Modifications in DRS, stop-clock in Tests, only one ball after 35th over in ODIs: ICC makes wholesale rule changes
The International Cricket Council (ICC) has rolled out a series of significant rule changes across all formats of men's international cricket, including modifications to the Decision Review System (DRS), over-rate penalties in Tests, and updates to ball usage in One Day Internationals (ODIs). While the new Test playing conditions have already come into effect with the commencement of the 2025–27 World Test Championship (WTC) cycle, the white-ball changes will be enforced from July 2. India's Rishabh Pant in action(Action Images via Reuters)
Here's a summary of the most notable adjustments across formats, as reported by ESPNCrifinfo:
After its successful implementation in limited-overs cricket, the stop clock is now part of the Test format as a measure to tackle slow over rates — a long-standing issue. Fielding teams will be required to start a new over within 60 seconds of the previous one ending. Umpires can issue up to two warnings, after which a five-run penalty will be imposed for further delays. These warnings will reset after every block of 80 overs. The clock will count upward from 0 to 60 seconds. Ball Change Rule Updated for Saliva Use
While the ban on saliva remains in place, the ICC has made it optional — not mandatory — for umpires to change the ball if saliva is applied. This move is aimed at preventing teams from intentionally applying saliva to manipulate ball replacement. Umpires will now assess whether the ball's condition has significantly changed — appearing wetter or shinier — before opting to replace it. If they deem the condition unaffected, the ball will stay in play, and the batting side will be awarded five penalty runs. No further replacement will occur, even if the ball starts behaving unusually later. DRS: Secondary Mode of Dismissal Now Carries Original Decision Weight
In a key change to the DRS protocol, the ICC has clarified how secondary modes of dismissal will be handled. For instance, if a batter is given out caught behind but replays show no bat contact, the TV umpire will review a potential LBW decision if it brushes his pad.
Unlike before, where the secondary decision defaulted to 'not out,' now the original 'out' decision will carry over into the LBW review. If ball-tracking returns an umpire's call, the batter will remain out. This change makes the review process more consistent with the on-field umpire's original verdict. Combined Reviews To Be Assessed Chronologically
Under updated review protocols, when both an umpire and a player refer the same delivery for different incidents — such as LBW and run out — the TV umpire will assess them in the order they occurred. Previously, umpire reviews were addressed first, irrespective of timing.
According to Rule 3.9, if the first review results in a dismissal, the ball will be declared dead, making any subsequent incident irrelevant. For example, if the batter is found out LBW, a follow-up run-out review will not be considered. Fairness of Catch to Be Checked Even on No-Balls
In the past, if a no-ball was identified during a check for a contentious catch, the third umpire would skip assessing the fairness of the catch. Under the revised rule, the fairness of the catch will still be reviewed. If it's clean, the batting side will only receive the extra run for the no-ball. If not, any runs completed by the batters will count. Deliberate Short Runs Will Now Be Penalised Strategically
The ICC has strengthened its stance on deliberate short runs. If umpires determine a batter intentionally failed to make ground during a run to unfairly steal extra runs, the fielding captain will be allowed to choose which batter faces the next delivery. A five-run penalty will also be imposed.
As clarified in Rule 18.5.1, if a run is aborted midway and there is no intent to deceive or gain an advantage, umpires will not treat it as deliberate. Full-Time Injury Substitutes Trial in Domestic First-Class Cricket
In a notable trial initiative, the ICC has encouraged member boards to implement full-time replacements for players suffering external, serious injuries in domestic first-class cricket. The substitute must be a like-for-like replacement, akin to the current concussion substitute protocol.
This replacement will only be allowed if the injury is visible and apparent to the match officials. The rule does not apply to muscular injuries like hamstring strains or minor niggles. ODIs: Single Ball From 35th Over and Boundary Law Update
Starting July 2, ODIs will be played with one ball from the 35th over onward, instead of using two new balls from either end throughout the innings. This move is expected to bring greater reverse swing and help spinners later in the innings.
Additionally, a clarification has been issued on the Boundary Catch Law, aligning wording with the Spirit of Cricket to avoid confusion during airborne catches or boundary-line interventions.
