logo
From Startup to State Asset? Former Hedge Fund Manager Warns Elon Musk's Dojo Is Quietly Becoming National Infrastructure

From Startup to State Asset? Former Hedge Fund Manager Warns Elon Musk's Dojo Is Quietly Becoming National Infrastructure

Yahoo3 days ago

BALTIMORE, June 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- It started as a Tesla project. But according to former hedge fund manager Enrique Abeyta's recent briefing, Elon Musk's Dojo may soon be functioning as critical U.S. infrastructure — without anyone officially calling it that.
What began as an AI chip built to replace Nvidia has quickly evolved into a full-stack platform capable of running autonomous vehicles, training machine vision systems, and powering physical AI across industries.
'This is how it happens,' Abeyta says. 'You build something private… and then one day, the government needs it more than anyone else.'
The Private Chip That's Becoming Public Policy
Dojo was born out of necessity — after Nvidia couldn't meet Musk's needs. The result? A custom chip now reported to be 6x more powerful than Nvidia's best-selling model, optimized for training AI on real-world video at massive scale.
Every day, Tesla's fleet feeds Dojo with 160 billion frames of visual data, helping the system learn how to operate in the physical world — without human help.
On June 1st, Tesla is expected to launch a robotaxi with no steering wheel, no pedals, and no fallback to human control.
AI Without a Kill Switch
Dojo's value isn't just speed — it's autonomy. Abeyta believes that's what makes it so appealing to government agencies quietly searching for domestic alternatives to foreign tech dependence.
'Once you control the AI, the chips, the vehicles, and the data — you're not a car company anymore,' he says. 'You're a national asset in everything but name.'
And the signs are already here: According to internal reports, one of Musk's key Dojo partners is 'expecting to receive billions of dollars from the Trump administration.'
That aligns with a recent executive order from President Trump, aimed at 'removing barriers to American AI innovation.'
The Tesla Effect: When Platforms Become Policy
This wouldn't be the first time Musk built something the government eventually leaned on — from satellites to EV infrastructure. But Abeyta says Dojo is different.
It's not about energy or communication. It's about machine-level control over physical environments — and that means its future may not be up to Tesla at all.
About Enrique Abeyta
Enrique Abeyta is a former hedge fund manager with more than two decades of experience tracking large-scale industrial and capital transformations. After managing nearly $4 billion in institutional funds, he now leads Breaking Profits, a research platform focused on identifying the hidden infrastructure reshaping America's future — from finance to tech to defense.
Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@paradigmpressgroup.comErreur lors de la récupération des données
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Erreur lors de la récupération des données

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Godfather Of AI' Launches Nonprofit Focused On Safer Systems
‘Godfather Of AI' Launches Nonprofit Focused On Safer Systems

