Senate Republican tax bill would end federal taxes on many guns, silencers
Senate Republicans' tax bill would eliminate federal taxes and regulations on short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns and silencers as well as preempt state or local licensing requirements in a win for gun-rights advocates.
The legislation unveiled by the Senate Finance Committee on Monday would expand on House legislation exempting silencers under the National Firearms Act of 1934, saving buyers from a $200 transfer tax as well as manufacturing taxes, registration and other requirements.
The Gun Owners of America lauded the move, posting on X, 'This is a massive victory for the Second Amendment!' The National Rifle Association also urged its members to lobby Congress to keep the proposal in the bill.
But Emma Brown, the executive director of the gun safety group GIFFORDS, led by a former congresswoman wounded in an assassination attempt, assailed the latest provision coming after shootings of lawmakers in Minnesota over the weekend.
'Voters sent lawmakers to Washington to protect their families, not make life easier for hitmen,' she said in an emailed statement. 'No one is better off if killers have silencers and sawed-off shotguns except the people who make money selling them. Americans are sick of this.'
Senate Democrats have already indicated they intend to challenge the House's provision as violating the Senate's so-called Byrd Rule limitation on items that are not primarily budgetary in nature. They are sure to expand their objection to the Senate Finance text in hopes of stripping the provision from the bill.
The broader tax and spending package is being crafted under special budget rules that allow it to pass with a simple majority vote, rather than the Senate's usual 60-vote threshold. Even if the Senate parliamentarian says it's comporting with the rules, it's not immediately clear if this provision can survive both the House and the Senate.
Any senator can force a vote to strike any provision of the bill subject to a simple majority threshold.
Machine guns and certain destructive devices would still be regulated by the National Firearms Act under the bill.
___
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
40 minutes ago
- CNN
A majority of Americans disapproves of Trump's Iran airstrikes, CNN poll finds
President Donald Trump's decision to launch airstrikes against Iran is broadly unpopular with Americans, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS after the strikes. Americans disapprove of the strikes, 56% to 44%, according to the survey, with strong disapproval outpacing the share who strongly approve. Most distrust Trump's decision-making on the use of force in Iran, with about 6 in 10 worried that the strikes will increase the Iranian threat to the US. Sharp partisan divides cut through nearly every question asked in the survey: Democrats are broadly opposed to the strikes as most Republicans support them, though younger GOP supporters and Republican-leaning independents are more skeptical than others in their party. Majorities of independents (60%) and Democrats (88%) disapprove of the decision to take military action in Iran. Republicans largely approve (82%). But just 44% of Republicans strongly approve of the airstrikes, far smaller than the group of Democrats who strongly disapprove (60%), perhaps reflecting that some in Trump's coalition are broadly distrustful of military action abroad. A 58% majority overall say the strikes will make Iran more of a threat to the US, with just 27% believing it will lessen the threat and the rest expecting it to do neither. Even among those who support the strikes, just 55% expect them to lessen the threat level. And few say the US made enough of an effort at diplomacy before using military force: 32% feel the US did enough, 39% that it did not and 29% are unsure. The poll was conducted Sunday and Monday, with nearly all of the interviews completed before Iran launched retaliatory strikes Monday against US air bases and all interviews done before Trump's subsequent announcement of a ceasefire. Just over half of Americans, 55%, expresses little or no trust in Trump to make the right decisions about the US use of force in Iran, with 45% saying they trust him moderately or a great deal. And most – 65% – say that he should be required to get congressional approval for any further military action, with 21% saying he should not. Mistrust of Trump's judgment is especially high among Democrats (88% of whom express little or no trust) and independents (62%), who also broadly say the president should be required to get congressional approval for any further military action in Iran (88% of Democrats and 67% of independents feel that way). Republicans express more trust in the president, although that trust is also somewhat tempered: 51% say they have a great deal of trust in him to make the right decisions on the use of force with Iran, 37% a moderate amount. And the GOP divides over whether Trump ought to be required to get congressional approval for further action, with 39% saying he should be required to do so, 38% that he should not and 23% are not sure. Americans younger than 35 are more likely than any other