Energy Minister visits Paris for talks on gas exploration, electricity sector cooperation
Minister of Energy and Water Joe Saddi visited Paris in the middle of last week, where he held a working meeting with Patrick Pouyanné, Chairman and CEO of TotalEnergies, to discuss gas exploration in Lebanon.
During his visit, Saddi also met with Béatrice Buffon, Chairwoman and CEO of Renewable Energy at Électricité de France (EDF) and the company's Director of International Management.
Discussions focused on Lebanon's electricity sector and ways to leverage French expertise and capabilities to enhance its development.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
MTV Lebanon
5 days ago
- MTV Lebanon
Media Office Walid Fayad: Minister Saddi could have canceled the tender had he not been convinced of its suitability
Despite the accusatory tone adopted by the media office of the current Minister of Energy and Water, Mr. Joe Saddi, the substance of the statement issued on June 6 confirms the position previously expressed by former Minister Dr. Walid Fayad during his interview with MTV. Specifically, it affirms that the current minister was indeed the one who signed the fuel supply agreement with Iraq for the fourth consecutive year and also signed the $200 million contract with the supplying company. It is worth noting that he could have canceled the tender initiated by Minister Fayad had he not deemed it appropriate. This amount will be added to the debt owed to Iraq. As of June 2025—four months after Minister Fayad left office and the ministry was handed over to Minister Saddi—the total amount owed to Iraq has reached $750 million. At the time of the ministerial handover, the outstanding amount was lower, standing at $600 million, precisely as Dr. Fayad had stated. Dr. Fayad concluded by reaffirming that the severe conditions Lebanon has endured—and continues to endure—alongside the lack of viable alternatives to ensure the minimum required level of electricity supply at the lowest possible cost, necessitated recourse to Iraqi fuel and the acceptance of Iraq's generous and appreciated initiative. Accordingly, based on the principle of continuity in government and Minister Saddi's conviction of the soundness of the decisions made in this regard—and until more suitable fuel supply alternatives, especially natural gas, become available—Minister Saddi found no viable course of action other than to renew the Iraqi agreement and proceed with awarding the first fuel delivery contract.
LBCI
6 days ago
- LBCI
Lebanese Energy Minister refutes predecessor's claims over Iraqi oil deal
Lebanese Energy Minister Joe Saddi issued a strongly worded statement on Friday, rejecting what he described as "a series of inaccuracies" made by former Minister Walid Fayad regarding the Iraqi oil agreement. He accused Fayad of misleading the public over financial and procedural matters. The statement, released by Saddi's media office, emphasized that successive energy ministers have been importing fuel from Iraq since 2021, with only the first contract officially ratified by Parliament. The second and third contracts, though approved by the Cabinet, remain unendorsed by lawmakers. Saddi also clarified that the fourth contract, at the center of the latest dispute, had its tendering process initiated by Fayad before the deal was signed. According to the statement, Fayad awarded the initial bid to a company he referenced in recent remarks. While Saddi confirmed that he had finalized the contract, he stated that this was done strictly in accordance with the principle of maintaining continuity of public services without launching a new tender or incurring further obligations outside of the existing framework. He insisted that no new financial burden was imposed on Lebanese taxpayers before receiving parliamentary approval, countering Fayad's assertions. The statement added that both Finance Minister Yassine Jaber and Minister Saddi informed Parliament about the status of the contract during the latest joint committee session. On the financial front, Saddi challenged Fayad's claim that the agreement amounted to just $600 million, stating the actual value was approximately $1.28 billion, with $753 million already due and the remaining balance to mature through the next year. "In the end, every official owes it to the Lebanese people to speak with honesty and transparency," the statement concluded.
Nahar Net
04-06-2025
- Nahar Net
US and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris
by Naharnet Newsdesk 04 June 2025, 13:50 Europe and the United States are meeting in Paris to negotiate a settlement of a tense tariff spat with global economic ramifications between two global economic powerhouses. The European Union's top trade negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, met Wednesday with his American counterpart, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, on the sidelines of a meeting of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. "We're advancing in the right direction at pace — and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum," Šefčovič posted on social media platform X alongside a photo of him shaking hands with Greer. Brussels and Washington are unlikely to reach a substantive trade agreement in Paris. The issues dividing them are too difficult to resolve quickly. President Donald Trump regularly fumes about America's persistent trade deficit with the European Union, which was a record $161 billion last year, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. Trump blames the gap between what the U.S. sells and what it buys from Europe on unfair trade practices and often singles out for criticism the EU's 10% tax on imported cars. America's was 2.5% until Trump raised it to 25% in April. The EU has argued its purchases of U.S. services, especially in the technology sector, all but overcome the deficit. After the Trump administration's surprise tariffs last week on steel rattled global markets and complicated the ongoing, wider tariff negotiations between Brussels and Washington, the EU on Monday said it is preparing "countermeasures" against the U.S. The EU has offered the U.S. a "zero for zero" deal in which both sides end tariffs on industrial goods, including autos. Trump has rejected that idea, but EU officials say it's still on the table. The EU could buy more liquefied natural gas and defense items from the U.S., and lower duties on cars, but it isn't likely to budge on calls to scrap the value added tax, which is akin to a sales tax, or open up the EU to American beef. "We still have a few weeks to have this discussion and negotiation," French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said in Paris on Wednesday ahead of the OECD meeting. "If the discussion and negotiation do not succeed, Europe is capable of having countermeasures on American products and services as well." Greta Peisch, who was general counsel for the U.S. trade representative in the Biden administration, said the zero-for-zero proposal could provide a way to make progress if the Trump administration "is looking for a reason not to impose tariffs on the EU.'' But Peisch, now a partner at the Wiley Rein law firm, wondered: "How motivated is the U.S. to come to a deal with the EU?'' Trump, after all, has longstanding grievances complaints about EU trade practices. One target of his ire is the value-added tax, similar to U.S. state sales taxes. Trump and his advisers consider VATs unfair protectionism because they are levied on U.S. products. But VATs are set at a national level, not by the EU, and apply to domestic and imported products alike, so they have not traditionally been considered a trade barrier. There is little chance governments will overhaul their tax systems to appease Trump. Likewise, the Europeans are likely to balk at U.S. demands to scrap food and safety regulations that Washington views as trade barriers. These include bans on hormone-raised beef, chlorinated chicken and genetically modified foods. "When you start talking about chickens or GMOs or automobile safety standards, you're talking about the ways countries choose to regulate their economies," Reinsch said. "We think that's protectionist. They think it's keeping their citizens healthy ... It's been a sore point for 60 years.''