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

‘Godfather Of AI' Launches Nonprofit Focused On Safer Systems

Yoshua Bengio testifies on the importance of AI regulation at a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee ... More hearing in July 2023. Computer scientist Yoshua Bengio, often referred to as the 'godfather' of AI, has launched a nonprofit aimed at creating AI systems that prioritize safety over business priorities. The organization, called LawZero, 'was founded in response to evidence that today's frontier AI models are developing dangerous capabilities and behaviors, including deception, self-preservation and goal misalignment,' reads a statement posted to its website on Tuesday. 'LawZero's work will help to unlock the immense potential of AI in ways that reduce the likelihood of a range of known dangers associated with today's systems, including algorithmic bias, intentional misuse and loss of human control.' LawZero is structured as a nonprofit 'to ensure it is insulated from market and government pressures, which risk compromising AI safety,' the statement says. Bengio is a worldwide leader in AI and a co-recipient of the 2018 A.M. Turing Award, the Association for Computing Machinery's prestigious annual prize that's sometimes called the Nobel Prize of Computing. He won the award alongside two other deep-learning pioneers — Geoffrey Hinton, another 'godfather of AI' who worked at Google, and Yann LeCun — for conceptual and engineering breakthroughs, made over decades, that have positioned deep neural networks as a critical component of computing. While artificial intelligence has sparked considerable excitement across industries — and Bengio recognizes its potential as a driver of significant innovation — it's also led to mounting concerns about possible pitfalls. Generative AI tools are capable of producing text, images and video that spread almost instantly over social media and can be difficult to distinguish from the real thing. Bengio has called for slowing the development of AI systems to better understand and regulate them. 'There is no guarantee that someone in the foreseeable future won't develop dangerous autonomous AI systems with behaviors that deviate from human goals and values,' the University of Montreal professor wrote in a blog post announcing why he'd signed a 2023 open letter calling for a slowdown in the development of some AI tools. He has signed other such statements, and appeared in front of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law to outline the risks of AI misuse. Bengio also serves as scientific director at Mila (Montreal Institute for Learning Algorithms), an artificial-intelligence research institute. Now, he'll add LawZero president and scientific director to his resume. LawZero says it's assembling a team of world-class AI researchers, though it did not immediately respond to a request for comment on who is included in that group. Together, the scientists are working on a system called Scientist AI, which LawZero calls a safer, more secure alternative to many of the commercial AI systems being developed and released today. Scientist AI is non-agentic, meaning it doesn't have agency or work autonomously, but instead behaves in response to human input and goals. 'Such AI systems could be used to provide oversight for agentic AI systems, accelerate scientific discovery and advance the understanding of AI risks and how to avoid them,' LawZero says. 'LawZero believes that AI should be cultivated as a global public good—developed and used safely towards human flourishing.'

Trump's early-term momentum has hit a wall. Here's why.
Trump's early-term momentum has hit a wall. Here's why.

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump's early-term momentum has hit a wall. Here's why.

