logo
Support surge for teals despite vilification campaign

Support surge for teals despite vilification campaign

Yahoo04-05-2025

The Liberal Party's shift to a conservative agenda turned off liberal-minded voters, with many angered that the party preferenced One Nation and Trumpet of Patriots, a key independent says.
Saturday's election showed the so-called "teal" community independents are here to stay with teal MPs retaining their seats, largely with more support after making history at the last election.
Independent Zali Steggall, returned in her seat of Warringah, said the Liberals needed to listen and adapt following their crushing election defeat.
"What's missing is they have abandoned concepts of liberalism. Where they are now is a conservative party," she said on the ABC's insiders program on Sunday.
Number two on most of the Liberals' ballot papers was One Nation followed by Trumpet of Patriots, Ms Steggall said.
"I actually had many voters come to me offended, saying they were previously moderate Liberal voters.
"Absolutely no way were they one, voting for Peter Dutton but B, offended at the idea that the second preference went to One Nation."
Ms Steggall said voters in general rejected the adversarial populism pursued by the coalition and the Greens.
She said community independents had faced a campaign of vilification against them.
"We've got to remember the News Ltd media and third-party groups … that were active actors in this election, threw everything at those campaigns to vilify and it was vicious," she said.
"I think more respectful, positive community independents have held their ground or increased. And I think that's what Australians are looking for."
When asked if the teals might form a bloc or even a party to ensure more negotiating clout, Ms Steggall said their current model worked very well, collaborating on issues and co-ordinating in some campaigning.
Ms Steggall and fellow teals Allegra Spender in Wentworth, Sophie Scamps in Mackellar, Monique Ryan in Kooyong and Kate Chaney in Curtin will return to parliament.
Zoe Daniel looked likely to retain her Melbourne seat of Goldstein, despite a swing against her to the Liberals' Tim Wilson.
The teals could also be joined by Nicolette Boele, who is ahead with the majority of votes counted in the former Liberal heartland of Bradfield in Sydney's north.
"Regardless of the outcome, this community has made it clear that we expect our representative to listen to and respond to the concerns of this community," Ms Boele said in a statement.
Independent candidate Jessie Price is also in with a chance in the formerly safe Labor seat of Bean in Canberra, where she claimed a strong swing with more than 80 per cent of the vote counted.
Crossbench stalwarts Andrew Wilkie, Helen Haines, Bob Katter and Rebekha Sharkie retained their seats.
Independent senator David Pocock enjoyed a more than 20 per cent swing to him to take first spot on the ACT Senate ticket and win a quota in his own right.
The senator gave credit to Labor for a campaign that delivered the party a huge majority in the lower house.
"I think there is an opportunity for them to really make some bold changes and change the future of our country," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble
EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble

The need to grow the Canadian economy in the face of tough economic times was underscored by the release of the latest unemployment numbers by Statistics Canada on Friday. The unemployment rate in May rose to 7.0%. That's the highest it has been since September 2016, excluding the 2020 and 2021 pandemic years, and a 12.9% increase from 6.2% a year ago in May. The Canadian economy generated a net increase of just 8,800 jobs in May, far short of the roughly 30,000 per month needed to keep pace with population growth. A total of 1.6 million Canadians were unemployed in May, an increase of 191,000, or 13.8%, compared to May 2024. A smaller share of people who were unemployed in April found jobs in May (22.6%), compared to a year ago (24.0%), and spent an average of 21.8 weeks searching for work, compared to 18.4 weeks in May 2024. Unemployment in Ontario (7.9%); Alberta (7.4%); Newfoundland and Labrador (9.7%); Prince Edward Island (8.2%); and Nunavut (9.0%) were all above the national average, as was the case in a number of cities, including Windsor (10.8%); Oshawa (9.1%); Toronto (8.8%); Calgary (7.8%); and Edmonton (7.3%). Canada recorded its largest merchandise trade deficit of $7.1 billion in April, the first full month of the tariff war with U.S. President Donald Trump, compared to $2.3 billion in March. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development last week projected meagre 1% economic growth for Canada this year and 1.1% in 2026, noting Trump's global tariff war is expected to hit the economies of Canada, Mexico, China and the U.S. hardest. Prime Minister Mark Carney proposed measures to bolster the economy on Friday, including eliminating federal barriers to interprovincial trade, increasing labour mobility and shortening the process for approving major infrastructure projects. Those are worthy long-term goals, since internal impediments to trade cost our economy $200 billion annually, raise consumer prices up to 14.5% and reduce economic growth as measured by gross domestic product up to 8% annually. But they are also long-term solutions, underscoring the importance of Carney's government producing a budget as soon as possible to reveal the Liberals' specific plans to boost the economy. For better or worse, Carney decided to delay releasing the budget until fall.

