logo
I know how Victoria Starmer feels. My family home became a target when my husband was an MP

I know how Victoria Starmer feels. My family home became a target when my husband was an MP

Telegraph20-05-2025

At first, I thought it was a book. I was standing in the hallway of our Cornwall house in 2020 and opened the slim Royal Mail package, assuming it was a copy of Johnny 's memoir. When I realised I was holding a nappy in my hand, it took me a moment to process what was going on. Then the side of it flapped open and I saw it was filled with adult human excrement.
'It's s---,' I screamed to Johnny, who had his back to me. It took him a beat to understand that I was being literal. Quickly, he grabbed it, ran outside and dumped it on the lawn, and then called the police. Johnny was at this point a minister in Boris Johnson's government and while all mail going to his Westminster and Plymouth offices was scanned, we were left to our own devices at home.
The police were with us half an hour later and were really helpful – eventually tracing it back to a woman in Croydon and doing everything they could to keep us safe. But I was shaken afterwards: this was our house, the place where we were raising our children away from prying eyes, and my husband's very public job had intruded inside it.
Hence my sympathy for Victoria Starmer. We don't know each other but I can guess how she must be feeling after the horrific arson incident at their north London house. Knowing these people can invade a place you see as a sanctuary – somewhere you deliberately keep separate from the business of politics – makes you feel powerless and very unsafe. For me, it was as if someone had reached their arm into my kitchen and handed me the nappy themselves.
Mrs Starmer is a clever woman and she will have understood that a job like her husband's doesn't come without consequences, but when Johnny first told me he wanted to be an MP, I was very naive. I didn't realise that abuse would be part of the territory.
Johnny and I met aged seven at our primary school in Sussex. We both sang in the choir, but after moving to different secondary schools we didn't see each other again until we were invited to the same party in London in 2009. I was 29 and recognised Johnny – who was in the Army and had already completed two tours of Afghanistan – immediately. We were engaged quickly but because we decided to start a family soon afterwards, we ended up not getting married for another five years.
However, our small wedding was arguably not the most life-changing moment of 2014. That is reserved for when Johnny told me he wanted to stand as an MP. He came home having read a statistic that said more soldiers died from suicide than on the field – and he found this so shocking he decided he wanted to do something about it.
Johnny and I have always been a team and even though Plymouth, the seat he wanted to contest in the 2015 election, was heavily Labour at that point, we decided to give it a go. I had given up my career in the airline industry to have my children and was earning money doing a cleaning job, so I was happy to help him in any way I could. Together, we drove around the city in a van emblazoned with Johnny's face and knocked on about 28,000 doors; our middle daughter, who was a baby then, was usually strapped to one of our backs.
We were given a 1 per cent chance of winning, so on the night of the election we went for a curry to celebrate having given it our best shot. Then we got a call from the constituency office: the count was close and we were needed there immediately.
When he won by 1,000 votes, I felt such a sense of achievement. Plymouth Labour could not believe it – and nor, to be honest, could we. Johnny was handed an envelope saying: 'Well done, you're an MP', and the whips still had no idea who he was. Our life changed quickly.
Unlike the party, the press were interested in us from the get-go. Johnny shared an office with four other new MPs but they had to kick him out because he had so many interviews and it was disturbing them. I think it was to do with him being a soldier and, maybe, our young family.
Soon we were an open story for everyone. I agreed to interviews if it meant Plymouth would get recognised and not just be the place people mistook for Portsmouth. I figured that if it meant talking about what shower gel we use, so be it.
