What is the cheapest fully loaded new car for 2025? Why this Nissan model stands out
What is the cheapest fully loaded new car for 2025? Why this Nissan model stands out The average new car price is nearly $50K in 2025. You can get this fully loaded new car for less than half of the average new car price.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Nissan offers US workers buyouts, halts pay rises: internal emails
Nissan has started offering buyouts to U.S. workers and has suspended merit-based wage increases worldwide, internal emails reviewed by Reuters showed, as the automaker expands cost cuts amid weak performance in key markets.
Reuters
Several affordable new cars have starting prices under $25,000 despite rising new car prices.
One subcompact car from Nissan has such a low price range that even its final trim is sub $25K.
Drivers can add optional packages and accessories to this affordable model to make it even more appealing.
Buying a new car can be incredibly expensive, especially a final trim model. The average new car price in June 2025 is around $48,699, according to automotive research site CarEdge.com. Luckily for American drivers, you can score a fully-loaded new car for less than half of that price.
That's right, some new cars have starting prices under $25,000, even as fully loaded models. Drivers can add available packages and accessories and still get a new final configuration vehicle for under $30K.
The Nissan Versa SR is the cheapest fully-loaded car for 2025
There are several new affordable cars on the market for 2025, but the Versa stands out among the pack. It starts at just $17,190 for the base model. The 2025 Nissan Versa SR trim starts at $22,330 and comes standard with the best Versa features that the Japanese brand has to offer.
2025 Nissan Versa SR standard features
Heated front seats
Leather-wrapped steering wheel
Wired Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
Wi-Fi hotspot
Blind-spot warning
The SR trim is loaded with plenty of standard driver-assistance and safety features that make upgrading to the final configuration worth the money. Furthermore, it takes an affordable subcompact car that is inherently barebones due to its affordability and modernizes it with additional tech and creature comforts.
2025 Nissan Versa SR colors, specs, and add-ons
The 2025 Nissan Versa SR comes in Super Black, Gun Metallic, or Brilliant Silver Metallic. Drivers can pay an additional $450 for premium color options such as Scarlet Ember Tintcoat, Artic Ice Blue Metallic, Gray Sky Pearl, or Aspen White Tricoat.
The Versa SR uses a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine to produce 122 horsepower and 114 pound-feet of torque. It achieves 32 miles per gallon in the city and 40 miles per gallon on the highway.
Nissan offers the option to add exterior ground lighting with logo for $424, for drivers proud to rep the brand. There are also interior add-on options such as accent lighting ($262) and door pocket lighting ($113). Adding interior, lighting and technology, and cargo accessories can still amount to a final price of under $25,000 depending on your specific build preferences.
Is the 2025 Nissan Versa SR worth buying?
The 2025 Nissan Versa SR is worth the money for drivers in search of an affordable and efficient subcompact car loaded with tech. Its small cabin and lack of power may deter drivers who prefer larger and more powerful cars.
It has "lots of features for the money, generous cargo capacity, and a user-friendly infotainment system" according to a vehicle review by Edmunds. So, the Versa SR makes a fine daily driver for folks who don't need extra cabin space and don't mind sluggish acceleration.
Nissan offers several budget-friendly options across its portfolio of vehicles. If the Versa SR isn't to your liking, the larger and more powerful 2025 Nissan Sentra SR is worth looking into.
