
Urgent Reform Needed To Address Mental Health Crisis In NZ Construction
More needs to be done to address the high rates of suicide in the construction industry, according to the head of one of the world's largest mentoring services for the sector.
Recent research shows New Zealand's construction sector is facing a mental health crisis, with suicide rates 25% higher than other sectors and Māori, Pasifika, female, migrant workers, apprentices and labourers among those at higher risk. This is due to a number of factors including financial instability, low pay and lack of mental health support.[1]
Marti Amos (Ngāpuhi), a former marketing lecturer at Otago University and the New Zealand-based head of The Professional Builder, says these issues are amplified by the industry's boom-and-bust cycle, cost-of-living crisis and a training model that prioritises trade skills over business acumen.[2]
'Kiwi tradespeople are trained to excel on-site, they are underprepared to manage the multimilliondollar business aspects of their work, with dire consequences for their mental wellbeing.
'Our construction workers account for about 7% of workingage male suicides - with nearly one worker losing his life to suicide each week and the avoidable burden and impact of suicide in the NZ construction industry has been estimated at $1.1 billion per annum,' he says.
Amos, whose coaching service has supported over 2,500 building companies worldwide over the past 21 years, says the growing mental health crisis among Kiwi builders requires a radical overhaul of the country's traditional construction model - with greater emphasis on financial literacy a priority.
'The New Zealand building industry is seeing its lowest levels of annual growth over a decade with a rate of just 0.6% in the second quarter of 2024 - a factor that is likely to exacerbate mental health concerns for many in the trade.
'Kiwi builders have been taught how to create outstanding projects, they're brilliant with the tools – but no one has taught them how to build a great business.
'In New Zealand and Australia, builders often employ their own teams and handle every aspect of a project themselves. This contrasts sharply with the U.S. model, where general contractors delegate tasks - reducing the burden on the individual,' he says.
Amos says his concerns extend beyond the daily operational stresses that plague many builders.
He says that without a proper understanding of financial management, many are left grappling with severe cashflow challenges, working long hours and sacrificing their personal lives - a situation that has, in many cases, led to overwhelming stress and deteriorating mental health.
'When you're constantly worrying about how to pay your subcontractors or secure payroll for the next week, it isn't just your business that suffers - it's your whole life,' he says.
Amos says demand for targeted support from builders around the world is growing rapidly and his service, The Professional Builder (TPB), which started with a team of three people in 2004, has expanded to 56 and is projected to reach 100 employees within the next 18 months. Company revenue is also projected to double to $30 million within the same timeframe.
He says TPB operates in five main countries: the US, Canada, the UK, New Zealand and their fastest growing market - Australia.
The company has launched an expansion programme to grow the US market, with plans to increase their physical presence there and establish partnerships with hardware wholesalers, similar to their relationships with Carters, ITM and Mitre 10 in New Zealand.
Amos says as part of a move to improve financial management in the sector he has now authored a book, The Profitable Builders Playbook, which is aimed at equipping builders with the business acumen needed to navigate these challenges.
'At the moment they're stuck on the builder's 'hamster wheel', caught in the weeds of daily operations without the skills to manage the large sums of money and complex challenges that come with running a construction company.
'What we need is to implement business training into apprenticeship programmes to ensure that our future generations of builders are as adept at managing large-scale financial responsibilities as they are at delivering quality craftsmanship.
'With a vital sector at risk and the mental health of thousands hanging in the balance, my message is clear: reform is essential.
'As New Zealand's construction industry stands at a crossroads, stakeholders must adopt a more balanced training model - one that nurtures not only technical excellence but also financial literacy and sustainable business practices.
'This call for change is more than an economic imperative; it is a matter of safeguarding the well-being of those who build our nation,' he says.
More information on The Profitable Builders Playbook is available here
[1] BRANZ. (2024). Workplace psychosocial stressors in the construction industry. Retrieved from here.
[2] BRANZ. (2024). Workplace psychosocial stressors in the construction industry. Retrieved from here.
Marti Amos
Marti Amos (Ngāpuhi) is a business strategist, entrepreneur, and global mentor who has helped over 2,500 building company owners scale their businesses and achieve financial independence. As the founder of The Professional Builder (TPB), he has built a team of 56 professionals operating across New Zealand, Australia, Canada, the UK, the US, and Puerto Rico, delivering business growth strategies for the construction sector.
Born and raised in Stewart Island, Marti studied commerce at Otago University, where he pursued PhD research on branding. He lectured in Marketing and MBA programs, examined MCom theses, and worked as a Māori students' tutor and thesis officer in Otago's Commerce Division. As a Mannaki Scholarship recipient, he was also awarded the Otago University Postgraduate Māori Scholarship in 1998.
Beyond academia, Marti has built eight businesses across wholesale, insurance, mortgage banking, cleaning, and coaching. As founder of Action Coach New Zealand, he ranked NZ's #1 business coach and #2 globally out of 1,250 coaches worldwide. His expertise in business scaling and financial strategy led him to develop TPB, which helps construction business owners increase profitability and efficiency through structured business systems and mentorship.
