logo
Nearly 1 in 6 cancer drugs found in Africa are defective, study finds

Nearly 1 in 6 cancer drugs found in Africa are defective, study finds

Business Insider7 hours ago

A new study has found that almost 17% of cancer drugs sampled in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Cameroon were substandard or counterfeit, raising concerns over patient safety and gaps in pharmaceutical regulation across Africa.
A study published in The Lancet Global Health revealed nearly 17% of cancer medications sampled in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Cameroon were substandard or counterfeit.
Approximately one in six tested medications had incorrect levels of active ingredients, highlighting risks to patient safety and treatment efficacy.
The study attributes issues to factors like poor manufacturing practices and storage conditions, as well as counterfeiting.
Published in The Lancet Global Health, the study tested nearly 200 unique cancer drug products collected from hospitals and pharmacies in the four African countries. It found that around one in six contained incorrect levels of active ingredients, putting patients at risk of ineffective treatment and disease progression.
Researchers said causes ranged from poor manufacturing and inadequate storage to deliberate counterfeiting. The problem is difficult to detect visually: only about 25% of the defective products could be flagged by inspecting packaging or color, while the majority required laboratory testing to uncover quality failures.
'If you can't test it, you can't regulate it,' said Marya Lieberman of the University of Notre Dame, who led the investigation. 'The cancer medications are difficult to handle and analyze because they're very toxic, and so many labs don't want to do that.'
The study points to big challenges for many African countries in making sure cancer drugs are safe. Many places don't have the right labs or trained staff to properly test these medicines. Even where labs do exist, they often can't handle these very strong and dangerous drugs.
WHO Addresses Cancer Drug Quality Concerns
The World Health Organization (WHO) said it is in contact with authorities in the four affected countries to review the findings and develop a response plan.
'We are concerned with the findings the article has highlighted,' the WHO said in a statement. 'We expect to assess full information to evaluate the situation... But we're committed to address these issues working with the relevant countries and partners.'
Defective or falsified medicines are not new challenges in Africa. Previous studies have found similar rates of poor-quality antibiotics, antimalarials, and tuberculosis treatments. The WHO has estimated that roughly 10% of all medicines in low- and middle-income countries are substandard or falsified, leading to treatment failures, adverse reactions, and wasted healthcare spending.
Despite the worrying results, researchers noted that most of the cancer drugs tested did meet quality standards, with around two-thirds of suppliers consistently delivering safe products.
Experts called for improved manufacturing oversight, stronger regulatory frameworks, and investment in local testing capacity. They also pointed to new screening technologies under development, such as portable 'paper lab' tests designed to help detect poor-quality medicines before they reach patients.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CCHR wants electroshocking children prohibited under child abuse laws
CCHR wants electroshocking children prohibited under child abuse laws

