logo
$6 bn funding crisis at US mass transit threatens commuters, travel

$6 bn funding crisis at US mass transit threatens commuters, travel

By Sri Taylor and Aaron Gordon
When Covid-19 broke the US economy, the trains and buses that carried millions of Americans to work every day emptied out. A $70 billion lifeline from the federal government kept them going — a bet that someday they would again be packed with commuters.
Five years later, that day has come. Workers and tourists are back on the rails and roads. Throngs of straphangers stand shoulder-to-shoulder on the subway. Finding a seat on a crowded rush-hour express train feels like a small victory. For transportation systems from New York to Chicago to San Francisco, it should be a moment to exhale. Faced with extinction, they survived.
Yet there has been no time for celebration.
That's a big problem for services that rely on the fares paid by riders to fund their operations. To close the gap, many mass-transit authorities are preparing to increase fares, cut service, or both — steps that transit advocates fear could lead to a 'death spiral.'
'When transit isn't frequent and when transit isn't reliable, people stop using it,' said former Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Secretary Leslie Richards, now a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Stuart Weitzman School of Design.
Shifting political and economic winds are amplifying the challenges. The Trump administration is drastically reining in federal spending, creating fear of job losses that could again decimate ridership. And tariffs could fan inflation, leaving riders less willing — or able — to swallow higher fares.
The accumulating pressure has transit agencies worried not only about their capacity to upgrade aging infrastructure, but even to keep buses and trains running for the riders who count on them. Cuts to service raise the risk of longer commutes, lost work hours and clogged roads, as well as a setback to the fight against climate change as more people turn to driving.
Few services are under more financial pressure than the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, which serves commuters in Philadelphia and its suburbs. The system is hurtling toward a projected structural deficit of $213 million.
State lawmakers have previously refused to enact proposals from Governor Josh Shapiro to increase the share of sales-tax proceeds allocated to mass transit, which would provide a backstop for fare revenue. Shapiro's latest budget proposal includes $1.5 billion in mass-transit funding over the next five years.
Transportation advocates have been sounding alarms about SEPTA's finances for years. The agency reduced its budget gap by $27 million by freezing salaries for roughly 1,300 of its employees. It plans to propose a fiscal 2026 budget that cuts service by 45 per cent while boosting fares 21.5 per cent starting in September. The cuts would lead to the elimination of 50 bus routes, five regional rail lines and Sports Express trains, according to SEPTA.
'There is nothing left to cut from the budget but service,' SEPTA says in large, red type on a website it set up to explain its funding issues to riders. The proposed fare increases would be the system's largest ever, 'by a long shot,' according to Scott Sauer, SEPTA's interim general manager.
'That will erode the operating money that is coming in,' said Richards, the former transportation secretary. 'Every time you make a decision to save money, either on the capital side or on the operating side, you're going to lose.'
System-wide data shows SEPTA ridership in March was 80 per cent of pre-Covid levels. At a board meeting in late March, Sauer warned that if SEPTA is forced to cut service, 'all these efforts that we are making to improve service will be disrupted and it will be extremely difficult to reverse course.'
Sauer said the 'cuts do not have to happen' if the state legislature backs Shapiro's plan. Shapiro's office didn't respond to a request for comment.
The federal government is unlikely to step in with an additional lifeline. President Donald Trump has sought to rein in government spending and US lawmakers are looking for savings to help finance an extension of Trump's first-term tax cuts.
'Literally no one has any expectation of Congress doing anything else for them,' said Yonah Freemark, principal research associate at the Urban Institute. 'A lot of folks are worried that the Trump administration will try to claw back transit dollars. And if that happened, their situation would get even worse.'
US transit agencies are in a trickier spot than international peers, which generally enjoy higher usage, lower construction costs and more consistent government support.
Transport for London's ridership stands at approximately 85 per cent of pre-pandemic levels; it no longer required government subsidies to compensate for lost ridership starting in 2024. Paris is faring better, with ridership almost fully back to where it was before Covid. Both London and Paris opened major new subway lines, in 2022 and 2024, respectively, which helped attract new riders.
Canadian transit agencies have recovered more than 90 per cent of revenue excluding subsidies and more than 80 per cent of ridership compared with pre-pandemic levels, according to Statistics Canada.
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which operates New York City's subways, buses and commuter rails, faces potential operating deficits of about $400 million in 2027 and 2028. The MTA needs state and federal money for infrastructure upgrades to improve service and attract more riders. Its 2025-2029 capital plan relies on an anticipated $14 billion of federal funds.