Trump's early-term momentum has hit a wall. Here's why. From Gaza to Ukraine and from federal judges to the Federal Reserve, President Donald Trump has seen his early White House successes take a back seat to emerging struggles. Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk slams Trump's big tax bill on X Days after leaving the White House, Elon Musk slammed President Trump's big tax bill on X. WASHINGTON − Governing? Harder than it looked. Just as Donald Trump is pushing to pass the centerpiece of his domestic agenda, former BFF Elon Musk is trashing his "big, beautiful bill" as "a disgusting abomination." The president's prediction that Vladimir Putin would heed his entreaties to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours is stretching into Month Five. Judges he appointed to the bench are daring to rule against him. From cutting federal spending to deporting illegal immigrants, from reaching a nuclear deal with Iran to negotiating a ceasefire in Gaza, Team Trump is running into roadblocks that are making it difficult to deliver on promises he confidently made before moving into the White House. More: Trump erupts when asked about 'TACO trade' ― a new nickname mocking his tariff approach There are some skid marks where the rubber has met the road. To be sure, some of Trump's problems come from a surplus of early successes and from the breadth of his ambitions. Through a flood of executive orders and actions, he has launched a transformation of the USA's approach to the world and the federal government's role in Americans' lives. Congressional Democrats are still struggling to craft a consistent and coherent strategy against him. But the pushback from other forces has become increasingly problematic for the White House − pushback from skeptical judges, foreign leaders with their own priorities, a steady-as-she-goes Federal Reserve and the reality of budget arithmetic. If Trump's first 100 days were a rollercoaster, the second 100 days, a span that ends on Aug. 8, are proving to be a bit of a slog. Ukraine: 'It'll be done within 24 hours' The question for Trump − as it was for many of his predecessors in the White House − is how he chooses to respond, whether he doubles down or adjusts his goals and tactics when obstacles loom. Consider Ukraine. In dozens of campaign speeches, candidate Trump said he would settle the war in Ukraine within a day of taking office, and perhaps even before he moved in. More: Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike "I know Zelenskyy, I know Putin," he said at one Pennsylvania rally, referring to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his Russian counterpart "It'll be done within 24 hours, you watch. They all say, 'That's such a boast.' It will be done very quickly.'" But Putin has swatted away Trump's demands for a quick ceasefire, and Ukrainian forces have engineered a stunning drone assault on Russian military forces. An end to the war seems nowhere in sight. "I'm very disappointed," Trump said on May 28. What does he do next? More: Russia demands harsh terms at Ukraine peace talks Trump has threatened sanctions on Russia but is clearly loath to impose them. He has also suggested the United States may just walk away, leaving the conflict to the two warring parties and the Europeans to figure out. He faces similar calculations on tariffs, where he has delayed or reduced his most far-reaching threats to China and elsewhere when they seemed to rattle the stock markets. Does he follow through on his July 8 deadline for trading partners to make deals or be hit with the most stringent tariffs in close to a century? And on Gaza, where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a longtime ally, has resisted the administration's efforts to negotiate a ceasefire. "Get it over with and let's get back to peace and stop killing people," Trump had vowed during the 2024 campaign. But the region is still wracked by chaos and violence, in recent days over the distribution of food aid. For presidents, a familiar problem Trump is hardly the first president to find himself stymied by the realities of governing and the frustrations of the balance of power. Franklin D. Roosevelt was so enraged by Supreme Court decisions undercutting his New Deal that in 1937 he proposed packing the court with additional, and presumably friendlier, justices. That idea went nowhere, though the high court started to be more welcoming to his initiatives. More than a half-century later, Bill Clinton adopted a strategy of cooperation with the new Republican House speaker, Newt Gingrich, when Democrats lost control of Congress in the 1994 midterm elections. The policy, dubbed "triangulation," dismayed liberal Democrats but led to welfare reform and a balanced budget. More: Elon Musk slams President Trump's big tax and policy bill as a 'disgusting abomination' After Democratic setbacks in the 2014 midterms, Barack Obama said he still had the ability to deploy "the pen and the phone" − that is, to sign executive actions and to activate outside allies. Trump enjoys considerable political assets, including the discombobulation of Democratic leaders and the loyalty of congressional Republicans. More: Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill That is being tested by the battle over the bill known as reconciliation. The sprawling measure would extend and expand tax cuts from Trump's first term, add billions of dollars for border security, and trim billions from Medicaid and clean-energy tax credits. It would also increase the national debt by a budget-busting $2.4 trillion over 10 years, according to the updated estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. In previous showdowns, Trump has prevailed in Congress, in part because GOP members see their reelections at risk if an unhappy president backs primary challengers against them. He is lobbying for the bill as "arguably the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country." But Musk, who until May 27 led Trump's DOGE budget-cutting initiative, has weighed in on the other side, warning the legislation would create a "crushingly unsustainable debt." His warnings are being cited by Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and a handful of other GOP senators alarmed by the bill's impact on the federal budget deficit. The tech billionaire posted an electoral threat of his own on X. The social-media platform is a political asset, too, not to mention the hundreds of millions of dollars that the world's richest man has been willing to spend in the past on political campaigns. "In November next year," he proposed, "we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people."

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Training Breach
Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Training Breach

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Reddit Sues Anthropic Over AI Training Breach

Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) has filed a federal lawsuit against Anthropic, the Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN)-backed creator of the Claude large language models, accusing the AI company of using Reddit's data without a license. The civil suit, reported by the Wall Street Journal, claims Anthropic trained its models on Reddit user content without permission and hit the platform's servers more than 100,000 times. According to the filing in California, Reddit attempted to negotiate a data licensing agreement with Anthropic but those discussions failed. Reddit has struck similar licensing deals with Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and OpenAI. It argues that Anthropic knowingly used its platform to build AI products without securing the proper rights or user consent. The legal move comes shortly after Anthropic released new modelsClaude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4aimed at advancing AI capabilities in coding, reasoning, and agent-based tasks. Shares of Reddit rose 7.5% in Wednesday afternoon trading following the announcement. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store