Our favorite budget-friendly fitness tracker is now just $79.95 at Amazon
All products featured here are independently selected by our editors and writers. If you buy something through links on our site, Mashable may earn an affiliate commission.
SAVE $20: As of Feb. 3, the Fitbit Inspire 3 is available at Amazon for $79.95, making it an almost record-breaking deal. It's just $10 shy of its lowest price ever.
Opens in a new window
Credit: Fitbit
Fitbit Inspire 3
$79.95 at Amazon $99.95 Save $20.00
Get Deal
If you're looking for a reliable and affordable fitness tracker that won't expose you to potentially harmful chemicals (we're looking at you, Apple), the Fitbit Inspire 3 is our favorite budget-friendly pick.
As of Feb. 3, you can get it for just $79.95 at Amazon. That's 20% off the list price and just $10 more than its all-time low price.
The Fitbit Inspire 3 does everything you'd need a basic fitness tracker to do — it tracks your steps, heart rate, sleep patterns, and more. It also has menstrual health tracking and includes a six-month Premium Fitbit membership, which gives you access to additional health metrics and personalized insights.
SEE ALSO: The Fitbit Inspire 3 is the budget-friendly fitness tracker of our dreams
While more expensive fitness trackers have additional features like built-in GPS and color displays, the Inspire 3 provides the core functionality most people need. It's also water-resistant up to 50 meters and has a battery life of 10 days on a single charge.
Plus, studies show that less pricey trackers can be surprisingly good at measuring steps and tracking what really matters. A 2020 study published by JMIR mHealth and uHealth tested a bunch of lower-budget fitness trackers and found they were actually pretty decent at tracking steps and estimating sleep, which is usually what most new fitness tracker owners care about the most.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
24 minutes ago
Apple heads into annual showcase reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump's trade war
After stumbling out of the starting gate in Big Tech's pivotal race to capitalize on artificial intelligence, Apple will try to regain its footing Monday at its annual Worldwide Developers Conference. The presummer rite, which attracts thousands of developers to Apple's Silicon Valley headquarters, is expected to be more subdued than the feverish anticipation that surrounded the event during the previous two years. In 2023, Apple unveiled a mixed-reality headset that has been little more than a niche product, and last year WWDC trumpeted its first major foray into the AI craze with an array of new features highlighted by the promise of a smarter and more versatile version of its virtual assistant, Siri. But heading into this year's showcase, Apple faces nagging questions about whether the nearly 50-year-old company has lost some of the mystique and innovative drive that turned it into a tech trendsetter. Instead of making a big splash as it did with the Vision Pro headset, Apple this year is expected to focus on an overhaul of its software that may include a new, more tactile look for the iPhone's native apps and a new nomenclature for identifying its operating system updates. Even though it might look like Apple is becoming a technological laggard, Forrester Research analyst Thomas Husson contends the company still has ample time to catch up in an AI race that's 'more of a marathon, than a sprint. It will force Apple to evolve its operating systems.' If reports about its iOS naming scheme pan out, Apple will switch to a method that automakers have used to telegraph their latest car models by linking them to the year after they first arrive at dealerships. That would mean the next version of the iPhone operating system due out this autumn will be known as iOS 26 instead of iOS 19 — as it would be under the current sequential naming approach. Whatever it's named, the next iOS will likely be released as a free update in September, around the same time as the next iPhone models if Apple follows its usual road map. Meanwhile, Apple's references to AI may be less frequent than last year when the technology was the main attraction. While some of the new AI tricks compatible with the latest iPhones began rolling out late last year as part of free software updates, Apple still hasn't been able to soup up Siri in the ways that it touted at last year's conference. The delays became so glaring that a chastened Apple retreated from promoting Siri in its AI marketing campaigns earlier this year. 'It's just taking a bit longer than we thought,' Apple CEO Tim Cook told analysts last month when asked about the company's headaches with Siri. 'But we are making progress, and we're extremely excited to get the more personal Siri features out there.' While Apple has been struggling to make AI that meets its standards, the gap separating it from other tech powerhouses is widening. Google keeps packing more AI into its Pixel smartphone lineup while introducing more of the technology into its search engine to dramatically change the way it works. Samsung, Apple's biggest smartphone rival, is also leaning heavily into AI. Meanwhile, ChatGPT recently struck a deal that will bring former Apple design guru Jony Ive into the fold to work on a new device expected to compete against the iPhone. 'While much of WWDC will be about what the next great thing is for the iPhone, the unspoken question is: What's the next great thing after the iPhone?' said Dipanjan Chatterjee, another analyst for Forrester Research. Besides facing innovation challenges, Apple also faces regulatory threats that could siphon away billions of dollars in revenue that help finance its research and development. A federal judge is currently weighing whether proposed countermeasures to Google's illegal monopoly in search should include a ban on long-running deals worth $20 billion annually to Apple while another federal judge recently banned the company from collecting commission on in-app transactions processed outside its once-exclusive payment system. On top of all that, Apple has been caught in the cross-hairs of President Donald Trump's trade war with China, a key manufacturing hub for the Cupertino, California, company. Cook successfully persuaded Trump to exempt the iPhone from tariffs during the president's first administration, but he has had less success during Trump's second term, which seems more determined to prod Apple to make its products in the U.S.. 'The trade war and uncertainty linked to the tariff policy is of much more concern today for Apple's business than the perception that Apple is lagging behind on AI innovation,' Husson said. The multi-dimensional gauntlet facing Apple is spooking investors, causing the company's stock price to plunge by nearly 20% so far this year — a decline that has erased $750 billion in shareholder wealth. After beginning the year as the most valuable company in the world, Apple now ranks third behind longtime rival Microsoft, another AI leader, and AI chipmaker Nvidia.
