OK judge needs more time to make decision on controversial social studies standards
OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) — An Oklahoma County District judge said Wednesday he would need more time to consider arguments for and against a case that could see controversial social studies curriculum blocked from Oklahoma schools.
Last month, News 4 reported former Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter had joined the legal team representing a group of parents and teachers in a petition filed against the Oklahoma State Department of Education and the State Board of Education to stop the standards.
The standards were approved by the State Board of Education in February, and lawmakers could have sent them back for additional review, but decided not to do so.
They include biblical teachings and ask students to examine discrepancies in the 2020 election. The case is tied to the process in which the standards were approved and how they could impact Oklahomans.
Public school parent-led group provides social studies curriculum opt-out form
On Wednesday, Hunter's legal team opened arguments asking for an injunction or temporary restraining order in front of Judge Brent Dishman. Current Putnam City Public Schools educator, plaintiff, and former standards writing committee volunteer, James Welch, PhD, was called to the stand to testify. During his testimony, Welch said that he was brought on as the sole person writing psychology and sociology standards last year.
Welch said last fall, he and 25 other teachers met in a University of Central Oklahoma conference room to review the standards. Welch said State Superintendent Ryan Walters attended and expressed to Welch and other attendees that he believed the committee members would do a good job. Welch said he was provided a set of standards from another state and was told attendees should model their standards based on them. He said he was concerned by blatant religious texts and pro-free enterprise standards, calling them 'extreme.' He also said that other attendees he spoke with were 'alarmed' as well.
Welch noted that when he reviewed a draft copy of the standards in December, he noted that all mentions of the word 'diversity' in his subject areas had been stricken. He said he found that problematic, and that the material pertained to subjects that were vital for an understanding in government. He said seeing the changes created a 'crisis of conscience' for him and that he feared he would be reported, disciplined, or fired if he taught the areas omitted instead of what he described as a 'radical right wing viewpoint.'
Oklahoma State Board of Education attorney, Chad Kutmas, pressed Welch about his experience, of which Welch admitted he had never been a part of standards writing processes prior to his volunteer commitment.
Oklahoma State Department of Education attorney, Michael Beason, pressed Welch about copies of standards handed out at the fall meeting Welch was not supposed to take with him outside of the meeting. Welch admitted to doing so, but when pressed about whether he shared them with media outlets, Welch said he did not. Beason argued that Welch was disgruntled because he didn't agree with the standards contents.
Hunter's legal team argued the process to approve the standard was inconsistent and that there were amendments made 'that nobody had ever seen.' He said the children across Oklahoma and their parents need to have confidence standards were implemented lawfully. Hunter argued the standards didn't come to the legislature lawfully, saying they were 'shoehorned' in and weren't properly deliberated.
'There has to be a recourse by citizens when there's a process like this that is so flawed,' said Hunter.
News 4 has covered reports in which new board members appointed by Governor Kevin Stitt in February say they were not given enough time to review the standards, following the draft of the standards in December, and a 30-day window of public comment. News 4 shared in March that public comments obtained surrounding the altered standards were mostly negative, with only one comment supporting religious texts in schools.
Despite that, attorneys for the board and OSDE argued Wednesday that the process, which isn't legally required, other than public comment and the legislature consideration, was all done by the book. They said there's no legal precedent to move the case forward since the legislature took no action, saying doing so would 'open up a Pandora's Box.'
'Just because you're a lawmaker doesn't mean you don't make mistakes,' said Hunter.
Hunter asked a judge to consider a joint resolution filed this legislative session by Edmond Republican Adam Pugh that would have sent the standards back to the board. Pugh argued the standards would cost taxpayers millions of dollars in updates to textbooks and curriculum. Dishman seemed weary of accepting the quoted over $30 million figure Wednesday, but Hunter noted the board and OSDE hadn't provided any other figures. Hunter also wanted Dishman to review the public comments.
