
HC declares city's biggest dumping ground a 'protected forest'
1
2
Mumbai: Fifteen years after BMC began using almost 120 hectares on the eastern coast at Kanjurmarg as a garbage dumping ground,
Bombay high court
on Friday declared it a protected mangrove forest. The HC gave BMC three months to take necessary measures to comply with its judgment. These include restoring the land, one-third the size of New York's Central Park, to its 'private forest' status, as assigned by the state in 2008.
The two-judge HC bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan, citing an earlier HC ruling, noted that the Kanjur plot has mangroves and was a '
protected forest
'. The HC, however, said for the next three months, dumping could continue at what happens to be the city's biggest landfill for solid waste. The HC declined a stay as sought by the state. The govt will now approach the Supreme Court.
NGO Vanashakti and its member Stalin Dayanand, who moved Bombay High Court to challenge the state's 2009 decision to de-notify 120 hectares of protected mangrove forest at Kanjurmarg for garbage dumping, said the govt followed no due process of law. The NGO, through senior counsel Gayatri Singh, contended that the state govt lacks absolute power to de-notify or deserve or delete any protected forest without approval from the Centre under the Forest Conservation Act of 1980.
The Supreme Court in 2003 had allowed dumping on 141 hectares at the site on condition that the state would abide by pollution norms. State advocate general Birendra Saraf argued that the land was only marginally covered with mangroves and those patches were excluded from the dumping ground and would be protected. However, the HC bench on Friday ruled that the walls constructed by BMC around the landfill stunted and denuded the mangroves which would normally have grown.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Google Brain Co-Founder Andrew Ng, Recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
A series of public interest litigations (PILs) have been filed since 2004 for mangrove protection in and around Mumbai. Given the need for a new dumpyard and the fact that other landfill sites in Mumbai were nearing their limit, HC had passed a slew of orders. The disputes travelled to the Supreme Court as well. Acting on a 2005 HC order to protect mangroves, the state notified over 425 hectares of Kanjurmarg land as 'protected forest'. But it de-notified almost 120 hectares from it in 2009 to create the landfill. It is a challenge to this de-notification that was heard by Justices Kulkarni and Sundaresan at length.
BMC, along with the state, challenged the protected forest status as a 'mistake'. BMC senior counsel Anil Sakhhare and AG Saraf said the Centre, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, had petitioned the HC in 2022 to question the 'protected forest' status given by the state govt to salt pan lands held by the central govt. The state wanted HC to clarify that since the SC in 2003 directed Kanjurmarg land be used as a dumping ground, its own 2008 decision to call it 'protected forest' was a "mistake".
But the HC held that the 'private forest notification' of 2008 was not 'simply erroneous' as the state and BMC sought to argue, since it was the product of studies, imaging, and due process of law. The HC, in a detailed analysis of the law, rules, and copious extracts of orders in an 87-page ruling, said, "The state verily found that the land was a mangrove area and it complied with the Forest Act and the HC's Mangrove Direction. The argument for de-notification was therefore not based on the factual position."
The HC said the subsequent deletion of 2009 can't be defended as a 'rectification' of error without following mandated process under the Forest Conservation Act. The SC order enabling dumping at Kanjur also directed that pollution laws should be strictly complied with. The SC order can't be a cover, said the HC. Significantly, HC said, "The issue of mangroves growth on the subject land and the declaration of the law that mangrove land is indeed protected forest (and therefore cannot be used for garbage dumping) was not even brought up before the SC."
Advocate Zaman Ali, who represented environmental non-profit Vanshakti, in a 2013 PIL, said, "BMC now has three months essentially to find a new location for a dumping ground in place of the Kanjurmarg plot."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Eng-Beng-physics worry prompts ‘cluster' schools
1 2 3 Kolkata: The West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education is set to introduce a cluster model for schools to address teacher shortage in the higher secondary section. The council conducted a survey of all subjects being taught in Plus-II at state schools and found that around 10,000-12,000 teachers are employed for English and Bengali for 16 lakh-odd students. The survey also revealed a teacher shortage in physics. The main reason behind the shortfall is the recent scrapping of jobs of 26,570 school staffers following a Supreme Court order, migration of teachers from rural schools to urban locations and retirements. To ensure that education is not affected till new teachers are recruited, especially after a semester system was introduced to Plus-II with several new subjects and courses, the state council has decided on launching the cluster system, likely from Oct. Under the cluster system, students at a school, without a teacher in a particular subject, will attend those particular classes with the students of a neighbouring school, which has a teacher in that subject. According to the plan, the joint classes will be held for seven schools, located within a radius of 3.5km-4 km. "Our aim is to provide quality education. We have introduced new science subjects that need more attention. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo So this system will help us ensure a good learning process without merging schools or transferring teachers," said council president Chiranjib Bhattacharya. Officials have completed the mapping of schools in Kolkata, North and South 24 Parganas, East and West Midnapore, East and West Burdwan, Howrah, and Hooghly. In each district, around 30 clusters have been identified, where they prepared subject- and course-wise clusters to address the teachers' shortage. The exercise will soon be extended to north Bengal. Council secretary Priyadarshini Mallick said, "The mapping of schools located in the districts in south Bengal has already been completed. We will have a meeting with the officials of regional offices to explain the plan so that the school heads in their respective districts, an be briefed about the format."


