Study reveals when the first warm-blooded dinosaurs roamed Earth 'It's the smoking gun, or the steaming guts, as it were — the actual direct evidence in the belly of the beast,' Poropat told The New York Times. The preserved plants, which survived in Judy's gut for at least 94 million years, consisted of material from conifers, flowering plants and extinct seed ferns, according to Smithsonian. The plants were mostly intact, suggesting that the massive dinosaurs, recognized for their long necks and tails, did not chew their food. Poropat said in a Curtin University news release that the condition of the plant matter indicated that sauropods were 'bulk-feeders,' meaning that they swallowed their food whole, allowing their digestive systems to do the work of breaking the food down. The method, still used by some birds and reptiles today, allows a meal to last up to two weeks. To confirm their long-held theory, Poropat and his colleagues had to show that the plants were not just random debris, Smithsonian reported. The fossil's well-preserved condition, including a layer of fossilized skin, indicated that the plants were inside the dinosaur's stomach when it died. Dinosaurs didn't roar like in the movies. Here's how they sounded A lack of plants anywhere near the excavation site also indicated that the plant matter came from inside the beast. 'Ever since the late 19th century, paleontologists have firmly regarded sauropods as herbivores,' Poropat said in the university release. 'However, the specific plants that they ate, and the height above ground at which they fed, have remained unknown — until now.' The research findings have revealed that the eating habits of sauropods may have contributed to their longevity on Earth. 'Sauropods were remarkable animals that roamed the Earth for more than 130 million years. Understanding their diet is critical to understanding their impact on Earth's ecosystems — particularly on plants and other herbivorous species — throughout that time,' Poropat said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Associated Press
2 days ago
- Associated Press
A grassland bird eavesdrops on prairie dog calls to keep itself safe from predators
WASHINGTON (AP) — Prairie dogs are the Paul Reveres of the Great Plains: They bark to alert neighbors to the presence of predators, with separate calls for dangers coming by land or by air. 'Prairie dogs are on the menu for just about every predator you can think of'— golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, foxes, badgers, even large snakes — said Andy Boyce, a research ecologist in Montana at the Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute. Those predators will also snack on grassland nesting birds like the long-billed curlew. To protect themselves, the curlews eavesdrop on the alarms coming from prairie dog colonies, according to research published Thursday in the journal Animal Behavior. Previous research has shown birds frequently eavesdrop on other bird species to glean information about potential food sources or approaching danger, said Georgetown University ornithologist Emily Williams, who was not involved in the study. But, so far, scientists have documented only a few instances of birds eavesdropping on mammals. 'That doesn't necessarily mean it's rare in the wild,' she said, 'it just means we haven't studied it yet.' Prairie dogs live in large colonies with a series of burrows that may stretch for miles underground. When they hear one each other's barks, they either stand alert watching or dive into their burrows to avoid approaching talons and claws. 'Those little barks are very loud — they can carry quite a long way,' said co-author Andrew Dreelin, who also works for the Smithsonian. The long-billed curlew nests in short-grass prairie and incubates eggs on a ground nest. When one hears the prairie dog alarm, she responds by pressing her head, beak and belly close to the ground. In this crouched position, the birds 'rely on the incredible camouflage of their feathers to become essentially invisible on the Plains,' Dreelin said. To test just how alert the birds were to prairie dog chatter, researchers created a fake predator by strapping a taxidermied badger onto a small remote-controlled vehicle. They sent this badger rolling over the prairie of north-central Montana toward curlew nests — sometimes in silence and sometimes while playing recorded prairie dog barks. When the barks were played, curlews ducked into the grass quickly, hiding when the badger was around 160 feet (49 meters) away. Without the barks, the remote-controlled badger got within about 52 feet (16 meters) of the nests before the curlews appeared to sense danger. 'You have a much higher chance of avoiding predation if you go into that cryptic posture sooner — and the birds do when they hear prairie dogs barking,' said co-author Holly Jones, a conservation biologist at Northern Illinois University. Prairie dogs are often thought of as 'environmental engineers,' she said, because they construct extensive burrows and nibble down prairie grass, keeping short-grass ecosystems intact. 'But now we are realizing they are also shaping the ecosystems by producing and spreading information,' she said. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
How the Old Masters painted animals: dragonfly wings and butterfly dust
