‘Daddy' Trump stopped Iran & Israel fighting, Nato chief says as ‘man of strength' Don threatens to bomb Ayatollah AGAIN
"DADDY" Donald Trump stopped Iran and Israel fighting, the Nato boss has said as the pair met during a crunch summit of alliance leaders this morning.
In the funny moment, the former Dutch PM Mark Rutte referred to the President with the fatherly word as he flattered him for holding the ceasefire together.
4
4
4
4
Rutte said: "Sometimes daddy has to use strong words" after Trump swore in front of cameras on Tuesday.
The US president shouted at reporters in front of the White House: 'They don't know what the f*** they're doing' as the ceasefire between Israel and Iran sat on the brink of collapse.
Those present in the room at the crunch Nato summit laughed at the humorous moment with Trump saying "every now and then you have to use a certain word".
Rutte also labelled Trump a "man of strength and peace" after his sweary outburst and a call with PM Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday was able to turn around Israeli jets.
Trump has also promised to bomb Iran again if the Ayatollah tries to build back its nuclear enrichment programme.
Trump is now taking a victory lap after his successful B-2 blitz on Iran's nuke plants on Saturday.
But the mad Ayatollah is now demanding compensation over the damage the bombs caused.
Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh told Iranian media Iran is going to try and chase the US through courts and diplomats to try and get paid back.
Trump is in the Netherlands for the crunch Nato summit which is pushing for trillions more in defence spending across the alliance.
The American met with the Dutch King and Queen for breakfast this morning.
Snaps captured him grinning broadly after he became the first US President to spend a night at the luxury Palace Huis ten Bosch.
Trump's attention will now turn to the other major global conflict - Russia's invasion of Ukraine - with Vlad threatening the rest of the continent.
His push to get Europeans spending more on defence has come to fruition - with Nato members expected to pledge a target of five per cent of GDP on defence spending.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump are set to meet later today.
It comes after the White House has slammed a leaked intel report as Donald Trump continues to insist the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites "completely destroyed" them.
According to a classified Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, Saturday's strikes only set back Tehran's nuke ambitions back by a few months.
A row has now erupted as to how much damage was actually done to the sensitive sites deep in the Iranian desert.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed the report leaked to CNN.
She said: "This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community.
"The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program."
Rutte personally congratulated the US president with gushing flattery for his strikes on Iran which Trump then posted on his social media accounts.
He said: 'That was truly extraordinary and something no one else dared to do.'
'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
38 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
120 Ukrainians told they will have to leave accommodation in Cork
Ukrainians who fled the the war in their homeland and were placed in accommodation in Millstreet, Co Cork, have said that they are distraught at a decision by the Department of Justice to move them from the site. Fiona Corcoran of the founder of the charity the Greater Chernobyl Cause says that some 120 Ukrainians at the Green Glens Arena have to leave the facility by August 29th. They have spent three years living in the facility. Advertisement It is understood that the decision was made without any consultation, not only with the Ukrainians onsite, but with the team at the Green Glens Arena who were reportedly informed of the decision by the Department last week. There is no plan for the reallocation of the accommodation to other persons seeking shelter. Ms Corcoran says that there is a huge sense of anxiety among the residents who received their notice to leave. 'Two ladies are battling cancer, while others have heart conditions, autism, and various other concerns. Many of these individuals are in school, attending college, or working locally. There is a profound sense of sorrow within the Ukrainian community. "They have been informed that they must find homes for their pets, as they will not be allowed to bring them to their next accommodation. Unfortunately, no one knows where they will go next. Advertisement "I call on decision makers to seriously consider the profound impact this move will have, particularly on the children and families who now call Millstreet home. It is deeply distressing.' Meanwhile, Valeria Marchenko, who is from Mariupol, has lived in Millstreet since 2022. She is desperate not to leave her new home. 'Even though I didn't speak English at first, I was hired (locally). My husband has been working as a welder for the past three years. I have never met people as kind and generous as those in Ireland. They gave us a home, and we are truly happy to be here. "We're glad that we can contribute something in return. We pay our taxes, we work, and we're proud to be part of this community. Arena is like a big family, we help and support each other. Please don't take my home away from me.' Advertisement Ms Marchenko said that when the war broke out in February 2022 her husband was away working. She was living with her mother. 'For two months and 16 days, we lived in a basement — without electricity, gas, or Internet. We were completely cut off from the outside world and didn't understand what was happening. We only understood one thing: we could die at any moment. "On March 8th, my godmother passed away. I took a shovel and dug a grave in our yard. I don't know where I found the strength, but I buried her. I tried to dig deep enough so that the body wouldn't be disturbed by animals. "There was no one left in the city — no doctors, no police, nothing was functioning. When there were fierce battles for access to water, we had to crawl on the ground to reach the sea. There was a stream about 2–3 kilometers away. When we couldn't cook over a fire, we ate snow. Food was given to the children first. There were around 30 people in the basement. Advertisement "I still remember how one young man's leg was torn off when he went out to get food. They tried to save him — they cut away the shrapnel with a kitchen knife and put a burning log or coal on the wound to cauterize it. "But sadly, he