As for our children: unlike Vic Starmer, I didn't mind occasional pictures of them in the paper, but I didn't want their lives to be too disturbed. We lived on the other side of the Tamar Bridge to Plymouth and we made sure they went to a school that wasn't in the constituency.
My life, meanwhile, was completely intertwined with Johnny's job. I ran his office; it was all casework, diary stuff and admin. While I was there, they made a rule that no family members could work for MPs, but because I was in situ I was allowed to stay. I worked so hard: I deserved my salary, no matter what people online said.
As for the rest of it, I just adapted. We were often invited to events in Plymouth and in London – and quite a few where I was asked to speak too. I really enjoyed it. Mostly, people were supportive of how much Johnny and I worked together, but every now and then someone from the 'old guard' would make a comment: usually something about me wearing trousers rather than a skirt. I just ignored it.
I opened a Twitter (now X) account so I could say the things Johnny wasn't able to – I'm outspoken, but he never asked me to tone it down (and apparently the bigwigs at Conservative HQ loved reading it). I once called Liz Truss an imbecile and that caused a bit of a hoo-ha, but let's be honest – history has proved me right.
I came off Twitter the day someone threatened the children: this person said that if I took them out that weekend, they wouldn't be safe. I told the police and they acted immediately, but that was it for me. I would be happy killing Twitter trolls forever but not if it puts the girls at risk.
I don't miss that aspect of political life at all. When we joined in 2015, Parliament had a security detail for the higher echelons but much less support for everyone else. Over Brexit, when tensions were running incredibly high and Jo Cox was murdered, there was a general feeling of unease and, thankfully, security was ramped up. From then on, I went everywhere with a panic button in my pocket, and when I did Johnny's surgery on a Thursday I had a bodyguard with me.
As Johnny's job got busier – and particularly once he became a minister in 2019 – I had to pick up more and more of the domestic work. He was usually away Monday to Thursday, which is a long time when you have three small children. It was hard for him too: he was desperate not to miss too much of the girls' childhoods, but he had no choice. Luckily, we have very easy-going daughters – and our third child, Audrey, was born in lockdown, so Johnny was home a lot during her first year.
Still, being an MP is all-consuming. It's a massive honour and privilege to be chosen by your peers; what we didn't realise was how awful it would be navigating the system and trying to get policies through. British politics, essentially, doesn't work. To pitch one side against the other means the whole thing is built on hatred, division and bullying. And even if one side comes up with a good idea, the other has to criticise it, which means you are set up to fail.
Still, for 10 years, it was our normal life. The 2024 election was brutal: Plymouth Labour are a special breed and when it was announced that we had lost, the security detail walked us to the stage, we shook the hand of the winner, and were back in the car five minutes later.
Afterwards, there was an adjustment period and I felt sad for Johnny, who had put his heart and soul into it – but there was also a feeling of peace. It's wonderful having him home. Last December, he went to every Christmas concert and nativity play that the children were in for the first time in nearly a decade. I also finally had the space to think about what I wanted to do. I started The Dress Barn – a space to buy clothes for events and weddings in Cornwall, where we live. I love doing it.
As for politics: if Johnny ever went back, he wouldn't be messing about – he would go with a big role in mind and, of course, I'd support him. But for now, we're happy being out of the spotlight.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man dies after being hit by van in Scarborough
Man dies after being hit by van in Scarborough

