
Balochistan: Two Steps Away From Independence From Pakistan; Once It Is Achieved, Pakistan Will Collapse; Iran Fears The Same Scenario
The time for Balochistan's freedom has arrived. A moment like that of 1971, which led to the creation of Bangladesh out of Pakistan, is here again. Balochistan is now just two steps away from gaining its independence from Pakistan. However, Pakistan's military and ISI still do not want to admit it openly and are working to keep the U.S. administration unaware of the real situation on the ground.
Pakistan's intelligence agency, ISI, which has embedded itself in the American system for decades, is now using deception to mislead the U.S. administration. Pakistani military and intelligence operatives control their narrative globally, especially in the U.S. and Europe, through embassies, business networks, and individuals, who have migrated to the West and now serve as unofficial representatives of Pakistan's army in Western institutions.
(Source: CIA)
Pakistan's ISI Is Working To Keep Western Media In The Dark To Hide Its Weakness And Not Lose U.S. Support
Despite being the world's superpower, the United States is currently relying on Pakistan's one-sided and misleading narrative regarding ground realities in Balochistan. The Trump administration remains unaware of the significant public support for the Baloch independence movement and the weakening grip of the Pakistani military over the region. However, Pakistan's ISI is deliberately working to keep Western media – particularly American media, think tanks, civil society, politicians, the business community, and the general public – in the dark to hide its military weakness and not lose U.S. support.
Pakistan's military and ISI have a long-standing habit of suppressing the truth from reaching the public. In 1971, when the Pakistani military had already lost the war against India and the Bangladeshi independence forces, called Mukti Bahini, Pakistani General Niazi falsely claimed military victories in an interview with BBC journalist Mark Tully. The reality became clear only when 93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered to Indian and Bangladeshi forces – the largest surrender in modern military history.
However, the world has stopped trusting Pakistan's falsehoods. Even Pakistan's own religious extremist ally, the president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman, has now openly admitted that the Pakistani army and ISI have lost control over Balochistan. Speaking at a recent session of the Pakistani National Assembly, Pakistan MP Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman admitted: "I swear by my heart that, at this moment there are five to seven groups in Baluchistan who, if they retaliate, will be granted independence and the country will break once again."
Fazl-ur-Rehman has always supported the Pakistan army against the Baloch freedom movement. In his speech, Fazl-ur-Rehman informed the establishment of Pakistan that the Baloch people are becoming independent and that this development, in his view, is not good for Pakistan's future. "If districts in Balochistan announce liberation, the UN will accept their independence and Pakistan will fall," he said.
Instead of relying on false information from Pakistan's Embassy and ISI-linked undercover operatives, the Trump administration should establish direct contact with legitimate Baloch leaders, particularly Baloch nationalist leader Hyrbyair Marri, president of the secular Free Balochistan Movement (FBM), a leading political party fighting for the independence of united Balochistan from Pakistan and Iran occupation. By doing so, the U.S. can gain true intelligence and secure its political and diplomatic interests in the region.
For long-term security and economic stability in the region, the United States must build strategic relations with Balochistan – a resource-rich, peaceful, and secular nation in a critically important geographic area – rather than relying on Pakistan, a failed and collapsing artificial state.
Hyrbyair Marri, president of Free Balochistan Movement (FBM)
The Fall Of The Islamic Republics Of Pakistan And Iran
It is worth noting that not only the Baloch movement is gaining momentum but also the Pashtuns are going to ask for their independence. The Free Balochistan Movement (FBM) leader Hyrbyair Marri has agreed to work with Pashtuns and collaborate to form a secular regional alliance. [1] This would be the end of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The Free Balochistan Movement is also active in Iran's occupied Balochistan and the Baloch people hope to soon unify their divided territory. All non-Persian ethnic groups under the rule of the Islamist regime of Iran (Kurds, Ahwazis, Azeris, Balochs, etc) are looking in awe at the Baloch and Pashtun movements' achievements in Pakistan. For this reason, the Islamic Republic of Iran fears the recent developments in Pakistan, as a similar scenario could repeat in Iran.
The United States of America and the free world must heed Balochistan's legitimate secular independence movement to put an end to the Islamic Republics of Pakistan and Iran, which are both terror states.
