logo
US cardinal accused of covering up sex abuse scandal to take part in Pope Francis' funeral, draws criticism

US cardinal accused of covering up sex abuse scandal to take part in Pope Francis' funeral, draws criticism

Indian Express25-04-2025

As preparations for Pope Francis' funeral move toward an end, the Vatican's decision to include Cardinal Roger Mahony, who has faced accusations of mishandling sexual abuse cases, in tomorrow's rites has attaracted criticism.
Mahony, the former Archbishop of Los Angeles, is among the most senior cardinal priests in the Church by length of service. However, at 89, he no longer holds voting rights in a papal conclave. Yet despite having been publicly sidelined by Church leadership more than a decade ago, he will take a prominent ceremonial role in the funeral proceedings. According to a Vatican spokesperson, Mahony was invited because he was the most senior cardinal priest available, as others in the line of precedence were either ill or unable to attend.
Accusations against Mahony
As a sign of the Church's ongoing tolerance for those who failed to protect children, Mohony's presence has sparked outrage among survivors of clergy abuse and those who support them. Mahony, who worked in Los Angeles from 1985 to 2011, has long been linked to the concealment of cases of sexual abuse. Internal Church documents from 2013 showed that he and his top aide had protected abusive priests from the police and permitted them to continue serving in the ministry.
The response was swift. Mahony's successor in Los Angeles, Archbishop José Gomez, announced in 2013 that Mahony would 'no longer have any administrative or public duties.' Rarely straightforward, the statement was later retracted by the archdiocese, which made it clear that Mahony was still a 'priest in good standing.'
Mahony retaliated defensively in a scathing letter to Gomez, asserting that he had established one of the strongest child protection systems in the Church and that the archbishop had never objected to his leadership during their shared years. 'I acknowledge my mistakes, especially in the mid-1980s,' he wrote, 'but I handed over an Archdiocese second to none in protecting children and youth.'
The Archdiocese of Los Angeles made the largest settlement in Church history in 2007 when it paid USD 660 million to 508 victims of clergy sexual abuse. More than 1,350 other survivors, many of whom had experienced abuse decades prior, received an additional USD 880 million in compensation last year. Mahony's handling of abuse cases during his previous position as Bishop of Stockton also drew criticism.
This is not the first time Mahony's involvement in a moment of papal transition has caused controversy. In 2013, in the days before the conclave that elected Francis, a petition circulated in Los Angeles calling on Mahony to refrain from participating, citing his role in covering up abuse. He attended anyway.
That decision, and now his role in Pope Francis' funeral, has revived frustration among survivor groups. Anne Barrett Doyle of Bishop Accountability, a leading watchdog organization, condemned Mahony's participation stating, 'shame on him for participating in the public rites for Pope Francis, and shame on the College of Cardinals for allowing him to do so.' David Clohessy, former executive director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), echoed her outrage saying, 'his presence sends a clear signal to complicit bishops that no matter their failures, they will still be protected and honoured.'
Pope Francis' work on addressing sexual abuse
Francis himself came into the papacy with a mandate shaped partly by the failures of his predecessors to fully confront the abuse scandal. By the time of his election in 2013, the crisis had spread across continents. Revelations had rocked Ireland, Germany, the United States, and Chile. Public trust in the institution was eroding. Victims and advocates were calling for structural change.
Yet in the early years of his pontificate, Francis appeared hesitant to address the issue directly. He rarely mentioned abuse in his first months as pope. When he finally did, he was quick to defend the Church's efforts, insisting in 2014 that 'no one else has done more' to root out the problem.
The pope's public defence of Chilean bishop Juan Barros, who was accused of concealing abuse by one of the country's most infamous predator priests, was a turning point in 2018. Francis accused critics of lacking evidence and dismissed the claims as 'slander.' The backlash spread quickly. Francis changed his position in response to international indignation, ordered an internal investigation, and finally expressed regret to survivors by acknowledging that he had 'been part of the problem.'
One of his most spectacular actions as pope was calling all Chilean bishops to the Vatican and asking them to resign.
It was an extraordinary acknowledgment of systemic failure within the Church's hierarchy. Several resignations were accepted, and survivors were invited to live with the pope at his residence, the Casa Santa Marta. One of those survivors, Juan Carlos Cruz, went on to become an advisor to the pope on abuse prevention.
Cruz later said of Francis, 'I think he has done more than any pope has ever done. But I think there is a lot more to be done. What frustrates me is people in the curia and bishops around the world who are not on the same page. What infuriates me is that survivors are walking this earth without justice.'
Francis identified the abuse crisis as a symptom of 'clericalism' – the concentration of power in the hands of unaccountable clergy. In 2019, he convened a global summit at the Vatican, where bishops from across the world heard directly from abuse survivors. He subsequently issued new protocols requiring Church leaders to report abuse and cover-ups. He lifted secrecy rules in abuse investigations and updated canon law to reflect that vulnerable adults can also be victims. Laypeople, too, could now be held accountable for abuse-related misconduct.
That same year, he acknowledged the abuse of nuns by priests, an issue long suppressed within the Church.
Yet even as he instituted reforms, barriers remained. Francis faced persistent resistance from within the Vatican bureaucracy. Some bishops opposed his changes or failed to implement them. Others accused him of acting too slowly. The lawyer Mitchell Garabedian, who has represented hundreds of survivors, said, 'there hasn't been any transparency. Pope Francis said the right things, he meant the right thing, but the bureaucracy just shut him down.'
Mahony's role in tomorrow's funeral has become, for many, a stark illustration of that bureaucratic resistance. It sends a message that seniority and tradition still hold more weight than accountability.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kim Sae Ron listed as creditor in father's bankruptcy while carrying $900,000 debt — new details emerge amid Kim Soo Hyun scandal
Kim Sae Ron listed as creditor in father's bankruptcy while carrying $900,000 debt — new details emerge amid Kim Soo Hyun scandal