These new regulations reflect the ICC's effort to streamline gameplay, strengthen fairness, and address long-standing concerns across formats. With a packed cricket calendar ahead, fans and players alike will be watching closely as these updates come into effect.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
44 minutes ago
- First Post
From stop clock to DRS protocols, all you need to know about changes to ICC's playing conditions
Here are all the changes to the International Cricket Council's playing conditions, some of which have already been implemented while the others are set to be introduced soon. read more The ICC has introduced a series of changes to its playing conditions, including on mandatory ball change after the application of saliva. Reuters The International Cricket Council (ICC) has made several changes to its playing conditions, some of which are already in effect while the others will be implemented from 2 July. Said changes include the introduction of a stop-clock in Test cricket, removal of the mandatory ball change after application of saliva among others, Decision Review System protocol for secondary reviews and combined reviews and more. Here's a detailed look at the changes in ICC's playing conditions across formats: STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Stop-clock in Test cricket Stop clocks have already been in place in One-Day Internationals and Twenty20 Internationals involving Full Members since 1 June, 2024 and has been introduced in Test cricket starting with the 2025-27 World Test Championship cycle – which got underway with the first Test between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in Galle on 17 June. In order to tackle the issue of slow over rates in the five-day format, which currently leads to penalties in the form of match fee deductions, the ICC has made it mandatory for fielding teams to be ready to start a new over within a minute of bowling the final delivery of the previous over. The umpires will give the fielding side two warnings before imposing a five-run penalty. Additionally, the warning count will be reset after every 80 overs. Mandatory ball change after application of saliva While the ICC isn't permitting players to use saliva on cricket balls, which has been in place since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the umpires are no longer required to change the ball soon as a player from the fielding team applies saliva on the ball. The umpires, therefore, will change the ball only if it is out of shape and does not pass the ring test, or it appears too wet or it has more shine, the decision of which will be left to the discretion of the umpires. Additionally, the ball will not be replaced if it starts doing things after the umpire has deemed the application of saliva has not altered its conditions. However, in such a scenario, the bowling team will be slapped with a five-run penalty. DRS protocols – secondary reviews and combined reviews In the Decision Review System (DRS), the original call for a secondary review will be set to 'Out' instead of 'Not Out'. So if a batter opts for a review after getting caught-behind, and the umpire decides to check for LBW after finding no contact with the bat, then an 'Umpire's Call' will lead to the batter getting the marching orders instead of staying put at the crease, which was the case until now. Additionally, combined reviews will follow a chronological order – i.e. if there's an appeal for an LBW as well as a run-out, the TV umpire will check the first mode of dismissal before moving on to the latter. In case the batter is out LBW, the run-out will not matter as the ball will have become dead at that point. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Fairness of a catch off a no-ball The umpires will also analyse the fairness of a catch taken off a no-ball. Earlier, the on-field umpires would not bother with the fairness of a catch once they signalled a no-ball, or were made aware of the same by the third umpire. However, as per the new rules, the umpires will have to check the fairness of a catch to decide whether to award extra runs collected by a batter off the illegal delivery. If the catch is fair, then the batting side will only get one run courtesy the no-ball. If not, then the extra runs collected by the batter by running between the wickets will also be added. Penalty for deliberate short run The batting team will be slapped with a five-run penalty if one of the batters is found to have taken a short run – that is turned around for a second run without grounding his bat on the other side of the non-striker's crease. However, in case the short run is adjudged to be deliberate on the part of the guilty batter, then the fielding team will be given the choice of picking the batter on strike in addition to the five-run penalty. 'A deliberate short run is an attempt for batters to appear to run more than one run, while at least one batter deliberately does not make good their ground at one end. Batters may choose to abort a run, provided the umpire believes that there was no intention by the batter concerned to deceive the umpires or to score the run in which they didn't make their ground,' reads Rule 18.5.1 of the playing conditions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Replacements in domestic cricket The ICC has also asked boards to trial a full-time playing replacement for players getting ruled out due to injuries in the middle of a game. Said player, however, will have to be a like-for-like replacement, which is the case for the concussion substitute rule that has been in place in cricket for years now. Additionally, the injury to the player needing replacement will also need to be evident and visible to match officials, and will not include hamstring issues and other niggles. The rule is being piloted on a trial basis and is entirely up to member boards whether they intend to introduce it or not.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
