
World's largest religious gathering in India underway as hundreds of millions visit 45-day festival
The Maha Kumbh Mela, or Great Pitcher Festival, is drawing hundreds of millions of pilgrims and tourists to India. The 45-day festival, which began Jan. 13, is the largest gathering of humanity in the world. It is expected to draw approximately 420 million.
That is about 200 times the number of Muslim pilgrims who participated in the annual Hajj in Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia, last year. It is so large it can be seen from outer space.
According to Hindu scriptures, gods and demons once churned the cosmic ocean in search of the nectar of immortality. During this struggle, drops of nectar fell at four sacred sites. The spiritual Hindu festival takes place once every 12 years at one of those four locations.
This year, it is being held in the city of Prayagraj in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. This year's event is considered particularly special because it aligns with a rare, once-in-a-century celestial configuration.
Throngs of devotees have been descending on northern India to take a dip at the confluence of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers. Hindus, who account for nearly 80% of India's more than 1.4 billion people, believe a third invisible river, the mythical Saraswati, also meets at the confluence.
Legend holds that a dip in the holy waters will cleanse them of sins and grant salvation. Bathing occurs daily, but on the most auspicious dates, Naga Sadhus, Hindu ascetics, head into the holy rivers at dawn.
Ava Poonawala, a resident of Mumbai, India, made the journey not as a pilgrim, but to "witness the world's largest religious event in our lifetime," she explained to Fox News Digital. She took an early 6 a.m. dip just as the sun was rising.
After her chilly dip, she expressed feeling invigorated and at peace.
"Everyone seemed to be there with one purpose," she told Fox News Digital. "And that was spiritual awakening."
The Maha Kumbh Mela is a massive undertaking by any standard. To accommodate the tens of thousands of holy men, pilgrims and tourists, authorities have built a sprawling tent city on the riverbanks. It's equipped with more than 150,000 tents and toilets, 3,000 kitchens and 11 hospitals, as well as roads, electricity, water and communication towers.
It covers some 15 square miles. About 50,000 security personnel, supported by artificial intelligence-powered cameras, are stationed in the city to maintain law and order and manage the crowds.
"I was blown away by the incredible magnitude of this event," Poonawala told Fox News Digital. "It's just unimaginable how they put this all together."
A predawn stampede broke out at the festival last week, reportedly killing roughly three dozen people and injuring many more. Prime Minister Narendra Modi offered condolences to "devotees who have lost their loved ones" without specifying the number dead.
Police reported the stampede occurred as hundreds of millions of pilgrims rushed to dip in sacred waters on the most auspicious day of the festival. Uttar Pradesh's chief minister said some devotees attempted to jump crowd management barricades, triggering the crush. The Kumbh's grand processions, which had been curtailed last week, have since resumed.
Prior to the stampede, the festival saw a brief but large fire, which was quickly extinguished.
For many, the marvel of the Maha Kumbh Mela lies neither in the religious nor spiritual experience, but rather the cultural extravaganza. It not only brings together ash-smeared monks, naked ascetics and priests dressed head-to-toe in saffron. It also attracts tourists with selfie sticks and awed foreigners.
Uttar Pradesh has gone to great lengths to promote this year's festival as a tourist event, offering luxury packages and experiences. The government even organized helicopters to shower flower petals on the saints and seers taking a holy dip. The state has allocated more than $765 million for this year's event.
The Kumbh has drawn people from all strata of society, whether it be billionaires like Laurene Powell Jobs, the wife of the late Steve Jobs, or athletes like Olympic boxer Mary Kom. Bollywood stars and celebrities like Coldplay frontman Chris Martin and his fiancée, actress Dakota Johnson, have descended on the festival.
Even royalty, like King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck of Bhutan, have made an appearance. On Wednesday, exactly a week after the stampede, Prime Minister Modi arrived in Prayagraj to take a sacred dip.
The Kumbh Mela's popularity has steadily increased in size over the years as improved infrastructure and facilities have attracted more people. This year, for the first time ever, the massive event also boasts being plastic-free and eco-friendly. The festival is a significant test for India to showcase Hinduism and culture, as well as handle tourism and crowd management.