The MTA is also counting on a congestion-pricing toll to finance service improvements and upgrades. The $9 fee to drive into certain parts of Manhattan is expected to raise $15 billion — yet US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is seeking to end the program, and has threatened to withhold federal transportation funding if it continues. The MTA sued the Transportation Department in February after Duffy withdrew federal approval for the toll.
The MTA's capital program 'must be fully funded to carry out critical work that will keep the system running and canceling congestion pricing has serious consequences,' Kevin Willens, the agency's chief financial officer, said in a statement. 'More broadly, unpredictable federal transportation policy harms the MTA and municipalities across the country.'
New York draws roughly half a million commuters every day from nearby suburbs in New Jersey and Connecticut. New Jersey Transit, which received about $4.4 billion in Covid relief, gets $850 million in federal formula funds annually. Competitive grant awards brought its total to just over $1 billion in fiscal 2025. Any freeze in federal funding could be devastating, officials said.
'Imagine what an existential crisis it would be if I'm not able to pay the staff, if I'm not able to advance projects,' NJ Transit Chief Executive Officer Kris Kolluri said in an interview. 'That would have a crippling effect on not just the Northeast Corridor, but the entire nation's infrastructure.'
To help tackle the system's fiscal challenges, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy enacted a corporate transit fee last year that is the first dedicated state funding source for NJ Transit in its history. The surcharge, which is expected to generate $815 million in revenue in fiscal 2026, will supplement a 15 per cent fare increase that took effect last summer and annual 3 per cent fare hikes thereafter.
Transit officials across the nation are confronting similar squeezes. San Francisco's Bay Area Rapid Transit is on track to use up its roughly $2 billion in federal and state emergency aid by spring 2026.
Faced with a drop in ridership that it expects to never fully recover, BART likely will need to overhaul its funding model. Fares and parking fees once paid for 70 per cent of operating costs before Covid, but now, they cover only 25 per cent. BART said in a statement in March that it had eliminated a projected $35 million budget deficit for fiscal 2026 by reining in costs, but structural deficits of $350 million to $400 million will remain in the years to follow 'unless long term stable funding sources can be identified.'
'I can't remember a situation where it's been this dire,' BART General Manager Bob Powers said in an interview.
In Chicago, a $770 million budget gap currently looms over the area's three transit systems, which average about 1.2 million daily rides combined in northeast Illinois.
If the city can't scrounge up funding to fix it by the end of the legislative session in May, service cuts of as much as 40 per cent are possible. Officials from the Regional Transportation Authority are pushing for an annual injection of $1.5 billion in additional operating funding from the Illinois legislature, along with a 10 per cent fare increase.
Moody's Ratings revised its outlook in March on the Chicago Transit Authority's debt to negative, saying it doesn't expect that the CTA, which runs the city's 'L' train service and buses, can close its operating deficit with spending cuts and fare increases alone. Kroll Bond Rating Agency cut its outlook on CTA's debt to negative from stable this month.
CTA didn't respond to request for comment.
Boston is also facing acute transit-funding issues. Governor Maura Healey has proposed an additional $500 million boost for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, the agency that runs the cash-strapped subway system known as the 'T.'
While that would help the agency balance its operating budget in the upcoming fiscal year, the deficit is projected to balloon to nearly $500 million by fiscal 2028, according to pro forma forecasts shared in February. The MBTA also needs at least an estimated $24.5 billion to bring its infrastructure to a state of good repair.
The system that serves the heart of the federal government, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, could face financial woes due to the Trump administration's spending cuts. Federal workers make up much of the Metro's ridership, but the District of Columbia is expected to lose as much as 21 per cent of its workforce.
The financial pitfalls risk leaving transportation systems unprepared to serve not only commuters, but also tourists.
About half the nation's major public transit systems need to prepare for the FIFA World Cup, which is expected to bring millions of international visitors to the US next year and place big demands on transportation infrastructure. Looming service cuts could make that all but impossible.
'The simple fact is we can't do it,' said SEPTA's Sauer. Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco and New Jersey are all hosting matches. 'We won't be able to handle the influx of people that we're going to see.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Trump's position weakening in the US? LA protests give a hint despite allies' claims
Is Trump's position weakening in the US? LA protests give a hint despite allies' claims

