
Watch as two lifesize robots swing punches at each other in the world's first humanoid robot boxing match
In a world where human boxers are at risk of dangerous injuries, we may have a glimpse of what the fight of the future could look like.
New footage shows the world's first humanoid robot boxing tournament, which took place over the weekend in Hangzhou, east China.
In the bizarre clip, two lifesize robots wearing gloves and protective headgear fight each other in a ring as a human officiator looks on.
Each fighter robot weighs about 35kg and is 4.3ft (132cm) tall – roughly the height of the average eight-year-old child.
Both the bots initially have trouble seeing exactly where their opponent is before successfully trading punches and kicks, to the delight of a baying crowd.
Commentators were generally impressed with the matchup, calling it 'adorable' 'cool' and a 'historic moment' for the robotics industry.
However, the two machines are remotely operated from the sidelines by their human developers, Robot Wars style.
One person posted online: 'This is just the start. Imagine in five years with all the crazy tech advancements.'
The 'G1' bipedal robots have been developed by Unitree Robotics, a Chinese robotics company based in Hangzhou.
Marketed for $16,000/£12,000 and remote-controlled by an employee standing nearby, G1 is 130cm (4ft 3in) tall, can carry up to 3kg (6.6lbs) and can move up to 2m/s (5mph).
G1 showcases some surprising coordination with punches and kicks, although it is capable of more refined interactions too, such as picking up and moving objects, shaking hands and waving at crowds.
'The robots fight in a human-machine collaborative way,' Chen Xiyun, a marketing team member of Unitree Robotics, told Global Times.
Chen added that the robots demonstrated straight punches, hook punches, sidekicks and aerial spin kicks, and they got up from the ground after falling.
The showdown was livestreamed on YouTube by CGTN (China Global Television Network), the English-language state-run news channel.
And if the machine look like amateur fighters now, some people remarked that in just a few years robotic fighting will come on leaps and bounds.
One said: 'They're likely remote-controlled, of course, but it still looks fun and it'll seem so primitive in just a few years!'
It isn't quite clear what the intended use of this robot is quite yet. Although it boasts a number of impressive features it is also too small to replace humans in factory work
A YouTuber said: 'Not quite ready for Primetime entertainment yet. Still a little underwhelming. Good first step- lots of potential.'
Another said: 'The fact that they chose to include kicks for the robots and they generally pull it off is impressive.'
A third said: 'Too be fair I think they should have made it fully autonomous, still impressive though.'
Sunday's historic fight was part of China Media Group World Robot Competition, which included both fighting demonstrations and matches.
The China Media Group (CMG) noted that all of the humanoid fighter bots are equipped with domestically developed technologies.
While it may seem like just a bit of fun, the the world's first humanoid robot boxing match signals the gradual integration of AI into combat sports.
In December, the world's first combat tournament with full-sized humanoid robots is set to be held in Shenzhen, Global Times adds.
As well as G1, Unitree is the creator of Go2, an intelligent robot dog that can dance, do a handstand while wiggling its legs in the air and even rush to greet its owner.
Go2 is similar to the Spot robot dog from rival Boston Dynamics, although it's been designed for consumers at a hefty price tag of $1,600 (£1,240).
Unitree and Boston Dynamics are two of the biggest rivals in the robotics industry, although the former has been more focused on commercially available consumer models at more affordable prices.
Spot, Boston Dynamics' most famous robot creation, first went on sale in 2020 and costs a whopping $75,000 (£60,000).
Compared to Unitree's Go line, Spot has been more directed at businesses, to assist employees in industries such as construction, defence, and building conservation.
In sci-fi films like Alien, humanoid robots are so lifelike that it's almost impossible to tell them from a real person.
Now, scientists in Japan are on their way to creating real-life versions of these realistic machines.
The experts from the University of Tokyo have created a robotic face out of lab-grown human skin.
Creepy video shows the bizarre pink creation attempting a cheesy smile.
According to the scientists, robots with real skin not only have an 'increasingly lifelike appearance' but could heal themselves if damaged.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Standard Chartered appoints ex-HSBC banker to head data, analytics and AI for wealth
SINGAPORE, June 2 (Reuters) - Standard Chartered (STAN.L), opens new tab has appointed Yusuf Demiral as its global head of wealth and retail banking data, analytics and AI, it said in a statement on Monday. Yusuf, who has over 25 years of banking experience, was most recently group head of data analytics and customer relationship management for wealth and personal banking at HSBC (HSBA.L), opens new tab. He will join Standard Chartered on July 7, and be based in Hong Kong, reporting to Samir Subberwal, the bank's global head of wealth solutions, deposits and mortgages, and chief client officer.


