Ex-Premier League star facing 13 YEARS in prison after being accused of smuggling TWO TONNES of cocaine
FORMER Premier League star Ronnie Stam is facing THIRTEEN YEARS in jail - after being accused of smuggling two tonnes of cocaine.
And the ex- Wigan defender could also be fined up to £1.5million if found guilty of trafficking the drugs, with a street value of £48m.
3
3
3
Stam, 40, had three top-flight seasons with the Latics - making 73 appearances.
He played in their FA Cup -winning campaign of 2013, but missed the final against Manchester City before leaving for Standard Liege that year.
But the now-retired player appeared in a Dutch court on Tuesday alongside his brother Rudi, 43.
The trial at Breda heard that the brothers transported cocaine from South America to the Netherlands in 2020 and 2021.
Prosecutors said evidence of drug shipments was found in encrypted phone chats between Ronnie and Rudi.
Photos of blocks of cocaine were reportedly seen among the duo's messages.
The public prosecutor called for Stam to be imprisoned until 2038, and fined Є1.7m, for his part in the alleged crimes.
Meanwhile, brother Rudi is facing over six years in jail, plus an identical fine, if found guilty.
Stam told the court that he has been involved in a 20 kilo shipment to Germany in 2020, but denied any further involvement in the drug trade.
The Breda-born former defender claimed the money in his bank accounts had come from his football career.
Stam won the Dutch title with FC Twente in 2010, under ex- England boss Steve McClaren, before landing a £2m move to Wigan that year.
He has been in custody since first being arrested last June.
The trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Major high street retailers duping shoppers with ‘misleading discounts' on pricey TVs, Which? warns
SHOPPERS looking for a new television may want to think twice before trusting the discounts advertised by some of the UK's biggest retailers. An investigation by consumer champion Which? has revealed questionable pricing practices at Currys, Very, and other major sellers, potentially misleading customers into believing they are getting better deals than they actually are. 1 Which? analysed over 1,600 television deals across five retailers. More than half (56%) of the "was" prices used in promotions were not the most recent prices charged before the discount. Which? said this tactic can create the illusion of massive savings when, in reality, the higher price may not have been charged for months – or was only briefly in place. Plus, four in 10 TVs (40%) had a "was" price that was only in effect for less time than the discounted price. And a third of all the TVs reviewed (33%) were doubly misleading, with both intervening prices and promotional periods longer than the higher "was" price. Which? said the findings are concerning because UK consumer protection guidance states that a "was" price must represent the genuine price immediately prior to the discount. Retailers that dodge these rules risk enforcement action from authorities such as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). Lisa Webb, Which? consumer law expert, said: "Shoppers deserve clear, honest pricing - not smoke and mirrors. "If retailers are using dodgy was/now discounts to create the illusion of a bargain then we expect the competition regulator to take enforcement action. 'Anyone in the market for a new TV or any other expensive purchase should take any such discounts with a pinch of salt and check price tracking sites like CamelCamelCamel or Price Runner to ensure they are getting a genuine deal before making a decision." Shopping discounts - How to make savings and find the best bargains Which retailers were the worst offenders? Very emerged as the worst offender in the Which? investigation. Of the 399 TV deals reviewed, nearly nine in 10 (87%) used "was" prices that were not the most recent, and over half (53%) had higher prices that were in place for less time than the promotional price. For example, the LG OLED65B46LA 65-inch TV was advertised with a "was" price of £2,499 and a "now" price of £1,499. However, the £2,499 price hadn't been charged for five months and had been replaced by seven lower price points during that time. Currys also came under fire, with three-quarters (75%) of its 608 TV deals featuring outdated "was" prices. Plus, it had the highest rate (68%) of TVs where the higher price applied for a shorter time than the discounted price. An example includes the LG UT73 50-inch TV, which had a "was" price of £399.99 and a "now" price of £299.99. The higher price had only been in place for 25 days, compared to 207 days at the lower price. What about other retailers? While AO was also found to use intervening prices in a third (33%) of its deals, it provides transparency by publishing the dates of its "was" prices and acknowledging that lower prices may have applied. This makes AO's deals less likely to mislead shoppers, Which? said. Argos performed the best, with nearly all of its "was" prices reflecting the price immediately before the promotion, offering customers a more accurate picture of potential savings. Amazon's pricing practices were also reviewed, but the retailer uses a different approach. Its "was" prices reflect the median price paid by customers over the past 90 days, excluding promotional offers. While this is a distinct method, Which? has concerns that it could still confuse shoppers and make discounts appear larger than they are. Which? also revealed earlier this week that Sports Direct shoppers are being misled by deceptive pricing