APPENDIX – Free Balochistan Movement Statement – London, February 21, 2025
The spokesperson for the Free Balochistan Movement (FBM) , in a recent statement, said that Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman , the president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) and a member of the Pakistani Parliament , has recently been making frequent statements acknowledging the progress of the Baloch independence movement in occupied Balochistan. His remarks indicate the failure of the Pakistani military's narrative and the decline of its brutal aggression against the Baloch nation .
Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman, a religious extremist politician favored by the Pakistani military , recently admitted in a speech before the Pakistani Assembly that the Baloch independence movement enjoys widespread popularity. This acknowledgment signifies a moral victory for the Baloch people and a psychological and ethical defeat for Pakistan ' s establishment . Furthermore, his statement exposes the false claims made by Balochistan ' s puppet ministers , who, under the influence of the Pakistani military, have been deceiving the international community through state-controlled media.
From the very beginning, Pakistan's occupying military has tried to suppress the Baloch independence movement by dismissing it as a minor rebellion of a few tribal leaders . However, truth and ground realities cannot be concealed .
Balochistan ' s Struggle Against Pakistani Military Aggression
The FBM spokesperson further emphasized that the Baloch nation has been in a state of war for over seven decades . To facilitate China's exploitation of Balochistan's coastal areas, including Gwadar, under the CPEC project , Pakistan's occupying military has intensified large-scale military aggression across occupied Balochistan .
The Pakistani military and air force have been targeting Baloch civilians indiscriminately , leading to severe humanitarian crises . Thousands of Baloch people have been forcibly disappeared , and millions have been displaced from their ancestral lands . Despite the billions of rupees allocated by Pakistan to escalate its military operations , the Baloch nation remains resolute , standing firm to protect its national identity, honor, and homeland with its limited resources.
Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman ' s Remarkable Admission
A few weeks ago, Maulana Fazal-ur-Rehman , in a speech before Pakistan's so-called National Assembly , stated that "Baloch people have reached a position where, if they declare independence, the Baloch masses will support them." He further admitted that "five to seven districts of Balochistan are now in such a position that, if they declare independence today, the United Nations will accept their request the next day, and Pakistan will be considered divided."
Balochistan's Liberation: The Only Path for Pakistan to Avoid a Bangladesh-Like Scenario
The FBM spokesperson noted that although Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman has historically been a favorite of the Pakistani military and ISI , his statements confirm Pakistan ' s moral, psychological, and now territorial defeat in Balochistan . It is now evident that the only way for Pakistan to avoid a situation similar to Bangladesh ' s secession in 1971 is to announce the withdrawal of its occupying forces from Balochistan .
The International Community Must Intervene in Balochistan
The FBM calls upon the United Nations and the international community to break their silence and recognize the gravity of the situation in occupied Balochistan . Even non-Baloch politicians and religious parties aligned with Pakistan's military are now openly acknowledging Balochistan ' s inevitable independence . Therefore, the UN must take immediate action to prevent further humanitarian disasters in Balochistan.
Independent Balochistan: A Key to Regional Stability and Peace
An independent and sovereign Balochistan is essential for the peace, prosperity, and stability of the region. Recognizing Baloch independence is the most viable solution to counter Pakistan's militancy and destabilizing ambitions in the region. It is also the best opportunity to prevent further bloodshed and chaos .
United Nations ' Precedents for Supporting Independence Movements
The FBM spokesperson urged the United Nations and the global community to follow past precedents where the UN played a crucial role in securing independence for oppressed nations :
East Timor (2002): Under UNTAET (United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor) , the UN facilitated East Timor's liberation and nation-building process .
Kosovo (1999): NATO intervened against Serbian aggression , forcing the Serbian military to withdraw, and the UN established UNMIK (United Nations Mission in Kosovo) to oversee Kosovo's administration and prevent humanitarian crises.
South Sudan (2011): The UN played an active role in peacekeeping and stability efforts under UNMISS (United Nations Mission in South Sudan) , paving the way for South Sudan's independence .
Namibia (1990): With the intervention of UNTAG (United Nations Transition Assistance Group) , Namibia gained independence from South African occupation .
Eritrea (1993): The UN played a crucial role in Eritrea's independence from Ethiopia .
