Teen (17) guilty of using hammer and hatchet during attack on woman held in Dublin flat
A youth has signed guilty pleas to charges of using a hammer and a hatchet in a gang attack on a woman held in a flat in Dublin last year.
The 17-year-old boy is accused of false imprisonment and assault causing harm to the complainant, 37, at Henrietta House, Dublin 7, on September 26th.
Advertisement
The teen, who cannot be named because he is a minor, is also accused of producing a metal pole, hammer, and hatchet during the incident.
In March, Judge Brendan Toale held that the case was too serious to be kept in the Children's Court, where a preliminary hearing was told the boy had "a significant role from start to finish".
Following a two-month adjournment, the teenager appeared there again with family and his lawyer.
He signed a guilty plea on all the charges before Judge Toale granted an order sending him forward for sentencing in the Circuit Court, which has greater sentencing powers.
Advertisement
Legal aid was granted to the youth who will face his next hearing in June.
Earlier, the defence emphasised that the teenager was vulnerable, less culpable, and had responded to a 5.40 am call to get involved in the incident, which was connected to a drug debt and "would not have been able to say no, go away."
The boy had no prior convictions.
Judge Toale agreed with the DPP that the case should go forward to the higher court.
Advertisement
The prosecution had disclosed 200 pages of evidence, including text message reports, to the defence. The prosecution also contended that the accused was involved in a joint enterprise with the others and that he had a significant role from start to finish.
And the court heard it was alleged the boy had used the weapons named in the charges.
Judge Toale noted video evidence and an outline of the facts assembled by the investigation team.
Defence solicitor Aonghus McCarthy had pleaded with the judge to deal with the boy in the Children's Court.
He cited a forensic psychological report and the detrimental effects of the teen's background of parental drug abuse and incarceration, which made him a trauma victim.
He also stressed that the teenager now had greater support from his wider family, had changed his peers, and had a job offer.
However, the judge refused jurisdiction.
Eight men aged between 20 and 54 are before the courts on connected charges.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Keir Starmer and Labour are accused of standing in the way of a ban on cousins marrying each other - after poll shows British people want it axed
Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour party are standing in the way of a ban on cousins marrying each other, after a new poll showed an overwhelming majority of Britons want to see it axed, a Conservative MP has claimed. Conservative MP Richard Holden last year introduced a private members' bill to ban the practice, which would bring cousin marriages into the same bracket as marrying a parent, child, sibling or grandparent. Now a new YouGov poll has revealed the British communities that are most likely to back first cousin marriages, with a large majority thinking the practice should be outlawed. The former Cabinet Minister and Conservative Party Chairman told MailOnline: 'This YouGov poll is clear. 'The overwhelming majority of Brits, including those of Pakistani heritage, want to see first cousin marriage banned. 'The fact Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party are standing in the way of ending an outdated practice rooted in misogynistic cultural practices shows that he's more interested in promoting cultural relativism than in ending practices that have no place in our country and isolate both individuals and communities from each other. 'If Starmer really believed in British values he'd back my bill, just like every community in Britain does.' Pakistani and Bangladeshi Britons are most likely to support the first cousin marriages, with 39 percent of those polled saying it should be legal. While 47 percent of the community say the practice should not be legal, this compares to just eight percent of white Britons who support first-cousin marriage. Six percent of black Britons say marrying a cousin should be legal, with nine percent of Indian Britons holding the same view. While marrying close relatives including siblings and half-siblings is illegal in the UK, marrying a first cousin is technically legal. Some 77 percent of white and Indian Britons believe marrying a cousin should be made illegal, compared to 82 percent of black Britons. Currently the UK follows the practice of 'genetic counselling', in which first cousins who are in a relationship are offered education about the risk of having children together and encouraged to receive extra checks during pregnancy. It is estimated that children of a first-cousin union have a six percent chance of inheriting a recessive disorder such as cystic fibrosis or sickle cell disease - double the risk of the general population. But some have warned that outlawing the practice completely risks stigmatising those already in first cousin marriages in the UK. Amongst these was Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed, who drew huge criticism last year