USFK dismisses troop downsizing report
No discussions yet with Washington over partial withdrawal of US troops: Seoul
The United States Forces Korea on Friday dismissed a report saying Washington is mulling the possibility of a partial withdrawal of the strong 28,500 troops stationed here.
"The US remains firmly committed to the defense of the ROK and we look forward to working with the incoming government officials to maintain and strengthen our iron clad alliance," the USFK said in a statement. "Reports that the Department of Defense will reduce US troops in the Republic of Korea are not true.'
ROK is an abbreviation for Republic of Korea, which is South Korea's official name.
The statement followed a report early Friday from The Wall Street Journal, which claimed that the Donald Trump administration is weighing the option of pulling out some 4,500 troops, or around 15 percent of the USFK, and moving them to other locations in the Indo-Pacific region, including Guam, which is an American island territory.
The report added to security concerns in South Korea amid volatilities stemming from North Korea's advancing nuclear weapons program.
Addressing the report, South Korea's Ministry of National Defense said in the morning that no discussions had recently been held with the US government over the issue of withdrawal of USFK.
'There were no discussions held between South Korea and the US over the issue of withdrawal of USFK,' the ministry said.
"The USFK, as the core strength of the South Korea-US alliance, has contributed to the peace and stability of the Korean Peninsula and in the region by maintaining a firm combined defense posture and deterring North Korea's invasion and provocation, alongside our military," the ministry added. "We will continue to cooperate with the US side to advance in such a direction.'
The WSJ report is aligned with a separate report from The Washington Post earlier this year that the second Trump administration plans to 'reorient' the US military to prioritize deterring China's seizure of Taiwan and shoring up homeland defense. It cited secret internal guidance distributed throughout the Pentagon in mid-March.
An official at Seoul's Foreign Ministry, declining to be named, echoed the Defense Ministry's statement, saying that the USFK has been 'the backbone and the symbol of the South Korea-US alliance, while deterring threats from North Korea and contributing to the peace and security in the region.'
The official highlighted the 'negative views' expressed by US Indo-Pacific Command Commander Adm. Samuel Paparo Jr. and USFK Commander Gen. Xavier Brunson about potentially scaling back the US troops deployed here.
'Recently, the US Indo-Pacific Command commander and the USFK commander have stressed the importance of the role of the USFK and expressed negative views on a possible withdrawal or reduction,' the official explained. 'The US' National Defense Authorization Act has also consistently included the part which calls for the maintenance of the current USFK troop strength.'
The report, which came as South Korea heads into a snap presidential election on June 3, triggered by former President Yoon Suk Yeol's impeachment and removal from office, prompted reactions from the political sphere.
People Power Party presidential candidate Kim Moon-soo on Thursday expressed concerns about front-runner and rival Democratic Party of Korea candidate Lee Jae-myung's past remark that labeled the USFK as 'an occupying force.'
'Candidate Lee Jae-myung in the past, undermined the USFK by calling them an occupying force and labeling the combined military exercises among South Korea, US and Japan as an extreme pro-Japanese act,' Kim wrote on Facebook in the afternoon. Kim claimed that 'worries have been spreading' across the country that the USFK's withdrawal could materialize if Lee is elected president. 'Candidate Lee Jae-myung should apologize for his past remarks (calling the USFK) an occupying force and clearly reveal his stance toward the South Korea-US alliance.'
Minor conservative New Reform Party candidate Lee Jun-seok told the press that South Korea should 'be confident' in dealing with the US regarding the issues of the USFK, after attending a memorial service for late President Roh Moo-hyun in the southeastern rural village of Bongha, South Gyeongsang Province, in the morning.
'The USFK is stationed here due to the US' strategic understanding -- South Korea must come up with the best outcome for our people by strengthening our own defense capabilities on one side and convincing the US that we can cooperate for the benefit of the US' security,' he added.
Lee has yet to release a statement on the matter, but Cho Seung-rae, the Democratic Party's chief spokesperson, highlighted the role of the USFK in protecting 'the peace in the Northeast Asia and the Indo-Pacific region' and 'deterring North Korea threats.'
'It's a topic that should be calmly discussed (between Seoul and Washington) based on the value we share in our alliance,' Cho told reporters after attending the same morning memorial service.
