Election results: Voters deciding next Ward 6 city councilor in northeast Salem
This story will be updated at 8 p.m. with initial election results.
Voters in northeast Salem are deciding who will represent them in the Ward 6 position on the Salem City Council.
Mai Vang, Logan Lor and Deanna Garcia are competing for the seat, which is unpaid and nonpartisan, and includes neighborhoods near Interstate 5, Lancaster Drive, Center Street and Sunnyview Road.
Salem has been without a Ward 6 councilor since January when former Councilor Julie Hoy was sworn in as mayor.
The winner will serve out the remainder of Hoy's term, which was set to expire at the end of 2026. For races to finish an unexpired term, the candidate with the most votes wins outright.
Vang is a Salem family law attorney who graduated from Willamette University College of Law.
She said she is focused on issues like the city budget, affordable housing, safety and livability, and economic development.
As of May 14, Vang's campaign had raised $31,160, according to Oregon Secretary of State's Office finance records.
Garcia is an operations and policy analyst for the Oregon Department of Transportation and chair of the North Lancaster Neighborhood Association.
Garcia said she is focused on public safety, homelessness, livability and the budget and said she's watched services and livability in Ward 6 fail to keep pace with population growth.
As of April 24, her campaign reported raising $57,172, according to Oregon Secretary of State's Office finance records.
Lor has worked as an Oregon Department of Corrections officer for 27 years.
He is focused on jobs, livability and collaboration and said he wants to bring his perspective as a blue-collar worker and father to the council.
"We need to change the policies at City Hall, because what the systemic social-economic disparity has done is create the northeast into a poverty area in Salem," Lor said.
Lor ran unsuccessfully for Ward 6 in 2014.
He was criticized in the weeks before the election by Marion County Democrats for his "anti-LGBTQ social media posts" and was told he was not eligible for endorsement. In the Facebook post, Lor said gay rights were not equivalent to civil rights.
He had no reported financial activity for donations to his campaign on the Secretary of State's Office website.
For questions, comments and news tips, email reporter Whitney Woodworth at wmwoodworth@statesmanjournal.com, call 503-910-6616 or follow on X at @wmwoodworth
This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Election results for Salem City Council Ward 6 race in 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brown student accuses school of waste at Congressional hearing
WASHINGTON (WPRI) — Speaking before a U.S. House Judiciary subcommittee, Brown University student Alex Shieh testified about his experience challenging his school as Republican lawmakers consider whether Ivy Leagues are violating antitrust laws. 'This committee has a responsibility not just to investigate Ivy League antitrust violations, but to reclaim the American Dream from those who have twisted it into a racket,' Shieh said. Shieh made national headlines when Brown launched a disciplinary investigation after he sent more than 3,000 emails to university staff, asking them to explain their jobs. He said the emails were for a Brown Spectator story investigating wasteful spending. During Wednesday's hearing, Republican Congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio asked Shieh what the school accused him of doing wrong. 'First, it was emotional, psychological harm, invasion of privacy and misrepresentation,' Shieh said. 'Asking someone how they spend your money is emotional harm?' Jordan asked. Shieh said the school dropped its charges after a disciplinary hearing last month. LOCAL COVERAGE: Brown student won't face discipline for DOGE-like email to administrators In a two-page email to 12 News, a spokesperson for Brown disputed several claims Republican lawmakers made about the school's finances during the hearing. The school also pushed back on Shieh's comments. 'We've continued to see inaccuracies reported publicly by the student testifying today about a related disciplinary process,' spokesperson Brian Clark wrote regarding Shieh. In an interview with 12 News after the hearing, Shieh said this issue is now much larger than him, and that he hopes lawmakers will get universities to cut down on wasteful spending. 'I'm glad that Congressman Jordan invited me to testify today,' he said. 'And I guess I'm grateful for all lawmakers there, both parties, who seem to be taking this issue of Ivy League antitrust violations very seriously.' But some Democrats on the subcommittee warn that the issue of college costs is being used by Republicans to go after universities. 'All institutions of higher learning are under attack?' Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., asked Julie Margetta Morgan, a higher education expert invited to testify in front of the committee. 'That's right,' Margetta Morgan said. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Associated Press
39 minutes ago
- Associated Press
In a crowded NYC mayoral debate, Cuomo faces attacks from all sides
Updated [hour]:[minute] [AMPM] [timezone], [monthFull] [day], [year] New York City mayoral race front-runner Andrew Cuomo was forced to fend off a volley of attacks from his Democratic primary rivals in a debate Wednesday, with his opponents unleashing pent up barbs at the former governor in an attempt to chip away at his lead. Cuomo was on the defensive from the opening bell. From a crowded stage, Cuomo's opponents swiped at him over the sexual harassment scandal that forced him from the governor's mansion, his coronavirus response and the federal investigation into whether he lied to Congress about his handling of the pandemic in nursing homes. At one point, Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist state lawmaker who has emerged as one of the leading candidates in the race, pressed Cuomo on the overlap between the former governor's political donors and those who donated to Republican President Donald Trump. 