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Are there any benefits to using a sunrise alarm clock in summer?
From sleep headbands to sleep masks and viral vagus nerve stimulators, my job as a sleep tech writer means I've tried my fair share of gadgets that promise to help you fall asleep fast and sleep well through the night. But what's the one device that I think is really worth your money? A top sunrise alarm clock. Honestly, I've asked the same question as you — is there really any benefit to using a sunrise-simulating gadget in summer when natural daylight streams through your window? While I can't wake up without one in winter, I assumed a sunrise alarm clock would be redundant come summer. Turns out I was wrong: I'm still using my beloved Philips SmartSleep Wake-Up Light in June. From elevating your bedtime routine to fighting morning blues, here are the benefits of using a sunrise alarm clock all year round... A sunrise alarm clock is a wake-up and night light, alarm clock and sleep sound machine, all wrapped up in one gadget. There's a sunrise alarm clock to suit every budget and bedroom aesthetic. You can get a Geuuap sunrise alarm clock for just $24.99 at Amazon or splash out on our #1 sunrise alarm clock of the year, the Hatch Restore 2 ($169.99 at Amazon), which comes with a library of sleep mediations and looks sleek on your bedside table. Exposing you to light first thing in the morning, these bedside accessories help regulate your circadian rhythm. This means your body will know exactly when to release and suppress sleepy hormones like melatonin, so you fall asleep fast and wake up alert. You don't have to pack your sunrise alarm clock away during summer. Here's how it can still help you get a good night's sleep and wake up refreshed... The sunset simulation and sleep sounds including with many sunrise alarm clocks are great year-round additions to your nighttime routine. Personally, I love using my Philips SmartSleep as a reading light before bed. It provides a warm light that gradually dims as I read, helping me feel sleepy and relaxed as I get through a chapter or two. Plus I don't have to get up or reach over to turn the light off just as I'm nodding off, counteracting the sleep-inducing effects of reading. You can put it on a timer so it turns off automatically. According to Talker Research, 49% of Gen Z and 32% of baby boomers lean on sounds to fall asleep, and this is where a sunrise alarm clock can help you fall asleep fast. The new Hatch Restore 3 sunrise alarm clock comes with an upgraded audio library holding more than 60 sleep sounds from guided mediations to sleep podcasts, soothing domestic sounds and ASMR. Although simulating natural light is their main purpose, sunrise alarms have audio alarms too. Even though the gradual light increase slowly pulls you from sleep, many people, including our testers, don't wake up to light alone and need an audio alarm too. Packed with natural alarm sounds from tweeting birds to goat sounds, or upbeat music, sunrise alarm clocks have many alarm options that help you start your day on a better note than a jarring iPhone alarm sound. Using an alarm device separate from phone means you can follow science-backed advice and keep screens out of bed for better sleep. Plus, you're less likely to reach for your phone first thing, which experts say is bad news for sleep. Instead of mindlessly scrolling before your head leaves the pillow, you should get natural light exposure to help regulate your circadian rhythm. People subjected to poor sleep because of shift work schedules, or anyone who needs to sleep at irregular times of day or wakes up super early, would particularly benefit from a sunrise alarm clock in summer. Shift workers may need to block out natural daylight for them to be able to nod off during the day to prepare or recover from a night shift. The simulated sunrise can help them wake up gradually at any time of day, preventing grogginess upon waking. While these people can't help their circadian rhythm being out of whack, the simulated daylight will help their internal body clock understand when to be alert and when to rest, which can help lift their mood, energy levels and sleep quality. Heavy sleepers may not be woken up naturally by light coming in through the window, especially on greyer days which, unfortunately, still occur during summer months. The added intensity of light from the sunrise alarm clock can help them wake up. The morning light exposure also helps reinforce your circadian rhythm, especially if you're exposed to late sunsets that can delay melatonin production. What's more, the warm colored light from the alarm clock is more likely to boost your mood than grey skies. This is because morning light exposure boosts serotonin levels, supporting a more positive mood and reducing irritability and grogginess. You may use blackout curtains to get your kids off to sleep at a reasonable time at night throughout the summer months when daylight hours are longer, so the sunrise alarm clock can help wake them up come morning. Plus, they're sure to enjoy the different color light options — particularly on the affordable Momcozy sunrise alarm clock available for $49.99 at Momcozy — and fun sleep and alarm sounds included with most clocks.