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Man dies after being hit by van in Scarborough

A man has died after being hit by a van outside a church in North incident took place outside the Jehovah's Witness Church at the junction of Westbourne Park with Seamer Road, in Scarborough, at around 09:25 BST on man, aged in his 80s, was taken to hospital, but has since Yorkshire Police said the driver of the silver Volkswagen Transporter van will be interviewed, but anyone with any information or dashcam footage is asked to get in touch. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

EXCLUSIVE How YOU could find yourself wrongly accused of 'pump and dash' and hit with a £60 fine - as alleged petrol thefts hit all-time high
EXCLUSIVE How YOU could find yourself wrongly accused of 'pump and dash' and hit with a £60 fine - as alleged petrol thefts hit all-time high

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE How YOU could find yourself wrongly accused of 'pump and dash' and hit with a £60 fine - as alleged petrol thefts hit all-time high

Petrol thefts have soared to an all-time high, figures suggest. MailOnline can reveal that 110,000 charges for alleged 'pump and dash' thefts were issued by two major fuel security firms last year. This marks a 20-fold rise in just six years. Industry bigwigs insist there has been genuine increase in drivers fleeing forecourts without paying, or 'bilking', especially in the wake of the cost of living crisis. Yet drivers say they have been incorrectly stung with threatening letters demanding hefty 'admin fees' on top of their supposedly unpaid petrol or diesel. In an attempt to recoup the costs of stolen fuel for petrol stations, many of which are independently owned, Forecourt Eye and British Oil Security Syndicate (BOSS) scan forecourts with numberplate-recognition technology. The two companies work with hundreds of filling sites and are considered among the biggest in the sector. Between the duo, they fired off nearly 113,000 requests to the DVLA for driver details last year. This is up from around 5,500 in 2018, according to data MailOnline obtained from the DVLA through Freedom of Information. Firms only request such data, which costs £2.50 a time and includes the car owner's name and address, if they intend to recover costs for non-payment of fuel. As well as seeking to recuperate the alleged unpaid fuel, companies may slap on their own admin fees. Forecourt Eye bolts on a £60 add-on. Drivers may feel pressured into paying up, even if they already forked out at the time. Some claim to have been threatened with being banned from forecourts up and down the country. There are several ways motorists can wrongly be accused of a 'pump and dash'. For example, if your card was declined and neither you nor the cashier noticed before you drove off, you are likely to be sent a demand. If a criminal has cloned your plates and genuinely steals petrol, you could also be on the hook for any fuel they have stolen. Criminal gangs have also been known to use entirely fake plates to dodge paying for fuel. Drivers also risk being falsely accused of bilking if a cashier selected the wrong pump (or failed to select one at all) when totting up your bill. If this happened, it would mean your fuel was technically never paid for, even if you paid for someone else's. This is the equivalent of a supermarket cashier failing to scan an item at checkout. Chris Mullen, for example, was accused of not paying £7.80 for petrol – even though he was driving a diesel car and filled up £30 worth of fuel. Despite fighting the claim from Forecourt Eye, thought to be caused by staff error, the 63-year-old from Stalham, Norfolk, said the firm 'insisted this was the case'. He was slapped with a £60 admin charge on top of the petrol he allegedly owed. After appealing, Tesco did issue a refund and an apology to him as well as a £10 gift card, which the motorist branded 'something of an insult'. Tesco told the Great Yarmouth Mercury that its processes were 'regularly reviewed' with regular meetings and new staff training to 'prevent errors from occurring'. Social media and forums are littered with similar stories of motorists claiming to have been falsely accused of driving off without paying. MailOnline's analysis can't prove genuine thefts have risen, it only shows that reports have gone up. Police data, however, suggests more than 27,000 alleged thefts occurred last year, in line with levels in 2020. About 95 per cent of cases are canned with no suspect being identified. Cops themselves moan they have 'finite resources' to probe suspected thefts. The Petrol Retailers Association, whose members run two-thirds of forecourts, says bilking robs them of around £100million a year. Petrol stations themselves have resorted to shaming 'pump and dashers' online in a bid to claw back the stolen fuel. One forecourt in Hythe, Kent, last summer shared CCTV footage of a blue car filling up with £120 of petrol before the driver got straight back into his vehicle and casually zoomed off without attempting to pay. Owner Sutha Hari, 49, claimed she wasn't going to bother alerting the police because 'nothing ever comes of it'. While there is no specific offence code for robbing from fuel pumps, it falls under the 'making off without payment' umbrella. It also covers restaurant 'dine and dashers', as well as people who make off without paying taxi drivers at the end of journeys. Thieves can be jailed for up to two years. Experts say petrol theft pushes up prices for law-abiding motorists. Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: 'It would be tempting to suspect that the cost-of-living crisis is pushing normally law-abiding people into committing this type of offence, but that would be an insult to the vast majority of people who continue to obey the law whatever their circumstances. 'Repeat criminals might well be pushing their luck more than ever because they believe other pressures on the police are such that they'll get away with it. 'Drive-offs might be seen as relatively low-level crimes in the grand scheme of things but they are corrosive to society, damaging to businesses and ultimately push up pump prices for law-abiding motorists and riders. 'More is being done to prevent these crimes through adoption of better surveillance systems and pay-at-pump options, but the numbers suggest the problem has been getting worse, with tens of thousands of drive-away fuel thefts each year. 'Those tempted to refuel without paying need to feel there is a real threat of being caught and punished.'

We have lived in our homes for years... but now our neighbours are costing us thousands - it's a race to become last family standing
We have lived in our homes for years... but now our neighbours are costing us thousands - it's a race to become last family standing

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

We have lived in our homes for years... but now our neighbours are costing us thousands - it's a race to become last family standing