'From the perspective of the South Korea-US alliance, the role of the USFK, which deters threats from North Korea and contributes to the peace in Northeast Asia and the Indo-Pacific region, is clear. And I believe that both the ruling and the opposition parties' thoughts and South Korea's and the US' perspectives on the matter are not different.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Patricia Murphy] 'Big beautiful bill' a boondoggle](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F03%2Fnews-p.v1.20250603.feb573661a2447cd9a1ea66b4611f094_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Patricia Murphy] 'Big beautiful bill' a boondoggle](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Patricia Murphy] 'Big beautiful bill' a boondoggle
Days before the US House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' Moody's Ratings agency had an ominous warning about the US economy. Because of America's recent history of running up huge debts and deficits, and no change in sight, 'the United States' fiscal performance is likely to deteriorate' relative to similar countries. As a part of that warning, Moody's downgraded the country's credit rating from its Aaa score to Aa1. Despite that red flag, House leaders forged ahead, passing their 10-year tax-and-spend plan, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, by a single vote. Unfortunately, the bill not only ignores Moody's debt warning, it looks more like one big, beautiful boondoggle. Included in the gargantuan bill are $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, more than $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and other social programs, and significant boosts in spending for defense and immigration enforcement. Costs of some social programs, including food stamps, are also shifted to states by the House. My colleague Tia Mitchell reported this week that Georgia officials could now be on the hook for more than $800 million in food spending if the Republicans' bill goes through. All of the cuts to social safety net programs came, in part, to help pay for the tax cuts in the bill, which are heavily weighted toward high-income earners. For example, the working-class tax breaks that Trump promised on the campaign trail, namely eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest, will only last through the end of Trump's term in 2028. But the income tax cuts, including for the richest Americans, as well as tax breaks for estates and investment income all become permanent. The House also stuffed loads of perks for special interests into the 1,100-page bill. One measure bans states from passing new regulations on artificial intelligence for 10 years. So if Georgia lawmakers decide they want to limit the use of AI in Georgia classrooms, like they did with cellphones this year, the Big Beautiful Bill Act would stop that until 2036. It would also mean Georgia lawmakers could not pass SB 9, a bill to ban deepfakes in political ads, which passed the state House and Senate earlier this year, but did not get to final passage. A different measure, this one for gun dealers, was put into the bill by Georgia's US Rep. Andrew Clyde. The Republican from Athens owns two large gun stores, which both sell gun silencers. Clyde flipped from a 'no' to a 'yes' after the $200 tax on silencers was eliminated, at a cost of $1.4 billion. Of all of the special interests in the bill, the most special of all seems to be Trump himself. The bill mentions Trump's name 52 times. It also creates new $1,000 savings accounts for babies born during Trump's second term called 'Trump Accounts.' It even has language to make it harder for federal courts to enforce injunctions against executive branch officials, a lot like the injunctions Trump has run into as he tries to expand his own powers in the White House. Every spending bill is a political document, of course, and a Republican Congress cutting taxes and rolling back Biden-era climate measures is no surprise. But what is a surprise is the bill's price tag, $3.94 trillion, which will all get piled onto the nation's $36 trillion debt that Moody's just warned about. For every tax cut and spending measure that may be a good idea on its merits, it's all getting paid for with more borrowed money. It's a long way from the Tea Party movement, which exploded onto the scene in 2009 after the US Congress passed big bailouts for banks following the 2008 financial crisis. The national debt then was $13 trillion, one-third of what it is today. Republicans then promised they would finally tackle the debt and the deficit. This bill does the opposite. Even Elon Musk, the mastermind of the "Department of Government Efficiency," said so on his last day as a government employee this week, adding that the bill 'undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' 'It can be big or beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both,' he said. If I were a House Republican at the beginning of this year, I would have had one job: to reduce the debt and deficit. With Trump in the White House, Republicans in control of Congress, and Musk promising to modernize and remake the federal government, the House bill was supposed to be the vehicle for all of that to happen. Instead, they just passed one big, beautiful boondoggle.