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I put Apple vs Google vs Samsung AI photo editing to the test — and there's a clear winner
Editing photos doesn't take years of Photoshop experience anymore to master, as AI-assisted tools in today's best phones make a breeze for anyone. Like really, you could spend a minute using these photo AI-editing tools and the results will make you look like a pro — it's that easy! For the last year, we've seen a barrage of phone makers coming up with different tools and features to make the process seamless and simple. While Google had a head start with Magic Eraser and Magic Editor, it wasn't long before Samsung and Apple came out with their interpretations. While I've found Google's AI-assisted tools to be some of the best I've tested, like how I've found out that Pixel Studio is superior over Apple's Image Playground for image generation, I want to test how well all three phone makers handle the task of erasing subjects from the scene. Whether it's because of something getting in the way of the shot, or that I simply want a less distracting background, these AI-assisted erasing tools are here to save the day. Below, I've taken photos I've captured previously on a phone and put it through each respective AI-assisted photo editing tool to see which does it best — which consists of Apple's Photo Clean Up, Pixel's Magic Editor, and Samsung's Generative Edit. I take a ton of car photos for my reviews, but there are still times when I can't have a completely empty parking lot to myself. Case in point, the shot of the Rivian R1S above, which is cluttered up by the stop signs and an idle car in the background. I will say that all three phone makers did an excellent job of identifying those distractions, but Google and Samsung do it better because Apple cuts off one of the trees to the left, making it look like it's hanging from a slim branch. Between Google and Samsung, I much prefer Google's result because the area to the left it erases isn't as fuzzy compared to Samsung. Winner: Google Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. When I was at the Amazon Alex Plus event back in February, I snapped this shot of Panos Panay with the telephoto zoom camera on my phone, but it couldn't keep out the people nearby directly in front of him. Clearly Apple's Photo Clean Up has trouble with this shot for some reason. Not only couldn't it identify the distracting elements in the shot, but it proceeded to erase parts of Panos in the process — it just couldn't make a proper generation for those areas. Meanwhile, Samsung and Google clearly look at the entire picture to recreate those parts of Panos. When I zoom into his right arm, they both manage to include the subtle folds of his jacket — while adding enough length to the bottom of it. Between the two, I prefer the Samsung recreation because Panos' jacket and shirt are unrealistically flush at the bottom. Winner: Samsung This one cracks me up because yes, I'm asking AI a whole lot with this request. As much as I loved using the EcoFlow PowerHat to charge my phone while on the beach, I was curious to see how AI could handle this complicated shot of removing it — for something else. I will say that Samsung's the easiest to tell exactly what I want to select, plus it does the best at replacing the hat with an interesting hair style. Google comes in second with this one, but I found it slightly more tedious because it couldn't identify the edges of the hat as well, which required me to manually add selections. Although, the hairstyle isn't as convincing. As for Apple? Well, let's say it was a mess. Winner: Samsung All three manage to remove the tree that's right in the middle of the shot. However, Apple's Photo Clean Up was another tedious process that required multiple selections before it was completely removed from the shot. You can see how some of the smudgy remains of the tree still linger around. Google and Samsung are again the better choices for this, but Galaxy AI's ability to identify the tree with one selection isn't just impressive — it puts to shame Apple and Google. I'm surprised about this because Magic Editor still had trouble identifying parts of the tree when I selected it. For this reason, I'm giving it to Samsung. Winner: Samsung For this final test, I tried removing the colorful sign in the middle of the shot. It's a complicated one, just like the previous tree shot, just because it requires AI to generate the proper elements with the building in the background. Again, Apple's Photo Clean Up proves to be the most frustrating because it couldn't identify the sign when I circled it — so I had to constantly swipe small areas before it started to work. Unfortunately, it's a smudgy mess filled with inconsistent generations. In contrast, Google and Samsung manage to recreate those missing elements to make for a realistic shot. Although, they slightly have different results with Google applying an over-sharpening effect — whereas Samsung softens them. Despite this, I still prefer Samsung. Winner: Samsung Samsung clearly has the best AI-assisted tool for erasing unwanted subjects. Not only does it intelligently know what I'm trying to select, but it fills the gap with realism. Google's Magic Eraser does just as good at using generative AI to erase stuff, but it's not as intuitive or smart as Galaxy AI when it comes to identifying what I want to remove. As for Apple? Well, let's say there's a lot of work needed to get it up to par. Even though Samsung convinces me it's the go-to for photo removal, I would still give Google the overall edge because of the amount of AI photo editing tools it offers. Not only does it have the Reimagine feature that lets me use a text box to change certain parts of a photo, but it even has the ability to extend a scene to make it wider — plus other tools such as autoframing, replacing the sky, and more.