SNOBELEN: Reflecting on the Common Sense Revolution three decades later
SNOBELEN: Reflecting on the Common Sense Revolution three decades later

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

SNOBELEN: Reflecting on the Common Sense Revolution three decades later

On June 8, a gaggle of old warriors will mark a rare collision of common sense and courage. It will be a quiet event, but 30 years ago, this unlikely team set the world (or at least Ontario) on fire. It was election day on June 8, 1995, in Ontario. I spent the day watching my sister Kathie run an amazing get-out-the-vote effort that capped six weeks of campaigning with friends and neighbours. It felt good to know that, regardless of the outcome, we had collectively worked our butts off. There was nothing left in the tank. But the outcome was not certain. At the start of that election, Lyn McLeod and the Liberals had a comfortable, double-digit lead in the polls. The taste of a 1990 defeat for the PC Party (and this rookie candidate) lingered as the hours dripped away. Some campaigns are riskier than others. In 1995, Mike Harris and a young campaign team broke all the rules with a bold, detailed election platform called the Common Sense Revolution, released a full year before election day. On election day, voters would determine if that strategy was incredibly brave or simply naive. Turns out it was brave. But the courage didn't end on June 8. A few weeks later, Premier Mike Harris presented his caucus with a stark appraisal of the economic conditions facing Ontario. The facts were simple — in the year since the Common Sense Revolution platform was released, the economy of Ontario had declined, eroding the foundation of the plan. I remember a sinking feeling that this was the moment when all the hard work over five years would begin to crumble. No plan survives first contact, and predictably, the Harris government would soften bold intentions in the face of reality. What happened next set the tone for the Harris government. Having laid out the harsh realities, Harris told his caucus that the plan would have to adapt. We would need to be bolder and move faster. Harris was unreasonable. Which is why, 30 years later, he remains my benchmark for courageous leadership. Much has been written about the Harris government. A good bit of it is nonsense that became an urban myth. But, by any account, Harris impacted Ontario in meaningful ways and altered the future of the province. One of the young revolutionaries, Alister Campbell, recently edited a collection of well-researched opinions on the long-term impact of the Harris government's policies and initiatives. The book, The Harris Legacy: Reflections On A Transformational Premier, should be required reading for anyone wishing to do the impossible. I don't spend much time looking back. Life doesn't move in that direction. But anniversaries have a way of prompting a backward glance. Thirty years on, it is remarkable how many of the issues left hanging at the end of the Harris government remain not only unresolved, but also unaddressed. These are recurring problems that governments either ignore or disguise. School boards continue to be quaint relics of the single schoolroom past, forever impeding the evolution of education. Conservation authorities, a watershed management structure invented 70 years ago, continue to impede, not inform, wise land management. Red tape grows exponentially every time it is cut. Three decades later, several things seem obvious. First, the job is never done. Second, the intersection of courage and common sense is both extremely rare and amazingly powerful. And, finally, 30 years is too long to wait for another revolution.