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Is Trump's position weakening in the US? LA protests give a hint despite allies' claims

As Los Angeles protests turn into a mass movement against his rule and approval ratings fall, US President Donald Trump appears to be on a shaky wicket. Even as he prepares to roll down tanks and soldiers on his birthday, the brewing discontent and opposition challenges the show of strength. read more Demonstrators holding signs and flags face California National Guard members standing guard outside the Federal Building as they protest federal immigration operations in Los Angeles, on June 9, 2025. (Photo: AFP) US President Donald Trump had a euphoric start to his second term: he had just scored a historic victory, his approval ratings were soaring, the Democratic Party was in shambles, the Congress was essentially a rubber stamp body, and the Supreme Court was in his pocket. Now, five months later, Trump is facing brutal reality checks: the Los Angeles protests against his immigration policy are spiralling into a mass movement against his rule, he has received rebuke after rebuke from the courts about his executive overreach, his policies have plunged the US economy into recession fears and trade war with China has backfired, and his approval ratings have fallen. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's international reputation is also in tatters as he has failed to end wars in Ukraine and Gaza — he had said he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. After National Guards, Trump has deployed US Marines in Los Angeles — the deployment of military on domestic soil against own citizens is an extraordinary step. More Americans oppose such a deployment than support and more Americans disapprove of Trump's performance than approve, as per latest polls. Americans reject US Marines deployment, Trump's policies California Governor Gavin Newsom has said the deployment of US Marines to Los Angeles amounts to crossing a red line and the American public agrees. As many as 47 per cent Americans oppose Trump's deployment of Marines against 34 per cent who support it, according to a YouGov poll published on Tuesday. 'US Marines serve a valuable purpose for this country — defending democracy. They are not political pawns. The Secretary of Defense is illegally deploying them onto American streets so Trump can have a talking point at his parade this weekend. It's a blatant abuse of power. We will sue to stop this. The Courts and Congress must act. Checks and balances are crumbling. This is a red line — and they're crossing it. Wake up!' said Newsom. The YouGov poll also found that 52 per cent Americans disapprove of Trump's policies in the week ending Monday. Trump plans birthday parade — even as uprising swells Even as the uprising against his rule is swelling, Trump is planning a military parade for his birthday on Saturday. Formally, the parade is supposed to mark the 250th foundation day of the US Army, but critics have said that the scale of the parade has been ramped up to unprecedented scale for the pleasure of Trump who would mark his birthday with the parade like leaders of authoritarian regimes usually do by removing the difference between their personal life and public office. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump looks forward to the parade, Los Angeles protests have spread to at least 22 places across the United States, such as New York, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, and Atlanta. NBC News has reported that at least 25 rallies and demonstrations have been organised against Trump's rule since Monday. Unlike his first term when mass protests against his rule were rather frequent, such protests had not been reported until this month in Trump's second term. Trump defies laws and courts — again With his deployment of military and mobilisation of National Guards, Trump has not just triggered Democrats, but has also possibly triggered courts — again. In his second term, Trump has defied courts multiple times by not following its orders regarding immigration crackdown and deportations. Now, as Newsom has challenged the troop deployment, Trump is expected to defy courts again if they don't rule in his favour. If and when such defiance comes, the rule of law in the United States would further erode in the eyes of Trump's critics and possibly fan further protests. By law, the US government cannot deploy military for domestic law enforcement for law enforcement purposes unless certain laws like the Insurrection Act are invoked. Trump has so far not invoked the act. The Trump administration has maintained that National Guards were mobilised and Marines were deployed to just protect federal law enforcement personnel and properties. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Critics have said that owing to authoritarian tendencies where Trump does not recognise anything that goes against him, whether it is court orders or election results as seen in 2020 election when he egged on a mob to attack the Capitol to illegally overturn the result in his favour, the deployment of the military on American soil is a very dangerous precedent.

Himachal opens Shipki La pass to tourists. Significance of historical link for trade & pilgrimage
Himachal opens Shipki La pass to tourists. Significance of historical link for trade & pilgrimage

The Print

timean hour ago

  • The Print

Himachal opens Shipki La pass to tourists. Significance of historical link for trade & pilgrimage