age group to disapprove of the military action in Iran (68% disapprove). They also express the broadest skepticism about Trump: They are the most likely of any age group to say they have no trust at all in Trump's ability to make the right decisions about US use of force in Iran (45% feel that way) and to say he ought to be required to get congressional approval before taking further military action (73%). That skepticism is partly driven by younger Republicans and Republican-leaning independents. Just 20% of Republican-aligned Americans younger than 45 say they strongly approve of the decision to carry out airstrikes, compared with 53% among older Republican-aligned Americans. Younger Republicans are about 20 points more likely than older adults aligned with the party to believe the strikes increase the threat to the US from Iran and are 26 points less likely to have a great deal of trust in Trump's decision-making on the use of force in Iran. Overall, there's almost no public appetite for sending ground troops into Iran, with just 9% in favor, and 68% opposed, with the remaining 23% unsure. Even those who support the airstrikes against Iran oppose sending in ground troops by a more than 2-to-1 margin. The share of Americans who offer no opinion when given the choice to do suggests that public opinion hasn't yet fully settled in the wake of a rapidly evolving situation. While the vast majority, 8 in 10, say they've been following news about America's strikes at least somewhat closely, only about one-third say they've followed the news very closely. The CNN poll was conducted by SSRS on June 22 and 23. Interviews with 1,030 adults nationwide were conducted by text message. People interviewed for the poll are members of the nationally representative SSRS Text Message Panel. Results for the full sample have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Getting Trump's full tax break on car loans may mean buying a $130,000 vehicle
Republicans are trying to make good on President Donald Trump's campaign promise to give Americans a tax break on their car loan interest. However, as structured, most households wouldn't get a substantial financial benefit, economists said. House and Senate Republicans proposed giving drivers a tax deduction of up to $10,000 on annual interest for new auto loans in their so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." The tax break would be temporary, ending after 2028. But few drivers pay that much annual interest, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive, an auto market research firm. It's "pretty rare," he said. Auto loans don't have annual interest charges of $10,000 or more outside of large loans on "exotic" vehicles, Smoke said. How large would the loan have to be? It would take a loan of roughly $112,000 to use up the full $10,000 deduction in the first year of car ownership, Smoke said. Only about 1% of new auto loans are this big, according to Cox Automotive data. Cars most likely to see loans of that magnitude include a "laundry list of exotic names" like Rolls-Royce, Ferrari, Bentley, Aston Martin, Lamborghini, McLaren, Porsche, Land Rover, Cadillac, Maserati, Lotus and Mercedes-Benz, Smoke said. Smoke's analysis assumes drivers use the most popular loan length, 72 months at the current new loan average of around 9.5%. It includes a 10% down payment and various fees like taxes and registration. The example implies a vehicle purchase price of about $130,000, he said. Vehicles with an average purchase price near this level include a Porsche Panamera or Cadillac Escalade, he said. Monthly car payments under those loan terms would likely be more than $2,000, Smoke said. More from Personal Finance:The salary Americans say they need to live comfortablyWhy electricity prices are surging for U.S. householdsHouse, Senate tax bills both end many clean energy credits House Republicans included the tax break on auto loan interest in a massive domestic policy bill, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which lawmakers narrowly passed along party lines in May. The Senate may vote on a similar measure as soon as this week. In practice, few if any households would likely claim the full benefit due to an income limitation, experts said. Both versions of the legislation reduce the value of the car loan interest tax deduction once an individual's annual income exceeds $100,000, or $200,000 for married couples filing a joint tax return. Households below those thresholds may qualify for the full tax benefit, but are unlikely to buy an expensive enough car to do so, economists said. Those drivers who might qualify to take on a six-figure car loan are unlikely to maximize the tax break, either. Taxpayers don't get a financial benefit once income exceeds $150,000 (or $250,000 for married couples), according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank. Qualifying cars must also receive final assembly in the U.S., according to current legislative text, potentially further limiting the potential roster of vehicles. The average car loan so far in 2025 is about $43,000, according to Cox Automotive data. Under Republicans' tax plan, the average buyer would get a tax deduction of about $3,000 in the first year of a six-year loan (and a roughly $2,000 average annual deduction over the loan's life), Smoke said. However, based on the way tax deductions work, this wouldn't mean car buyers get $3,000 in their pocket the first year. That $3,000 would be deducted from the buyer's taxable income. "The math basically says you're talking about [financial] benefit of $500 or less in year one," and a declining value in subsequent years, Smoke said. That's less than the average monthly payment on a new loan, he said.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New York votes in mayoral primary as Cuomo tries a comeback. Zohran Mamdani stands in his way