![[Kim Seong-kon] What we expect from our new president](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F03%2Fnews-p.v1.20250603.9f11c6d27b004f1184de174e67354397_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Kim Seong-kon] What we expect from our new president
The 2025 presidential election day is over now. Whoever may be inaugurated as our next president, he will be heavily burdened with so many urgent tasks because the country's situation is unprecedentedly dire. Among others, our new leader must put an end to the chronic sickness of political revenge that has plagued our country for the past two decades. In the eyes of foreigners, South Korea may look like a politically underdeveloped country because no president has been safe since 2009: one died by suicide, one was imprisoned and two were impeached. Another one is presently under investigation by the prosecution. Such incidents are far from normal. They are not supposed to happen in a fully developed, advanced country. Indeed, that is why our new president must find and appoint truly able and competent cabinet members. Some of his predecessors ran the country with the help of amateurs, such as their former high-school buddies, or those who were already personally close to them, regardless of their aptitude or qualifications. Such nepotism has caused a lot of damage to our country. Our new president also must not forget or ignore the fact that South Korea is a Free World country of liberal democracy, not an authoritarian socialist country of a so-called 'people's democracy.' It is imperative that he honor and value liberal democracy and should not attempt to change the fundamentals of our country according to his own political ideology. These days, experts have pointed out that democracy is in jeopardy, as it produces legitimately elected dictators. Thus, we hope that our new leader is an unpretentious, humanitarian person, not an elected tyrant who manipulates and controls the administrative, the legislative and the judicial branches all together. If he is self-righteous, opinionated and tyrannical, he will surely ruin our country and make our lives miserable. To ensure Korea survives these international crises, our leader needs to be a skillful diplomat who, depending on the situation, can use, as needed, both what Dag Hammarskjold has called "quiet diplomacy," and 'wolf warrior diplomacy,' another term that one of our neighboring countries is using these days. The most outstanding and compelling diplomatic issue we are now facing is how to deal with America's 'reciprocal benefits' policy. In other words, how to deal with the heavy tariffs recently imposed by the US and the expense-sharing issue for the US troops stationed in Korea. Experts suggest that South Korea's unparalleled shipbuilding industry and semiconductor technology could serve as good leverage when we deal with America. Recently, the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration is now considering the relocation of 4,500 out of 28,500 American soldiers in South Korea to Guam and other Indo-Pacific regions. The US government may think that such 'strategic flexibility' is necessary, especially when war clouds are hanging over Taiwan. However, according to the Wall Street Journal, it is 'a move that could stir new anxiety among allies worried about the White House commitment to Asia.' Therefore, our new president must find the best way to deal with the above issues. For one thing, he should persuade the US government that the American troops in Korea are mutually beneficial because they also serve America's strategies to deter North Korea. He also should remind American politicians how America, too, greatly benefited from the help of their blood ally, South Korea, during the Vietnam War. Another diplomatic conflict our new leader must solve is our neighboring countries' violation of our sea and air borders. We hope our new president can valiantly stand tall, strongly protest and boldly exercise countermeasures, if necessary. If our president seems timid or weak, our country will not only lose respect but also end up inviting more aggressive violations of international laws from other countries. In addition, our new president also must prepare for the anticipated side effects of a possible war in Taiwan. Experts have warned of two possibilities if a Taiwan War broke out by any chance. One is that US airbases in South Korea might be attacked by missiles. The other possibility is that North Korea might provoke a war by miscalculation. Either way, we should be prepared. These days, political analysts worry that the world is now regressing to the World War II era when the strong manipulated the weak. It is unnerving and disheartening news to us, to say the least. To protect us from foreign aggression, we may need to join the league of countries sharing the same values, including Japan, Australia and Southeast Asian countries. We hope that our new president knows where to go and what to do to protect his people and the nation, instead of simply enjoying the fame of his privileged post. In a 2025 American film, 'Sniper: The Last Stand,' a military commander says, 'A leader knows the way, goes the way and shows the way. Leadership is an action, not a position.' Indeed, the future of Korea depends on our new president's superb leadership.
Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Russian rockets kill 3 in a Ukrainian city as Kyiv claims it damaged a key bridge deep in Russia
A Russian attack targeted the Ukrainian city of Sumy on Tuesday, killing at least three people and leaving many injured, officials said. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy denounced the assault, saying it underscored that Moscow has no intentions of halting the three-year war . Meanwhile, Ukraine's secret services said they struck again in Russia's rear, two days after a spectacular Ukrainian drone attack on air bases deep inside Russia. In Sumy, local authorities said a barrage of rockets struck apartment buildings and a medical facility in the center of the northeastern city, a day after direct peace talks made no progress on ending the 3-year war . Delegations from the warring sides held talks in Istanbul on Monday and agreed to swap dead and wounded troops but their terms for ending the war remained far apart. The Ukrainian Security Service, known by its acronym SBU, claimed it damaged the foundations of the Kerch Bridge linking Russia and illegally annexed Crimea — a key artery for Russian military supplies in the war. The SBU said it detonated 1,100 kilograms of explosives on the seabed overnight, damaging the bridge's foundations in an operation that took several months to set up. It was the third Ukrainian strike on the bridge since Russia's invasion of its neighbor in February 2022, the SBU said. 'The bridge is now effectively in an emergency condition,' the SBU claimed. It said no civilians were killed or injured in the operation. It was not possible to independently confirm the claims. Traffic across the Kerch Bridge was halted for three hours early Tuesday morning but reopened at 9 a.m., official Russian social media channels said. The Ukrainian president said the attack on Sumy was a "completely deliberate strike on civilians and that one of the rockets pierced the wall of an apartment building but failed to detonate. 'The Russians brutally struck Sumy — directly targeting the city, ordinary streets — with rocket artillery," Zelenskyy said. 'That's all you need to know about Russia's 'desire' to end this war,' the Ukrainian president wrote in a post on Telegram. Zelenskyy appealed for global pressure and 'decisive action from the United States, Europe, and everyone in the world who holds power' — without it, he said, Russian President Vladimir Putin "will not agree even to a ceasefire.' The war has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations, as well as tens of thousands of soldiers on both sides along the roughly 1,000-kilometer front line where the war of attrition is grinding on despite US-led efforts to broker a peace deal . Though Russia has a bigger army and more economic resources than Ukraine, a spectacular Ukrainian drone attack over the weekend damaged or destroyed more than 40 warplanes at air bases deep inside Russia, Ukrainian officials said, touting it as a serious blow to the Kremlin's strategic arsenal and its military prestige. The Russian Defense Ministry acknowledged that the Ukrainian attack set several planes ablaze at two air bases but said that the military repelled attempted attacks on three other air bases. Both Zelenskyy and Putin have been eager to show US President Donald Trump that they share his ambition to end the fighting — and also avoid possible punitive measures from Washington. Ukraine has accepted a US-proposed ceasefire, but the Kremlin effectively rejected it. Putin has made it clear that any peace settlement has to be on his terms. Dmitry Medvedev, a former Russian president who now serves as deputy head of the country's Security Council chaired by Putin, indicated on Tuesday that there would be no let-up in Russia's invasion of its neighbor. 'The Istanbul talks are not for striking a compromise peace on someone else's delusional terms but for ensuring our swift victory and the complete destruction of (Ukraine's government),' he said. In an apparent comment on the latest Ukrainian strikes, he declared that 'retribution is inevitable.' 'Our army is pushing forward and will continue to advance,' Medvedev said, adding that 'everything that needs to be blown up will be blown up, and those who must be eliminated will be.' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded to suggestions that a face-to-face meeting between Putin, Trump and Zelenskyy could break the deadlock, said the possibility was 'unlikely in the near future.' Meanwhile, a senior Ukrainian delegation led by First Deputy Prime Minister and Economy Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko has travelled to Washington for talks about defense, sanctions and postwar recovery, Andrii Yermak, the head of Ukraine's presidential office, said Tuesday. The delegation will meet with representatives from both major US political parties, as well as with advisors to Trump, Yermak added. Ukrainians on the streets of Kyiv welcomed the strikes on Russian air bases but were gloomy about prospects for a peace agreement. 'Russia has invested too many resources in this war to just … stop for nothing,' said serviceman Oleh Nikolenko, 43. His wife, Anastasia Nikolenko, a 38-year-old designer, said diplomacy can't stop the fighting. "We need to show by force, by physical force, that we cannot be defeated,' she said. Russia recently expanded its attacks on Sumy and in the Kharkiv region following Putin's promise to create a buffer zone along the border that might prevent long-range Ukrainian attacks hitting Russian soil. The city of Sumy, about 25 kilometers (15 miles) from the border, had a prewar population of around 250,000. Russia's Defense Ministry claimed Tuesday its troops had taken the Ukrainian village of Andriivka, close to the border in the Sumy region. Ukraine made no immediate comment on the claim, which could not be independently verified. (AP)