for defending cousin marriage. Instead of banning it outright, he said a 'more positive approach' involving advanced genetic tests for prospective married cousins would be more effective in addressing issues around it. One of Britain's foremost experts on child health also defended the right for first cousins to marry, dismissing concerns about inbreeding. Professor Dominic Wilkinson, an NHS neonatologist and ethics expert at the University of Oxford, argued a ban would be 'unethical'. Instead, Professor Wilkinson backed calls for such couples to be offered special screening on the NHS to help them decide if they should have children. Such tests can cost £1,200 privately. They are designed to spot whether prospective parents are carriers for the same genetic conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy. It comes as data from 2023 showed in three inner-city Bradford wards, 46 percent of mothers from the Pakistani community are married to a first or second cousin, according to data published in 2023. The overall estimate for the cousing marriage capital of the UK in Pakistani couples was 37 percent ten years ago, and this figure has since dropped. Reasons behind the fall are thought to include high educational attainment, stricter immigration rules and changes in family dynamics. It compares to just one percent of white British couples. YouGov's data also revealed that those in London are most likely to support first cousin marriage, at 15 percent. The north followed at 12 percent, while in the Midlands it was ten percent. The south of England and Wales were the least likely to support it being legal, at six and seven percent respectively. Historically, first cousin marriages were extremely common amongst royalty and the British upper classes. It was seen as a way of firming up alliances and keeping wealth and land in the family. MailOnline recently revealed that no-one is tracking the rate of cousin marriages in the UK, with councils not recording any data on the issue. Studies have put Pakistan as having one of the highest rates globally at 65 percent of unions. This is followed by Saudi Arabia (50 percent), Afghanistan (40 percent), Iran (30 percent) and Egypt and Turkey (20 percent).
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Mum's in a care home. Dad has a new girlfriend
I watched my mum's face beam as she read her retirement cards, each one urging her to embrace freedom, explore hobbies and savour the best years of her life. Just eight months on, she was sat staring at the television, silent. When I asked what she was watching, she hesitated — then smiled as if to cover the fact that she didn't know the answer. Something was wrong. Mum was diagnosed with early onset dementia at 64. The celebration of her retirement had barely faded before she began withdrawing. Less eye contact. Short answers. Smiling and scoffing before walking away. Within a few months, my dad, my brother and I knew what life had in store for Mum, and it was far from anything in those retirement cards. At the same time, my wife was expecting our first child —Mum's first grandchild. We had decided to name her after Mum. The announcement was met with silence. No flicker of emotion from a woman who had always been so sentimental, so affectionate — never short of happy tears, even at corny adverts on TV. Dementia tightened its grip. Within three months, Mum became adamant nothing was wrong. She refused to see professionals, shutting us out with stubborn silence. Dad took over all housekeeping duties while Mum sat quietly, emotionless, staring into space. When she became doubly incontinent and suffered recurring infections, we accepted we needed help. After she was found in her nightgown down the road, Dad called a family meeting. We made the painful decision to move Mum into a local residential home. Then Covid hit, and for the next 12 months we waved at our despondent, rapidly declining mum — now a grandmother — through a window. I knew the adjustment would be hard. For me it meant losing the family unit I had always known. For Dad it meant the end of a 40-year marriage as he'd known it. But what none of us could have prepared for was how quickly life would shift once Mum was in the home. And how, in the midst of our grief, Dad would find love again. Out of the blue, Dad announced he was going on holiday. 'That's brilliant,' my wife said, nodding at me to agree. I did, half-listening as they chatted about the details. That night, she turned to me. 