Lord Hermer ‘regrets' comparing Reform and Tories' policy to Nazi Germany
The Attorney General has expressed regret over his remarks comparing calls for the UK to withdraw from international courts to 1930s Germany.
In a statement, Lord Richard Hermer's spokesperson said that he acknowledged his "choice of words was clumsy" and 'regrets' them, but rejected "the characterisation of his speech by the Conservatives".
Lord Hermer faced backlash for a speech on Thursday in which he criticised politicians who argued that Britain "abandons the constraints of international law in favour of raw power".
Arguing that similar claims had been made "in the early 1930s by 'realist' jurists in Germany", Lord Hermer added that abandoning international law would only "give succour to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin".
He also said that because of what happened "in 1933, far-sighted individuals rebuilt and transformed the institutions of international law".
That was the year that Adolf Hitler became German chancellor.
The speech prompted Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, who has suggested the UK would have to leave the ECHR if it stops the country from doing 'what is right', to accuse Lord Hermer of 'starting from a position of self loathing, where Britain is always wrong and everyone else is right'.
In a post on social media, she said: 'The fact is laws go bad and need changing, institutions get corrupted.
'Our sovereignty is being eroded by out-of-date treaties and courts acting outside their jurisdiction.
'Pointing this out does not make anyone a Nazi. Labour have embarrassed themselves again with this comparison and unless the Prime Minister demands a retraction from his Attorney General, we can only assume these slurs reflect Keir Starmer's own view.'
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has said he would get rid of the ECHR, and told ITV in April that 'we have to get back the ability to decide, can we really control our borders'.
Lord Hermer's spokesman said: 'The Attorney General gave a speech defending international law which underpins our security, protects against threats from aggressive states like Russia and helps tackle organised immigration crime.
'He rejects the characterisation of his speech by the Conservatives. He acknowledges though that his choice of words was clumsy and regrets having used this reference.'
In his same speech to the Royal United Services Institute on Thursday, the Attorney General said 'we must not stagnate in our approach to international rules' and that officials should 'look to apply and adapt existing obligations to address new situations'.
'We must be ready to reform where necessary,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer refuses to set date for UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence
Keir Starmer has refused to give a date for the UK to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence, saying he would not indulge in 'performative fantasy politics', as he prepared to launch the government's strategic defence review. Speaking at a defence facility in Scotland, the prime minister said his commitment to hit 2.5% of GDP on defence spending from 2027 showed he was serious about the issue, but that he could not go further without fiscal certainty. 'I am not, as the prime minister of Labour government, going to make a commitment as to the precise date until I can be sure precisely where the money is coming from, how we can make good on that commitment, because I don't believe in performative fantasy politics, and certainly not on defence and security,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Pressed again on the date, Starmer said: 'We had a commitment for 2.5% by the end of this parliament. We pulled that right forward to 2027. We showed that when we say there's a new era of the defence and security of our country, is our first priority – as it is – that we meant it. We take the same approach to 3%. 'But I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air until I'm absolutely clear that I can sit here in an interview with you and tell you exactly how that's going to work.' The defence review will say Britain must be ready to fight a war in Europe or the Atlantic, though it is not expected to promise immediate increases in the size of the armed forces to deal with the threat. The 130-page document will call for a move to 'war-fighting readiness' to deter Russian aggression in Europe and increases in stockpiles of arms and support equipment, some of which currently may only last days in a crisis. Asked about this, Starmer said: 'We have to recognise the world has changed, and if the world has changed, we need to be ready. What I would say, by way of reassurance, is if you want to deter conflict, then the best way to do that is to prepare for conflict.' Questioned on whether this could involve, for example, British troops being sent to defend attacks on countries adjoining Russia, Starmer replied: 'I very much hope not. And in order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare. But we cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses. 'We've seen what's happened in Ukraine just over three and a half, three years ago, those tanks rolled across a border, something I think all of us thought we wouldn't really see in our lifetimes – the invasion of a European country. Russia has so shown in recent weeks that it's not serious about peace. We have to be ready.' The review is not expected to contain any additional spending commitments. The defence secretary, John Healey, acknowledged on Sunday that any plans to increase the size of the British army, at its smallest for 300 years, would have to wait until after the next election. Speaking to the BBC, Healey said there had been '15 years of a recruitment and retention crisis in our armed forces' as he acknowledged that the size of the army had fallen to 70,860, below the government's target of 73,000.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Two Chelsea players in Williams' underrated XI of the season
As the dust settles on this Premier League season, we asked former England international Fara Williams for her underrated XI for the selected two players who have represented Chelsea this CucurellaCucurella has gone from a player fans really didn't like when he first joined to a cult hero. He has played almost every game this season and stepped up a level in terms of his energy, desire and winning mentality have had such a positive impact on the young team around him and even at 26 he has taken responsibility as a senior player. Because of the way he presents himself on the pitch he is very easy to dislike which is probably why he doesn't get the credit he deserves as one of the league's best ChalobahIt would have been easy for Chalobah to shut off when deemed surplus to requirements at Chelsea at the start of the season and shipped off to Crystal Palace on loan, but he kept his head down, worked hard, and represented the Eagles with when recalled to Chelsea, he didn't fuss and was a reliable performer when selected. He is maybe not your modern-day centre-back who steps into the play, but he defends solidly and wins his put in seven or eight out of 10 performances every week despite difficult situations and an uncertain future is admirable and he deserves his chance in Thomas Tuchel's England Williams was speaking to BBC Sport's Nat Hayward
