logo
Gavin Newsom's climate change chicanery

Gavin Newsom's climate change chicanery

The Hill06-02-2025

Gavin Newsom doesn't really care about climate change — and I can prove it.
Despite his rhetoric, Newsom is loudly backing a massive, state-funded project that will pump millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere. Of course, I am referring to the colossal boondoggle known as California High Speed Rail — a project so onerous, it's caught the attention of President Trump.
To date, more than $11 billion has been spent developing this train, with $3.4 billion coming from carbon fees generated by the state. The segment under construction is 171 miles through the Central Valley. That means thousands of tons of steel and millions of tons of cement — commodities with very large carbon footprints, estimated at 1.4 tons of carbon dioxide per ton of steel and 0.88 tons per ton of concrete.
The project's carbon impact doesn't end there. Wiring, plastic, earth-moving equipment and deliveries ramp up the carbon budget even more.
All this for a project that may never be completed. The current projected cost is $135 billion, with no identified source for anywhere close to the funds needed to complete it (not to mention that the price keeps going up). The segment under construction is the easiest stretch. The line still must tunnel through mountains to the north and south, including the longest tunnel in the U.S., which, if built, will traverse an active earthquake fault.
Newsom's California Air Resources Board has committed 25 percent of its revenue to California High Speed Rail. That money, from carbon permit auctions, is intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions putting $3.4 billion toward the rail project thus far.
Here is where we see Newsom's insincerity. Instead of pouring billions down high-speed rail's bottomless pit, that $3.4 billion could have gone to real greenhouse emissions reductions that would also help middle- and low-income Californians.
For example, climate change warriors have targeted the dreaded gas stove for extinction. Old stoves do leak methane and nitrous oxide (300 times more potent than carbon dioxide). Newsom and the California Air Resources Board could replace 2 million of these malevolent monsters for under $1.4 billion.
Old window air conditioners, energy inefficient and leaking potent hydrofluorocarbons, could be replaced with modern Energy Star units. Replacing 3 million of those units would cost up to $1.8 billion. That's $3.2 billion for much more efficient appliances that emit far fewer greenhouse emissions and cost less to operate, yielding financial benefits to low- and middle-income households. And that is paying full retail price; asking consumers to put a bit of their own cash into the till could expand the program significantly.
But if California is determined to do something about rail, there is already a passenger rail project ideal for investment: an existing rail route from San Diego to Santa Barbara via Los Angeles.
The route is a sometimes single-track, diesel route full of at-grade intersections, making it a slow, polluting train. An upgraded rail line, double-tracked, electrified and grade separated, would efficiently serve over 10 million people in one of the most car-congested parts of the country. And it would require no tunneling, nor significant land purchases. Projected improvements for the corridor could have been completed for less than what has been spent thus far on a high-speed line that currently goes from nowhere to nowhere.
But the problem is that upgrading existing infrastructure is relatively boring compared to a brand-new white elephant.
Like the rest of the loud California climate change crowd, Newsom is not interested in actually helping people or truly reducing greenhouse emissions. They want big shiny projects with massive contracts, news stories, photo ops and dramatic drone videos. Three million air conditioners get a brief moment in the sun, but interminable megaprojects are the gift that keeps giving (and taking).
That's the real priority for the odious Newsom: popularity and power.
Newsom's preference for preening and publicity took a dark turn with the January southern California wildfires. Thoroughly uninterested in dull and unremarkable preventive acts — controlled burns, fire breaks, burying electrical lines, allowing new fire-resistant homes to replace old tinderboxes, not to mention ramping up firefighting capacity — the Los Angeles region was primed for catastrophic wildfires, regardless of the extent of climate change.
Newsom is not fully at fault, but he and the rest of the California political establishment deserve a solid portion of the blame for the multibillion-dollar catastrophe and its 4.4 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions. Of course, Newsom won't take the blame at all, casting it on oil companies, insurance companies and anyone else who doesn't move in lockstep with his ideology.
The bottom line is simple: if there is a climate emergency, individuals, governments, nonprofits and companies should be doing everything they can do now to reduce emissions. Maybe a new air conditioner only cuts emissions a small amount or perhaps switching from diesel fuel to natural gas is not perfect, but in an emergency, you do what you can with what you have.
For politicians like Newsom, his words and alarmism say climate emergency, but his actions say it's a big fraud.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread
California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread

