This Phone Brought My Dad Back to Life and I Don't Know How to Feel
My dad died just after my fourth birthday in 1992. Being so young, I have few memories of him and my family has only a small handful of home movie clips, filmed in the brief window before he died. But I do have a selection of still pictures and in my testing of a new phone, I found I was able to bring him to life using AI.
Honestly? I really don't know how to feel about it.
The original still image of my dad (left) and the AI-created video of him (right).
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
The phone is the new Honor 400 Pro and while it's broadly a decent handset, it packs a tool that uses AI (powered by Google's VEO-2 model) to turn any image into a 5-second video. I was skeptical when I read the press release about it (as I usually am), but I found it genuinely fascinating to use. Here's how it works.
You open the tool within the gallery app, choose your source image from any picture you have in your camera roll and hit go. It takes about a minute to analyze the image but then that picture suddenly springs to life, like a magical picture from the world of Harry Potter. Don't like the result? Simply tell it to generate again and you'll get a slightly different outcome.
The original still image.
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
The AI-created video version (converted into a lower-quality gif format).
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
I've tried it on various images with mixed results. Sometimes it's pretty low-key (an image of someone reading a book simply resulted in them turning a page), while other times it goes weirdly hard. I loaded in a picture of a family of sheep on a Scottish island that I shot on Kodak Gold film (seen just below). In the moving AI version, there was suddenly a flood of sheep pouring through the frame before the camera angle cuts to an aerial view of a whole flock running across a meadow. I think that's what the kids call "extra." Ditto when I ran it on a picture of my cat and it threw in bizarre-looking titles for some baffling reason (seen further down).
The original still image of this family of sheep.
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
The AI-created video version (converted into a lower-quality gif format).
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
But then I went another way. I've had my dad's photo on my shelf for decades. It shows him onstage playing bass in his band. It's an image I love for many reasons, but chiefly because I'm a musician myself and I've always liked that we've had that in common. But that one picture is all I've seen of him performing. I certainly never went to a show and I don't believe any video footage of him playing exists. Until now, that is.
I fed the image into the app and with a certain sense of trepidation hit go. I waited for it to process and then suddenly there he was: My dad, moving around, jamming on his bass, visibly getting into the spirit of the performance. It transformed this small black and white picture I've treasured for so long into something more. Something alive. It actually made me quite emotional.
But then another part of my brain spoke up. This isn't my dad. It's not him moving and vibing with the music. Not really. It's what Google's algorithm imagines he'd do. In many ways it's like he's a marionette being grotesquely controlled by some invisible puppeteer, trying to give the impression of lifelike movement.
I ran it a few more times to see what options it would give but each one was basically a minor variation on him swaying and bopping while playing the bass. To be fair, the AI did a great job here. It looks realistic, with the shadows moving just right, the microphone staying in place and his hands actually looking like they're specifically playing a bass guitar. It's also still in black and white, with the film grain and various signs of aging to the image still present.
The original image of my lovely cat Toulouse.
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
What the hell is this?
Andrew Lanxon/CNET
I think that made all the difference to me as it really did give me the impression of what he might have looked like on stage. I didn't have to squint to ignore any strange errors or random other elements the AI could have thrown in. Every time it produced a gentle clip of my dad playing his music.
So I remain split in how I feel. On the one hand it's kind of gross in how it puppets a deceased loved one like this, based solely on Google's "best guess" of what would happen. I showed it to my brother who seemed to have much the same stance as me: "I'm not sure I like it, but I also don't think I dislike it. It's kind of spooky."
On the other hand it's injected life into a picture that I've treasured for decades and given me a glimpse into what my dad might have been like onstage. And I liked seeing that, even if it's not exactly real.
It's definitely not a perfect solution for me, and if I want to really remember him I'd rather turn to our actual home movies than AI-created imagery. But maybe AI tools like these will eventually bring real comfort to the many people in this world with passed loved ones, who right now only have a handful of static images to hold on to.
