
'The Disability Allowance Is Broken – And It's Hurting The People Who Need It Most' (Part 4)
Press Release – NZCAST
MSD staff apply inconsistent interpretations, with some clients being approved for support and others being told you dont qualify for the same medication, the same cost, depending on who they get.
The Disability Allowance was designed to help some of the most vulnerable people in Aotearoa – those living with ongoing physical or mental health conditions that incur regular costs. But ask anyone who has tried to access it recently, and you'll hear the same story: it's broken.
Every week, we speak to state care survivors, disabled people, and mental health service users who are trying to navigate this system. They're not asking for luxuries – they're asking for help with GP visits, counselling, transport, medication, gluten free products, or extra heating. Basic costs for daily survival, healing and wellbeing. Yet they are being met with suspicion, delays, inconsistent rules, and outright denials.
It's Not the Criteria – It's the System
The criteria for the Disability Allowance are already narrow: you must have a disability likely to last at least six months, and it must incur extra costs. But even when someone clearly meets these requirements, barriers are built into every stage.
GPs are asked to fill out complex forms, sometimes requiring detailed medical notes, verification and financial estimates for every item. For trauma survivors, this means reliving their experience over and over again. Some one receiving gluten free products, or unsubsidized medication or even simply gym visits, must provide copious amounts of evidence, stretching an already over-whelmed health system.
MSD staff apply inconsistent interpretations, with some clients being approved for support and others being told 'you don't qualify' – for the same medication, the same cost, depending on who they get.
Reviews are demanded regularly, with little warning. Clients are forced to re-prove their disability as if it might have magically disappeared.
We know of survivors whose claims were rejected because their trauma-related costs were not deemed 'essential,' despite being recommended by medical professionals. Our survivors know their healing, yet with the small amount extra a week, they have to provide so much, it isn't worth the hassle.. People with PTSD and chronic health issues produced by their abuse in state care have been told that they are not eligible for Disability Allowance, because they must first spend the money, they must first produce all the receipts, they must first get a specialist letter. And all of this happens while they are simply trying to survive. Why should someone go without food? Just to buy medication? That shows you how backwards the policy is.
A Patchwork of Postcode Policies
Perhaps the most insulting feature of the Disability Allowance system is how postcode-dependent it is. What's approved in Christchurch may be rejected in Porirua. What one case manager calls 'reasonable' may be dismissed as 'not covered' by another.
This is not just unfair – it's unlawful. The Ministry of Social Development is a public agency. It is bound by Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the Human Rights Act, and the principle of equity. Yet it is administering a benefit that delivers different results depending on where you live, who you talk to, and how much you know how to fight.
For State Care Survivors, It's Another Betrayal
Many of the people we support are survivors of state abuse. They were harmed by the very institutions that were meant to protect them. The state failed them once – and it is failing them again.
Being denied the Disability Allowance isn't just a bureaucratic inconvenience. For these survivors, it means going without counselling. It means deciding between heating and medication. It means staying isolated because they can't afford to travel to healing spaces. Every rejected form is a reminder that their wellbeing is still seen as a cost to be minimized, not a right to be protected.
If the government is so risk adverse why don't the put the costs on the green card? That way they ensure that the person's health costs are going to the place, directly to the provider.
What Needs to Change
We're calling on the Government to overhaul the Disability Allowance system with urgency. This includes:
Trauma-informed training for MSD staff;
Standardised national guidance to end postcode-based decisions;
Streamlined application processes, especially for those already in the healthcare or redress systems;
Guaranteed access to interpreters and alternative therapies for those with specialist needs;
And most of all, a shift in mindset – from gatekeeping to support.
People shouldn't have to fight for the basics. They shouldn't have to beg, prove, or relive trauma just to get the help they are entitled to. The Disability Allowance was meant to uphold dignity. Right now, it is doing the opposite.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bank of Canada governor talks fighting inflation in a ‘shock-prone' world
Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem sat down for a one-on-one interview with The Canadian Press after the central bank held its benchmark interest rate steady on June 4, 2025. He discusses how the central bank can – and can't – address issues like housing affordability while still keeping inflation under wraps. (June 7, 2025)


CNA
22 minutes ago
- CNA
Norway dare to dream big again after a quarter century of heartbreak
After a quarter of a century of near misses and heartbreak, Norway's rout of Italy in their World Cup qualifier has reignited the country's hope of a return to international football's biggest stage. There was little doubt that Norway were the better team on Friday as they easily dominated Italy in Oslo, pushing on until the scoreboard read 3-0 and taking a big step towards next year's World Cup. For supporters of the Norwegian team, the result has sparked a glimmer of hope in hearts that have been broken many times over the past decades. Norway have not participated in an international football tournament since the European Championship in 2000, which was hosted in Belgium and the Netherlands. There have been many close calls since then, with the margins consistently going against the squad, but now there is a shift in attitude after Norway dominated against the four-times world champions. "I am 100 per cent sure", former Norway, Denmark and Iceland coach Age Hareide told newspaper VG when asked if Norway would go to the World Cup. SOLID STATISTICS Norway are in pole position in Group I with nine points out of nine and a goal surplus of 10. Israel, Estonia and Moldova are the other nations in the group. The Football Meets Data statistics platform gives Norway a 77 per cent chance of winning the group and qualifying directly for the tournament hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Key striker Erling Haaland, who put himself on the scoresheet against Italy, agreed with the statistics. "We are too good not to play in championships. I will play both the World Cup and the European Championship. Not to put pressure on myself but I will," he told Norwegian broadcaster NRK. While World Cup fever in Norway is reaching a point not seen since 1998, when Norway last participated, manager Stale Solbakken, wise from experience, is lowering expectations. "It is a coach's misfortune that I have to concentrate on the next match, so you can enjoy yourselves and ask those questions. I would have liked to say that it was 100 per cent certain but I can't," he told reporters after Friday's game.


