logo
Pensioner told to pay £24k energy bill for ‘empty' second home

Pensioner told to pay £24k energy bill for ‘empty' second home

Telegraph19-06-2025

A pensioner has been hit with a 'crazy' £24,000 energy bill on her holiday home despite it being empty for most of the year.
Lin Lawler, 70, who owns Grange Farmhouse in Hainford, Norfolk, claimed her monthly electricity bill shot up from less than £200 a month to more than £2,000 due to a faulty smart meter.
Her energy supplier, Smartest Energy, is now chasing her for £24,010 and has ordered her to repay £2,000 a week.
This is despite the homeowner claiming her five-bedroom 50-acre property with adjoining annex is only used for around 100 days a year when let out as a holiday rental.
Ms Lawler said the property's energy use was typically modest, with an average electricity bill of around £200 a month and said the debt had pushed her to the brink of financial ruin.
She said: 'I just can't afford it. They've got their hands around my throat and their hands in my pocket.'
Ms Lawler said she was stunned when she started receiving monthly bills totalling thousands of pounds. In February, the company charged her £3,217 for a month's worth of electricity.
The pensioner said she complained numerous times to Smartest Energy's customer service team, and alleged a call handler 'slipped up' by admitting the company was unable to communicate with their smart meter.
Ms Lawler said: 'One of them said the readings were like that of a factory and I should only be paying about £200 a month, not thousands.
'He said he was condemning the meter as it was faulty and not communicating properly.'
She added: 'I just can't afford it. They've got their hands around my throat and their hands in my pocket.'
Ms Lawler claimed that when she replaced her meter in March, her bills immediately dropped. Her bill for May was £183, compared to £1,675 the year before.
She contacted the Energy Ombudsman. However, the adjudicator ultimately ruled in Smartest Energy's favour due to a lack of evidence that the meter was over-recording.
Successive governments have pushed for all households to have a smart meter fitted – the Tories had hoped that all homes would have one by 2020. The target has since been downgraded to 74.5pc by the end of the year.
The rollout has stalled amid reports that the technology is prone to faults, and that some are unable to send readings back to suppliers remotely, leading to customers being sent sky-high bills that do not reflect their usage.
The National Audit Office said in 2023 that 37pc of smart meter customers surveyed by Smart Energy GB, the company tasked with rolling out the devices nationally, reported having issues with their smart meter, including no automatic readings, inaccurate bills, and the connected handheld device not showing any information.
Smartest Energy is still demanding £24,000 from Ms Lawler. Broadland and Fakenham MP Jerome Mayhew said Ms Lawler's situation was 'a crazy case' and pledged to support her.
He said: 'I have contacted Smartest Energy to make sure that this case is properly investigated and my team will continue to support Ms Lawler until she gets a successful resolution.'
A spokesman for the Energy Ombudsman said: 'The Energy Ombudsman offers a free and independent service to help resolve disputes between energy suppliers and consumers.
'In the initial complaint, we determined that usage at the property was relatively high, but there wasn't enough evidence to show the meter was over-recording.
'We therefore recommended that Ms Lawler request a meter accuracy test.
'Following the completion of the remedies, it is clear that Ms Lawler remains in dispute with the supplier and therefore we're now going to look at the matter again.'
A Smartest Energy spokesman said: 'We continue to speak directly with Ms Lawler and the Energy Ombudsman to reach a resolution with the present case.
They added: 'While the Energy Ombudsman originally concluded that there was not sufficient evidence of over-recording with Ms Lawler's energy meter, we recognise that a new case has been raised. We will continue to work with all necessary parties to resolve the issue and will be guided by the Energy Ombudsman's decision.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huge £25m UK attraction with 590ft surfing lake suddenly closes & website down after owners collapse into administration
Huge £25m UK attraction with 590ft surfing lake suddenly closes & website down after owners collapse into administration

The Sun

time17 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Huge £25m UK attraction with 590ft surfing lake suddenly closes & website down after owners collapse into administration