The Case for a UN Mission in Balochistan (UNMIB)
The situation in occupied Balochistan is no different – perhaps even worse – than these past cases . Pakistan ' s military and ISI have turned Balochistan into a war zone , making life unbearable for the Baloch people. Therefore, the UN must fulfill its responsibility by announcing a United Nations Mission in Balochistan (UNMIB) and compelling the withdrawal of Pakistan ' s occupying forces .
Only then can the Baloch people reclaim their sovereign state , a right that is historically, politically, morally, and ethically theirs .
What is FBM?
FBM (Free Balochistan Movement) is a political organization headed by Baloch nationalist leader Hyrbyair Marri currently residing in UK, London. He is the pioneer of the ongoing Balochistan independence struggle and advocating for a democratic, united republic of Balochistan free from Iranian and Pakistani occupation.
*Rudam Azad is a Baloch writer, Baloch representative, and Human Rights activist. He can be reached on Twitter, @RudamAzad and email rudambaloch@gmail.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Shafaq News
27 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Iran strikes US airbase in Qatar
Shafaq News/ Iran launched ballistic missiles at Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar on Monday evening in response to US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. The attack, part of a coordinated operation by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Iranian army under the banner 'Promise of Victory,' involved six missiles targeting the CENTCOM-run facility, according to Iran's National Security Council. The SNSC asserted that the operation posed no threat to Qatar or its citizens, referring to the Gulf state as 'friendly and brotherly.' Iran described the strike as 'powerful and destructive,' calling it a direct response to US air raids on Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. Military officials warned that further action from Washington would accelerate the dismantling of American forces across the region. Qatar's Foreign Ministry condemned the strike as a 'flagrant violation' of sovereignty and international law, stating that Al-Udeid had been evacuated earlier under standard precautionary protocols. Doha added that it reserves the right to respond proportionally and in line with legal frameworks. US President Donald Trump oversaw developments from the White House Situation Room, joined by top defense and military leaders, according to American media.


Memri
2 hours ago
- Memri
Arab Journalists and Liberals Praise U.S. Strike On Iran: The Iranian Threat Is Over; Trump Saved Humanity; God Bless America
The June 22, 2025 U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities was met with approval and satisfaction by many Arab journalists and liberals, who took to X to express their support for it. Some thanked U.S. President Donald Trump, saying he had "made history" and "saved humanity" from the nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime. Others expressed hope for the downfall of this regime, and several mocked Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, calling on him to surrender unconditionally or else face a grim fate. It should be mentioned that some of these writers also expressed support for Israel's attack on Iran, launched on June 13, stating that this country was not defending only itself but the entire Middle East.[1] Below is a sampling of these reactions on X welcoming the U.S. strike on Iran. Saudi Journalist: The Iranian Threat Is Gone Saudi journalist Abd al-Aziz Al-Khames wrote: "The dream, the danger and the Iranian nuclear project have come to an end for a long time. Iran wasted billions that went down the drain at the expense of its people's livelihood. Will reason prevail, with Iran launching an economic development project instead of a military one of nukes and missiles?"[2] Saudi Journalist: Some Regimes Are A Burden On Humanity And Their Downfall Is A Chance For Salvation In a series of posts on June 22, Saudi journalist Wafa Al-Rashid implicitly supported the overthrow of the Iranian regime, writing: 'Sometimes the fall [of a regime] is not a threat but an opportunity for salvation'; '[Tolerating] the continued existence of some regimes is not political neutrality but a conspiracy against humanity'; 'Some regimes are not only a burden on their own people but on all of humanity! They feed on oppression, export chaos, impoverish the world and destroy the people. Their existence is not a 'sovereign decision' but a danger to the future of the world.'[3] Egyptian Liberal: Death To Khamenei, The Supreme Clown Amr Bakly, an Egyptian liberal based in the U.S., shared an image of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei as a clown and added "death to Khemenei."[4] Egyptian Liberal: President Trump Has Made History Again; God Bless America Egyptian liberal researcher Dalia Ziada, who also lives in the U.S., wrote in English: "President Trump has made history in the Middle East… for the second time. God bless America! I pray this will trigger the geopolitical reset that the Middle East has been craving since 1979. In case you are wondering, the first time president Trump made history in the Middle East was the Abraham Accords in 2020".