Residents of a once-proud neighbourhood say their lives are being turned upside down by a wave of out-of-town landlords converting grand family homes into a patchwork of cramped bedsits. Locals on Greenbank Road in Darlington, County Durham, say property developers are exploiting loopholes to slice up elegant 19th-century townhouses into 'overcrowded rabbit hutches'. The residential street, once brimming with families, is now 'overrun' with so-called HMOs - homes of multiple occupation - with landlords attempting to cram up to nine tenants inside the three-storey buildings. The few families that remain on the road fear their value of their homes plunging as the road becomes a HMO valley - and told of safety fears as transient tenants move in. Matt Fisher, 47, who lives on Greenbank Road with his four children, said the close-knit community had deteriorated. He said: 'When we moved here 15 years ago these were all family homes. 'There's only four homes on that side of the road now - the rest are HMOs. Landlords are buying the properties for cheap and converting them all. 'It's ridiculous and it's gone way too far. It's almost a race to see who'll be the last family standing. 'We want our kids to play in the neighbourhood with other kids, but there's no neighbourhood anymore. 'You never know who's moving in and out. They swap and change like yo-yos. 'I think about moving all the time and if I could afford it I would. But every new HMO knocks even more money off the value of my home. 'If I could pick up this house and move it a mile away, it would be worth £100,000 more.' Looking over the road, where HMOs and self-contained flats are easily spotted due to the number of doorbells and buzzer panels, Mr Fisher said he had noticed a surge in drug dealing and anti-social behaviour. He added: 'There's drug dealing in the middle of the road - really brazen. 'They literally stand in the street to do deals. A quick swap and off they go.' At one house, work is underway to transform a home into a money-spinning nine-bed HMO after developers secured the property after the deaths of its elderly owners. Tenants' individual living and sleeping space, plus an en-suite, will all be based in single rooms of the house, with a shared kitchen. Each will likely pay in the region of £400 to £500 a month - generating a significant return for the landlord. A neighbour told how her life had become a 'nightmare' after enduring months of building work and spoke of concerns about the impact on her house price. She said: 'I've had the same neighbours for 40 years on both sides. Now I'll have nine people coming and going at all times of the day. 'Who's going to want to buy my house? I might end up with a house that I can't sell.' Another neighbour, who asked not to be named, described the HMOs as 'overcrowded rabbit hutches' that were destroying the fabric of the community. John Ridgeway, 65, who lives on Greenbank Road with wife Sharon, 64, is leading the fightback against the scourge. Referring to a house under development, he said: 'What really started it for us was what's happening. 'The woman who lived there passed away, and her family sold it off. 'The property was bought by a developer up in Newcastle. At first, they were going to put six people in. Then we got a planning notice to say they want to make it a nine-person HMO. 'Round the back, they've added these huge dormers onto the roof - absolutely massive. The backyard is a tip, just piles of rubbish stripped out of the house. 'These houses are lovely. Big, solid family homes. Yes, they're cheap compared to elsewhere. But they're cheap because of the HMOs. Families don't want to move in anymore. 'We're not looking to move, unless we win the lottery - but it's devaluing our homes. Every family house that gets turned into a HMO knocks a bit more off the rest of us, doesn't it? That's what it comes down to.' According to Darlington council, there are already 400 HMOs in the town. But locals believe the true figure is much higher because landlords do not need consent for less than six occupants. Grandfather Sandy Duncan, 86, said: 'I've lived here forty-three years. This whole side of the street used to be families - all of it. That side too. It's just not the same anymore. Now it's all multi-occupants. 'I worry about the rubbish and bins overflowing, and the drainage. Can the pipes cope with nine showers in a morning? I doubt it. 'If I wanted to sell my house now, would I get the price I would've got ten years ago? No. I wouldn't. 'There's no regulation. Up to six people, they don't even need to ask anyone. They can just do it. You just wonder where it ends. No one's really stopping it.' According to council documents, large HMOs are also planned in nearby streets. In Station Road, developers want to flip a former family home into a six-bed HMO - the same fate as a three-bed semi in Yarm Road. On Greenbank Road, residents have launched a petition in the hope of getting the local authority to clamp down. It reads: 'Darlington Borough Council has lost control of the HMO situation in our neighbourhood. 'The council planning department currently has no way of knowing how many houses have already been converted into HMOs. 'Planning law means that now only new HMO conversions for more than six people need planning permission. 'They cannot make reasonable planning decisions by assessing the impact of new, large HMOs on our local streets if they don't know the scale of the local problem.' Residents want to see the council enforce a legal direction known as Article 4, which means all conversions from single household homes to HMOs need planning permission. The rule has already been enforced in neighbouring cities such as Middlesbrough and Durham. A spokesman at Darlington Borough Council said HMOs provided 'a valuable contribution to housing provision for people who could not access the housing market through home ownership or rental'. It added: 'We also recognise that a concentration of unregulated HMOs can cause issues for neighbouring residents. 'We have been working hard to look into measures, such as an Article Four direction, that can be introduced at the earliest opportunity to help control those smaller HMOs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store