National Guard faces off with protesters hours after arriving in Los Angeles on Trump's orders
LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Tear gas was fired at protesters in Los Angeles on Sunday when some demonstrators moved close to National Guard troops and shouted insults at them, hours after President Donald Trump's extraordinary deployment of the military over the objections of the governor and mayor.
The confrontation broke out as hundreds of people protested in front of the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles, where several of the newly-arrived National Guard troops stood shoulder to shoulder behind plastic riot shields.
Video showed uniformed officers shooting off the smoke-filled canisters as they advanced into the street, forcing protesters to retreat. It was not immediately clear what prompted the use of chemical irritants or which law enforcement agency fired them.
Minutes later, loud popping sounds erupted again, as some protesters chanted "go home" and "shame." One person was taken to the ground by uniformed officers. Another appeared to be bleeding from their head.
Around 300 National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles early Sunday on orders from Trump, who accused Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats of failing to stanch recent protests targeting immigration agents.
The move appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's national guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts.
Deployment follows days of protest
The deployment followed two days of protests that began Friday in downtown Los Angeles before spreading on Saturday to Paramount, a heavily Latino city south of the city, and neighboring Compton.
As federal agents set up a staging area Saturday near a Home Depot in Paramount, demonstrators attempted to block Border Patrol vehicles, with some hurling rocks and chunks of cement. In response, agents in riot gear unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls.
Tensions were high after a series of sweeps by immigration authorities the previous day, as the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the city climbed above 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement.
The deployment of the National Guard came over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who accused Trump of a "complete overreaction" designed to create a spectacle of force.
The recent protests remain far smaller than past events that have brought the National Guard to Los Angeles, including the Watts and Rodney King riots, and the 2020 protests against police violence, in which Newsom requested the assistance of federal troops.
The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Trump says there will be 'very strong law and order'
In a directive Saturday, Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."
He said he had authorized the deployment of 2,000 members of the National Guard.
Trump told reporters as he prepared to board Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, Sunday that there were "violent people" in Los Angeles "and they're not gonna get away with it."
Asked if he planned to send U.S. troops to Los Angeles, Trump replied: "We're gonna have troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden." He didn't elaborate.
Trump also said that California officials who stand in the way of the deportations could face charges. A Wisconsin judge was arrested last month on accusations she helped a man evade immigration authorities.
"If officials stay in the way of law and order, yeah, they will face charges," Trump said.
Newsom called Trump on Friday night and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. It was not clear if they spoke Saturday or Sunday.
There was some confusion surrounding the exact timing of the guard's arrival. Shortly before midnight local time, Trump congratulated the National Guard on a "job well done." But less than an hour later, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said troops had yet to arrive in the city.
Defense secretary threatens to deploy active-duty Marines 'if violence continues'
In a statement Sunday, Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin accused California's politicians and protesters of "defending heinous illegal alien criminals at the expense of Americans' safety."
"Instead of rioting, they should be thanking ICE officers every single day who wake up and make our communities safer," McLaughlin added.
The troops included members of the California Army National Guard's 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, according to a social media post from the Department of Defense.
In a signal of the administration's aggressive approach, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also threatened to deploy active-duty Marines "if violence continues" in the region.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders said the order by Trump reflected "a president moving this country rapidly into authoritarianism" and "usurping the powers of the United States Congress."
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch Trump ally, endorsed the president's move, doubling down on Republicans' criticisms of California Democrats.