The National Gallery of Art and the Smithsonian's Natural History Museum have been next-door neighbors in Washington, DC for nearly 90 years—but until now, they've never shared so much as a cup of coffee across the fence. That all changes this summer, as the two institutions collaborate to create a cross-pollinated art and natural science exhibition featuring selections from the art gallery's centuries-old paintings of birds, bugs, and exotic critters … along with actual examples of those creatures drawn from the Smithsonian's enormous collection of animal artifacts. The exhibit, called 'Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World,' focuses on a period beginning in the 1500s when artists in Northern Europe—inspired largely by strange specimens that had found their way to Antwerp, Belgium, aboard merchant sailing ships—were creating exquisitely detailed, and unprecedentedly accurate, images of creatures from the smallest insects to the largest mammals. One display case features the Smithsonian's own specimen of a Central American elephant beetle, the size of a baby's fist but armored and horned in a most terrifying (if harmless) manner. Next to it is mounted Flemish painter Jacob Hoefnagel's 1592 painting of the same species, meticulously rendered with brushes that at times consisted of a single hair bristle. Nearby is 17th-century Czech artist Wencenslaus Hollar's etching of a Tasmanian vasum ceramicum shell, impossibly spindly and surreally suspended in midair, joined by a spectacular real-life specimen from the Smithsonian's vast shell collection. And there is Hoefnagel's life-sized painting of a Southern Hawker dragonfly, highlighted with gold paint, seemingly ready to fly off its parchment page—accompanied by a real dragonfly, temporarily freed from its drawer in the Smithsonian's climate-controlled archives. (Recent studies have revealed that Hoefnagel, obsessed with accuracy, sometimes fastened actual dragonfly wings to his paintings.) These and the rest of the exhibition's works embrace a historic moment when artists—many wielding magnifying glasses—became obsessed with capturing nature in all its detail. Throughout three exhibition halls, the juxtaposition of art and artifacts reveals the astonishing amount of research and detail represented in each work. (A rare look inside the Smithsonian's secret storerooms) While it holds a prestigious spot on the National Mall, the National Gallery is not part of the Smithsonian—and the collaboration is novel for both institutions. 'We came up with the idea for this during the pandemic,' says Alexandra Libby, a curator of Northern Paintings for the museum. 'We started trading e-mails, hoping to get the Smithsonian people excited about it, explaining that these are not just pretty pictures of butterflies, but evidence that there was a real scientific level of engagement during this period. 'They were engaged from the start. They said, 'This is amazing!'' Moving from gallery to gallery, a visitor to this joint venture exhibition walks through a period when artists took the lead in creating the concept of natural history, says Brooks Rich, a curator of Old Master art at the National Gallery. 'The flourishing of interest in nature in its most minute detail that we see here really provided the foundation for the entire discipline,' he says. That breakthrough is crystalized in a display case positioned at the center of the exhibition's first room: Four diary-sized books, bound in leather, illustrated by the artist Hoefnagel. Entitled Aier, Aqua, Ignis and Terra (Air, Water, Fire, and Earth), the books contain, on fine parchment paper, 270 hand-painted images of creatures ranging from house flies to elephants with a level of detail that rivals anything a 4K TV screen will reproduce today. 'Prior to Hoefnagel, most people dismissed insects as vermin,' says Stacy Sell, the museum's curator of Northern Book Painting. 'But he undertook a sustained study of them, looking at every minute detail, and saw how beautiful they were. 'Finally, he said, 'You know, watercolor just isn't going to cut it.' So, he developed all kinds of innovative techniques to create a level of detail no one had attempted before. 'I mean, he actually painted with butterfly dust. That's pretty amazing.' (How to plan a walking tour of the best museums in D.C.) So delicate are the images in the four books, the museum almost never has them on display. In the course of the exhibition—May through November 2—the pages will be turned just three times. Perhaps the most glorious art work in the exhibition is the epic 'Noah's Family Assembling the Animals Before the Ark,' painted around 1660 by the Flemish artist Jan van Kessell the Elder. The Noahs—dressed in their Flemish finest—herd a zoofull of animals across a distinctively Northern European landscape toward a distant, barely-visible boat. Camels, turtles, monkeys, ostriches—even North American turkeys—ramble across the frame. But it's the sky that commands our attention: A riot of birds, two-by-two, winging their way to safety. 'It was such a joy to work with the Natural History Museum managers as they identified all the birds in this painting,' says Libby. 'They studied it to see what the artist got right, and why they might have gotten some things wrong.' For example, at the painting's extreme upper right, a pair of Paradisaea apoda—Greater Birds of Paradise, from New Guinea—streak into the image like plumed missiles. Besides their glorious color, their most distinctive feature is the fact that they have no legs. 'These birds were prized for their feathers, for women's hats,' says Libby. 'By the time those dead birds arrived in Europe, their legs were gone.' For a painter obsessed with getting everything just right, only one solution could satisfy both art and science: Rather than get the legs wrong, van Kessell simply left them out. (How do you find a 'lost' masterpiece?)