As he opened the pass for domestic tourists, Sukhu became only the second state chief minister to visit the high-altitude pass after Yashwant Singh Parmar. Former prime minister Indira Gandhi visited the region 1968. The strategic pass near the Line of Actual Control (LAC) may also work as a new route for the sacred Kailash Manasarovar Yatra. The tourism initiative, launched by Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu Tuesday, also aims to bolster the local economy and foster cultural exchange in the remote border region. Kalpa (Kinnaur): Himachal Pradesh has opened the Shipki La pass, a motorable mountain pass at an altitude of 3,930 metres in the tribal Kinnaur district, to domestic tourists, a significant step towards revitalising border tourism and reviving hopes of resuming India-China trade through the route stalled since 2020. The state government secured the Ministry of Defence's approval to open border areas, including Shipki La, Lepcha, Giu, and Rani Kanda to domestic visitors, easing restrictions imposed due to security concerns. 'Tourists can now experience the pristine beauty of Shipki La, one of the highest motorable passes in the region,' Sukhu said at a public gathering at the pass. 'This initiative will strengthen the local economy, create employment opportunities, and boost tourism in Kinnaur's border areas.' He urged the central government to engage with China to restart trade through the pass and to consider Shipki La as a viable route for the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra, a pilgrimage revered by Hindus, Buddhists, and Jains. Also Read: Why Himachal is unwilling to release water for long-delayed Kishau multipurpose project A historical trade route Shipki La, through which the Sutlej River (known as Langqen Zangbo in Tibet) enters India, has long served as a vital trade corridor between India and Tibet. Historically, it facilitated the exchange of 37 export items from India—such as agricultural implements, copper products, clothes, tea, and spices—and 20 import items from China, such as wool, raw silk, yak tails, and herbal medicines. Trade through the pass resumed in 1992 after a hiatus following the 1962 India-China war but faced setbacks in recent years due to geopolitical tensions, notably the Doklam standoff, and was completely halted in 2020 amid the COVID-19 pandemic. 'There are immense possibilities for trade and cultural exchange through Shipki La,' Sukhu said. 'We will raise the matter of restarting trade with the central government to restore this centuries-old route.' Hishey Negi, the president of the Kinnaur Indo-China Trade Association, wrote to the Kinnaur deputy commissioner last month to expedite discussions with the Ministry of External Affairs to resume trade from 1 June. He requested 150 trade passes for local traders, emphasising the economic lifeline that the trade provides to border villages. Namgya Panchayat pradhan Baldev Negi shared historical context with ThePrint, recalling a trade treaty signed centuries ago between the princely states of Ladakh, Rampur Bushahr, and Guge in Tibet. 'The treaty was signed at a location called Lauhche, now in Tibet,' he said. 'I heard this from my elders. It was related to trade among these regions.' Norbu Chhoria, a former pradhan, provided further insights into the pass' history. 'The old name of Shipki La was Pema La, or Shared Gate, also known as Shared Pass. It was declared the Line of Actual Control post-1962, and later, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police named it Shipki La.' वर्षों के इंतज़ार के बाद शिपकी-ला अब पर्यटकों के लिए पूरी तरह खुल चुका है। यह केवल एक पर्यटन स्थल ही नहीं, बल्कि हिमाचल की संस्कृति, साहस और शांति से जुड़ने का एक द्वार है। शिपकी-ला न सिर्फ़ सैलानियों का स्वागत करेगा, बल्कि क्षेत्र की आर्थिकी को नया जीवन देगा। — CMO HIMACHAL (@CMOFFICEHP) June 10, 2025 A potential pilgrimage route Beyond trade, Shipki La holds spiritual significance as a potential gateway for the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra. 'I will meet the prime minister and present the case for starting the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra via Shipki La, which could be the easiest route for pilgrims,' Sukhu said. Saraswati Negi, local Mahila Mandal Pradhan, elaborated on the route's feasibility to serve this purpose. 'There is a route from Shipki La to Kailash Manasarovar. The Chinese road extends up to Shipki village, with a 4-kilometer path in between. It used to take 15 days on horseback to reach Kailash Manasarovar. This route was specially prepared for trade, but it can serve pilgrims too.' She added, 'Opening this route for tourism and pilgrimage will create employment opportunities for the youth of our villages.' The pass' location, close to the sacred Mount Kailash and Lake Mansarovar in Tibet, makes it a compelling alternative to existing pilgrimage routes, which often involve longer and more arduous journeys. Also Read: 'This wealth is Himachal's, we deserve rightful share,' says CM Sukhu amid Punjab-Haryana water row Boosting tourism & local economy The opening of Shipki La to tourists is part of a broader strategy to stimulate economic growth in Kinnaur and Lahaul-Spiti, which share a 240-km border with China. Tourists can access the pass via the Shimla-Kinnaur Highway, taking a detour near Khab village. Entry requires valid identity documents such as an Aadhaar card, and is strictly monitored by the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) on a daily basis. Overnight stays at the pass are prohibited to maintain security. Revenue Minister and Kinnaur MLA Jagat Singh Negi underscored how the tourism initiative would address the region's economic challenges. 'This is a significant step to boost tourism in the border district,' he said. 'It will help locals financially, and curb migration from remote areas of Kinnaur, where economic opportunities have been limited since the suspension of the trade.' Tenzin, a resident of Nako village, echoed the sentiment, 'Trade is not just a part of our history but a source of livelihood for many. Its resumption, alongside tourism, is crucial for our survival.' Lalit Negi, a resident of Kalpa, said, 'Opening Shipki La will bring visitors beyond the explored valleys of Kinnaur, directly benefiting local communities through increased economic activity.' The state government has also requested the central government to engage with China to resume livestock trade and other exchanges, signaling a proactive approach to restoring economic ties. Despite the enthusiasm, significant challenges remain. The suspension of trade since 2020 has strained local economies, and ongoing geopolitical tensions between India and China complicate efforts to resume cross-border trade activities. The state government, however, remains committed to overcoming these hurdles through dialogue with the central government, MLA Negi said. 'We have requested the Centre to engage with China to resume livestock trade and other exchanges,' he said, adding the success of these efforts will also depend on diplomatic progress and the resolution of security concerns along the LAC. (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)