A HUGELY popular UK attraction with 400,000 visitors has suddenly closed. The Wave near Bristol was popular among water-sport lovers before bookings were unexpectedly cancelled after it collapsed into administration on June 26. 3 3 3 When it opened in 2019, it was Britain's first inland surfing lake. The £25 million project was filled with 26 million litres of water to produce nearly 1,000 waves an hour ranging from nearly 20 inches to more than six foot. Surfers have been left disappointed after the business suddenly closed, and its website shuttered, showing a holding message saying the page couldn't be found. They have since been told that their bookings have been cancelled. The majority owners cited the bankruptcy of a director of JAR Wave, another funding partner, as the reason behind the financial trouble. However, Bristol Live reported that there had been issues in the facility's management dating back to April when its founder Nick Hounsfield resigned. In April, Nick Hounsfield's firm The Wave Group Ltd moved from Bristol to London as it entered administration, appointing Begbies Traynor Group to manage the insolvency. Nick then resigned from the company, and at the end of May the company was renamed to SBL Midco. A report issued on May 22 claimed that the company had struggled to repay loans used to build the site. It claimed the facility was effectively put up for sale in May of this year as they sought new investors to pay off the debt - which totalled around £15 million across various companies. Teen Scot becomes youngest Brit woman to tackle the world's biggest waves A month later they decided to close the company down after a rescue package wasn't finalised. Majority owners Sullivan Street Partners have said that a refinancing plan is underway which could see the site reopened. The company said it invested £27 million into The Wave in 2023. When he first announced the project with Craig Stodder in 2010 to tackle mental health with the joy of surfing, Nick said: "It's amazing to finally be able to show people what we have created and I'm unbelievably proud of our team who have got us to this point. He added: "I feel incredibly privileged and grateful to be part of this, as well as excited about the potential we have to bring greater health and happiness to people of all ages, backgrounds and abilities." What does going into administration mean? WHEN a company enters into administration, all control is passed to an appointed administrator. The administrator has to leverage the company's assets and business to repay creditors any outstanding debts. Once a company enters administration, a "moratorium" is put in place which means no legal action can be taken against it. Administrators write to your creditors and Companies House to say they've been appointed. They try to stop the company from being liquidated (closing down), and if it can't it pays as much of a company's debts from its remaining assets. The administrator has eight weeks to write a statement explaining what they plan to do to move the business forward. This must be sent to creditors, employees and Companies House and invite them to approve or amend the plans at a meeting. A Notice of Intention is used to inform concerning parties that a company intends to enter administration. It is a physical document which is submitted to court, usually by directors aiming to prevent a company from being liquidated. Like with a standard administration process, a Notice of Intention stops creditors from taking out any legal action over a company while they try and rectify the business. The company had planned to expand into London in 2023 at Lee Valley Regional Park - although this never happened. Since 2019, the facility has welcomed 400,000 visitors, from beginners seeking surf lessons, to seasoned experts. The 180m lake was operated using solar array and battery storage to create more energy than was used each year according to The Wave team. In a statement, Sullivan Street Partners said: 'The Wave Group team apologises unreservedly for any upset caused and is doing its best to ensure the situation can be remedied. 'The Wave Group, owners of the surf park in Bristol, has lined up a refinancing alongside its exciting London developments, which would see all creditors repaid in full within a week and is offering to continue to operate the park."