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Buying Florian Wirtz reveals Liverpool's new ambition – and poses a question for Arne Slot
When Florian Wirtz was 18, he was interviewed by Bayer Leverkusen 's club magazine. The headline was a quote from the teenager: 'I have big dreams'. If he leaves, as looks likely, it will be after making Leverkusen's biggest come true and yet while showing he didn't share the dream of many a star at Germany's other clubs. From Lothar Matthaus to Leon Goretzka and Leroy Sane, they gravitated to Bayern, given their guarantee of trophies. The Bavarian dominance in the 21st century has been aided by an ability to raid the rest of Germany for their prized assets. Michael Ballack, taken from Leverkusen, was a pioneer. Jonathan Tah, going from Leverkusen this summer, follows in his footsteps, just as Dortmund were plundered when they represented Bayern's major rivals. Not Wirtz, though. A player who can weave his way past defenders is plotting a different path: to Liverpool. It is a dream with a big price, Liverpool's second bid amounting to €109m (£92m), Leverkusen still wanting more. It shows a certain ambition and audacity at Anfield: to target and tempt Wirtz. Logic suggested Wirtz would be paired with Jamal Musiala at Bayern, Germany's two generational talents together for club and country. Yet, Tah's decision notwithstanding, this Leverkusen have displayed a capacity to frustrate Bayern. Their maiden Bundesliga title ended the Bavarians' run at 11 in a row. Xabi Alonso rejected Bayern's advances to stay another year, Real Madrid instead his preferred destination. Now Wirtz is set to become Liverpool's new Jurgen Klopp: a man Bayern had wanted but never got. The similarities with Klopp may end there. Wirtz has a different kind of charisma; with the ball at his feet, caressing it, sometimes with the simplicity of a master, sometimes with a crowd-pleasing flair. He has a capacity to catch opponents out with deft footwork; in a different way, Liverpool demonstrated their own with an approach that almost came by stealth. He would be a statement signing: win the title and then buy perhaps the most coveted player on the market this summer. Wirtz is an illustration that Fenway Sports Group and Liverpool can go very big: not often, normally when they have earned the right to and, encouragingly, usually successfully. Virgil van Dijk and Alisson Becker were the £140m pair acquired for world-record fees. Relative to the prices previous centre-backs and goalkeepers cost, there was a case for arguing they paid over the odds; yet they bought players who were both among the best in the game in their position then and who still are now. The false economy would have been to spend less on lesser players. Wirtz, they may hope, becomes a similar case. Darwin Nunez has proved otherwise, but then his signing owed more to Klopp. Wirtz will join when Arne Slot's dealings are underpinned by the axis of the returning Michael Edwards and the relatively new sporting director Richard Hughes. He may be still be cheaper than Moises Caicedo might have been: Liverpool's £111m bid in 2023 remains an oddity, and they instead constructed a title-winning midfield for lower fees, but it again shows they will stretch the budget. Wirtz can be seen as a reward for relative austerity, for making a profit last summer. He would be, though, a coup that raises questions. The most immediate may be where he will play. There might have looked a more natural vacancy at Manchester City, with Kevin De Bruyne going, with a central creator required. At Liverpool, Dominik Szoboszlai is forever running but going nowhere. The Hungarian had a huge importance as a presser, a hassler, a harrier and a man who did some of Mohamed Salah 's defending. There were days when he was incisive: he was wonderful in a week that brought back-to-back wins over City and Newcastle, for instance. Yet Slot often says a midfielder for Liverpool has to score goals and Szoboszlai's return can be slight, given his class. Wirtz offers more creativity, more end product after 34 goals in his last two seasons at Leverkusen; six of them came in this year's Champions League alone, albeit largely against weaker teams in the group. So simply an upgrade as a No 10? It may not be that simple. Slot experimented with Szoboszlai as a No 8 at the end of the season. The Hungarian could still have a considerable role to play. And it does feel pertinent that, whereas there had been an expectation Liverpool would devote much of their budget to a striker this summer, they are instead committing it to an attacking midfielder. Luis Diaz was a qualified success when reinvented as a No 9 but Diogo Jota arguably regressed over the season. There were reasons to think the attacking upgrade would come in the centre of the attack, perhaps with Diaz competing with Cody Gakpo on the left. Alonso made few mistakes in his two-and-a-half years in Leverkusen but playing Wirtz as a false nine in the 2024 Europa League final against Atalanta may have been one of them. Nevertheless, one of Liverpool's finest performances of the season occurred in a striker-less 4-2-2-2, with Szoboszlai and Curtis Jones as twin No 10s against City. Slot soon abandoned the tactic, compelling as it seemed. At Feyenoord he built around a prolific centre-forward, in Santiago Gimenez. But there are reasons to revive it and a temptation to wonder if Wirtz, though very different, could take on the mantle of Roberto Firmino as the central conductor, with quick, wide raiders ahead of him (his Leverkusen teammate Jeremie Frimpong among them). Tellingly, the sense is that Liverpool presented Wirtz with a clearer idea of his role than Bayern did. That felt persuasive. Whatever Slot's tactical idea, and further summer signings could help answer that, Wirtz looks the future of Liverpool. He can form part of the succession to Salah: not directly, as another right winger would be required for that. But he is a decade the Egyptian's junior. For most of the last decade, it has helped Liverpool's other attackers that Salah shouldered so much responsibility that the burden on them was reduced. They could score in his slipstream. Even as Salah has his new deal, his era may be entering its final couple of years. Perhaps Wirtz's big dream was to become Liverpool's main man.