Associated Press

time3 hours ago

  • Associated Press

CCHR wants electroshocking children prohibited under child abuse laws

LOS ANGELES, Calif., June 30, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — Child and adolescent psychiatrists have issued a policy statement urging broader access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for children and adolescents despite growing international condemnation of the practice on minors. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Human Rights Office have called for an outright ban on ECT for children, explicitly stating: 'ECT is not recommended for children, and this should be prohibited through legislation.'[1] The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR), a mental health industry watchdog, condemned the statement as 'medically reckless, legally dangerous, and morally indefensible.' CCHR is demanding federal and state lawmakers move urgently to outlaw the electroshocking of children, classifying it as a form of child abuse. ECT, also known as shock treatment, sends up to 460 volts of electricity through the brain to induce a grand mal seizure. This disruption of the brain's electrical activity alters its structure and function, an especially serious risk to the developing brains of children. Yet child psychiatrists not only call for expanded use of ECT on minors but also oppose 'any efforts—legal, legislative, and otherwise—to block access to ECT.' Through US Freedom of Information Act requests, CCHR uncovered that children as young as five have been electroshocked. The full scope remains hidden due to the lack of national transparency requirements on ECT usage. Internationally, some countries have already banned ECT entirely (e.g., Slovenia and Luxembourg). In the U.S., California prohibits it under age 12, and Texas under 16. In Western Australia, ECT on minors under 14 is illegal, with criminal penalties—including jail time—for administering it to children. CCHR was instrumental in helping secure that law, along with state bans in the US. Disturbingly, a child and adolescent psychiatry group has also called for more research involving ECT on youth, potentially exposing children under age 13 to an unproven and highly invasive procedure. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricts its use to individuals aged 13 and older for limited diagnoses. The psychiatry group's statement fails to disclose that brain damage is a known risk of ECT. Yet, the American Psychiatric Association concedes that 'ECT can result in persistent or permanent memory loss.' The joint WHO/UN report adds: 'People being offered ECT should also be made aware of all its risks and potential short- and long-term harmful effects, such as memory loss and brain damage.' [2] In June 2024, the California Supreme Court ruled that an ECT device manufacturer must warn doctors of the risks of brain damage and permanent memory loss.[3] In 2018, a US District Court judge found there was sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that an ECT device could cause brain injury.[4] Neuropathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu—known for discovering chronic traumatic encephalopathy ( brain diseases or damage) in football players—publicly condemned ECT, stating: ' The amounts of electrical energy introduced to the human brain by ECT machines can be nothing but harmful and dangerous…. The patient who receives ECT therapy will manifest permanent and cumulative brain injury, which can be progressive over time and result in chronic encephalopathies and brain degeneration.' [5] Despite pediatric psychiatry's claim that ECT is 'safe and effective,' the FDA has never required manufacturers to prove ECT's safety or efficacy through clinical trials.[6] Internationally renowned researcher Prof. John Read reports that only 11 placebo-controlled trials of ECT have ever been conducted—all prior to 1985, and all deeply flawed. 'None found any benefit beyond the end of treatment,' he stated. Further, children's developing brains are 'particularly susceptible to the memory loss caused by ECT.' [7] Legal precedent exists for holding professionals and psychiatric facilities accountable for misleading parents about the safety and nature of treatment. In June 2024, an Arizona jury awarded $2.5 million in punitive damages to the family of a teen girl who suffered coercion and abuse at a troubled teen treatment facility. They successfully argued that they were misled by marketing materials portraying the program as therapeutic and safe, when it was abusive.[8] CCHR says that this same legal framework must apply to misleading promotion of ECT's benefits to desperate parents. Failing to disclose the full risks of ECT should be subject to the same scrutiny and liability as cases in the troubled teen treatment industry. CCHR asserts that electroshocking should not only be banned nationwide, but if administered to children, should be held accountable under child abuse laws. Jan Eastgate, president of CCHR International, stated, 'The electroshocking of children is without moral or scientific justification and should be indefensible under the law. As international bodies condemn it, and legal rulings establish precedent for holding programs accountable for misleading parents, the U.S. must act. We urge lawmakers at all levels to ban ECT, especially on minors, and define it as a form of child abuse.' CCHR, which was established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and professor of psychiatry, Dr. Thomas Szasz, recommends parents watch its documentary, Therapy or Torture: The Truth About Electroshock, with expert opinions about how ECT damages minds. To learn more, visit: Sources: [1] World Health Organization, OHCHR, 'Guidance on Mental Health, Human Rights and Legislation,' pp. 58 & 59 [2] [3] [4] 'ECT Litigation Update: Are Patients Being Warned of Brain Damage Risk?' MAD, 13 June 2019 [5] [6] [7] [8] MULTIMEDIA: Image link for media: Image caption: Through US Freedom of Information Act requests, CCHR uncovered that children as young as five have been electroshocked. The full scope remains hidden due to the lack of national transparency requirements on ECT usage. NEWS SOURCE: Citizens Commission on Human Rights Keywords: AP, ban ECT, child abuse laws, ECT usage, Citizens Commission on Human Rights, CCHR International, electroshock, Jan Eastgate, LOS ANGELES, Calif. This press release was issued on behalf of the news source (Citizens Commission on Human Rights) who is solely responsibile for its accuracy, by Send2Press® Newswire. Information is believed accurate but not guaranteed. Story ID: S2P127282 APNF0325A To view the original version, visit: © 2025 Send2Press® Newswire, a press release distribution service, Calif., USA. RIGHTS GRANTED FOR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY LEGITIMATE MEDIA OUTLET - SUCH AS NEWSPAPER, BROADCAST OR TRADE PERIODICAL. MAY NOT BE USED ON ANY NON-MEDIA WEBSITE PROMOTING PR OR MARKETING SERVICES OR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT. Disclaimer: This press release content was not created by nor issued by the Associated Press (AP). Content below is unrelated to this news story.