'The difference between myself and Andrew Cuomo is that my campaign is not funded by the very billionaires who put Donald Trump in D.C.,' Mamdani said, calling himself 'Donald Trump's worst nightmare.' Weathering the onslaught, Cuomo started flicking out his own jabs. 'Mr. Mamdani is very good on Twitter, with videos, but he actually produces nothing,' Cuomo said. 'Donald Trump would go through Mr. Mamdani like a hot knife through butter. He's been in government 27 minutes, he's passed three bills. That's all he's done.' The pile-on came after Cuomo, who has led every poll since entering the race, has largely avoided his opponents in public, giving them virtually no opportunities to meet him face-to-face. That all changed Wednesday night. The former governor's opponents had him in their sights throughout the debate, working in criticisms of Cuomo in their responses to questions or interjecting at points to get in another quick dig at the former governor of New York. The cross talk was heavy on a stage that hosted nine total candidates. Incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who pulled out of the primary to instead run for a second term on an independent ballot line, did not participate in the debate. Cuomo had been considered one of the Democratic Party's rising stars before his dramatic downfall in 2021 following a sexual harassment scandal. The former governor has said he did not intentionally mistreat the women and had fallen out of step with what was considered appropriate workplace conduct, though his lawyers and consultants have worked to discredit his accusers. Cuomo repeated a similar refrain on Wednesday during the debate. During his comeback run for mayor, Cuomo has faced renewed questions about his decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic and is under investigation by the Justice Department over whether he lied to Congress about how he handled the virus as it spread through nursing homes. During the debate, moderators tried to pin Cuomo down on the truthfulness of his congressional testimony about a state report on nursing home deaths during the pandemic, but he sidestepped the question. 'I was very aware of the report,' he said, drawing a laugh from one of the other candidates. ___ Izaguirre reported from Albany, New York.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Egypt illegally detaining Alaa Abd el-Fattah, UN investigators find
The British-Egyptian human rights activist and writer Alaa Abd el-Fattah is being illegally detained by the Egyptian government, an independent UN panel has found after an 18-month investigation. He is being held in a Cairo jail while his mother, Laila Soueif, based in Britain, is on hunger strike. She is holding a daily one-hour vigil outside Downing Street, the limit her health and weight loss allows. She is on day 241 of the hunger strike, and her body weight has halved. Keir Starmer, the UK prime minister, last week called for a second time for the Egyptian president, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, to show clemency, saying the Egyptian government was causing the family great anguish. In a report released to the family, the UN working group on arbitrary detention also asked the Egyptian government 'to take the steps necessary to remedy the situation without delay', adding 'the appropriate remedy would be to release Abd el-Fattah immediately and accord him an enforceable right to compensation and other reparations, in accordance with international law'. Unusually, the Egyptian government mounted a full defence of its actions to the UN panel. The UN group gave a withering verdict on the standards of justice in Egypt, including the suppression of free speech. It concluded that the activist's continued imprisonment was arbitrary and illegal owing to the absence of a warrant at the time of his arrest and the lack of explanation of reasons for his arrest or the allegations against him. It found Fattah was arrested for exercising his freedom of expression, not afforded a fair trial, and was detained based on his political views. Egypt is not obliged to comply with the report, but its findings add to the damage being done to the country's reputation by continuing to detain one of it most prominent writers. Fattah was arrested in September 2019, and was finally sentenced in December 2021 to five years in jail for spreading false news and harming Egypt's national interest. The UN panel found the allegation stemmed from Fattah sharing a Facebook post about the death of a prison inmate. Fattah's English barrister, Can Yeğinsu, said: 'The UN working group has delivered a clear and unequivocal decision: Alaa Abd el-Fattah's detention is arbitrary and in breach of international law. Egypt is now obligated to release Alaa immediately.' Richard Ratcliffe, the husband of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, the British-Iranian held in a Tehran jail for five years, said: 'Having a ruling from the working group of arbitrary detention is a club no family wants to belong to. You worry repeatedly about whether to file, and then the UN system is so slow, so you can wait for years. Then when it comes, it is a moment of clarity – an acknowledgment of the injustice under international law. 'The crime is not Alaa's; the criminals are those still holding him, and provoking his family to desperation. For our family, our WGAD ruling was also a relief: we thought it would mark an end to the UK government's prevarication, and the beginning of firm action on Nazanin's case. In the end, it did. 'But for Alaa's family, time is so much shorter. The ruling needs to be implemented now. The law is clear, but so is the heavy cost of continuing to ignore it.' Fattah's cousin Omar Robert Hamilton urged the UK to take Egypt to the international court of justice over the detention. The working group in its report said the use of excessively broad and vague concepts such as 'dissemination of false information' were incompatible with international standards of freedom of expression and should be abolished. It also suggested it was a crime against humanity to use 'rotation sentencing', whereby the prosecution changes the original charge so that the defendant's period in pre-trial custody is not counted as part of the sentence.