'In this situation, we certainly want the judge to review everything carefully and thoughtfully,' said Hunter.
Attorneys for the board and OSDE, while not providing another estimate, disputed the costs, but they did encourage Dishman to consider a motion to dismiss the case, arguing it's only costing taxpayers more money in legal fees.
'I just don't think that's good government, and I don't think that that's a correct argument, nor do I think the judge is going to buy it,' said Hunter.
Judge Dishman did not say when he expects to make a decision on separate motions for the injunction/restraining order or to dismiss the case. Hunter expects an update in June.
News 4 reached out to a spokesperson for State Superintendent Ryan Walters on Wednesday, but his office declined to comment.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
New Mexico appeals court rejects lawsuit against oil and gas regulators
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico appeals court rejected a lawsuit alleging that the nation's No. 2 oil-producing state failed to meet constitutional provisions for protecting against oil and gas industry pollution, in an opinion Tuesday. Environmental advocates vowed to appeal the matter to the state's top court. A panel of three judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals found that it was beyond the judiciary's authority to weigh whether the pollution controls are adequate, writing that they'll defer to the Legislature to balance the benefits of environmental regulation with natural resources development. The 2023 lawsuit from a coalition of environmental groups was the first to invoke the constitution's pollution-control clause, a 1971 amendment requiring that New Mexico prevent the contamination of air, water and other natural resources. 'While plaintiffs correctly observe that, as the 'Land of Enchantment,' the state's beauty is central to our identity, we cannot ignore the long history of permitting oil and gas extraction within our borders,' the panel wrote, invoking the state motto. 'If anything, the law, history, and tradition of our state demonstrates that resource extraction must be considered alongside, and must coexist with, pollution control legislation.' Gail Evans, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity and lead counsel on the case, said Tuesday's opinion would dismiss the case entirely if unchallenged and 'displays a fundamental misunderstanding of our constitution and constitutional rights.' She said plaintiffs intent to appeal to the state Supreme Court. 'Fifty years ago, New Mexico voted to amend the constitution and to provide protections from industry pollution and the court has found today that the amendment — the pollution control clause — is essentially meaningless, and that has to be wrong,' Evans said. The court challenge comes as New Mexico's state government rides a wave of record income from development in the Permian Basin, one of the world's most productive, oil-producing regions. Oil-related revenue collections underwrite a considerable amount of the state's budget, including public education. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's administration is policing the industry with regulations that target methane and other emissions. But the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups say these efforts are not enough and that the state is failing to enforce existing pollution-control measures. Attorneys for the Democratic-led Legislature and environmental regulators said the lawsuit threatened their constitutional authority. Appeals Judge Katherine Wray issued an additional concurring opinion, expressing further limitations of the pollution control clause.
Fast Company
22 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Business leaders must prioritize employee well-being
As I've been watching deep cuts unfold across the federal government and nonprofit sectors, I can't help but feel deeply sad for the work that is at risk or has been cancelled, the knowledge that will be lost, and for the people who did the work. I know firsthand what it means to be on both sides of the equation. I've been the leader tasked with executing layoffs, and I've also been the one laid off. Both experiences gutted me. They made me reflect on what leadership really means and what we should be measuring when we define success. The problem is that we often gauge success by revenue, efficiency, and productivity while completely overlooking a key factor:the well-being of the people doing the work. A 2024 Gallup report revealed that only 21% of employees strongly agree that their organization cares about their overall well-being. While I agree that there are inefficiencies in every bureaucracy and organization, leaders have a responsibility to balance financial performance with other measures of success. At Catapult Design, a social impact design firm, we've made well-being a non-negotiable metric—on equal footing with financial performance and creative excellence. Because if an organization's work is meant to improve lives—whether in social innovation, government services, or private enterprise—how can we ignore what's happening inside our own walls? Well-being is the missing metric I worked at one consultancy that had indicators for measuring the quality of work and the financial health of the company. I thought that was amazing. It really kept