Will we ever know for sure how COVID-19 began? Not without more data from China, WHO says
Will we ever know for sure how COVID-19 began? Not without more data from China, WHO says

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Will we ever know for sure how COVID-19 began? Not without more data from China, WHO says

Scientists still aren't sure how the COVID-19 pandemic – the worst health emergency in a century – began. That was the unsatisfying conclusion from an expert group charged by the World Health Organization (WHO) to investigate the pandemic's origins in its final report. Marietjie Venter, the group's chair, said at a press briefing that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals. That was also the conclusion drawn by the first WHO expert group that investigated the pandemic's origins in 2021, when scientists concluded the virus likely spread from bats to humans, via another intermediary animal. At the time, WHO said a lab leak was 'extremely unlikely'. Related Five years after COVID appeared, mysteries remain. Here's what we know Venter said that after more than three years of work, WHO's expert group was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not COVID-19 was the result of a lab accident, despite repeated requests for hundreds of genetic sequences and more detailed biosecurity information that were made to the Chinese government. 'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' she said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science'. She said that the 27-member group did not reach a consensus; one member resigned earlier this week and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. Venter said there was no evidence to prove that COVID-19 had been manipulated in a lab, nor was there any indication that the virus had been spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China. Related Italy honours COVID-19 victims on remembrance day, five years after pandemic hit 'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' Venter said, referring to the scientific name for the COVID-19 virus. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said it was a 'moral imperative' to determine how COVID began, noting that the virus killed at least 20 million people, wiped at least $10 trillion (€8.8 trillion) from the global economy and upended the lives of billions of people. Last year, the AP found that the Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus' origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020 and that WHO itself may have missed early opportunities to investigate how COVID-19 began. Related New CIA assessment claims COVID-19 virus 'probably' came from Chinese laboratory US President Donald Trump has long blamed the emergence of the coronavirus on a laboratory accident in China, while a US intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea that the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying that the search for its origins should be conducted in other countries. Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread COVID-19 to humans, including racoon dogs, civet cats, and bamboo rats.

New COVID-19 variant Nimbus spreads across the US, here's what to know in Georgia
New COVID-19 variant Nimbus spreads across the US, here's what to know in Georgia

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New COVID-19 variant Nimbus spreads across the US, here's what to know in Georgia

A new version of COVID-19 that hardly anyone had heard of a few months ago is spreading quickly in the nation after first being detected in China earlier this year. The variant, called NB.1.8.1 or "Nimbus," did show up in the U.S. until May. But now, health officials estimate it makes up about 37% of current COVID-19 cases, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). That's just behind the most common variant right now, LP.8.1, which is a type of Omicron and accounts for 38% of cases. NB.1.8.1 is a newer version of a variant that's already been spreading. Experts say it might spread more easily and could be a little better at getting around the body's defenses, especially for people who've had COVID before or had a vaccine in the past, according to USA TODAY. The World Health Organization says the overall risk from this variant is low right now, but they're still watching it closely. So far, this new variant seems to cause the same types of symptoms as earlier versions of COVID-19. These can include: Fever or chills Cough Runny nose or congestion Sore throat Fatigue (feeling very tired) Headache Muscle aches Trouble breathing Some people have reported an especially bad sore throat, so painful that some are calling it 'razor blade throat." No. However, the state reported 2,574 COVID-19 cases over a two-week span, according to data from the Georgia Department of Public Health last updated on March 27, according to Patch. To find a location near you that offers free testing in Georgia, visit Vanessa Countryman is the Trending Topics Reporter for the Deep South Connect Team Georgia. Email her at Vcountryman@ This article originally appeared on Savannah Morning News: What to know about the new COVID-19 variant Nimbus, as it spreads in US

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store