logo
He Fled the Nazis Before the War. He Came Back to Put His Country on Trial.

He Fled the Nazis Before the War. He Came Back to Put His Country on Trial.

New York Times22-02-2025

On a gray wintry day in December 1970, Willy Brandt, the first postwar Social Democratic chancellor of West Germany, fell to his knees at a Warsaw monument to the Jews who had fought there against the Nazis. His gesture has come to exemplify what the Germans resonantly call Vergangenheitsbewältigung, the striving to cope with the past. For all the shortcomings in this nationwide effort, most Germans today set an example of remorse that shames Turkish nationalist leaders equivocating about the Armenian genocide, or rightist Japanese politicians visiting the Yasukuni war shrine in Tokyo that honors Class A war criminals.
Yet in the years after World War II, many Germans were in varying degrees unrepentant, nationalistic or self-justifying. Four years after the Allied military tribunal at Nuremberg for top Nazi leaders, only 38 percent of West Germans in the American-occupied zone approved of further trials for war criminals.
How did so many Germans become contrite about the Nazi past? In his gripping and well-researched biography, 'The Prosecutor,' Jack Fairweather argues that the answer lies in part in the work of an irascible, honorable German Jewish lawyer named Fritz Bauer, who pressed the people of his country 'to face their complicity in the industrialized mass murder of Europe's Jews.'
A bookish judge in Stuttgart under the Weimar Republic, Bauer was triply anathematized in Nazi Germany: He was Jewish, a Social Democratic foe of Nazism and a secretly gay man. He and his fellow Social Democrats were shaken by the readiness of establishment conservatives who 'went along with Hitler's desire to upend the democratic order.' Bauer was lucky to survive six terrifying months in the concentration camps, where he was repeatedly beaten. He emerged to find a police state where Jewish doctors could not practice and Jewish stores were boycotted, while Stuttgart's non-Jewish residents unconcernedly got on with their lives. As Christmas drew near, Fairweather writes, 'girls from the newly renamed Adolf Hitler School sang carols.' Bauer fled to Denmark in 1936 and then to Sweden in 1943, after a Danish rabbi warned that the occupying Germans were about to round up all the Jews in the country.
Fairweather's book makes for an uncomfortable reminder of how many Germans supported the Third Reich. The legal ideal of individual criminal justice crumbled before the more than 250,000 Germans who had served in the SS, murdering at Auschwitz and the other death camps in German-controlled Poland, or as part of the mobile killing squads called the Einsatzgruppen; the indoctrinated soldiers of the German military who had backed up the Einsatzgruppen's massacres, shot Jews themselves or used Jews as slave labor, as well as killing vast numbers of Soviet prisoners of war and civilians; the bureaucrats and lawyers who had arranged the logistics of genocide; and the nearly 14 million Germans who had voted for the Nazis in July 1932, although Hitler's vicious hatred of Jews had been flaunted in 'Mein Kampf' and his fulminating speeches.
Returning to Allied-occupied Germany in 1948, Bauer demanded at least a symbolic German reckoning with that widespread complicity. While some skeptics dismiss war crimes trials as a veiled tool of Western domination, Fairweather shows a quite different dynamic. In the early Cold War, the Western powers increasingly preferred to shelve war crimes prosecutions in order to fortify West Germany as an anti-Soviet bulwark. Far from justice being a foreign imposition, here German prosecutors pursued German trials for German crimes.
In 1956, Bauer became the attorney general of West Germany's largest state and issued an arrest warrant for Adolf Eichmann, the fervid SS chieftain who had engineered the deportation of Jews from across Europe to the death camps. With good reason, Bauer worried that Nazis working in West Germany's government might alert Eichmann or scupper the investigation. The first head of West Germany's new foreign intelligence agency was Reinhard Gehlen, previously the Third Reich's chief of military intelligence for the eastern front in World War II. He knew where Eichmann had gone to ground in Argentina, but did not inform Bauer, instead putting the German prosecutor under surveillance.
When Bauer unexpectedly got a tip from a Dachau survivor with Eichmann's address in Argentina, he did not dare ask the West German police to run it down. Instead he passed his information to the Israelis and kept exhorting them to grab Eichmann — leading eventually to his abduction from Buenos Aires and his dramatic 1961 trial in an Israeli court in Jerusalem.
As the German journalist Ronen Steinke argues in his own first-rate biography, Bauer's greatest achievement was a sprawling trial of some 20 German officers and functionaries at Auschwitz, held in a Frankfurt courtroom in the mid-60s. Bauer made a point of prosecuting not just senior camp leaders but also lower-ranked Germans, since every person operating the death camp contributed to mass murder. The most devastating testimony came from Auschwitz survivors, one of whom described the mortal terror of people in the gas chambers, some taking 10 or more minutes to die, struggling frantically, their corpses covered in blood from their noses and ears. An Austrian Jewish survivor recalled the words of a little boy who was to be gassed the next day: 'No, I'm not afraid. It's all so terrible here, it can only be better up there.'
Fairweather writes that Bauer's story shows 'how the Holocaust came to define our collective sense of humanity.' Yet his book arrives as major political parties are working to stamp the memory of the Holocaust out of public consciousness. Last year, the immigrant-hating extremist party Alternative for Germany became the first far-right group to win a plurality in a state election since the fall of Nazi Germany. The party was led to victory by Björn Höcke, who has scorned the prominent Holocaust memorial in Berlin and said that Germany needs a '180-degree' turn in remembering its history.
In 2023, the billionaire mogul Elon Musk endorsed as 'the actual truth' an antisemitic online post that blamed Jewish communities for pushing 'dialectical hatred against whites' and flooding Western countries with 'hordes of minorities'; earlier this year, he took time out from his new role as a powerful adviser to President Trump to tell an AfD rally by video that Germany has 'too much of a focus on past guilt.' Trump won his second term as president despite having dinner at his Florida estate with Kanye West, an outspoken antisemite, and Nick Fuentes, a white supremacist and Holocaust denier. Fairweather's book would be haunting to read at any time; it is especially bitter today.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ Sues Coffee Shop for Allegedly Denying Service to Jewish Customers
DOJ Sues Coffee Shop for Allegedly Denying Service to Jewish Customers

