logo
Letters: Labour needs to stop apeing Reform and start being positive

Letters: Labour needs to stop apeing Reform and start being positive

New European13-05-2025

This kind of stuff is forgivable only if Labour now finds another tactic to deal with the surge of the far right Reform other than donning Nigel Farage's tweeds, and keeps the far right out of power in the UK. Following Farage means eternally inching towards him as he inches further right; doing this has already left the Conservatives in ruins.
I read 'Can Starmer avoid the Farage trap?' by Tom Baldwin (TNE #434) on Sunday night, then awoke the next morning to the sound of a trap's sharp snap and a Labour prime minister saying that Britain 'risks becoming a country of strangers' unless migration is checked. It seems the very strong case for the benefits of migration in a country with an ageing population and a declining birth rate will have to be made by other parties.
All opinion polls show British voters in favour of continuing the battle against climate change, and for much closer integration with the EU. Keir Starmer must now stand up and make the positive argument for these as job-creating, economy-boosting policies; otherwise his Labour will stand for nothing.
Simone Hartley
Bold action to differentiate the Labour party from Reform could include a wealth tax, windfall taxes and acknowledgement that Farage's Brexit has and will continue to impoverish us. I'm no longer a card-carrying member and won't be until Labour becomes Labour again.
Catherine Garrett
This is a moment of great opportunity for Labour. While they hold office, and given the various crises born of Trump, Starmer could almost certainly negotiate a favourable agreement with the EU that would boost trade and thus tax receipts in short order.
The way to go about this is by first getting a series of quiet bilateral agreements-in-principle with EU leaders, and underlining Britain's seriousness by dangling a juicy carrot (while we still have something to dangle). Only then should Starmer announce his intention, admit his mistake, and put an ocean between himself and Farage.
RSP Zatzen
Labour need to be as anti-Farage as most of us are. Victories in Canada and Australia were down to being vocally against populism. So stop chasing long-gone voters. Seek new voters from progressive, outward-looking people. In other words, dump Morgan McSweeney and Maurice Glasman.
Lauren Smith
Labour's unpopularity is not about the winter fuel payment. Let's face it, the majority of the wealth in the UK is with older people.
Instead, it is about a government that is not bold enough, should be spending not cutting and has been way too cautious for a party that campaigned on change. We knew from the start that Keir Starmer was not a charismatic leader, but he needs to show some flair quickly lest the public turn away.
Adam Primhak
So how do we stop Nigel Farage? Not by supporting Labour, at least not in Wales where Senedd Cymru elections take place in less than a year.
The latest ITV opinion poll confirms that Labour has now sunk to third place behind Plaid Cymru and Reform.
Plaid Cymru is a party that has consistently opposed Brexit and is committed to the European Union. Its policies are to the left of Labour.
Its long-term goal is to win for Wales the same status as other EU nations. And in Rhun Ap Iorwerth it has a credible and talented candidate for the role of first minister. Plaid Cymru offers the only realistic chance of stopping Reform and the slide towards fascism.
Dafydd Williams
Sgeti, Abertawe
I feel deeply ashamed of my continued membership of the Labour Party. Starmer's (or should I say McSweeney's) Labour government is behaving like an austerity Tory administration.
On May 1, I voted for a Labour mayor in North Tyneside because of the success of her retiring predecessor, not because of the party's national behaviour. I am totally unsurprised that she was given a run for her money by the Reform candidate.
I shall probably continue to vote Labour on the basis that a bad Labour administration is preferable to a bad Tory one and the thought of lending support to Farage's bunch of thugs is for me an impossibility.
David Isaacs
I live in County Durham, which elected 65 Reform councillors on May 1. Quite frankly it was an accident waiting to happen. This was a frustrated reaction to years of perceived neglect in a region that has struggled for at least four decades since the collapse of its core industries.
Yet pandering to Reform's agenda is not only wrong in principle, it gives them momentum and implies they are the tail wagging the dog. They do not understand why we have high immigration – lack of suitably skilled workers for key jobs for instance – and that merely controlling numbers will achieve nothing. Reform's economic policies are Truss on speed and their culture wars just sow division.
Locally, they are threatening the council with auditors. To what end, apart from trying to prove malpractice, of which there is little evidence? Their silly war on DEI has already come up against reality. They have limited local powers on environmental matters, and cutting local expenditure when councils have struggled for years due to austerity will blow up in everyone's faces.
Mainstream parties would be wise to confront them and construct credible policies that address the most urgent issues of the day. Reform gaining local office will gradually unravel, as they are shown up as inadequate for the complex tasks we all face.
David Rolfe
Labour seem to hope that in four-and-a-bit years' time they will be rewarded by red wall voters because they didn't try to rejoin the EU, tax the wealthy or bring in PR to blunt Reform's electoral chances. If they think that it is a strategy that will work, then they are fools.
Mark Grahame
Imitating Reform will never get Labour anywhere. Reform voters will vote for the original rather than a pale copy. Labour has to be courageously supportive of the downtrodden, whether British or not, courageously left wing, courageously itself. Only then will voters have a real choice.
Jessica Gaines
Some perspective is needed on the May 1 elections. It is a bit early to be talking about the collapse of the two main parties after one local election where Reform won a few hundred seats. Labour have almost 10 times more council seats and a parliamentary majority with over four years until the next general election.