The dissolution of the Donald Trump-Elon Musk marriage was enough, for a brief moment, to lift beleaguered California Democrats' spirits. But within 24 hours, the gleeful mood in this heavily Democratic state darkened amid sweeping immigration raids and reports the Trump administration was planning to yank funding from California. The swift reversal was a reminder that, for all the delight Democrats took in a public feud between the president and the world's richest man, a war of words on X is far less consequential than a hostile White House. Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders on Friday quickly returned to a familiar defensive crouch, condemning the White House's reported plan and escalating the standoff by threatening to withhold the money California sends to Washington. 'We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back,' Newsom said in a post on X. 'Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump.' It was unclear on Friday what money the White House might rescind. A spokesperson said no decision had been made. Many Democrats had spent the previous day reveling in the extraordinary break between Trump and his former patron Musk, piling on in a cascade of snarky tweets, triumphant news hits and floor speeches. The joy was especially palpable in California, where Democrats watched Musk transform from a source of pride to a conservative nemesis eager to attack the state that helped make him. The dunking contest seemed to open new political possibilities, as Musk amplified Democrats' case against tariffs and the GOP 'megabill' being debated in Congress — two central features of the president's agenda. But the respite from unforgiving news cycles proved short-lived. And it vindicated warnings from some Democrats that the Trump-Musk feud was distracting from the more serious threats emanating from Washington. For Rep. Dave Min, who is preparing to defend a frontline Orange County seat that could help determine control of the House, Thursday was all about Musk: He excoriated the Tesla executive in a preplanned floor speech, and joined the mockery on X. On Friday, Min was scrambling to confront what he called a 'blatantly lawless' push to claw back funds. 'These cuts appear to be clearly and on their face illegal and motivated by vengeance and political retribution aimed at our state,' Min wrote in a letter to the White House. Rep. Jimmy Gomez went from tweaking Trump with a Taylor Swift meme to sounding the alarm about immigration arrests throughout Los Angeles, a resolutely Democratic county, that followed Trump's vow to target 'sanctuary' jurisdictions that limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal authorities. Union officials said SEIU California President David Huerta was detained and injured during a protest of immigration raids, drawing condemnations from a broad swathe of elected officials (ICE did not respond to a request for comment). Californians were simultaneously rallying in San Francisco against federal plans to rename a naval ship named after the late gay-rights icon Harvey Milk. Against the backdrop of that multifront defensive, the feuding between Trump and Musk became a secondary concern, at best. Newsom passed on a chance to swipe at Musk, with whom he has a long and complicated relationship, telling reporters during an unrelated news conference on Thursday that he hoped people mesmerized by 'what Elon Musk tweeted today and what Trump said tomorrow can focus on what matters' — although Newsom's press office still used a Trump-Musk breakup reference to tease the news conference, Similarly, Rep. Laura Friedman called the Trump-Musk meltdown a distraction from the White House's agenda to remake the federal government. 'They are cutting health care from Americans, they are destroying people's ability to go to the doctor and get health care coverage, they are making life more expensive for everyday people through tariffs,' Friedman said. 'I hope people see through the entertainment value of this — it is funny, but this is harmful to our country in so many ways.' Few were laughing by Friday afternoon. Instead, leading California Democrats were once again girding for battle with an administration that has made a habit of threatening to block money for areas like wildfire recovery, education and law enforcement if California does not change its policies. 'We must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes,' Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said in a BlueSky post.

Newsom pushes back against potential federal cuts to California public universities
Newsom pushes back against potential federal cuts to California public universities

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom pushes back against potential federal cuts to California public universities