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Kim Sae Ron listed as creditor in father's bankruptcy while carrying $900,000 debt — new details emerge amid Kim Soo Hyun scandal

Almost four months after Kim Sae Ron's heartbreaking death, new reports are shedding light on the financial struggles she faced as the sole breadwinner for her family. These revelations come just as dating rumours linking her to actor Kim Soo Hyun have resurfaced, sparking widespread speculations about her past. Kim Sae Ron was listed as a creditor in her father's bankruptcy According to court filings, as reported by multiple K-media outlets, Kim Sae Ron was registered as a creditor in her father's personal bankruptcy case. She was owed over 250 million KRW (180,000 USD)—money she had used to repay her father's debts after he defaulted on loans from more than 20 creditors. Her father, identified only as 'A,' filed for bankruptcy in December 2020 and was officially discharged by the Uijeongbu District Court in March 2023. Kim was just 20 years old when the bankruptcy was finalized. Failed restaurant investment added to financial burden After her father's bankruptcy, Kim tried to help her family bounce back. In May 2021, she reportedly invested in a family-run restaurant, registering it under a friend's name. She poured financial resources into the business and promoted it using her entertainment industry contacts. But despite her efforts, the restaurant shut down in 2024 due to unpaid rent and operational fees, causing her to lose even more, including the security deposit. The DUI incident that changed everything In 2022, Kim was involved in a drunk driving incident, crashing into a transformer in Seoul. The case quickly spiralled into a public controversy. More than just a reputational hit, the crash reportedly impacted multiple nearby businesses, leading to civil compensation claims and a wave of legal expenses. During her DUI trial in 2023, her legal team stated that Kim had been the family's sole breadwinner, citing ongoing financial strain. They described her as taking on significant monetary responsibilities for herself and her relatives. Over 1.2 billion KRW in confirmed debt Reports from Money Today, bnt News, and allkpop detail the extent of the former child actress' financial struggles, with public records showing her confirmed liabilities totalled over KRW 1.2 billion (around USD 900,000). This included KRW 100 million each borrowed from two idols and one singer friend, a KRW 60 million loan from her agency to cover medical expenses, and a massive KRW 700 million owed to her former agency, Gold Medalist, as repayment for pre-paid breach-of-contract penalties following her 2022 DUI incident. Despite the staggering total, it remains unclear how exactly these funds were used—whether for personal needs, legal fees, or to support her family. Family disputes posthumous claim In April 2025, a month after Kim's death, her family's legal team released a statement denying the narrative that she had been the family's sole provider. They dismissed the reports of financial mismanagement and wealth being squandered as 'unworthy of attention.' Still, the court filings and business records tell a different story—one where Kim appeared to be taking on a role far heavier than her age. For all the latest K-drama, K-pop, and Hallyuwood updates, keep following our coverage here.