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Unsealed records in Abrego Garcia case offer few details that are new, unknown
A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the unsealing of several court documents in the lawsuit over Kilmar Abrego Garcia's deportation, rejecting the Trump administration's arguments that it would risk national security. U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Maryland issued her order after media organizations, including The Associated Press, argued the public has a right to access court records under the First Amendment. Filings unsealed so far offer little information that's new or unknown publicly. Xinis described one document as 'relatively boilerplate.' It was a request by the Trump administration to temporarily halt discovery, an early phase of a lawsuit where parties share evidence. 'It does not disclose any potentially privileged or otherwise sensitive information for which a compelling government interest outweighs the right to access,' Xinis wrote. Xinis noted that some documents were public before the court was asked to seal them the next day. Those filings contained a back-and-forth between Abrego Garcia's attorneys and the U.S. government over efforts to return him from El Salvador. Trump administration lawyers often objected to answering questions, arguing that they involve state secrets, sensitive diplomatic negotiations and other protected information. For example, the U.S. attorneys mentioned 'appropriate diplomatic discussions with El Salvador.' But they wrote that disclosing the details 'could negatively impact any outcome.' Xinis also ordered the partial release of a transcript from an April 30 court hearing. Some of it will be reacted to protect potentially classified information. Wednesday's ruling was unrelated to the Trump administration pending invocation of the state secrets privilege, a legal doctrine often used in military cases. The administration has argued that releasing information about the Abrego Garcia matter in open court — or even to the judge in private – could jeopardize national security. Xinis is yet to rule on the state secrets claim. Abrego Garcia's attorneys have argued that the Trump administration has done nothing to return the Maryland construction worker. They say the government is invoking the privilege to hide behind the misconduct of mistakenly deporting him and refusing to bring him back. Abrego Garcia's deportation violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shielded Abrego Garcia from expulsion to his native country. The immigration judge determined that Abrego Garcia faced likely persecution by a local Salvadoran gang that terrorized his family. Abrego Garcia's American wife sued over his deportation. Xinis ordered his return on April 4. The Supreme Court ruled on April 10 that the administration must work to bring him back. President Donald Trumptold ABC News in late April that he could retrieve Abrego Garcia with a phone call to El Salvador's president. But Trump said he wouldn't do it because Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, an allegation that Abrego Garcia denies and for which he was never charged.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Fake' certicate for job: Surat court rejects anticipatory bail application of dismissed cop
An anticipatory bail application of a dismissed police officer, who had allegedly obtained a fake caste certificate to land a job, was on Wednesday rejected by the Surat District Court. The officer served as the Assistant Commissioner of Police in the Surat city police before his services were terminated. B M Chaudhary was dismissed from service as per an order by the state home department, dated May 20. A week later, on May 25, he was booked under Section 12(1)(A), 12(1)(B) of the Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018. Chaudhary then filed an anticipatory bail application with Surat District Court of 14th Additional Session Judge B M Govani a few days ago. The order passed by the court on Wednesday stated: 'Investigating Officer is hereby directed to strictly comply with the provisions of Section 35(2) of BNSS (the arrest of a person without a warrant when a complaint, credible information, or reasonable suspicion exists that they are involved in a non-cognizable offense) and the ratio laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Arneshkumar Vs. State of Bihar in their true letter and spirit.' As per the details of the case, Chaduhary's late father Motiram Chaudhary had allegedly obtained a fake ST certificate, issued to him on July 19, 1990. Chaudhary then allegedly landed a job using the certificate. He was recruited as a sub-inspector in 1990, and later was promoted to the posts of a police inspector and then an assistant commissioner of police. Chaudhary had been posted as the ACP, K division, Surat city police, since 2022. The case was filed against Chaudhary based on a letter by Praveen Parghi, president of Adijati Vikas Trust, Godhra, on October 7 last year. Parghi claimed that Chaudhary had used a fake ST certificate to get his job and promotions. The State Vigilance Department ordered the Gujarat Police's vigilance cell to launch a probe. According to the FIR, the commission had written to Chaudhary '15 times' in 2024 seeking documents, but he delayed the process, seeking more time. The State Vigilance Department subsequently ordered registration of an offence against him, it stated. Additional Public Prosecutor Dighant Tevar said, 'The accused police officer had obtained a tribal certificate to get a job in the police department. The investigation agency had reminded him 15 times to appear for statements, but he failed to turn up.' Defence lawyer M A Patel did not respond to calls till the press time.