The Brief Sources told CNN that the Trump administration is targeting California universities over alleged antisemitism on campus. Newsom is threatening to withhold federal tax dollars if the cuts go through. PALO ALTO, Calif. - California Gov. Gavin Newsom is pushing back amid reports that the Trump administration is considering cutting federal funding for the University of California and California State University systems. A White House spokesperson told CNN no final decision has been made. Still, Newsom is threatening to withhold federal tax dollars if the cuts go through. H.D. Palmer, a spokesperson for the governor, responded to the CNN report on Friday. "Let's have a serious discussion about how much California contributes to the national economy," said Palmer. Newsom also took to X, posting, "Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off." In Palo Alto, community members responded to the potential federal cuts to universities during a rally in defense of science research and academic funding. "We want to preserve our democracy, our science, and our medicine," said Carol Peyser, an organizer of the "Stand Up for Science and Sanity" demonstration. Big picture view Next year's federal budget proposal includes cuts of 40% to the National Institutes of Health and 55% to the National Science Foundation. Peyser and others expressed concern that additional cuts could reverse decades of progress in scientific research and public health. "The attacks on the universities are really severe and not what we voted for. People did not vote for this," Peyser said. "It's absurd, and it's not just going to hurt California. We develop technology that goes all over the country and supports our economy." The Source Original KTVU reporting

California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread
California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

California shifts from Musk glee to Trump dread

The dissolution of the Donald Trump-Elon Musk marriage was enough, for a brief moment, to lift beleaguered California Democrats' spirits. But within 24 hours, the gleeful mood in this heavily Democratic state darkened amid sweeping immigration raids and reports the Trump administration was planning to yank funding from California. The swift reversal was a reminder that, for all the delight Democrats took in a public feud between the president and the world's richest man, a war of words on X is far less consequential than a hostile White House. Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders on Friday quickly returned to a familiar defensive crouch, condemning the White House's reported plan and escalating the standoff by threatening to withhold the money California sends to Washington. 'We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back,' Newsom said in a post on X. 'Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump.' It was unclear on Friday what money the White House might rescind. A spokesperson said no decision had been made. Many Democrats had spent the previous day reveling in the extraordinary break between Trump and his former patron Musk, piling on in a cascade of snarky tweets, triumphant news hits and floor speeches. The joy was especially palpable in California, where Democrats watched Musk transform from a source of pride to a conservative nemesis eager to attack the state that helped make him. The dunking contest seemed to open new political possibilities, as Musk amplified Democrats' case against tariffs and the GOP 'megabill' being debated in Congress — two central features of the president's agenda. But the respite from unforgiving news cycles proved short-lived. And it vindicated warnings from some Democrats that the Trump-Musk feud was distracting from the more serious threats emanating from Washington. For Rep. Dave Min, who is preparing to defend a frontline Orange County seat that could help determine control of the House, Thursday was all about Musk: He excoriated the Tesla executive in a preplanned floor speech, and joined the mockery on X. On Friday, Min was scrambling to confront what he called a 'blatantly lawless' push to claw back funds. 'These cuts appear to be clearly and on their face illegal and motivated by vengeance and political retribution aimed at our state,' Min wrote in a letter to the White House. Rep. Jimmy Gomez went from tweaking Trump with a Taylor Swift meme to sounding the alarm about immigration arrests throughout Los Angeles, a resolutely Democratic county, that followed Trump's vow to target 'sanctuary' jurisdictions that limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal authorities. Union officials said SEIU California President David Huerta was detained and injured during a protest of immigration raids, drawing condemnations from a broad swathe of elected officials (ICE did not respond to a request for comment). Californians were simultaneously rallying in San Francisco against federal plans to rename a naval ship named after the late gay-rights icon Harvey Milk. Against the backdrop of that multifront defensive, the feuding between Trump and Musk became a secondary concern, at best. Newsom passed on a chance to swipe at Musk, with whom he has a long and complicated relationship, telling reporters during an unrelated news conference on Thursday that he hoped people mesmerized by 'what Elon Musk tweeted today and what Trump said tomorrow can focus on what matters' — although Newsom's press office still used a Trump-Musk breakup reference to tease the news conference, Similarly, Rep. Laura Friedman called the Trump-Musk meltdown a distraction from the White House's agenda to remake the federal government. 'They are cutting health care from Americans, they are destroying people's ability to go to the doctor and get health care coverage, they are making life more expensive for everyday people through tariffs,' Friedman said. 'I hope people see through the entertainment value of this — it is funny, but this is harmful to our country in so many ways.' Few were laughing by Friday afternoon. Instead, leading California Democrats were once again girding for battle with an administration that has made a habit of threatening to block money for areas like wildfire recovery, education and law enforcement if California does not change its policies. 'We must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes,' Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said in a BlueSky post.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store