tactics, creating the illusion of bargain deals. How to compare prices to get the best deal JUST because something is on offer, or is part of a sale, it doesn't mean it's always a good deal. There are plenty of comparison websites out there that'll check prices for you - so don't be left paying more than you have to. Most of them work by comparing the prices across hundreds of retailers. Here are some that we recommend: Google Shopping is a tool that lets users search for and compare prices for products across the web. Simply type in keywords, or a product number, to bring up search results. Price Spy logs the history of how much something costs from over 3,000 different retailers, including Argos, Amazon, eBay and the supermarkets. Once you select an individual product you can quickly compare which stores have the best price and which have it in stock. Idealo is another website that lets you compare prices between retailers. All shoppers need to do is search for the item they need and the website will rank them from the cheapest to the most expensive one. CamelCamelCamel only works on goods being sold on Amazon. To use it, type in the URL of the product you want to check the price of.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Cadillac sweep front row in Le Mans 24 Hours qualifying
June 12 (Reuters) - Cadillac locked out the front row in qualifying for the 24 Hours of Le Mans endurance race for the first time on Thursday with Britain's Alex Lynn securing pole position. Lynn set a best time of three minutes 23.166 seconds in the number 12 Team Jota Cadillac at the Sarthe circuit with New Zealand's Earl Bamber putting the sister 38 car alongside and 0.167 slower. Lynn shares his car with compatriot Will Stevens and Frenchman Norman Nato while Bamber's teammates are 2009 Formula One world champion Jenson Button and French four-times Champ Car champion Sebastien Bourdais. "I can't tell you how much I wanted this," said Lynn, who missed out on pole last year by a mere 0.138, over the team radio. "One tenth last year hurt a lot. "I'm truly honoured to be able to put in a performance like that in front of everyone and deliver for Cadillac in the way they deserve," he added after getting out of the car. "This is a magical circuit and this is a special feeling. I can't describe it. We will enjoy this tonight, have a good sleep and re-set." GM-owned Cadillac are the first American marque to take outright pole at Le Mans since Ford in 1967. The number five Porsche Penske was third fastest, after threatening to take pole, with France's Julien Andlauer, Denmark's Michael Christensen and France's Mathieu Jaminet. The number 15 BMW qualified in fourth place with Belgian Dries Vanthoor, Swiss-Italian Raffaele Marciello and Danish former F1 driver Kevin Magnussen. Defending champions Ferrari, outright winners for the past two years, had Italian Antonio Fuoco, Denmark's Nicklas Nielsen and Spaniard Miguel Molina in seventh place in last year's winning car number 50. The 93rd edition of the race starts on Saturday at 1600 local (1400GMT).
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Cristiano Ronaldo deals with rude fan after Portugal's Nations League victory as he calls out behaviour of selfie-hunting supporter in Munich
Cristiano Ronaldo was forced to deal with a rude fan in Munich on the back of Portugal's Nations League victory. Ronaldo helped his country to their second title in the competition, scoring in both the semi-final and final out in Germany as Roberto Martinez's side claimed victory. First, the Al-Nassr forward was on hand to tap in the winner against home side Germany in the semi-finals, setting up a mouth-watering clash with Spain in the final two. Though the European champions were favourites, Portugal delivered, drawing 2-2 after trailing and then winning on penalties. Ronaldo, meanwhile, scored the equaliser. Portugal embarked on a series of celebrations and Ronaldo was no different. The 40-year-old was seen donning sunglasses and a shirt that read 'campeones' on the back of the win. In Munich, the forward greeted a handful of fans who were looking for autographs and selfies, though he took exception to one supporter's actions. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Daily Mail Sport (@dailymailsport) In a video shared by Mail Sport, Ronaldo was seen signing autographs as he made his way down the line. Eager fans waited in anticipation, but Ronaldo dodged one selfie before another fan jumped into his path, looking to a photo. The ex-Manchester United star almost walked into the supporter, taking a step back as his face dropped after he had seemingly suggested he needed to leave. He held out his hands, frustrated, exchanging some words with the supporter. That didn't put him off, however, and he tried again, before Ronaldo put his hand on his shoulder. Eventually, after rejecting that photo too, Ronaldo carried on down the line and did eventually pose for a photo - with a different supporter. Ronaldo confirmed after the win that he would be staying with Al-Nassr despite suggestions he could leave to head to the Club World Cup. 'The tears were of joy. When you win something for Portugal, it's always special, but there's nothing like winning for the national team, in my opinion,' the 40-year-old said. 'This generation deserved it and we were going to have a bit of luck and merit and we were going to win the final. 'We knew it was going to be difficult but we deserved it and this gives us confidence and allows us to go to the World Cup with more confidence. Future? It won't change anything. Al-Nassr, yes.'
