Pirelli's Chinese investor rejected 'unfair' proposal but open to collaborate
MILAN, May 15 (Reuters) - A leading Chinese investor in Italian tyre maker Pirelli said on Thursday a proposal the company had put forward to solve problems that having a Chinese shareholder pose for its U.S. expansion plans were "seriously unfair".
Without providing details on the proposal, Pirelli said Wednesday its Chinese shareholder Sinochem had rejected it.
"The proposal was rejected by us because (it is) potentially disruptive for Pirelli and overall seriously unfair and unbalanced for all Pirelli shareholders ... other than Camfin," Marco Polo International Italy, the vehicle through which Sinochem invests in Pirelli, said in a statement.
The statement reiterated Sinochem's "firm support for the long-term sustainable development of Pirelli" saying it would continue to work with its shareholders, management and the relevant authorities to help its growth and development.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
10 minutes ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves turning around UK's finances 'like Steve Jobs did for Apple', claims minister
Rachel Reeves will turn around the economy the way Steve Jobs turned around Apple, a cabinet minister has suggested ahead of the upcoming spending review. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle compared the chancellor to the late Apple co-founder when asked on Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips where the £86bn for his department is coming from. The package, confirmed ahead of the full spending review next week, will see each region in England granted £500m to spend on science projects of their choice, including research into faster drug treatments. Asked by Trevor Phillips how the government is finding the money, Mr Kyle said: "Rachel raised money in taxes in the autumn, we are now allocating it per department. "But the key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. "Just bear in mind that how Apple turned itself around when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. "Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. "Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector... they will create jobs in the future." The spending review is a process used by governments to set departmental budgets for the years ahead. Asked if it will include more detail on who will receive winter fuel payments, Mr Kyle said that issue will be "dealt with in the run-up to the autumn". "This is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years, so you're sort of talking about two separate issues at the moment," he said. 0:42 Scrapping universal winter fuel payments was one of the first things Labour did in government - despite it not being in their manifesto - with minsters saying it was necessary because of the financial "blackhole" left behind by the Tories. But following a long-drawn out backlash, Sir Keir Starmer said last month that the government would extend eligibility, which is now limited to those on pension credit. It is not clear what the new criteria will be, though Ms Reeves has said the changes will come into place before this winter. Mr Kyle also claimed the spending review will see the government invest "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". However, he said the chancellor will stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules - which rule out borrowing for day-to-day spending - meaning that while some departments will get extra money, others are likely to face cuts.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spending review: Schools to get more funding but police warned to ‘do their bit'
Schools are set to receive a funding boost in the spending review, a Cabinet minister has indicated, as he insisted other public services must 'do their bit' amid concerns about cuts to other budgets. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said the Government will commit to investing 'the most we've ever spent per pupil' next week, but declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing. Facing questions from broadcasters on Sunday about which public services will be prioritised, Mr Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the Chancellor, they have,' the Cabinet minister told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a Government.' He pointed to the £1.1 billion extra funding already earmarked for police this year, warning that public services would be expected to 'do their bit' alongside Government as he defended Ms Reeves' stewardship of the country's finances. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Mr Kyle said. 'You see a Chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most… You will see the priorities of this Government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS receiving a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Economists have said the expected 2.8% annual increase in its day-to-day budget, which amounts to a rise of about £30 billion by 2028, or £17 billion in real terms, will see other departments squeezed. Speaking on Sunday, Mr Kyle said the schools system, along with an £86 billion funding package for research and development, would be top priorities as the Government seeks to 'invest in the future.' 'You will see in this spending review that we are investing the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system,' he told Sky News. Mr Kyle said Labour was 'absolutely laser-focused' on delivering manifesto pledges amid questions about how competing commitments will be balanced with little room for manoeuvre amid narrow fiscal headroom. Asked about the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament, the minister declined to guarantee Housing Secretary Angela Rayner's department would not face cuts. But he added: 'We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that.' He said the Government was also 'on the way' to delivering 13,000 new police officers, another manifesto pledge. Ms Reeves has acknowledged that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. She blamed the former Conservative government's stewardship of the economy rather than her self-imposed fiscal rules, which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. It comes after the Government announced science and technology sectors would receive new funding as part of an £86 billion package set to be confirmed next week. Mr Kyle's Department for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSIT) said the money would help research into new drug treatments and microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Tories accused Labour of copying their own plans in office over the commitment. Shadow technology secretary Alan Mak said: 'Labour's central budget announcement seems to be a reheat of Conservative plans just showing this Chancellor will copy and paste anyone's ideas to get out of the mess that she's put herself in. 'As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back.'
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Eurostar needs as much competition as possible
At least it didn't decide that the wrong type of snow made it impossible to run any more trains, or that too many leaves on the line made it far too risky to have an extra operator. Even so, the oddly named Office of Rail and Road, or ORR, last week decided that there is only enough depot space for one extra competitor to Eurostar to run trains from Britain to the rest of the Continent. The other companies queuing up to offer a service will have to be turned away. That is crazy. The rail service needs more competition not less – and anything that gets in the way of that should be fixed before the service gets any worse. Few of us were probably aware of the ORR until last week, although the regulator has more than 350 staff doing something or other, and a budget of more than £40m a year to spend. Last week, however, it made a significant decision that will have an impact on anyone who travels between Britain and the rest of Europe by train. A whole series of rival companies had been preparing to offer rival services to Eurostar running trains through the Channel Tunnel. Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Trains was pitching to run a service on the route, and so were Gemini Trains, chaired by the Labour peer Lord Berkeley, as well as Trenitalia, the main operating arm of the Italian state rail operator. If the tunnel was genuinely opened up, plenty of other companies might have come into the market, such as Germany's Deutsche Bhan, which has expressed an interest in the past; one of the other rail companies; or indeed an airline company such as Air France KLM, which could use the train route to feed long-haul passengers into its Paris hub. St Pancras International could have been humming with new competitors pitching different possibilities. But the ORR has decided that there is only enough space at the depot for one extra competitor on the route. 'The assessment suggests there is room for at most one new operator, or for Eurostar, to grow,' it concluded. At a stroke, the vision of lots of new players has been dashed. Of course in fairness, the ORR is just doing its job, and no one would want to question its decision about the capacity at the depot. It is important that all the trains are properly maintained, and if there is not enough space for more than one extra operator at the moment, then clearly that is a problem. And yet, looking at the bigger picture, it is also completely ridiculous. If we need more depot space, then surely we should just build it. Likewise, if we need another platform, or an extra stop along the route through Kent, or even just space for another Pret so the passengers can pick up a sandwich before they hop on a train to the Continent, then we should build that as well. It would hardly be impossible.