NEW YORK (AP) — New York City Democrats will decide Tuesday whether to reboot Andrew Cuomo's political career, elevate liberal upstart Zohran Mamdani, or turn to a crowded field of lesser-known but maybe less-polarizing candidates in the party's mayoral primary. Their choice could say something about what kind of leader Democrats are looking for during President Donald Trump's second term. The vote takes place on a sweltering day about four years after Cuomo resigned as governor following a sexual harassment scandal. Yet the 67-year-old has been the favorite throughout the race, with his deep experience, nearly universal name recognition, strong political connections and juggernaut fundraising apparatus. The party's progressive wing, meanwhile, has coalesced behind Mamdani, a 33-year-old self-described democratic socialist. A relatively unknown state legislator when the contest began, Mamdani gained momentum by running a sharp campaign laser-focused on the city's high cost of living and secured endorsements from two of the country's foremost progressives, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders. While preliminary returns will be released after the polls close at 9 p.m. Tuesday, a winner might not emerge for a week because of the city's ranked choice voting system, which allows voters to list up to five candidates in order of preference. If a candidate is the first choice of a majority of voters, they win outright. If no candidate reaches that threshold, the tabulation of the rankings wouldn't begin until July 1. The primary winner will go on to face incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who decided to run as an independent amid a public uproar over his indictment on corruption charges and the subsequent abandonment of the case by Trump's Justice Department. Republican Curtis Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels, will be on the ballot in the fall's general election. The mayoral primary's two leading candidates — one a fresh-faced progressive and the other an older moderate — could be stand-ins for the larger Democratic Party's ideological divide, though Cuomo's scandal-scarred past adds a unique tinge to the narrative. The rest of the pack has struggled to gain recognition in a race where nearly every candidate has cast themselves as the person best positioned to challenge Trump's Republican agenda. Comptroller Brad Lander, a liberal city government stalwart, made a splash last week when he was arrested after linking arms with a man federal agents were trying to detain at an immigration court in Manhattan. It was unclear if that episode was enough to jumpstart a campaign that had been failing to pick up speed behind Lander's wonkish vibe. Among the other candidates are City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, hedge fund executive Whitney Tilson and former city Comptroller Scott Stringer. Mamdani's energetic run has been hard not to notice. His army of young hipster canvassers relentlessly knocked on doors throughout the city seeking support. Posters of his grinning mug were up on shop windows. You couldn't get on social media without seeing one of his well-produced videos pitching his vision — free buses, free childcare, new apartments, a higher minimum wage and more, paid for by new taxes on the rich. He would be the city's first Indian-American and first Muslim mayor. Cuomo and some other Democrats have cast Mamdani as unqualified. They say he doesn't have the management chops to wrangle the city's sprawling bureaucracy or handle crises. Critics have also taken aim at Mamdani's support for Palestinian human rights. In response, Mamdani has slammed Cuomo over his sexual harassment scandal and his handling of the coronavirus pandemic. In one heated debate exchange, Cuomo rattled off a long list of what he saw as Mamdani's managerial shortcomings, arguing that his opponent, who has been in the state Assembly since 2021, has never dealt with Congress or unions and never overseen an infrastructure project. He added that Mamdani couldn't be relied upon to go toe-to-toe with Trump. Mamdani had a counter ready. 'To Mr. Cuomo, I have never had to resign in disgrace," he said. Cuomo r esigned in 2021 after a report commissioned by the state attorney general concluded that he had sexually harassed at least 11 women. He has always maintained that he didn't intentionally harass the women, saying he had simply fallen behind what was considered appropriate workplace conduct. The fresh scandal at City Hall involving Mayor Eric Adams, though, gave Cuomo a path to end his exile.