A warning shot perhaps, but this talk is all hysteria and hyperbole.
Jack Millard
One nation, one party
After reading Patience Wheatcroft's 'Labour's next nightmare could be a non-dom U-turn' (TNE #434), I've come up with an idea. Labour can reverse their plans on taxing non-doms and on private school VAT, and they can scrap net zero. Then their politics will be identical to the Tories. They can merge and both can become the largest party again!
Jonathan Porteous
When I moved to France to retire (not in a chateau, simply a rented two-bedroom flat), I didn't get to choose where I'd be taxed. There were rules which dictated that, once I'd been here six months, I'd be taxed here (and had to send a document to the UK tax office to avoid being taxed twice).
Why should there be ANY different regime for some people, just because they're rich?
Tony Jones
It's not Gen Z's fault
In 'The war on law' (TNE #434), Matthew d'Ancona repeated the claim that 52% of Gen Z believe that the UK would be better 'with a strong leader in charge, who did not have to bother with parliament and elections'.
Channel 4, who made the original claim, have never published the questionnaire on which this is based, nor the data. When the Policy Institute at King's College London sought to replicate it, they found 6%, not 52%, holding these views, and no authoritative source, including the British Election Study, has confirmed the Channel 4 claim. However, the King's study did find that Gen Z (as defined by Channel 4) had lower levels of confidence in a range of institutions.
Young people, like many of us, are frustrated by the state of Britain and impatient at the time involved in putting things right. But that does not make them supporters of a dictatorship.
Stephen McNair
Coltishall, Norfolk
Don't get mad
Tim Bradford's strip in TNE #434 promotes the same misconceptions as the musical Hamilton, beginning, 'In the 1770s, Americans fought for liberty against a mad tyrant'. Monty Python refuted this timing brilliantly in 'The Golden Age of Ballooning', as George III where Graham Chapman complains 'I don't go mad till 1800!''
The issue of mental capacities apart, Britain had had a constitutional monarchy and bill of rights since accepting William III nearly a century earlier – not that people in the country at various levels of power hadn't been trying to get round such obstacles ever since then.
But it wasn't possible for a Georgian king to be either a tyrant or an absolute monarch, no matter how much he might have wanted to be.
Bryn Hughes
Wrexham, North Wales
Best of British
After reading the latest splendid Dilettante column by Marie Le Conte on slowly becoming British (TNE #434), some humble suggestions.
Firstly, I have found using the phrase 'mustn't grumble' more than useful over the last 60-odd years. Next, Marie should try watching the peerless TV series, Dad's Army, along with the films and the recent remakes in order to be able to quote those inimitable and timeless lines.
Turning to tea, undoubtedly close to the pinnacle of Britishness, when I lived in Montreuil-sur-Mer a lovely neighbour told me that the French like Earl Grey tea as it has some bite. Hope Marie enjoys it!
Robert Boston
Kingshill, Kent
Telling it like it is
Congratulations on Svetlana Lazareva's article 'The Iranian execution machine' (Carousel, TNE #433). Most articles on the regime either don't mention or misrepresent the National Council of Resistance of Iran. A parliament in exile is an exact description of it.
Carolyn Beckingham
Lewes, East Sussex
Capital gains
Quipping about the lateness of London buses when waiting for a response from the mayor's office in the capital (Rats in a Sack, TNE #433) will ring hollow with any readers who, like me, live in the north but visit London regularly.
If buses in Cheshire ran even 20 per cent as well as those in zone 4 and 5 in London, we'd be cheering from the rooftops.
Catriona Stewart
Northwich, Cheshire
BELOW THE LINE
Comments, conversation and correspondence from our online subscribers
Re: Rats in a Sack on Reform advertising work-from-home roles while telling staff at the new councils that they must work from the office. (TNE #434). Where does all this leave its leader Nigel Farage? He rarely turns up to the Westminster office and doesn't work from his Clacton home either!
Ken Broughton
So Arron Banks has lost out on becoming the west of England mayor after admitting he didn't understand what the role entailed and wanted to do it from his chateau (Rats in a Sack TNE #434). At last, a Reform politician who actually tells the truth!
Christopher Harrison
Re: Josh Barrie on the new greasy spoons (TNE #434). There is an old truism: you are offered a last breakfast before you are shot. Who is going to go for the healthy option as against a full English?
John Tanzer
Re: 'Trump's war on language' by Peter Trudgill (TNE #434). If Donald has his way, the official language of the USA will soon be Pointing And Grunting.
Geoff Stevenson
Re: 'Plato and the piano' by Emily Herring (TNE #434). Right on! At the age of 86 I picked up where I had left off 70 years before and got a qualified piano tutor. Brahms and Chopin wouldn't care too much what I do to their music. But if I sit down for a spare 10 minutes at the piano I generally find it out turns out to be a good hour before I check how long I've been at it.
John Churchill
Re: 'What the hell happened to the bloke from Coast?' (TNE #433). To be fair to Neil Oliver, the writer Owen Jones is making a very good job of monetising the far left viewpoint. Crackpot views pay healthily on both sides of the political divide, it would seem.
Michael McKeown
Re: 'Jesus of Madrid' (TNE #433). One of the reasons I love the New European (apart from its news and analysis) is articles like this! I'd never heard of Camilo Sesto, but the story of him bringing Jesus Christ Superstar to Franco's Spain is remarkable, and something I'd never have heard about otherwise. Worth the subscription alone! Brilliant!
Richard Debonnaire
JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Subscribe and download our free new app to comment and chat with our writers