Al Jazeera
22 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
ICE launches ‘military-style' raids in Los Angeles: What we know
Los Angeles witnessed a series of coordinated immigration raids by United States law enforcement officials on Friday, resulting in the arrest of dozens and igniting widespread protests. The raids, which were carried out in a military-style operation, have intensified concerns about the force used by federal immigration officials and the rights of undocumented individuals. Here is what we know about the raids and the latest on the ground. Federal agents from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) conducted a series of 'immigration enforcement operations' across Los Angeles on Friday morning. Individuals suspected of 'immigration violations and the use of fraudulent documents' were arrested. The arrests were carried out without judicial warrants, according to multiple legal observers and confirmed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), which did not take part in the raids, was called in to quell ensuing protests. The raids were part of a broader initiative under the Trump administration's intensified immigration policies. The raids focused on several locations in downtown LA and its immediate surroundings. These spots are known to have significant migrant populations and labour-intensive industries. Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition of Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), which covers California, said advocates had recorded enforcement activity at seven sites. This included two Home Depot stores in the Westlake District of Los Angeles, a doughnut shop and the clothing wholesaler, Ambiance Apparel in the Fashion District of downtown Los Angeles. Other locations in which raids were carried out included day labour centres and one other Ambiance facility near 15th Street and Santa Fe Avenue in south Los Angeles. ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) reported the 'administrative arrest' of 44 individuals for immigration-related offences. An administrative arrest, unlike a criminal arrest, refers to detention for civil immigration violations such as overstaying a visa or lacking legal status, and does not require criminal charges. These arrests can result in detention, deportation, temporary re-entry bans and denial of future immigration requests. Advocates believe the number of arrests made was higher, however. Caleb Soto, of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, told Al Jazeera that between 70 and 80 people had been detained, but only three lawyers have been allowed access to the detention centre where they were being held to provide legal advice. Additionally, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California, was arrested for allegedly obstructing federal agents during the raids. Huerta was reportedly injured during the arrest and received medical treatment at Los Angeles General Medical Center before being taken into custody. What sets these raids apart from typical civil enforcement actions was their military-style execution, experts say. According to witnesses, legal observers and advocacy groups, federal agents involved in the operations were heavily armed and dressed in tactical gear, with some wearing camouflage and carrying rifles. Agents arrived in unmarked black SUVs and armoured vehicles and, at certain points, sealed off entire streets around targeted buildings. Drones were reportedly used for surveillance in some areas and access to sites was blocked off with yellow tape, similar to measures which would be taken during a high-threat counterterrorism or drug bust operation. The ACLU described the show of force as an 'oppressive and vile paramilitary operation'. Civil liberties groups said the tactics used had created panic in local communities and may have violated protocols for civil immigration enforcement. As news of the raids spread via social media and through immigrant advocacy networks, hundreds of protesters gathered outside the Edward R Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles, where detainees were being processed. Demonstrators blocked entrances and exits to the building, chanted slogans and demanded the release of those arrested. Some spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the building's exterior walls. Several protesters attempted to physically stop ICE vehicles, leading to confrontations with law enforcement. LAPD officers issued dispersal orders and warned protesters that they would be subject to arrest if they remained in the area. To enforce the order, officers in riot gear deployed tear gas, pepper spray and 'less-lethal munitions', including firing rubber bullets to disperse the crowd. A citywide tactical alert was also issued, requiring all LAPD officers to remain on duty. Shortly after 7pm on Friday [02:00 GMT Saturday], the LAPD declared the protests to be an 'unlawful assembly', meaning that those who failed to leave the area could be subject to arrest. The declaration appeared to remain in effect until the crowd dispersed later that evening, though no formal end time was publicly announced. US media outlets and rights groups reported that hundreds of detainees, including children, were held overnight in the basement of the federal building without access to beds, blankets or adequate food and water. However, an ICE spokesperson told CBS News that the agency 'categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles', stating that it takes its mandate to care for people in custody 'seriously'. The status of all individuals detained remains unclear. While some have been released, others continue to be held and details about their current locations or conditions have not been fully disclosed. Local and state officials condemned the raids and the manner in which they were conducted. In a statement shared on X on Friday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said such operations 'sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city'.California Governor Gavin Newsom issued a statement describing the operations as 'cruel' and 'chaotic', adding that they are an attempt 'to meet an arbitrary arrest quota'. All 15 members of the Los Angeles City Council issued a joint statement denouncing the raids. Some Trump administration officials, on the other hand, defended the actions and criticised local leaders for pushing back. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, for instance, suggested that Mayor Karen Bass was undermining federal law.