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DOJ Sues Coffee Shop for Allegedly Denying Service to Jewish Customers

On Monday, Attorney General Pam Bondi filed a civil rights lawsuit against an Oakland, California, coffee shop that allegedly denied service to two Jewish customers. While the suit focuses on allegations of obvious anti-Semitic discrimination, Bondi herself has highlighted the coffee shop's use of offensive drink names and controversial pro-Palestinian images—both of which are obviously protected speech. The suit claims that two different Jewish men were denied service at the coffee shop, called Jerusalem Coffee House, for wearing hats with the Star of David on them. The first man, Michael Radice, tried to go to the coffee shop in June 2024 to see if it could be a good location for a fundraising event for the organization he worked for. He was wearing a baseball cap with a Star of David on it, and the words "Am Yisraeli Chai," meaning "the people of Israel live." Radice walked up to the shop, and a man sitting at a table in front of the store—an employee, Radice later learned—asked him if he was a Jew and a Zionist and "began shouting numerous accusations at Mr. Radice, including that he was complicit in Israel's military actions in the Gaza Strip following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks," according to the suit. Radice returned weeks later for the fundraising event, and "arrived early and entered the coffee shop to purchase a cookie, which he hoped would be seen as a sign of goodwill," according to the lawsuit. "Radice was not wearing the baseball cap he wore on his previous visit, nor anything else that would indicate his religious or political beliefs." The suit claims that the employee from the previous encounter told him, "You're the guy with the hat. You're the Jew. You're the Zionist. We don't want you in our coffee shop. Get out." The suit further claimed that Fathi Abdulrahim Harara, the shop's owner, and "two other employees followed Mr. Radice outside, yelling 'Jew' and 'Zionist' at him," even though Radice at no point said anything about his views on Israel. In a second incident, Jonathan Hirsch entered the shop in October 2024 with his five-year-old son. Hirsch was wearing a dark blue baseball cap with a white Star of David on it. The suit claims that, a few minutes after entering the shop, Harara "demanded to know whether Mr. Hirsch was a 'Zionist' and whether he was wearing a 'Jewish star,'" and "demanded that Mr. Hirsch and his son leave the premises." Hirsch refused to leave, and Harara called the police. When police arrived, Harara "repeatedly demanded that the officers remove Mr. Hirsch and arrest him for trespassing, at one point requesting that they physically restrain Mr. Hirsch face-down on the sidewalk in front of his young son." The suit adds that "Harara followed Mr. Hirsch and the officers outside and continued to spew insults and epithets at both Mr. Hirsch and his young son. These included repeatedly calling Mr. Hirsch a 'bitch,' a 'dog,' and a 'piece of shit.'" While the lawsuit alleges incidents of clear discrimination against Jews, it also bizarrely mentions the coffee shop's protected speech. The suit notes that, on the anniversary of the October 7 attacks against Israel, the coffee shop unveiled two new drinks "'Iced In Tea Fada,' an apparent reference to 'intifada,' and 'Sweet Sinwar,'" apparently named after Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar. The suit also notes that the shop has several inverted red triangles—a controversial pro-Palestinian symbol—painted on an exterior wall. Bondi herself stated that this speech motivated the lawsuit in a recent television interview, discussing the drink names before saying, "We've sued them and we're gonna stop this from happening. And anywhere in the country, if you do this, we're coming after you." While the suit does not claim that these speech acts are themselves illegal discrimination, their inclusion at all in the suit—and Bondi's remarks—will surely have a chilling effect on businesses looking to engage in controversial, though protected, pro-Palestinian speech. While the Justice Department should be going after illegal discrimination, they can achieve that aim without chilling protected speech. The post DOJ Sues Coffee Shop for Allegedly Denying Service to Jewish Customers appeared first on

European rabbis cancel Sarajevo event after minister's boycott call
European rabbis cancel Sarajevo event after minister's boycott call