The 'not-so-fixed' nature of fixed income markets
The 'not-so-fixed' nature of fixed income markets

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

The 'not-so-fixed' nature of fixed income markets

The term 'fixed income" sounds reassuring—evoking stability, predictable returns, and minimal risk. But in today's market, this label can be misleading. From wild price swings to rate-driven gains and losses, fixed income is no longer as 'fixed' as it once was. The roots of what we now call fixed income go back at least 250 years, when the British government issued 'Consols"—a type of perpetual bond used to finance wars. These bonds had no maturity date and paid fixed coupons indefinitely, until redeemed by the government. The term gained prominence with the advent of modern portfolio theory in the 1950s, when economists like Harry Markowitz developed frameworks around diversification and risk. These theories clearly distinguished between 'equities' (stocks) and 'bonds,' the latter defined by their steady, fixed returns. Over time, as large asset management firms grew in influence, 'fixed income" became a standard industry classification, covering bonds and a wide range of debt instruments. Many investors take the term at face value, assuming bonds or debt-based funds are inherently low-risk. 'Fixed income" feels comforting, as if one is promised consistent returns regardless of market conditions. But today, this assumption doesn't hold. Also read: How you can invest in a fully valued market Reality check While the core principles remain, the fixed income landscape has changed dramatically. Financial markets today are more complex, interconnected, and reactive. Innovations in debt instruments, investment vehicles, and valuation models (like mark-to-market and NAV) have introduced a layer of volatility. What was once considered the domain of stable returns now exhibits price and yield fluctuations akin to equities. Variables such as changing interest rates, shifting credit spreads, and evolving liquidity conditions can all disrupt the 'fixed" nature of returns. When bonds behave like stocks Take the example of Austria's 100-year bond issued during the Covid-19 pandemic, which offered a 0.90% yield. As global rates rose over the next three years, the bond's price crashed from €135 to €33—wiping out around 75% of investor value. Closer home, Indian gilt mutual funds reported a yield-to-maturity (YTM) of 7.30% in April 2024. But falling interest rates boosted returns to 11% over the year. Similarly, a 30-year Indian government bond jumped from ₹98 to ₹107 in early 2025, delivering a 16% gain. 'Not-So-Fixed' isn't necessarily a bad thing Volatility isn't always a drawback. In fact, it creates opportunities to manage risk and enhance returns—provided you understand the levers at play. What investors should watch for: Central bank cues and bond duration: Rising rates mean better reinvestment opportunities via newer, higher-yielding bonds. Falling rates can lead to capital gains in long-duration bonds. Credit quality and research: Conservative investors should favour high-rated government or corporate bonds. Those with higher risk appetite can benefit from well-researched strategies that anticipate upgrades or downgrades. Don't blindly trust YTM: The yield-to-maturity assumes holding bonds till maturity and reinvesting at the same rate—conditions that rarely hold. It's not a return guarantee. Liquidity matters: Whether you invest directly or via mutual funds, understand how easily you can exit. If flexibility is important, favour short-duration or highly liquid instruments. Review regularly: Just like equities, fixed income investments require monitoring. Keep tabs on rate cycles, credit ratings, and broader liquidity shifts. Also read: This CEO has no fixed-income investments, and has never done an SIP Summing up The world of fixed income has changed. Interest rates, credit risks, liquidity conditions, and market sentiment now have a more visible impact on returns. To navigate this landscape, investors need to let go of outdated assumptions and embrace a more active, informed approach. As this evolving asset class offers both stability and strategy, it may no longer be entirely 'fixed," but it remains very much relevant. Also read: Mastering Fixed Income Trinity: Balancing income, duration, and liquidity for smarter investments Bhupendra Meel, Head – PMS & Alternative – Fixed Income, Bandhan AMC. Views expressed in this column are personal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store