'Did you hear him say 'we'?' I hadn't. But now I couldn't stop hearing it. We speculated. Had he met someone? Could it be a catfish after his retirement fund? • Women who go through early menopause 'have higher risk of dementia' It wasn't a fraudster. It was Carol — Mum's best friend. The woman who had lived over the road for as long as I could remember. Mum and Carol had met when my parents moved to the street aged 29. Unlike Mum, who was quite shy, Carol was the wild one, the party girl. She told stories of nudist beaches and reckless adventures that made Mum giggle. Their friendship was built on shared experiences, always being there for one another, and a general mutual love of all things 'good housekeeping'— they were the typical Tupperware partygoers. Carol and her husband had been there for all of Mum's milestones. But shortly after Mum's 60th birthday, Carol's husband died suddenly. Carol and her two grown-up daughters were devastated. From this point on, Carol often came over, escaping the silence in her now-empty house. And when Mum started forgetting things, mixing up days and names, it was Carol who first suggested something might be wrong. She knew Mum so well — probably better than Dad did. After Mum moved into the care home, I would visit Dad and Carol would be there, drinking tea, just as she always had. It felt normal. She was family. I never imagined there was anything more to it. The holiday made it official. When Dad returned, tanned and relaxed, he told us he'd been away with Carol. He explained they had found comfort in each other's company and that they felt it was right to tell us. I was in shock. My wife did all the talking. All I could hear was Mum, in my head, scoffing: 'Carol? Dad and Carol? No.' The next time Dad came over, Carol was with him. She had always been around, yet suddenly everything was different. They sat closer to each other than before. Dad looked at her the way he used to look at Mum. And when Carol played with our daughter — her natural ease from raising two of her own — it hit me. Dad was happy. Wasn't that the point? Whether it was because he wanted an extension of Mum to live on in Mum's place, or just have a great companion, I'll never know. Dad was happy and that was all that mattered. • Drink coffee, tell jokes, read, nap — how to cut your risk of dementia Five years later, Mum is still here, though bedbound, unable to move or recognise any of us. Twice a week she gets visits from not one but two of her best friends: Dad and Carol. They care for her as a husband and a best friend would. They talk about Mum all the time, reminiscing about their memories together. Dad's attention sometimes drifts in the absence of Carol, and I know he's thinking about Mum. I have two daughters now, and one is an absolute double of my mum — Dad comments on it all the time. Carol smiles when he does. They both love and miss Mum just as much as I do. I'm not denying the fact that there have been uncomfortable moments. When Dad and Carol cleared out Mum's wardrobe, he brought a bag of her hats, scarves and handbags for my wife. I bristled. It felt too soon — she was still alive. But the truth is, she's never going to wear them again. She's not coming back. Without Carol, Dad would have been lonely, eating microwave meals for one, sitting by Mum's bedside having a one-way conversation. That's no life. If Dad had met a stranger, it would have been harder to accept. But Carol? Someone who had loved Mum too? It made sense. At first, friends and family were intrigued, full of questions. Some expected us to be upset, to reject Carol. We never felt that way. And as time passed, we realised this situation wasn't so unusual. It's common, in fact. One of my colleagues had family friends in an identical situation, and I've heard of many more too. People gravitate towards those they trust, those who understand their grief, those who are just as lonely but share the same experiences and values. And why shouldn't they? • Don't let age or dementia steal the right to a sex life Life doesn't follow the rules we expect. Grief and happiness can exist side by side, intertwined like the past and present. And if I've learnt anything, it's this — sometimes, the best way to honour someone you love is to keep living.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says office managers should be able to ban women from wearing face coverings
Office managers should be able to ban employees from wearing burkas, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Tory leader hit out at the Islamic traditional dress and said she had 'strong views about face coverings' and would not allow people into her constituency surgeries if they wore them. Her remarks came after Reform's chairman Zia Yusuf quit following a row over the subject after his colleague MP Sarah Pochin urged the Prime Minister to ban the burka 'in the interests of public safety'- before rejoining on Saturday night. Mrs Badenoch said Britain could enforce a ban on burkas but what needs to be addressed are pressing issues around integration. She added that sharia courts and first-cousin marriage are an 'insidious' barrier to integration. She said: 'If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first cousin marriage – there's a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems. 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.' She added: 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' France is just one of a number of countries that have already banned the burka. But Mrs Badenoch said: 'France has a ban and they have worse problems than we do in this country on integration. So banning the burka clearly is not the thing that's going to fix things.' If employers started to tell staff to remove any religious clothing, they could face legal issues under equality and human rights laws on the grounds they were being discriminating. An organisation would have to demonstrate its ban was for a legitimate reason, such as ensuring health and safety or enabling effective communication.
