Three years after opening the door to a cannabis industry maelstrom, Thailand reverses course
Efforts to implement the change were accelerated after a pro-cannabis party left Thailand's governing parliamentary coalition on June 18, giving the ruling Pheu Thai Party a freer hand - albeit with a much reduced majority - to pursue the full recriminalisation of weed.
Thailand legalised medical cannabis in December 2018 and recreational cannabis in September 2022 under a previous government, becoming the first country to do so in Southeast Asia, a region known for its harsh drug penalties.
Following legalisation, Thai entrepreneurs established some 18,000 cannabis shops across the country.
Soon after decriminalising marijuana, the country was awash in newly legalised and grey area businesses, from glitzy dispensaries to farm tours.
Yet the brief but burgeoning era of decriminalisation was marred by divided public opinion and criticism that cannabis shops faced few regulations and little oversight in practice.
In defending the new policy direction, the Thai Government has cited high rates of dependence and concerns over the risk of children using the drug. (The legal age to buy marijuana was 20.)
'Many shops opened to sell cannabis both for recreational and medical purposes, allowing easy access for children and general people, which contradicts the Government's purpose to crack down on drugs,' Thai government spokesman Jirayu Houngsab said in a statement, the AP reported.
While several countries have legalised or decriminalised marijuana in recent years, Thailand appears to be the only one to have reversed course so drastically.
Thailand's Health Ministry did not respond immediately to a request for comment on the new policies.
Writing Thailand's Cannabis Future Network, a pro-cannabis advocacy group, called for a public protest outside the Ministry of Public Health on July 7 in response to the ban, according to local media reports.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Real Life: Forest and Bird CEO Nicola Toki slams ‘sneaky' conservation reforms
'Really concerning ' and 'sneaky' reforms by the coalition Government are stripping back protections for nature so fast that 'no New Zealander can keep up', Forest and Bird 's CEO says. Nicola Toki raised the alarm in an interview on Newstalk ZB's Real Life with John Cowan
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Flooding Demonstrates Danger In Govt ‘Growth At Any Cost' Ideological Agenda
Flooding in the top of the South Island, and the threat of more to come later this week, demonstrates the dangers of the Government pushing ahead with policy changes based on narrow ideological grounds and a 'growth at any cost' agenda, say freshwater campaigners. Tom Kay, spokesperson for the campaign group Choose Clean Water, says the Coalition Government's proposed resource management reforms, with an ideological focus on 'the enjoyment of property rights', will inevitably leave communities more vulnerable to the impacts of flooding. 'The Coalition Government has demonstrated across its resource management reform that they care more about the profits of commercial players than good governance for the health and stability of our communities. Their 'growth at any cost' agenda is not only thoughtless but downright dangerous.' Kay, a strong advocate for the idea of Making Room for Rivers as a strategy to keep communities and infrastructure safe from flooding while restoring the health of our rivers, says while many communities, councils, and insurance companies are ready for action to avoid hazards and widen allowed floodplains, the Government must not put growth and development on par with community safety and environmental health if they want to meaningfully reduce the risk to communities. 'We've just seen yet another example of devastating flooding following back-to-back experiences in Otago in October, the West Coast in November, and Canterbury in May. The costs are incredibly serious, including people losing their lives. 'We know our rivers need more space to carry floodwater safely, especially with the more extreme weather we're getting as the climate continues to warm. But the Government's narrow focus on growth and private property rights through their resource management reform risks undermining progress towards this.' Kay says international evidence and case studies show the best option for keeping communities and infrastructure safe from flooding is to avoid development in high-risk locations, and to incentivise and fund planned relocation from places already at high risk. This approach also provides the best opportunity for restoration of rivers and their floodplains, whilst increasing community wellbeing, amenity values, and resilience. However, he says the Government's focus on growth and property rights is inconsistent with this. 'Documents continue to highlight the Coalition Government's obsession with growth, and the misplaced idea that somehow we can continue to grow anywhere, with few restrictions, and still somehow mitigate the consequences. We can't. 'While we support the introduction of a National Policy Statement for Natural Hazards, for some reason it is less-developed now than it was last year, and drafted provisions that would have prioritised using nature-based solutions to reduce flood risk—such as making room for rivers, and to direct councils to avoid development in high risk locations, are gone.' 'The proposed provisions direct councils to 'consider' risk and act 'proportionately', leaving plenty of room for vested commercial interests to push councils into continuing to allow development, including homes, in high-risk locations. 'Not to mention that the proposal doesn't apply to the development of infrastructure, which is one of the main and most expensive assets hit during flooding; or to aquaculture, agricultural, pastoral, horticultural, mining, quarrying, or forestry activities and the land and buildings they use.' Kay says proposed changes to weaken the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management will also undermine the need to keep people out of harm's way, and to maintain sufficient river health and width to safely carry floodwaters. 'We have a requirement to prioritise the health of water bodies and communities in the management of our freshwater under the idea of Te Mana o te Wai. Flood managers have supported this idea as a way to help communities reconsider how they live with rivers, including their associated risks and hazards, and to make changes that increase flood resilience and river health together. 'But the Coalition Government wants to get rid of this prioritisation.' 'We also have no idea what the Government wants to do with an existing provision in the policy that prevents the 'loss of river extent', and thereby maintains wider flood corridors, for example; or whether they want to remove a provision that requires water to be managed as part of an 'integrated response to climate change'.' 'Our rivers and wider catchments need to be healthy and resilient if our communities are going to be safe from the worst harms of flooding. This Government needs to understand that private property rights and growth-at-all-costs won't enable that. It will cost us all in the long-run.' The Government's consultation on freshwater and natural hazard policies, as well as related policies, is open for submissions until 27 July.
1News
3 hours ago
- 1News
Live stream: PM briefs media after law and order announcements
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is speaking to media after Cabinet met earlier today. The briefing follows two announcements on law and order in the past 24 hours. Yesterday, the Government announced that people who assaulted on-duty police officers, firefighters, paramedics or prison officers would face longer prison sentences under new criminal offences. Those who assaulted with intent to injure would face up to five years in jail, while those who injured with intent could receive up to seven years — an offence that would also trigger the Three Strikes regime, requiring mandatory minimum sentences. And, this afternoon, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith unveiled a specific offence for "coward punches", which would mean tougher sentences for perpetrators - up to life for culpable homicide. ADVERTISEMENT A coward punch usually involves a person being punched or assaulted, without warning, by a stranger. Goldsmith said: 'We know how dangerous they are. People can be killed or suffer lifelong brain injuries, yet perpetrators often receive lenient and insufficient sentences. 'This fulfils a commitment in the National/New Zealand First coalition agreement, to introduce legislation to create an offence for anyone who injures or kills someone with a coward punch."