didn't survive. He remained dead with us in the basement for another five days until we could finally carry him out and bury him. "During all this time, my husband didn't know whether I was alive or not. He was trying to find me. Some people took money from him in exchange for false information. They even told him I had died in the drama theatre.' Ms Marchenko said that her mother was too terrified to even leave the basement. Advertisement 'But when the Russians entered, we left the city. My dad lived in the nearby village of Volodarsk. My mom, my cat, my dog, and I walked 22 kilometres. The city was closed, and my dad didn't know whether I was alive or not. He tried to get into Mariupol five times, but they wouldn't let him in. Ireland West Cork woman (88) faces looming prospect of hom... Read More "A military bus eventually took us from Volodarsk to Taganrog. From Taganrog, we made our way to Lithuania. My mom's husband was waiting for us there. My husband's family was already in Ireland because they had a car and had managed to leave earlier. My husband and I later flew to Ireland. "We were welcomed with smiles and kindness. People gave us food, clothes, and housing. I want to say that, throughout this incredibly difficult journey, I didn't meet a single bad person. I am deeply grateful to Ireland and its people.' It is understood that the Department of Justice has told the families that there is a reduced need for accommodation for Ukrainians in Ireland following a drop in the number of people leaving Ukraine. They were told that the number of locations is being reduced and that all accommodation required is 'temporary' in nature. The Department of Justice has been contacted for comment in relation to the move.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Iran SCRAPS co-operation with nuclear watchdog - banning inspectors from enrichment facilities as world fears regime could step up bomb program in wake of US strikes
Iranian lawmakers have voted in favour of suspending cooperation with the United Nations ' nuclear watchdog after US and Israeli warplanes battered nuclear facilities across the country over 12 days of strikes. 'The International Atomic Energy Agency, which refused to even marginally condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, put its international credibility up for auction,' Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said. He went on to announce that 'the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the IAEA until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed.' The bill is said to be subject to approval from the Supreme National Security Council. If it is passed, Tehran will bar IAEA inspectors from carrying out inspections at any nuclear sites. US President Donald Trump insists that bunker-busting bombs and tomahawk missiles 'totally obliterated' Iran 's nuclear facilities and erased the Islamic Republic's chances of building a bomb. But despite his triumphant bluster, Iran still likely boasts significant stockpiles of highly enriched uranium (HEU) and could well have other facilities lying in wait to reach purity levels required to fashion nuclear warheads. IAEA Rafael Grossi sent a letter to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to propose a meeting and urge the Islamic Republic to cooperate. 'Resuming cooperation with the IAEA is key to a successful diplomatic agreement to finally resolve the dispute over Iran's nuclear activities,' Grossi said in a statement. 'I've written to Foreign Minister Araghchi stressing the importance of us working together and proposing to meet soon.' He said IAEA inspectors have remained in Iran and are ready to start working again. 'As I have repeatedly stated – before and during the conflict – nuclear facilities should never be attacked due to the very real risk of a serious radiological accident,' Grossi said. Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf announced that 'the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the IAEA until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed.' Voting to suspend cooperation with the IAEA would be a violation of Iran's responsibilities as part of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). But there are fears Tehran may seek to pull out of the agreement in light of the US and Israeli strikes. 'The Non-Proliferation Treaty allows member states to withdraw (with a three month notice period) 'if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this treaty, have jeopardised the supreme interests of its country',' said Darya Dolzikova, Senior Research Fellow for Proliferation and Nuclear Policy at the RUSI think tank. 'The events of the last week could arguably give Tehran the justification it needs to that end. A withdrawal from the NPT would likely see the international community lose all visibility of the Iranian nuclear programme and could - long-term - become a catalyst for broader proliferation in the region.' In May, the IAEA, reported that Iran had accumulated more than 400 kilograms (900 lbs) of uranium enriched to 60%. This is already enough to create an atomic weapon like those that laid waste to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Such bombs are too heavy and cumbersome for Iran to deploy effectively. But achieving the 90% enrichment required to produce modern nuclear devices small and light enough to mount to any one of Tehran's vast array of missiles could take mere weeks. As far as anyone knows, that HEU is still safely squirrelled away, safe from American and Israeli bombs - not to mention tonnes more uranium enriched to levels below 60%, but still far in advance of the 3-5% required for civilian energy use. At present, there is no telling whether Trump's 'Operation Midnight Hammer' was as effective as the President claims - particularly at the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, where enrichment centrifuges are hidden beneath 90 metres of rock and concrete. There are fears that Tehran may well have several other secret facilities that remain unknown to Israel 's Mossad and the CIA. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, claims he moved the country's uranium stockpile to a secret location - a belief echoed by Israeli intelligence officials. IAEA chief Grossi told the New York Times his team of UN inspectors had seen the uranium about a week before Israel began its attacks. HEU is stable and dense, meaning it can be easily dispersed and stored to avoid detection. Grossi said the stockpile seen by IAEA inspectors was stored in special casks small enough to fit in the trunks of about 10 cars. He also said he believed the material had been moved. Satellite images published by US defence contractor Maxar Technologies showed 16 trucks leaving Iran's Fordow nuclear facility on June 19, three days before Operation Midnight Hammer. Further images reveal a flurry of activity prior to the trucks' departure involving bulldozers and security convoys that were likely reinforcing and sealing Fordow's entrances and evacuating sensitive documents. Now, no one outside of Iran knows exactly where its HEU stockpile is located, and Tehran's options are endless. The canisters could be stored in Iran's network of tunnels and caves, brought to Iranian Revolutionary Guard bases, or concealed at civilian facilities such as universities and research centres or even telecoms. They could even be kept on the move in trucks. Analysts largely agree that no amount of bombing could totally eradicate Iran's nuclear programme, and have pointed out that the American and Israeli campaign could have the opposite effect. Dr Andreas Krieg, an expert in Middle East security and senior lecturer at King's College London's School of Security Studies, told MailOnline: 'Going after Iran's nuclear programme could reinforce Tehran's belief that a nuclear deterrent is not only justified but essential for regime survival'. 'Rather than halting Iran's nuclear trajectory, the strikes may serve as a vindication of the logic that drives Iran's long-term nuclear ambition - deterrence through capability,' he said. Dr Andreas Boehm, international law expert at the University of St. Gallen, was even more forthright. 'After the experiences of Ukraine, Libya and now Iran on the one hand, and North Korea on the other, there can be no other conclusion than that only the possession of nuclear weapons offers protection against attack,' he said. 'For this or any subsequent Iranian regime, the path of negotiation is no longer an option. It will now work even more resolutely towards acquiring a nuclear bomb.' Some Western leaders appear to share this view. French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters today he felt there was an 'increased' risk that Iran would attempt to enrich uranium secretly in the wake of US-Israeli attacks.
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is banning Palestine Action likely to achieve anything?
As things stand, next Tuesday the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, will proscribe the Palestine Action organisation (PA), its members and its supporters, under terror laws. The ban comes after a series of attacks on defence industry establishments and military bases, as well as large demonstrations. It's a move that is controversial and has itself provoked further protest. With the prosecution of Liam Og O hAnnaidh, a member of the Irish hip-hop group Kneecap, on terrorism charges, the meaning of 'terrorism' does seem to be getting stretched... What is Palestine Action? In the organisation's words: 'Palestine Action is a direct action movement committed to ending global participation in Israel's genocidal and apartheid regime. Using disruptive tactics, Palestine Action targets corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex and seeks to make it impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians.' What's the problem? They recently broke into RAF Brize Norton – with surprising ease – and set about vandalising, indeed sabotaging, air force planes, spraying red paint into the engine bays. No one was hurt, but it was the fourth such incident involving the group. Their activities, arguably, go beyond the usual definition of peaceful protest, and obviously they themselves advocate 'direct action'. It aids a potential enemy, for sure, because it hinders the UK's ability to defend itself, but it doesn't seem to fit the usual template of terrorism, which involves intentional injury to civilians (though the law includes damage to property alone as terrorism). PA's proscription places them in the same uncomfortable company as the IRA, al-Qaeda, Isis, the military arm of Hezbollah, Hamas, the Wagner Group, and the fascist National Action (but not, curiously, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps). On the other hand, the law as it stands is very broad, and counts the 'glorification' of terror acts as being in support of terrorism and therefore unlawful – hence the number of people arrested at protest rallies. The definition even includes wordless images, so destroying planes might well fall within its scope. Maybe it's not so strange, then, to see PA banned. So why are they being banned? There are two possible further explanations. First, that there are things about Palestine Action known to the Security Service and the Home Office that would justify such a move, but are not, or can't be placed, in the public domain. Briefings, for example, by Home Office personnel to the effect that Palestine Action has been funded by Iran – a suggestion that is firmly denied by PA – indicate that there might be other issues. Or it could just be a smear. The second is that it comes down to raw politics. The government doesn't want to look weak or biased in the way that it regulates such activities – the 'two tier justice' jibe. Also, at some point in the future, some PA direct action exercise could go wrong, cause casualties (to PA, military personnel, police or the public), and/or represent a more serious threat to national security. Cooper doesn't want to have to look as though she failed to take action against PA in time (and be forced to resign). What else might be done? There are numerous laws covering trespass, criminal damage and the like (some would add treason), and indeed, many very wide ones concerning terrorism that don't necessitate banning PA. These can be applied to anyone, in a proscribed organisation or not. The home secretary plainly doesn't deem them sufficient, but some other course, short of using terror legislation, could be pursued. Soon, all PA members or 'supporters' will be subject to the threat of imprisonment for up to 14 years. What will happen? Defiant, passionate, even fanatical by nature, PA people may well continue to organise demonstrations, break into arms factories, and take direct action, and will relish getting arrested, jailed – and becoming martyrs. Some MPs may join them, which will complicate matters. It's also difficult for the security services to track terrorist organisations' membership lists and supporters, and to prove an offence. In other words, individuals and small informal groups of people supporting the Palestinian cause, as they see it, could carry on regardless and undeterred, under the Palestine Action banner or not, and some will no doubt welcome getting caught red-handed.