The Fallout Between President Trump and Elon Musk—This Week in Your Words
The Fallout Between President Trump and Elon Musk—This Week in Your Words

Newsweek

time3 days ago

  • Newsweek

The Fallout Between President Trump and Elon Musk—This Week in Your Words

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. What started as a somewhat quiet week for President Trump has proved anything but as his public fallout with so-called "first buddy" Elon Musk has caught the attention of the world. Newsweek turns to your comments to add fresh perspectives and insights to the conversation. Your Highlighted Comments On Reaction to the Fallout Between Elon Musk and Donald Trump Original article: 'Told You So': Liberals React as Trump-Musk Alliance Implodes in Real Time Background: The political marriage between Trump and Musk—who once called himself first buddy—came crashing down in spectacular fashion on Thursday. Original comment: "It was always just a matter of time. Anyone successful that works with Trump ends up leaving in disgust. For someone supposedly as smart as Musk, the only surprise was that it took this long." – Quickdrawmcgraw What makes the comment noteworthy: The commenter cuts to the heart of the saga, highlighting the inevitable fallout many see as a pattern when high-profile figures work with Trump. It underscores the surprise not in the split itself, but in how long the alliance lasted. Original article: Musk On If Trump Should Be Impeached: 'Yes' Background: Musk has backed a post calling for Trump to be impeached amid their fracturing relationship. Original comment: "What a divorce! and played out in public. Perhaps this could be planned, deceiving the public. Musk needs distance himself from Trump for the benefit of his companies, needs to convince the public." – Guests What makes the comment noteworthy: The commenter questions the timing of the very public fallout, especially given the recent wave of negativity surrounding Musk and Tesla. They suggest the possibility that the split may be strategically planned to distance Musk from the president in order to protect his business interests and repair his public image. Original article: JD Vance Reacts to Trump and Musk's Public Meltdown Background: Vice President JD Vance cracked a joke on social media Thursday about the war of words between Musk and Trump. Original comment: "Iran is playing him, Putin has no respect for him, our 401Ks are suffering and all he seems to do is tweet. The boy who tweeted wolf. I'm afraid Trump's whimsical and unpredictable tariffs will prove Elon right by triggering a recession. - Johan S What makes the comment noteworthy: A comment that highlights growing concerns around the Trump administration's impact on the economy. The commenter shared their strong opinion on the president, which sparked debate from both supporters and critics. Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump shake hands as they attend the men's NCAA wrestling competition at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia on March 22, 2025. Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump shake hands as they attend the men's NCAA wrestling competition at the Wells Fargo Center in Philadelphia on March 22, 2025. Getty Images Original article: A Timeline of Elon Musk's and Donald Trump's Bromance Background: Trump's friendship with Musk took center stage during much of the Presidential race—and made for numerous headlines around the world. Original comment: "My friends, in other words, Elon Musk has never really been a supporter of Donald Trump or his policies. He doesn't want to be MAGA and in general he can hardly be defined as an American. If tomorrow the Chinese or Russians offer him more tempting terms, he will move there. He doesn't care about America and its fate. Musk flirted with Dems more than with Republicans. As in business, he bet on Trump and his bet worked, but it was clear to me from the beginning who Mr. Musk is. Now he will jump to the Democrats again and the liberal media will embrace him." - dubbi_dubinoff What makes the comment noteworthy: The commenter takes a strong stance on the relationship between Musk and Trump and questions the authenticity of the relationship from the beginning. On the Impact the Trump/Musk Fallout Has Had on Tesla Original article: Tesla Shares Plummet as Musk, Trump Relationship Crashes to Earth Background: Tesla shares plummeted by more than 14 percent on Thursday as the fallout between Musk and Trump became global news. Original comment: "Tesla posted a loss on operations last quarter, but they showed a net profit due to a sale of carbon credits to other manufacturers. Since then, sales have plummeted worldwide. We can expect outright losses next quarter. The critical report will come out late July. Then watch the stock really drop." - biji_basi What makes the comment noteworthy: The comment provides a detailed perspective on Tesla's recent performance, connecting the company's operational challenges to the broader impact of the Musk-Trump fallout. It highlights how public controversies can have tangible effects on a company's stock and investor confidence. As always, we'd like to thank you for sharing your discussions and opinions on the topics that shape the world today. Make sure you keep an eye out for further comment highlights in the coming weeks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store