The most affordable 2025 final trim cars
2025 Nissan Sentra SR Midnight Edition ($25,285)
2025 Kia K4 GT-Line Turbo ($28,090)
2025 Toyota Corolla Hybrid XLE ($28,190)
2025 Hyundai Elantra N-Line ($28,975)
2025 Volkswagen Jetta SEL ($29,000)
There are several 2025 final trim cars with starting prices under $30,000. The Nissan Versa SR is the only 2025 final trim car model with a starting price under $23,000. It may be underpowered and small compared to other final trim cars, but its value proposition is hard to ignore in such an expensive new car market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Executive Chairman of 360 Capital REIT Picks Up 22% More Stock
Potential 360 Capital REIT (ASX:TOT) shareholders may wish to note that the Executive Chairman, Tony Pitt, recently bought AU$260k worth of stock, paying AU$0.38 for each share. That's a very solid buy in our book, and increased their holding by a noteworthy 22%. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. In fact, the recent purchase by Tony Pitt was the biggest purchase of 360 Capital REIT shares made by an insider individual in the last twelve months, according to our records. That implies that an insider found the current price of AU$0.39 per share to be enticing. Of course they may have changed their mind. But this suggests they are optimistic. While we always like to see insider buying, it's less meaningful if the purchases were made at much lower prices, as the opportunity they saw may have passed. Happily, the 360 Capital REIT insider decided to buy shares at close to current prices. The only individual insider to buy over the last year was Tony Pitt. Tony Pitt bought 1.34m shares over the last 12 months at an average price of AU$0.38. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction! Check out our latest analysis for 360 Capital REIT 360 Capital REIT is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of under-the-radar companies with insider buying. Many investors like to check how much of a company is owned by insiders. I reckon it's a good sign if insiders own a significant number of shares in the company. From looking at our data, insiders own AU$2.1m worth of 360 Capital REIT stock, about 2.5% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. We prefer to see high levels of insider ownership. It's certainly positive to see the recent insider purchase. We also take confidence from the longer term picture of insider transactions. However, we note that the company didn't make a profit over the last twelve months, which makes us cautious. While the overall levels of insider ownership are below what we'd like to see, the history of transactions imply that 360 Capital REIT insiders are reasonably well aligned, and optimistic for the future. While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. To help with this, we've discovered 3 warning signs (1 is a bit concerning!) that you ought to be aware of before buying any shares in 360 Capital REIT. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Automotive Industry Faces Supply Chain Turmoil
Via Metal MIner The Automotive MMI (Monthly Metals Index) moved sideways month-over-month, dropping by 0.70%. This comes as auto industry executives in the U.S. are confronting a whirlwind of trade and supply chain disruptions, not to mention the effects of the recent round of Trump tariffs. In the past month alone, high-stakes U.S.–China trade talks, critical mineral export curbs and seesawing metal tariffs have shaken procurement strategies across the automotive sector. From rare earth shortages forcing factory shutdowns to volatile steel and aluminum costs pressuring budgets, the landscape is shifting daily. The good news? A tentative trade truce may be emerging. Urgent closed-door negotiations ensued following China's rare earths restrictions in April and May. In early June, U.S. and Chinese trade teams met in London and reportedly reached a handshake deal to resolve the impasse. China agreed to resume rare earth shipments in volume, while the U.S. signaled it might ease certain tech export curbs. In fact, Beijing quietly began approving export licenses for key customers. According to sources at Reuters, China granted temporary rare earth export licenses to suppliers of GM, Ford and Stellantis, the top U.S. automakers. The tentative deal also implies a rollback of some punitive duties. After the so-called Trump tariffs began in the spring, duties on both sides had climbed into the double and even triple digits during the skirmish. In one striking example, the White House more than doubled U.S. steel import tariffs from 25% to 50%. The goal was to pressure Beijing, but it inadvertently spiked domestic input costs. Now, with a 90-day truce in place, negotiators are expected to scale back the latest Trump tariffs in tandem with China loosening its mineral controls. For automotive procurement teams, any tariff relief on metals is welcome news that could potentially ease the price volatility for steel, aluminum and other key inputs. After the tariffs hit, automakers realized their exposure was frighteningly high. 'The whole car industry is in full panic,' Reuters quoted one European magnet supplier CEO as saying. They went on to note that some car factories could be idled by mid-July without backup magnet supplies. In response, companies and governments are racing to diversify sources of both rare earths and base metals. The industry's answer is a mix of innovation and old-fashioned resource hunting. Many automakers have been investing in alternative materials and technologies to reduce their reliance on Chinese rare earths. Several major OEMs, including GM, BMW, Stellantis and suppliers like ZF and BorgWarner, are engineering electric motors that require little to no rare earth content, while others are exploring novel magnet compositions or even rare-earth-free speakers and sensors. At the same time, Western firms are forging new supply lines. Mining projects for rare earths are springing up from Nebraska to Australia. Even recycling is part of the solution. Reuters reports that companies like Heraeus in Germany are currently trying to reclaim rare earths from used magnets, albeit on a small scale. Automakers are also directly investing upstream in base metals needed for electric vehicles. In one recent example, Volkswagen took a 9.9% stake in a Canadian lithium mining firm to secure a 10-year supply of battery-grade lithium. Earlier, GM committed $650 million to develop the largest U.S. lithium deposit in Nevada, as covered in These deals signal a new era of vertical integration, where carmakers act more like miners to ensure they have the raw materials to keep