His insights on business growth and financial resilience will be shared in his upcoming book, launching in May 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines
Photo: 123RF Means testing is being introduced on a wide range of benefits. Questions are being asked over how long it will be before superannuation is targeted. Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in Kiwisaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. "There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means tested with one big exception." Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. "You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. "Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation." Means testing superannuation is also not as straight forward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing "which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire". Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of "two horrible options" and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is "more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age". "But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well thought through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about Kiwisaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners," Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. "The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected." The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a Kiwisaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well off, "because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age ... you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. "This is not what's happened here." Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
New Zealand's mean testing creep
Photo: 123RF Means testing is being introduced on a wide range of benefits. Questions are being asked over how long it will be before superannuation is targeted. Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in Kiwisaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. "There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means tested with one big exception." Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. "You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. "Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation." Means testing superannuation is also not as straight forward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing "which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire". Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of "two horrible options" and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is "more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age". "But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well thought through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about Kiwisaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners," Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. "The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected." The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a Kiwisaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well off, "because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age ... you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. "This is not what's happened here." Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Migrant communities celebrate parent visa, amid concerns it'll lock many out
Parents and their sponsor will need to meet a range of health and income requirements to qualify for the new visa. Photo: RNZ Migrant communities are hailing a new visa which will allow parents of New Zealand citizens and residents to visit multiple times over a five-year period. Applications for the visa - announced by the government yesterday - will open from 29 September, with parents and their sponsor needing to meet a range of health and income requirements. But the Green Party has concerns it would lock out all but the most wealthy. The Parent Boost visa allows migrants to sponsor their parents to visit and stay in New Zealand for up to five years, with the option to extend for five more. The prime minister said it would mean a lot for many families. "Many, many other countries around the world have started to back off from visas like this. But it's so important to our migrant community, when we know how hard they work, and what they're doing to try and raise their families and strengthen their communities, and we want to be able to support them in this way," Christopher Luxon said. To get the visa, parents will need to have an eligible sponsor, meet acceptable character and health standards, and have at least one year of health insurance coverage providing emergency medical cover, repatriation, return of remains, and cancer treatment. While offshore during the third year of their visa, the parent would need to complete a new medical assessment and demonstrate they had maintained their insurance. The sponsor must also earn the median wage to sponsor one parent, or one and a half times the median wage for both parents. Otherwise, the parent or parents must have an ongoing income aligning with the superannuation rate, or have available funds of $160,000 for a single parent or $250,000 for both, to see them through the duration of their visa. Both National and ACT campaigned on a parent visitor visa in 2023. The policy was secured in the coalition agreement, although ACT wanted an annual $3500 fee, which would go into a public health fund, and ensure the visa was self-funding. ACT immigration spokesperson Parmjeet Parmar was at the announcement and while she was celebrating it, she said she did not want to see any situations where migrants were forced to remortgage their house to pay for emergency hospital bills. "Having a health insurance component is helpful, but sometimes it can also be a risk if the health insurance co-pay doesn't cover the cost, because I don't want to see any sponsor in any kind of debt," she said. Immigration minister Erica Stanford said the insurance component was necessary. "When you come to New Zealand on a visitor visa, there is no ability for you to go into the public service and receive healthcare. That's why, when you're here for five years, there needs to be that insurance component," she said. Insurance from an overseas provider would also be eligible. Luxon was confident the right balance had been struck. "We have to find the balance where you've got visitors from overseas who then want to access public services in New Zealand, but yet they haven't been taxpayers for 40 years, and that's not fair on New Zealanders who are here. But equally, we don't want it to be so onerous and unachievable," Luxon said. Ethnic and Faith Communities Network convenor Abdur Razzaq said the announcement was a long time coming, and was a significant step towards ensuring ethnic minorities in New Zealand would feel like they were part of New Zealand's fabric. "What we have got now is families who can be actually families," he said. He said many doctors, engineers, and IT professionals had been leaving New Zealand because their parents could not come. "Canada has had this for a long time, and it's worked." Razzaq believed it struck the right balance so there would not be burdens on the health and housing sectors. Daljit Singh from the Supreme Sikh Society said he had been lobbying Parliament for this kind of visa for years. "It's a benefit to every migrant in this country. It is the opportunity for parents to stay with their children," he said. But Singh continued to have concerns about the income thresholds. "There is still a gap between rich and poor. Everybody wants, actually, to stay with their parents." The Green Party's immigration spokesperson Ricardo Menéndez March said the income requirements would lock out thousands of migrant families. "Low-waged workers that National called essential during the pandemic will be missing out on being able to have their parents living with them in their new homeland," he said. Menéndez March had concerns that when the visas expired, migrants would end up sending more money offshore instead of in New Zealand, and using up weeks of leave to see their ageing parents. The visa is not a pathway to residency. Parents would not be able to work in New Zealand, but would be able to do remote work for their offshore employer. Luxon said checks and balances would be in place to ensure parents and their sponsors met their obligations. "I know people will respect it, but it's really important that people meet their obligations, and so there will be stronger enforcement as well associated to make sure that people are not abusing the system or taking advantage of the system," he said. The existing $441 Parent and Grandparent visitor visa allows relatives to stay for six months at a time, for a maximum of 18 months over a three year period. A separate Parent Resident visa lets parents live in New Zealand indefinitely, but comes with English language requirements, costs $5810, and needs an expression of interest before being invited to apply. They can apply for permanent residence after ten years. There is also a Parent Retirement Resident visa which costs $12,850, and requires parents to have an adult child who is a New Zealand citizen or resident living in New Zealand, have at least $1 million to invest in New Zealand for four years and at least $500,000 for settlement, and an annual income of at least $60,000. After the four years, the parent can apply for permanent residence. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.