And I'd like to think that, for all AI's faults, maybe this is one way it can do some good.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is a GPT?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The introduction of generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs) marked a significant milestone in the adoption and utility of artificial intelligence in the real world. The technology was created by the then fledgling research lab OpenAI, based on previous research done on transformers in 2017 by Google Labs. It was Google's white paper "Attention is all you need", which laid the foundation for OpenAI's work on the GPT concept. As seen in > Model matchup surprise > ChatGPT announcements > Goodbye ChatGPT-4 > Why ChatGPT 4.1 is a big deal Transformers provided AI scientists with an innovative method of taking user input, and converting it to something that could be used by the neural network using an attention mechanism to identify important parts of the data. This architecture also allows for the information to be processed in parallel rather than sequentially as with traditional neural networks. This provides a huge and critical improvement in speed and efficiency of AI processing. OpenAI's GPT architecture was released in 2018 with GPT-1. By significantly refining Google's transformer ideas, the GPT model demonstrated that large-scale unsupervised learning could produce an extremely capable text generation model which operated at vastly improved speeds. GPT's also uprated the neural networks' understanding of context which improved accuracy and provided human-like coherence. Before GPT, AI language models relied on rule-based systems or simpler neural networks like recurrent neural networks (RNNs), which struggled with long-range dependencies and contextual understanding. The story of the GPT architecture is one of constant incremental improvements ever year since launch. GPT-2 in 2019 introduced a model with 1.5 billion parameters, which started to provide the kind of fluent text responses where AI users are now familiar with. However it was the introduction of GPT-3 (and subsequently 3.5) in 2020 which was the real game-changer. It featured 175 billion parameters, and suddenly a single AI model could cope with a vast array of applications from creative writing to code generation. GPT technology went viral in November of 2022 with the launch of ChatGPT. Based on GPT 3.5 and later GPT-4, this astonishing technology instantly propelled AI into public consciousness in a massive way. Unlike previous GPT models, ChatGPT was fine-tuned for conversational interaction. Suddenly business users and ordinary citizens could use an AI for things like customer service, online tutoring or technical support. So powerful was this idea, that the product attracted a 100 million users in a mere 60 days. Today GPT is one of the top two AI system architectures in the world (along with Google's Gemini). Recent improvements have included multimodal capabilities, i.e. the ability to process not just text but also images, video and audio. OpenAI has also updated the platform to improve pattern recognition and enhance unsupervised learning, as well as adding agentic functionality via semi-autonomous tasks. On the commercial front, GPT powered applications are now deeply embedded in many different business and industry enterprises. Salesforce has Einstein GPT to deliver CRM functionality, Microsoft's Copilot is an AI assisted coding tool which incorporates Office suite automation, and there are multiple healthcare AI models which are fine-tuned to provide GPT powered diagnosis, patient interaction and medical research. At the time of writing the only two significant rivals to the GPT architecture are Google's Gemini system and the work being done by DeepSeek, Anthropic's Claude and Meta with its Llama models. The latter products also use transformers, but in a subtly different way to GPT. Google however is a dark horse in the race, as it's becoming clear that the Gemini platform has the potential to dominate the global AI arena within a few short years. Despite the competition, OpenAI remains firmly at the top of many leaderboards in terms of AI performance and benchmarks. Its growing range of reasoning models such as o1 and o3, and its superlative image generation product, GPT Image-1 which uses the technology, continue to demonstrate that there is significant life left in the architecture, waiting to be exploited.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
T-Mobile makes unexpected move to lure customers from competitors
It is no secret that many Americans across the country are frustrated with price increases. This trend has especially impacted home internet bills, as many internet providers have hiked prices for their services, causing consumers to make drastic decisions to save money. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter According to a new survey from CNET, 63% of U.S. adults saw the monthly price of their home internet service increase last year. On average, they paid $195 more for internet service in 2024 than they did in 2023. Related: T-Mobile CEO has a harsh warning for customers Despite paying higher prices for internet, 51% of the respondents in the survey said they still experienced unreliable connectivity. These price hikes even pushed one in five U.S. adults to either downgrade their service, switch internet providers or cancel their service altogether. Many consumers have been flocking to providers such as T-Mobile (TMUS) , AT&T, and Verizon (VZ) , which all offer fixed wireless internet. This service provides internet access to remote or underserved areas at a price that's usually cheaper than traditional internet services. During the first quarter of 2025, T-Mobile added 424,000 new high-speed internet customers. This contributed to the company generating a net income of $3 billion, which is 24% higher than what it earned during the same quarter in 2024. Image source:As