'Czech Sphinx' billionaire to become chairman of Royal Mail
'Czech Sphinx' billionaire to become chairman of Royal Mail

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

'Czech Sphinx' billionaire to become chairman of Royal Mail

Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky will become chairman of Royal Mail following confirmation of the postal service's controversial takeover last month. Kretinsky, an energy tycoon nicknamed the 'Czech Sphinx' for his inscrutable approach to his business decisions, swooped on Royal Mail's parent company International Distribution Services with a £3.6billion offer last year. Royal Mail is set to fall into foreign ownership for the first time in its 509-year history after IDS investors backed the deal in May. Kretinsky's investment company EP Group said on Friday the so-called 'Czech Sphinx' will be joined on the separate boards of IDS and Royal Mail by colleagues Daniel Mareš and Marek Janča. The group also revealed the UK Government has been allotted and issued a 'golden share' worth £1. The golden share has no economic or voting rights but Royal Mail's new owners require the prior written consent of the Government for some decisions. It should ensure Royal Mail keeps its UK headquarters and continues to pay taxes in the country. Global head of operating assets at Trafigura Jiří Zrůst will also join the boards as a non-executive director, bringing with him 'significant previous experience in the infrastructure, transport and logistics sector', EP Group said. It follows the shock departure of Royal Mail boss Emma Gilthorpe after a little over a year in the job, as well as the planned departure of IDS chair Keith Williams and the rest of the board when the group delisted from the London Stock Exchange in May. EP Group added: 'A further announcement will be made in due course upon the appointment of additional independent non-executive directors to the IDS Board and the board of directors of Royal Mail.'

Tories accuse Starmer of ‘humiliating U-turn' as climbdown over welfare bill confirmed
Tories accuse Starmer of ‘humiliating U-turn' as climbdown over welfare bill confirmed

The Guardian

time34 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Tories accuse Starmer of ‘humiliating U-turn' as climbdown over welfare bill confirmed

Update: Date: 2025-06-27T07:30:50.000Z Title: Kiran Stacey Content: Good morning. Political journalism, like all reporting, has a weakness for cliche and at Westminster there seems to be an unofficial rule that any use of the word U-turn must be proceeded by the adjective 'humiliating'. The problem with this is that most U-turns are only mildly embarrassing, and turn out to be tactically advantageous. But this time – by accident or design – the Tories do seem to be using the word appropriately. No 10 has performed a colossal U-turn on the universal credit (UC) and personal independence payment (Pip) bill, the legislation that will slash sickness and disability benefits. It was only confirmed in the early hours this morning, in an exchange of letters. has the details here. In welfare matters, many policy decisions are motivated by the need to reduce costs decades ahead and that was always one of the main aims of this bill (as the Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis yesterday pointed out). The bill still functions as a long-term, cost-saving measures. But it was also intended to save money for the Treasury during this parliament. In that respect, the bill has been more or less gutted. For Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, this is a disaster. The U-turn has various big consequences, about which we will learn more today. Keir Starmer now seems to have guaranteed that the UC and Pip bill will pass on Tuesday night – but the rebellion will not disappear entirely. Some Labour MPs are still planning to vote against. Reeves is now under more pressure than ever to raise taxes in the autumn budget. People who will need sickness and disability benefits in the future are still due to lose out, by significant amounts, compared to what they might get if they were claiming benefits now. Ministers will still have huge difficulty defending this. The Tories are accusing the government of creating a 'two-tier benefits system'. Keir Starmer's authority in his party has been badly damaged. We can't tell yet how significant this will turn out to be, but his personal approval ratings have collapsed since the general election and, at the very least, this will make recovery harder. Back to 'humiliating U-turn', and this is what the Conservatives said about the move in a statement early this morning. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: This is another humiliating U-turn forced upon Keir Starmer. With the sickness benefits bill set to reach £100bn by 2030 the country needs action. But Labour has lurched from a bad plan to a next-to-nothing plan. The latest 'deal' with Labour rebels sounds a lot like a two-tier benefits system, more likely to encourage anyone already on benefits to stay there rather than get into work. We made a serious offer to Keir Starmer in the national interest if he was willing to grip the challenge of getting the welfare bill down and more people into work - making savings to avoid putting up taxes. But instead, he's done yet another U-turn. Here is the agenda for the day. 10.05am: Keir Starmer is expected to speak at the Welsh Labour conference in Llandudno. Morning: Kemi Badenoch is on a visit in Essex. 11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store