ICC's Big Rule Changes, From Stop Clock To DRS To Saliva Use
The ICC has introduced stop clock in Test cricket to deal with slow over rates while allowing fielding teams to decide which batter should be on strike in case of a 'deliberate' short-run as part of the playing conditions for 2025-27 World Test Championship cycle. The new rules have been implemented from the 2025-2027 World Test Championship which got underway with the first of the two Tests between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in Galle. According to the ICC Test Match Playing Conditions on the governing body's website, the use of the stop clock — like in limited-overs cricket — has been implemented to eradicate the issue of slow over-rate. "The fielding side shall be ready to start each over within 60 seconds of the previous over being completed. An electronic clock will be displayed at the ground that counts up seconds from zero to 60,' the ICC said. The fielding side will thus be given two warnings and in case of a third infraction, the batting side will be awarded with five penalty runs. These warnings will be reset to zero after the completion of 80 overs, the ICC said. Saliva Use Meanwhile, ESPNcricinfo reported that the ICC no longer mandates the umpires to change the ball once they discover saliva on it. The ban on the use of saliva remains in force. The website said fielding teams may deliberately apply saliva on the ball to force a ball-change but the current document available on playing conditions for men's Test cricket does not mention any such change. DRS calls The ICC also said in case there are instances of referrals being made by both player and the on-field umpire, the process will be carried out in a chronological order, effectively as per the order of their occurrence. The ICC instructed that in case of a second review of a decision adjudged 'out' by an on-field umpire, the default decision for the subsequent mode of dismissal will remain 'out'. For example, if a batter challenges an on-field call for caught-behind and is adjudged not out with the replays showing the ball hit the pads, the TV umpire would subsequently turn to see if the batter was out leg-before. In such a scenario, the default decision for this mode of dismissal will be 'out' and if the ball-tracking shows 'umpire's call', the batter will be given 'out'. Deliberate short run In case of a 'deliberate short run', the ICC explained, 'A deliberate short run is an attempt for batters to appear to run more than one run, while at least one batter deliberately does not make good their ground at one end.' 'Batters may choose to abort a run, provided the umpire believes that there was no intention by the batter concerned to deceive the umpires or to score the run in which they didn't make their ground.' In such scenarios, the umpire at the bowler's end will disallow all runs to the batting side, return any not out batter to his original end, signal a no-ball or a wide-ball if applicable, make a short-run signal to the scorers, award five penalty runs to the fielding side and 'request their captain to identify which of the two batters will be on strike for the next delivery'. The ICC said the TV umpire will now review the fairness of a catch taken off a no-ball. In case if a fair catch, the batting side will get an extra run for the no-ball and in case the catch is not cleanly taken, the batting side would get the runs the batters would have taken. In previous edition of the playing conditions, the TV umpire was not needed to look into the fairness of a catch off a no ball.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
ICC introduces new rule stop clock in new World Test Championship cycle
The ICC has introduced stop clock in Test cricket to deal with slow over rates while allowing fielding teams to decide which batter should be on strike in case of a deliberate' short-run as part of the playing conditions for 2025-27 World Test Championship cycle. The new rules have been implemented from the 2025-2027 World Test Championship which got underway with the first of the two Tests between Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in Galle. According to the ICC Test Match Playing Conditions on the governing body's website, the use of the stop clock like in limited-overs cricket has been implemented to eradicate the issue of slow over-rate. The fielding side shall be ready to start each over within 60 seconds of the previous over being completed. An electronic clock will be displayed at the ground that counts up seconds from zero to 60, the ICC said. The fielding side will thus be given two warnings and in case of a third infraction, the batting side will be awarded with five penalty runs. These warnings will be reset to zero after the completion of 80 overs, the ICC said. Meanwhile, ESPNcricinfo reported that the ICC no longer mandates the umpires to change the ball once they discover saliva on it as the ban on the use of saliva remains in force. The website said fielding teams may deliberately apply saliva on the ball to force a ball-change but the current document available on playing conditions for men's Test cricket does not mention any such change. The ICC also said in case there are instances of referrals being made by both player and the on-field umpire, the process will be carried out in a chronological order, effectively as per the order of their occurrence.