the company on track because both were reported quarterly. The work was consistently good by many measures, and the company was very healthy from a financial perspective. When I left there to take a CEO position, I suggested to my new board that we measure the quality of our work and financial health but also add another indicator around team well-being. At first, this was around ensuring that we had the best benefits that a small business could offer. We were thoughtful around vacation time, sick leave, training days, and professional and personal stipends. But over time, we realized that well-being isn't just about benefits or hours worked—it's about how people experience their work. We started paying closer attention to overwork—not as the cause of burnout, but as an early signal. Research shows that burnout is less about working too many hours and more about things like lack of clarity, autonomy, or alignment with values. Still, sustained overwork often points to deeper systemic issues. We use it as a 'check engine' light of the well-being of the team. That's why we've built a practice that if anyone is consistently working more than 45 hours a week, they message me directly. Then we talk about why. Is it a broken process? Poorly scoped projects? Is someone quietly drowning? We bring those issues to the board and leadership meetings, treating them as seriously as financial projections. As we've deepened our approach to well-being, we've also learned it's shaped just as much by leadership behavior as by organizational policy. A few months ago, my team asked to formally review me. Their feedback was honest, thoughtful, and generous. One thing they shared was that when something seems obvious to me, I tend to move forward without discussion. But what's clear to me isn't always clear to others—and they wanted more transparency and space for shared decision making. That feedback was a gift. One small but meaningful change I made was to begin sharing my weekly board emails with the entire team. It's helped remove ambiguity and reduce stress about what's happening behind the scenes. We all know at Catapult Design that we are not immune to what is happening in the U.S. government right now. While I'm happy to see efforts for efficiency in financial performance, I worry about what's being lost in the process. As budgets shrink and priorities shift, how will the quality of government services be measured? And what happens to the well-being of those providing—and relying on—those services if we fail to track what really matters? 4 ways to prioritize employee well-being Prioritizing well-being isn't just a leadership philosophy; it's a strategic decision. We're always refining what this looks like, but here's how organizations can make it real: Make well-being a key performance indicator. Measure engagement, workload balance, and psychological safety as rigorously as revenue. Normalize feedback loops. If leaders aren't being reviewed by their teams, they're missing critical data about what's working (and what's not). Recalibrate workloads. If overwork is the norm, the problem isn't employees—it's leadership. Project scoping must align with reality, not just ambition. Champion transparency. When teams understand the organization's financial health and strategic direction, they feel more invested—and less anxious. Well-being matters more than ever We're in a moment of reckoning. Layoffs are making headlines across industries—from tech to media to government—and many organizations are under pressure to do more with less. It's not surprising that burnout and questions about leadership are surfacing more often in the process. In a world where talent is mobile and exhaustion is widespread, the best organizations won't just be those that survive financially—they'll be the ones that create workplaces where people want to stay, grow, and thrive. I've learned the hard way that leadership isn't about having all the answers. But I do wonder, if we don't prioritize the people who make the work possible, will anything else matter.
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Iran-U.S. Nuclear Talks: What's at Stake?
After weeks of tense negotiations aimed at preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, the Trump administration has offered a concession that may open a path to a compromise. Over the weekend, the United States proposed the outline of a deal that would seem to allow Iran to temporarily continue enriching uranium. That has been a sticking point in the talks, which have been at an impasse. President Trump has consistently berated Iran's leadership, and the countries have been at odds for many decades. But shifts in geopolitics and Mr. Trump's wish to secure a legacy-making deal have sent his aides back to the negotiating table. Failed talks could lead to a destructive regional war. Under the proposal, which Iranian and European officials described on the condition of anonymity, Iran could produce enriched uranium temporarily while the United States facilitates building nuclear power plants for Iran. A consortium of countries in the region would manage uranium enrichment facilities to provide nuclear fuel for the plants. Iran would then have to stop all enrichment within its borders once it begins receiving any benefits from those facilities. Here is what you need to know. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