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

European rabbis cancel Sarajevo event after minister's boycott call

The Conference of European Rabbis (CER) has cancelled its upcoming meeting in Sarajevo after a minister called for a boycott of the event, the organization's president said on Wednesday. Calls by Adnan Delić, the labour minister of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH), led the hotel hosting the event to cancel the booking, CER President and Chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt said. The FBiH is one of the two political entities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, alongside the Republika Srpska. In a post on Facebook, Delić denounced Israel's role in the war in the Gaza Strip and demanded that Sarajevo not become a "venue for supporting genocide." "We have been made unwelcome, and this last-minute, ministerial boycott of Jewish European citizens, dedicated to purely to promoting Jewish life in Europe and furthering dialogue and democracy across the continent, is disgraceful," Goldschmidt wrote in a statement. He thanked the German city of Munich for agreeing at the last minute to host the meeting, planned for June 16-18. During the Bosnian war from 1992-95, 11,000 citizens lost their lives in Sarajevo, when the city was besieged by Serbian troops. The war killed almost 100,000 people and displaced 2 million. Today, Bosnia and Herzegovina is home to large populations of Muslim Bosniaks, Orthodox Serbs and Catholic Croats. Delić wrote that the CER had misused Sarajevo as a place "to send a message legitimizing the occupation and systematic destruction of the Palestinian people." Goldschmidt rejected this, emphasizing that CER events promote dialogue and calling the cancellation "Sarajevo's loss." The CER has around 1,000 members and 800 active rabbis in its ranks. According to its own statements, it advocates for the religious rights of Jews in Europe and is committed to religious freedom and interfaith dialogue with other faiths.

Opinion: First Lady Melania and Pope Leo are right — it's 'unum' time
Opinion: First Lady Melania and Pope Leo are right — it's 'unum' time

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: First Lady Melania and Pope Leo are right — it's 'unum' time

In a season of tragedy and division, two powerful voices — one from the Vatican, one from the White House — reached for the same ancient word: Unum. Last month, after the horrific shooting outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., First Lady Melania Trump offered her condolences by quoting our national motto: E Pluribus Unum — 'Out of many, one.' Days earlier, Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, delivered his inaugural message with a similar phrase etched into his papal crest: In Illo Uno Unum — 'In the One, One.' And with the horrifying attack on Jewish families in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, the same call to unity remains. These aren't just old, dusty Latin words. They were calls to unity in a time when America — and the world — feels dangerously divided. We are living through a season of immense high conflict, spilling over into hate-fueled violence. But from Rome to D.C., this month reminded us that Unum — unity — is not just a relic. It's a lifeline. Let's be honest: unity sounds soft. It can feel like wishful thinking. But today, invoking unity is a bold act. It takes guts to say, 'We still belong to each other,' especially when everything around us screams otherwise. I see signs of that courage every day. In an exhausted middle of Americans who are tired of the yelling, the blaming and the endless outrage. They're not perfect — but they're trying. Trying to build bridges instead of burning them. Trying to find common ground without giving up their convictions. That's the heart of Unum. It doesn't erase conflict or pretend we all agree. It's not utopia. It's the hard, daily work of choosing coexistence over chaos. Unum means Jewish and Muslim Americans grieving side-by-side. It means a First Lady who grew up Catholic in Slovenia invoking a motto that speaks across American synagogues, mosques and churches alike. It means a Pope who spent years in Latin America calling for peace — not as an abstract dream, but as an urgent task. And in Washington last week, that task was made painfully real. The shooting near the Israeli Embassy wasn't just another violent act. It was a national alarm. A young couple was killed. Jewish Americans and foreign diplomats had gathered at a museum dedicated to the hard work of remembering history and resisting hate. They came in peace. They fled in terror. If that doesn't shake us, what will? I mourn every loss — from D.C. to Gaza. As a former diplomat and humanitarian worker, I've seen the cost of war up close. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is heartbreaking: tens of thousands dead, aid blocked, civilians suffering. Hostages still not home. Israelis and Palestinians alike living in fear and grief. But pain doesn't have to harden us. It can humble us. It can move us to action — not vengeance. In moments like these, we face two temptations. One is despair: to give up, to believe the divisions are too deep. The other is rage: to blame, punish and retreat into our tribes. Neither will save us. The harder path — the braver one — is to build bridges anyway. Pope Leo XIV said it plainly: 'Be bridgebuilders, peace seekers, and companions on the journey.' That's not just a prayer. It's a plan. Because in a world driven by algorithms that divide and outrage that sells, choosing Unum is radical. It means staying at the table when you'd rather storm out. It means believing that pluralism — people of different faiths, races, beliefs and stories — can still build a shared life. You could say that in an interfaith nation like America, that is our common wealth — a society where deep differences don't divide us, they deepen us. The First Lady's words last month were not just a prayer — they were a call to action. Quoting our centuries-old motto E Pluribus Unum — 'Out of many, one' — was a reminder that belonging isn't partisan. It's American. It always has been. So let's hold on to that fragile hope. Let's say Unum again — and mean it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store