more consumers ditch traditional internet service providers such as Spectrum and Comcast for cheaper options, T-Mobile will launch its Fiber Home Internet service on June 5, which introduces three new fiber internet plans with five-year price-lock guarantees. This first plan is called Fiber 500, which is $75 per month with an autopay discount. T-Mobile says this plan is ideal for "everyday streamers, remote workers, and smaller households," according to a press release. For customers who have "busy households with multiple people streaming, gaming, and using smart devices at the same time," T-Mobile is offering a plan called Fiber 1 Gig, which is $90 a month with autopay. Related: T-Mobile pulls the plug on generous offer, angering customers For "high-demand" internet users who want a "top-tier speed," T-Mobile has introduced Fiber 2 Gig for $105 a month with, of course, an autopay discount. If customers want to shave $15 off the monthly price for each plan, they have the option to purchase and attach a T-Mobile voice line to it. In addition, T-Mobile also announced a limited-time Founders Club offer where customers in select locations can get a 2 Gig fiber internet plan for $70 a month with autopay activated. No voice line is required for this plan, and it comes with a 10-year price lock guarantee. "With the official launch of T-Mobile Fiber, we're delivering on our promise to bring better broadband to more people - the Un-carrier way," said Allan Samson, T-Mobile chief broadband officer in the press release. "Our new plans, backed by long-term price guarantees, are designed to give customers more choice and peace of mind." The move from T-Mobile comes after it officially acquired fiber-to-the-home provider Lumos in April to expand its fiber internet service. T-Mobile Fiber is now available to over 500,000 households across the nation. T-Mobile's announcement also comes after one of its top competitors, Verizon, received approval last month from the Federal Communications Commission to acquire Frontier Internet. This will accelerate the delivery of its mobility and broadband services to current and new customers. More Retail: Costco quietly plans to offer a convenient service for customersT-Mobile pulls the plug on generous offer, angering customersKellogg sounds alarm on unexpected shift in customer behavior The deal is set to expand Frontier's network in 25 states and deploy fiber internet to 1 million or more U.S. homes per year. "Frontier customers and those previously outside Verizon's fiber footprint are expected to gain more choice and access to Verizon's premium mobility, home internet, streaming and connected home offerings, alongside premium business products like Verizon Business Complete," said Verizon in a press release last year when it first announced the acquisition. Related: Verizon makes bold move to make it harder for customers to leave The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alphabet stock could tumble 25% in a 'black swan' scenario that forces it to divest Google Chrome, Barclays says
There's a big risk hanging over Alphabet stock, Barclays says. The bank said Alphabet being forced to sell Chrome is a black swan scenario that could spark a 25% stock plunge. Tech firms like OpenAI have signaled interest in buying the platform. The worst-case scenario in Google's antitrust trial could slash Alphabet's stock price by as much as a quarter, according to Barclays. Analysts at the bank hashed out the various possibilities that could follow the decision in Google's antitrust case. Last year, a federal judge ruled that Alphabet operated a monopoly in online search and search advertising. The court is expected to decide on a remedy on the matter in the next several months. While it's unlikely, it is possible that a court decision forces Alphabet to divest Google Chrome to another owner, like Microsoft, Barclays floated in a client note on Monday. That would represent a black swan event for the stock, an unlikely but plausible tail risk that could lead to a major decline. If Alphabet were to divest Chrome, that could potentially hit earnings-per-share by more than 30%, the bank estimated, given that Chrome provides 35% of Google's search revenue and has around 4 billion users. The scenario could send its stock falling around 15%-25%, the bank estimated, partly because "no investors" the bank has spoken to are pricing in that scenario. "The probability of a Chrome divestiture, while low, has increased in our view," analysts wrote. "To our surprise, and this may have just been the style of the judge's approach to put the Google attorneys on the spot, he indicated that this might be the 'cleanest' remedy of the lot." Other tech firms, like ChatGPT creator OpenAI, have already said they might be interested in purchasing Chrome if it were up for sale. Barclays sees other remedies related to the trial that could be more likely. Google, for one, could provide its index to licensees in order to help its competitors. That could hit earnings per share around 10%-15%, and potentially spark a 5%-10% hit to the stock, the analysts estimated. The tech giant could also be forced to start a "phased roll off" of its traffic acquisition contracts, which means Google won't be able to pay third parties to direct users to its platform. That scenario could hit earnings per share by 10%-20%, potentially taking the stock down 5%-10%, they estimated. The Department of Justice, which initiated its suit against Google in 2020, said in a statement shortly after the federal ruling that it believed Google had "subverted competition" for more than 15 years. The Google parent has said it disagrees with the ruling and will appeal the decision after remedies are decided. The Department of Justice's proposal to divest Chrome and Android, in particular, would hurt businesses and increase cybersecurity and national security risks, Alphabet said in a statement. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