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn

Daily Record

time14 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn

Around 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Earlier this week the UK Government announced Winter Fuel Payments will be reinstated for over 9 million pensioners later this year. The U-turn and Chancellor Rachel Reeves Spending Review on Wednesday have prompted calls from the 'End Frozen Pensions Campaign' for the annual State Pension uprating to be reinstated for around 453,000 retirees living in countries which do not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. The campaign said it would cost the UK Government just under £60 million per year to end this 'historic wrong'. The policy, which prevents State Pensions from being increased annually - to counteract the impact of inflation for UK pensioners living in certain countries - means some are receiving as little as £60 per week, far below the current £176.45 rate for the Basic State Pension for those living in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. John Duguid, Chair of the End Frozen Pensions Campaign, said: "The Government's U-turn on Winter Fuel Payments shows there is a common consensus that the most vulnerable in our society rely on such payments as essential lifelines during times of need. 'Victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal, who receive only a fraction of their full UK State Pension because they live in some countries overseas, should not be excluded from this rationale. Yet the Government's continued refusal to address this longstanding discrimination means they continue to suffer from often negligible levels of state support. 'These British pensioners, many of whom spent their working lives in the UK, receive on average just £60 per week compared to the more than £170 per week they would be entitled to in the UK, or a non-frozen country.' He added: 'Ending this historic wrong would cost just under £60 million per year. This would barely register in the overall State Pension budget. But this isn't only about cost, it is about the principle of treating British state pensioners fairly and equally. 'Similar to the Government's decision to reinstate Winter Fuel Payments, ending this scandal is the correct and morally just action to take. The Government should do right by those who paid fairly into the system, and ensure they have dignity in their retirement.' Last month, cross-party MPs united to intensify pressure on the UK Government over its refusal to reform the so-called 'frozen pensions' policy. Only British overseas pensioners living in specific countries - mostly within the Commonwealth - are impacted, in what Rebecca Smith MP described as "the ultimate postcode lottery'. Those in the USA see the same annual increase as British pensioners living in the UK or France, while those in Australia or Canada, see their State Pension remain 'frozen' and effectively fall in value. For example, 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, who lived and worked in the UK until the age of 76 and served in all three of the RAF, Navy and the Army, has received just £72.50 per week since 2001, the year she moved to Canada to be nearer her daughter. Jim Shannon MP similarly questioned the logic of the policy applying in only some countries and not others, arguing 'the arbitrary distinction between countries with and without an operating agreement lacks logic and smacks of red tape and bureaucracy gone mad." The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, was mostly notably challenged on the estimated cost of ending the policy, which is estimated at £60m per year - 0.04 per cent of the annual State Pension budget - rather than the £950m per year quoted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The difference explained by the fact the DWP are quoting for uprating and backdating payments to account for the years affected pensioners have been frozen. However, campaigners are instead asking to receive the annual increase from this point onwards. Douglas McAllister MP stressed that campaigners and supportive MPs are 'not seeking a full backdating, but for the Government to introduce some form of yearly indexing to answer that injustice'. Longterm critic of the policy Sir Roger Gale MP argued the policy is 'not a matter of cost. It is a matter of moral responsibility and duty.' The Minister was also reminded by a number of MPs that 'the vast majority of impacted pensioners still report having no knowledge of the policy's existence prior to moving overseas'. ‌ State Pension payments 2025/26 Full New State Pension Weekly payment: £230.25 Fortnightly payment: £460.50 Four-weekly payment: £921 Annual amount: £11,973 Full Basic State Pension ‌ Weekly payment: £176.45 Fortnightly payment: £352.90 Four-weekly payment: £705.80 Annual amount: £9,175 Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5% Article continues below Recent analysis released by Royal London revealed only around half of people receiving the New State Pension last year were getting the full weekly amount - and around 150,000 were on less than £100 per week.