assembly lines running. For procurement professionals, the takeaway is clear: cast a wider net for suppliers and qualify alternative sources now, not when a crisis hits. Amidst all this, automakers are scrambling to avoid line stoppages by redesigning products and shuffling manufacturing plans. For example, some companies are preparing to build cars minus certain components (such as speaker systems or sensor modules) and park them until parts arrive. This is very similar to what GM and others did during the semiconductor chip shortage. It's a less-than-ideal workaround, but still better than no production at all. Meanwhile, engineers are hard at work redesigning components to use fewer vulnerable materials. Notably, EV makers are experimenting with motor designs that cut out heavy rare-earth elements. These designs use alternative magnet materials or clever motor geometries to maintain performance without the usual dose of neodymium or dysprosium. These types of innovations could reduce exposure to future export bans. However, retrofitting existing vehicle platforms is costly and time-consuming. Geopolitics is also prompting a geographic shuffle in manufacturing. With new U.S. tariffs hitting not just China but even friendly trade partners like Canada and Mexico, companies have an extra incentive to localize production in the United States. These disruptions come with a price tag. Input cost volatility has become a top concern for automakers' finance chiefs as commodity prices whip around. Over just the past quarter, tariff announcements have caused benchmark steel prices to climb, dip and spike again. Aluminum and copper have seen similar swings amid shifting trade policies and global demand uncertainty. Such volatility can wreak havoc on vehicle profit margins, as raw metals account for a significant share of an automobile's bill of materials. Automakers are also doubling down on direct investments to secure supply and stable prices. We've seen car companies finance mining projects (lithium, nickel, copper, etc.) not just for supply security but to eventually procure those materials at negotiated, stable prices. Source:, MetalMiner Insights. By investing in a lithium mine, an OEM might ensure it can buy lithium at a fixed formula cost for a decade, thus insulating itself from market gyrations. Similarly, some companies are setting up joint ventures for battery material processing, effectively bringing more of the supply chain in-house to control costs. Moves like these are akin to an insurance policy against future price volatility. Perhaps the most straightforward strategy is simply passing costs down the line, which can mean renegotiating supplier contracts or adding surcharges to vehicle prices. Industry surveys indicate that new vehicle prices in the U.S. have ticked up in recent months, partly due to higher material costs stemming from the Trump tariffs being passed through. But there's a limit to how much automakers can raise prices in a competitive market, especially as interest rates and vehicle affordability weigh on demand. Thus, cost containment and smarter purchasing remain paramount. By Metal Miner More Top Reads From this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans vote to claw back $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid, NPR and PBS
The Republican-led House voted 214-212 on Thursday to pass a proposal from President Donald Trump to cancel $9.4 billion in previously approved federal funding. The 'rescissions' package would claw back $8.3 billion for foreign aid and $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to NPR and PBS. It is part of an effort by the White House to codify cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency, which was helmed by tech billionaire Elon Musk. Four House Republicans — Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Mike Turner of Ohio — voted with 208 Democrats to reject the measure. Some GOP members flipped their votes from 'no' to 'yes' toward the end after realizing it wouldn't pass otherwise. Four Democrats and two Republicans missed the vote. Three Democratic-held seats are vacant because of lawmaker deaths. Trump pushed Republicans to back the bill just ahead of the House vote, posting on social media, 'The Rescissions Bill is a NO BRAINER, and every single Republican in Congress should vote, 'YES.' MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' After the vote, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called the package a start to restoring 'fiscal discipline' in Washington. 'Today's passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step towards a more responsible and transparent government, that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first,' Johnson told reporters. 'It's just one of the ways that Republicans are codifying DOGE findings and putting taxpayer dollars to better use. 'There will be more of this in the days to come,' he added. The package now heads to the Senate, where it isn't subject to the 60-vote threshold, meaning Republicans can pass it along party lines. Some Republicans, like Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, have voiced concerns about cuts to PEPFAR — the Bush-era program to combat HIV/AIDS that has been credited with saving millions of lives in Africa. And Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has said she opposes cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, noting that parts of her state rely on it to meet important needs. 'Not only would a large portion of Alaska communities lose their local programming, but warning systems for natural disasters, power outages, boil water advisories, and other alerts would be severely hampered,' Murkowski said. 'What may seem like a frivolous expense to some has proven to be an invaluable resource that saves lives in Alaska.' Overall, the $9.4 billion in savings is a drop in the bucket compared to the $2.4 trillion in new deficits that Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would create, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Republicans are pushing to pass the larger bill through the Senate by July 4. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., slammed the rescission package as 'reckless' and said it would 'undermine America's national security, hurt our ability to protect the American people.' 'Republicans want to rip billions of dollars away from America's efforts to keep her people safe and secure to satisfy some extreme ideological crusade related to a deeply unpopular effort formerly led by Elon Musk to devastate the American way of life,' Jeffries said before the vote. This article was originally published on