"Gavin Newsom has shown an inability or an unwillingness to do what is necessary, so the president stepped in," Johnson said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
G7 to Agree on Road Map for Rare Earth Procurement; June Summit Will Feature Documents of Agreement, Forgo Leaders' Statement to Avoid Inflaming Tensions
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo The leaders of the Group of Seven countries pose for a photo in Italy last year. One of the documents of agreement to be adopted at the upcoming summit of the leaders of the Group of Seven countries will call for the formulation within the year of a road map to diversify procurement of rare earth minerals, with the goal of lowering dependence on China, a major producer of rare earths and other resources, according to a draft of the document The Yomiuri Shimbun has obtained. The next G7 summit will be hosted by Canada in the Kananaskis region from June 15 to 17. Amid deepening division between the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and European countries, the G7 countries view stabilizing supply chains for critical minerals as a top priority and are trying to work together to achieve it. According to government sources, the G7 nations do not plan to formulate a leaders' declaration, a choice made to avoid highlighting divisions within the G7 over Trump's tariff policy and responses to Russia's aggression against Ukraine. Instead, preparations are under way to come up with documents of agreement on critical minerals and six other topics, such as artificial intelligence and measures against wildfires, on which consensus can be reached with relative ease. The draft statement on critical minerals obtained by the Yomiuri Shimbun notes that the G7 nations share common interests in national and economic security and suggests the danger of dependence on China without mentioning the country by name. It also goes on to say that a road map for the creation of a new marketplace based on procurement standards of critical minerals will be formulated. The draft states the procurement standards will be common standards to be shared by Japan, the United States and European countries, and it stipulates that each government will actively provide subsidies to mining companies and investment firms which meet these standards. During the previous summit, held last year in Italy, the G7 countries, in regard to procurement standards, affirmed a principle of giving consideration to concerns in addition to price, such as transparency and trustworthiness of procurement sources. According to European diplomatic sources, in order for this principle to be achieved quickly, the roadmap will include deadlines for addressing certain concerns, such as consultations with international organizations, mineral mining countries and companies; creation of detailed procurement standards; and formulation of guidelines for companies. The guidelines will apparently include a goal of keeping the percentage of rare earths procured from countries that do not meet these standards under a certain percentage. The G7 plans to encourage non-G7 countries to join their efforts. Rare earth minerals are used in electric vehicles and smartphones. China, which accounts for 70% of global production, has imposed restrictions on exports of them as a countermeasure to the Trump administration's high tariff policy.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Protests in Los Angeles: Trump Has Gone Too Far in Deploying U.S. Military Domestically
U.S. President Donald Trump has deployed U.S. troops within his country in the name of maintaining security. This is extremely unusual and a dangerous decision that could invite new chaos. Large-scale protests have continued in Los Angeles, Calif., in response to federal authorities' roundup of undocumented immigrants. Some people rioted and destroyed cars and other property, and the authorities have been trying to suppress them with tear gas sprays and other means. In light of this situation, Trump first dispatched National Guard troops to the area, saying that he would take strong measures. This was reportedly the first time a president has mobilized the National Guard without a request from the governor since the civil rights movement of 1965. In addition, Trump has decided to send in about 700 marines. Military deployments within the country have been limited to cases such as the Los Angeles riots of 1992. The U.S. military is prohibited in principle from enforcing U.S. laws within the country. The marines, in particular, are a unit that specializes in landing operations in enemy territory. Caution should be exercised about directing a military organization against its own people on home soil. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, which allows for the military to be deployed and for it to engage in law enforcement, on this occasion, so the marines cannot enforce the law in the field. The reasons for deploying the military to maintain security, which is normally the responsibility of local police, as well as the specific duties that the military will assume, must be clarified. In 2020, during his first administration, Trump also considered deploying the military to quell protests over the fatal assault of a Black man by a police officer, but a senior defense official opposed the idea and it ultimately did not happen. The fact that Trump's second administration is full of his loyalists and contains few military and judicial experts may also be a factor in the decision to deploy the military in this case. Political conflicts are also deepening. Calif. Gov. Gavin Newsom has filed a lawsuit against the president and others, claiming that the deployment of the National Guard, which was done without coordinating with the governor, was illegal. Democratic governors from 22 states across the United States issued a statement criticizing the president's 'abuse of power.' Prior to the demonstrations, the Trump administration had ordered the largest deportation operation in history against undocumented immigrants. Los Angeles and surrounding areas with large foreign-born populations have been the targets of intensive crackdowns. Widespread opposition to activities such as forced searches of workplaces at retail stores, restaurants and other businesses developed into massive demonstrations. A spate of lawsuits have been filed in other areas as well, alleging the deportation measures are unjust. As long as the administration continues its aggressive immigration measures, even if protests are suppressed by force, the backlash from society and social unrest will not subside, and new demonstrations could arise. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 11, 2025)
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Five Nations and EU Urge Trump Not to Impose New Airplane Tariffs
Reuters A picture taken through a telescope shows a silhouette of an aircraft against the sun during a partial solar eclipse in the settlement of Kojori outside Tbilisi, Georgia October 25, 2022. WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) – Five nations and the European Union, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial planes and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed. Airlines and planemakers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of $75 billion for the U.S. industry. The documents made public by the U.S. Commerce Department bared concerns over the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as nations such as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the European Union. 'As reliable trading partners, the European Union and United States should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field,' it added. Trump has already imposed tariffs of 10% on nearly all airplane and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, U.S. planemaker Boeing BA.N cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for airplanes and parts. 'The United States should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the United Kingdom,' Boeing told the Commerce Department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported $1.45 billion in aircraft parts, just a tenth of the total, to the United States. The EU said it took U.S. exports of aircraft worth roughly $12 billion, while exporting about $8 billion of aircraft to the U.S. In early May, the Commerce Department launched a 'Section 232' national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for even higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air LinesDAL.N and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'Current U.S. tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100% domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing U.S. content in its airplanes over the last decade and its newest airplanes, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88% domestically-sourced content.' The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding that U.S. aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the entire aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defense sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways JBLU.O opposed new tariffs, however, saying, 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilize, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'