Two Indian women arrested for stealing items worth SGD 635 at Changi airport
Two Indian women arrested for stealing items worth SGD 635 at Changi airport

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Two Indian women arrested for stealing items worth SGD 635 at Changi airport

Two Indian women transiting through Changi airport in Singapore were detained for allegedly shoplifting items at different stores in the transit area, police said on Monday. Both women, aged 29 and 30, were detained before they could flee the country, as reported by The Straits Times. According to the report, the thefts took place on June 2 in the departure transit area of Terminal 3 of the Changi airport. Police were alerted to the suspected shoplifting and, with the help of CCTV footage, they were able to identify the two suspected women shoplifters. The police arrested both women within an hour of the crime. Authorities recovered a purse, a backpack and a bottle of perfume, all allegedly stolen and found in women's possession. The total value of the three items was SGD 635 or USD 494, The Straits Times reported. The purse was found on the younger woman, and a black haversack and a bottle of perfume were in the luggage of the older woman. The women are expected to be charged in court on June 10. If convicted, both of them can be jailed for up to seven years, fined, or both. 'The police will continue to work closely with stakeholders and the community to prevent and deter cases of shop theft,' reported The Straits Times. In another incident, a 35-year-old Australian woman was fined $750 after pleading guilty to stealing a bottle of Chanel perfume worth nearly SGD 250 from a duty-free store at Changi Airport two years ago. The incident, which took place on March 22, 2023, led to her detention when she returned to Singapore on March 31, 2025, as reported by The Straits Times. The most recent case of reported shop theft at Changi Airport was in May, when a British man was arrested for allegedly stealing more than SGD 2,900 worth of items.

India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan
India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

The Print

time2 hours ago

  • The Print

India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

He was responding to a query on how India would safeguard farmers amid US pressure for greater market access for American agricultural and horticultural products. 'Our priority is to protect the interest of our farmers. India will not work closing its eyes. We will assess our gains and losses. Keeping that in mind, an agreement will be finalised,' Chouhan told PTI in an interview. New Delhi, Jun 8 (PTI) India will prioritise protecting its farmers' interests while assessing potential gains and losses in the ongoing trade negotiations with the United States over agricultural market access, Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said. The negotiators are expected to agree on the framework for the broad contours of the first phase of the bilateral deal, expected to be signed by fall (September-October) 2025. 'The discussions are ongoing between India and the US. One thing is clear, we will protect the interest of our farmers. When we talk about two nations, we need to see the overall trade,' the minister added. According to a NITI Aayog report, 'Promoting India-US Agricultural Trade under the new US Trade Regime', the value for US agriculture and allied product exports to India was about USD 2.22 billion in the triennium ending 2024. In the same period, India exported USD 5.75 billion worth of agricultural products to the US. India's main agricultural exports to the US include frozen shrimp, basmati rice, spices, processed cereals, and other value-added products. The US wants to export more agricultural products such as corn, soybeans, and animal feed, but faces high Indian tariffs — especially in agriculture, where average tariffs can reach up to 39-50 per cent. The minister's comments come as India and the US continue negotiations on expanding agricultural trade, with Washington seeking reduced tariffs and improved market access for its farm products in the Indian market. India is cautious about fully opening its agriculture and dairy markets due to concerns about potential backlash from rural communities and the need to protect domestic producers from global price volatility. PTI LUX TRB TRB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store