'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night
'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night

The National

time29 minutes ago

  • The National

'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night

The Succession star was speaking as he appeared on the BBC Scotland Debate Night programme on Wednesday evening. Cox called for more unity of purpose from Scottish politicians and the public more widely. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: John Swinney needs to rethink his strategy over Scottish independence 'I'm not just talking about parties, I'm talking about the country,' he said. 'I'm talking about this country, which I love, and I'm very proud that I come from this country, but I've seen it time and time again where there's this endless debate: debate this, that, this, that, this. 'I just feel that we need unity, we need unity of purpose, and we haven't got unity of purpose. I'm sorry, but we simply don't. 'We have so much dissension, and we've lost the way really big time, and I feel that we should resume that, we should get it back.' Cox said he did not know which political party could unite Scotland, but suggested it was 'certainly' not Labour under Starmer. The actor went on: 'I'm not pleased with Mr Starmer and his attitude towards Scotland, because everything for him is England. 'He talks about England, he talks about English football.' After applause from the audience, the Dundee-born star added: 'I'm at heart a socialist, so I get, I do really get annoyed when it's not about socialism, it's about something else, and that's what I feel is lacking. 'I'm just, I'm sick of it really, I'm fed up. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed 'I come back to this country. I love this country and I see dissension after dissension after dissension, the inability to come together, and it's an appalling situation.' Asked if pro-independence parties should unite, Cox said: 'Absolutely they should, because it's in everybody's interests.' Talking about the Labour Government, he added: 'They're not interested in us. I know for a start that Starmer is certainly not interested and doesn't want an independent Scotland. 'He only sees it as a sort of encumbrance to what he is, so I'm not happy about that situation.' Brian Cox is known for his role as Logan Roy in the smash hit SuccessionElsewhere, Cox, a former Labour supporter, said that the UK Government's attitude to Scotland was 'nebulous'. 'I worry about a lot of things that go on, and I'm particularly worried about the attitude towards Scotland,' he said of the impact of the Spending Review, which Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday. Cox went on: 'There certainly should be more detail, but they also should certainly understand what the need of this country is – and that's what gets me. 'It's a bit bland, it's a bit off, you know, just off the cuff, and I really want to see really what they think about Scotland, and I find it a little bit nebulous.'

North Korea appears to follow the South in suspending loudspeaker broadcasts
North Korea appears to follow the South in suspending loudspeaker broadcasts

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

North Korea appears to follow the South in suspending loudspeaker broadcasts

SEOUL, South Korea — North Korea appears to have stopped loudspeakers near the border targeting South Korea, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said Thursday. The JCS said that North Korean loudspeaker broadcasts were not heard on Thursday, and the South Korean military was monitoring Pyongyang's activities. Seoul suspended its own loudspeaker broadcasts near the border targeting North Korea on Wednesday, after having resumed propaganda and K-pop blasts last year during a time of growing tension with its neighbor. South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, who took office this month vowing to resume dialogue with the North, ordered the move to ease tension, reduce military confrontation and build trust, his spokesperson said, as North Korea has refrained from provocations lately. Those living near the heavily fortified border have opposed the loudspeaker broadcasts, which they blame for severe noise nuisance. Seoul's resumption last July of a round-the-clock campaign of loudspeaker broadcasts was in response to Pyongyang's launch of balloons carrying trash over the border, the South's military said at the time. Pyongyang had said the balloons were retaliation for a propaganda campaign by North Korean defectors and activists in the South who regularly send inflatables with anti-Pyongyang leaflets and other items across the border.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store