Coin Geek
2 hours ago
- Coin Geek
Why blockchain's cultural adoption may still be years away
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... This post is a guest contribution by George Siosi Samuels , managing director at Faiā. See how Faiā is committed to staying at the forefront of technological advancements here . 'Technology changes fast. Humans change slowly.' In the blockchain space, we often mistake momentum for readiness . We see surges in transaction volume, new Layer 1s, enterprise pilots, or headlines about central banks and tokenized assets—and we assume that mainstream adoption is imminent. But a deeper look reveals a sobering truth: we're not even halfway there. Despite being popularized with Bitcoin in 2008, blockchain's mainstream adoption—let alone cultural integration —is still unfolding. In fact, if history is any guide, we may still be 15 years away from true normalization. Let me explain why. Artificial urgency vs. actual readiness Across tech circles, there's an unspoken pressure to 'move fast or miss out.' This artificial urgency is often driven by venture capital, hype cycles, or career incentives. Blockchain—especially post-2017 and post-2021—has not been immune. But urgency doesn't equal readiness. Pilots ≠ Platforms. Most enterprises are still experimenting, not integrating. Most enterprises are still experimenting, not integrating. Hype ≠ Habit. Most users still see crypto as speculative, not systemic. Most users still see crypto as speculative, not systemic. Adoption ≠ Acceptance. Tech may be used, but that doesn't mean it's trusted. It's not that the tech isn't ready. It's that we're not—at least not at scale. The 30-year arc of cultural adoption History tells us that major technological shifts typically require three decades to become culturally normalized: The push-button elevator took 20–30 years to replace human operators due to psychological discomfort with 'no driver.' took 20–30 years to replace human operators due to psychological discomfort with 'no driver.' The Internet , while technically available in the '80s and commercialized in the '90s, didn't achieve cultural ubiquity until the late 2000s. , while technically available in the '80s and commercialized in the '90s, didn't achieve cultural ubiquity until the late 2000s. Even electric vehicles, around since the 1800s, only became commercially viable and socially normalized in the 2010s–2020s. Why the lag? Because culture lags behind code. It takes time for people to reshape their mental models, trust new systems, and embed them into everyday workflows. Blockchain—despite its architectural brilliance—still struggles with this. Blockchain's hidden bottleneck: Human culture We tend to see scalability as a technical problem. But often, it's a cultural bottleneck: Compliance teams still default to paper trails. still default to paper trails. Boards struggle to distinguish between crypto noise and blockchain signal. struggle to distinguish between crypto noise and blockchain signal. Internal systems weren't designed with tokenization or auditability in mind. weren't designed with tokenization or auditability in mind. Language remains a barrier—terms like 'wallet,' 'hashrate,' or 'decentralization' confuse rather than clarify. Put simply: the infrastructure may be scalable, but the institutions—and instincts—aren't. Why 15 more years is not a problem—it's a pattern If we see blockchain as being in its teenage years (2008–2025), then what comes next is maturity—not more speed. The next 15 years will likely be less about technological breakthroughs and more about: Integration with legacy systems Cross-cultural regulation and harmonization Cultural onboarding and language reframing Trust-building through transparency and utility That's not stagnation. That's evolution. And it's where the long-term value will compound. A note for enterprise leaders If you're leading digital transformation at scale, the temptation to chase 'what's next' can be strong. But consider this: 'Culture is the invisible architecture of adoption.' Your blockchain strategy isn't just about ledgers and nodes. It's about human patterns, legacy instincts, and organizational memory. Success will come not from rushing adoption, but from aligning pace with place. Closing thought: Urgency is a signal—not a strategy Artificial urgency creates short-term buzz, but long-term burnout. In blockchain, as in most foundational innovations, what matters most is durable trust, not fleeting traction. So the real question isn't: 'How fast can we scale?' It's: 'How well are we integrating blockchain into the rhythms of human trust and institutional behavior?' The ones who win won't be the fastest—they'll be the most aligned. Curious how culturally aligned your blockchain strategy really is? Get in touch to get a free CSTACK Audit (worth $1K) — a diagnostic for enterprises navigating emerging tech with clarity and confidence. Watch: IPv6 & Blockchain: Pioneering the next digital revolution title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""> Blockchain Blockchain Adoption Culture Enterprise


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
London was once the tech capital of Europe. Where did it all go wrong?
Baroness Helena Morrissey DBE is a City 'superwoman' who, among other senior roles, ran Newton Investment Management for 15 years while supporting a family of 11. She also founded the 30 Percent Club, which seeks to bring more women on to company boards. London is no longer Europe's tech capital. Paris has taken that title, coming in fourth in the league table of the world's top technology centres, while London has slipped to sixth, according to Dealroom's 2025 report. Both are flanked by American cities. This shift signals a troubling loss of momentum, and is underscored by KPMG data showing UK fintech investment at a four-year low in 2024 – $9.9bn (£7.3bn) compared with 2021's spike of $48.1bn. For years, London led Europe's fintech boom. Fuelled by world-class developers, creative talent and a deep venture capital market that consistently funded innovative start-ups, the City fostered a vibrant tech ecosystem. Shoreditch, London's start-up destination of choice, became synonymous with fintech and new agile ways of working. The proof of success? London's tally of 125 tech unicorns – companies valued at $1bn or more – far outpacing Paris (53) and Munich (17). Yet past success guarantees nothing. Dealroom's data reveals a stark contrast: 'total funding growth' for technology companies based in Paris is up nearly 24pc over the past four years and a whopping 60pc for Austin, Texas – but London has seen a 7pc decline. Where has it all gone wrong? As a country we have taken our eye off the ball when it comes to creating an attractive environment for start-ups and scale-ups – just as others have raised their game. In 2015, I was a member of the UK's Financial Services and Trade Investment Board (FSTIB), a partnership between government and industry formed by George Osborne, the then chancellor, to help propel high-growth areas. Fintech was a top priority, with five key ingredients identified to maintain the UK's attractiveness: supportive regulation, plentiful investment, global connections, top talent and integration with other financial and professional services. However, FSTIB was disbanded in 2019 and, while trade bodies have been doing what they can, no one has been pulling it all together – a challenge exacerbated by the frequent change of leaders in government. As a result, our early advantage has slipped away. Revolut, a fintech star, offers a perfect – if depressing – case study. Founded in 2015, the digital bank was valued at $45bn last August, making it Europe's most valuable private technology company, but it took three years for Revolut to secure a UK banking licence.