[5] Emirati Liberal: This Is The Taste Of Victory; God Bless America Emirati liberal Amjad Taha posted in praise of Trump and the U.S. attack, writing in English: "To those still struggling with English or math: the U.S. won. Israel won. The Islamist in Iran lost. The Middle East just took its first breath of fresh, non-radioactive air. Trump didn't just send missiles, he sent a message. No nukes. No bullies. No threats to America's allies, especially Israel. This wasn't just war. This was diplomacy with a spine, a masterclass in keeping promises and crushing bad deals. Fordo was flattened. Natanz was neutralized. Esfahan was erased. These weren't peace-loving labs. They were ticking bombs. And now, they're gone with precision. Trump said it best, and for once, the whole world nodded. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier.' And guess what? People from Tel Aviv to Texas, from Erbil to Rome, celebrated with one voice and a few B2 vitamins just for fun. Because when evil plans fall, good people rise. Moral of the story? Never bring uranium to a superpower fight. Always keep B2 handy. Apparently, it's what victory tastes like. God bless America. God save lives. As for Tehran's hardliners, someone please bring them chamomile tea, a therapist, and a globe. It's time they realize the world isn't flat, and it doesn't revolve around them. In the end, peace isn't given. It's earned, protected, and sometimes enforced. And those who chase destruction always forget.. justice doesn't knock. It lands."[6] Iraqi Journalist: Iran And Its Agents Must Be Eliminated; Trump Saved Humanity Iraqi journalist Sufian Al-Samarrai, chair of the Iraqi news website Baghdad Post, wrote after the U.S. strike on Iran: "Israel and the U.S. are waiting for retaliation by Iran, its agents in the region and the terror organizations. [Such retaliation] is needed in order to justify the elimination of these terror gangs and so that humanity can live in peace." In another post he wrote: "[Trump] did it along with the Lord of the World and saved humanity from the nuclear [program] of the extremist Nazi Islam." In a third post he shared an animated video mocking Khamenei, and commented: "Nobody [in the Iranian leadership] is left except for Khamenei, and now, if he does not declare his surrender, he will meet the same fate as [the nuclear facilities in] Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan. This is America's basic demand, and its first requirement is unconditional surrender."[7] Bahraini Liberal: This Is A Historic Turning Point; The Rule Of The Jurisprudent Will No Longer Threaten The Middle East Bahraini liberal Ahdeya Ahmed Al-Sayed wrote: "The U.S. has managed to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordo. This strike put an end to the efforts of Khamenei's regime to attain nuclear power. It is a historic turning point that will transform the Middle East, [leading to] a future in which the terror of the 'rule of the jurisprudent' [i.e., the Iranian regime] no longer threatens the region. With this step America fulfilled its obligation and put an end to the matter."[8] Emirati Political Analyst: The Iranian Regime Is Paying The Price Of Its Folly Emirati political analyst Salem Al-Ketbi posted: "The Israel-Iran war will go down in the annals of history as one of those moments of political folly that repeatedly [characterize] dictatorial regimes which do not understand the discrepancy between their own [capabilities] and the military and technological prowess of Isael… History will not spare those who refuse to develop but persist in a policy of collective suicide… The lesson is clear to all: he who does not learn from the past, [his history] will be written by bombs [that fall] on his soil in the present."[9]


Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iran's IRGC claims missile strike on US base in Qatar
Shafaq News / Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced on Monday that it had launched a 'powerful and destructive missile strike' on the US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, in retaliation for what it described as an American 'military assault on Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities.' In a statement, the IRGC said the attack was carried out under the direction of Iran's Supreme National Security Council and the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Command, and was part of Operation 'Bushra al-Fath' (Promise of Victory). The IRGC framed the attack as a clear message to Washington and its allies, asserting that Iran' will not leave any aggression against its sovereignty, territory, or national security unanswered—under any circumstances.' The statement also accused the US of acting in concert with Israel, stating, 'It has become clear that Zionist evil [Israel] is an extension of American designs, and we remind them that US military bases and mobile targets in the region are not strongholds of deterrence, but major vulnerabilities and thorns in the side of this war-obsessed system.' This announcement comes less than an hour after Qatar confirmed the interception of missiles targeting Al Udeid, with both the Qatari Defense and Foreign Ministries condemning the Iranian attack and vowing a response in line with Qatar's right to self-defense under international law.