"The ground was buzzing at all hours, right through the night into the morning," Poonawala said. "It was so surreal with such purity. I can't even begin to explain it."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The world's most dangerous country revealed in new global survey — and it's probably not where you think
Their national flag is red. As tensions rise around the world, picking summer travel destinations can be like navigating an international minefield. As a service to globetrotters, financial comparison site Hellosafe has ranked the most dangerous nations to travel, revealing that the Philippines is the most unsafe vacation nation on Earth for 2025. They compiled this 'travel safety index' based on 35 different criteria that were boiled down into five categories: the frequency of natural disasters, societal violence, involvement in armed conflict (internal or external), health infrastructure and militarization, per the site. Based on these indicators, nations were rated on a scale from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the safest and 100 being the most dangerous. Hellosafe assured readers that 'this index is not intended to reflect the tourist attractiveness of a country, but rather a global index of security and safety based on the largest possible number of objective criteria.' The Philippines ranked first on this dangerous nation decathlon with a score of 82.32 out of 100, which the index attributed to 'high levels of violence within society.' In October 2024, 26-year-old American YouTuber Elliot Onil Eastman was abducted at gunpoint from a small island in the country's south by four masked men masquerading as police officers. He is currently presumed dead. The nation is also home to Muslim rebel groups like the Abu Sayyaf group, a terrorist organization known for kidnapping foreigners for ransom. Despite the alleged danger, the Philippines remains a popular destination for travelers with 5.4 million foreign travelers making their way to the idyllic Southeast Asian isles in 2024. Coming in at No. 2 and 3, respectively, were Colombia (79.21) and Mexico (78.42), which both have high levels of crime and kidnapping, according to the US State Department. In fact, they warn US tourists not to travel to certain areas, such as Michoacan and Sinaloa for this very reason Rounding out the Top 5 list of most dangerous nations were India and Russia with respective scores of 77.86 and 75.65. This comes amid heightened fears that war could break out between India and Pakistan following clashes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. Meanwhile, there appears to be no end in sight for the Russia-Ukraine war, which recently saw Putin launch one of his largest airstrikes on Kyiv since the conflict broke out in 2022. Coincidentally, the US ranked as the 14th least safe country for travel with a score of 59.47 despite an overall downward trend in crime in major US cities. Philippines (82.31) Colombia (79.21) Mexico (78.42) India (77.86) Russia (75.65) Yemen (74.6) Indonesia (72.94) Somalia (70.8() Mozambique (69.69) Pakistan (68.03) Fortunately, there are plenty of perfectly safe nations where people can decamp for the summer, most of which are concentrated in Europe, per the Index. Clocking in at No. 1 was Iceland (18.23), followed by Singapore (19.99), then Denmark (20.05). Meanwhile, Austria (20.31) and Switzerland (20.51) rounded out the top five. Iceland (18.23) Singapore (19.99) Denmark (20.05) Austria (20.31) Switzerland (20.51) Czech Republic (21.19) Slovenia (21.44) Finland (21.81) Ireland (22.49) Hungary (22.87)


New York Post
18 hours ago
- New York Post
The world's most dangerous country revealed in new global survey — and it's probably not where you think
Their national flag is red. As tensions rise around the world, picking summer travel destinations can be like navigating an international minefield. As a service to globetrotters, financial comparison site Hellosafe has ranked the most dangerous nations to travel, revealing that the Philippines is the most unsafe vacation nation on Earth for 2025. They compiled this 'travel safety index' based on 35 different criteria that were boiled down into five categories: the frequency of natural disasters, societal violence, involvement in armed conflict (internal or external), health infrastructure and militarization, per the site. Based on these indicators, nations were rated on a scale from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the safest and 100 being the most dangerous. 5 An iconic Philippine jeep in the streets of Manila. Nathaniel Gonzales – Hellosafe assured readers that 'this index is not intended to reflect the tourist attractiveness of a country, but rather a global index of security and safety based on the largest possible number of objective criteria.' The Philippines ranked first on this dangerous nation decathlon with a score of 82.32 out of 100, which the index attributed to 'high levels of violence within society.' In October 2024, 26-year-old American YouTuber Elliot Onil Eastman was abducted at gunpoint from a small island in the country's south by four masked men masquerading as police officers. He is currently presumed dead. 5 Red Square in Moscow. Helen Filatova – The nation is also home to Muslim rebel groups like the Abu Sayyaf group, a terrorist organization known for kidnapping foreigners for ransom. Despite the alleged danger, the Philippines remains a popular destination for travelers with 5.4 million foreign travelers making their way to the idyllic Southeast Asian isles in 2024. 5 Aerial view of the skyline of Bogota, Colombia. pabloacruz – Coming in at number 2 and 3, respectively, were Colombia (79.21) and Mexico (78.42), which both have high levels of crime and kidnapping, according to the US State Department. In fact, they warn US tourists not to travel to certain areas, such as Michoacan and Sinaloa for this very reason Rounding out the top five list of most dangerous nations were India and Russia with respective scores of 77.86 and 75.65. 5 Pushkar, India. henktennapel – This comes amid heightened fears that war could break out between India and Pakistan following clashes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. Meanwhile, there appears to be no end in sight for the Russia-Ukraine war, which recently saw Putin launch one of his largest airstrikes on Kyiv since the conflict broke out in 2022. Coincidentally, the US ranked as the 14th least safe country for travel with a score of 59.47 despite an overall downward trend in crime in major US cities. 5 Temple of Kukulkan Pyramid at Chichen Itza, one of the largest ancient Maya cities discovered by archaeologists in Yucatan, Mexico. ronniechua – The top ten most dangerous nations Philippines (82.31) Colombia (79.21) Mexico (78.42) India (77.86) Russia (75.65) Yemen (74.6) Indonesia (72.94) Somalia (70.8() Mozambique (69.69) Pakistan (68.03) Fortunately, there are plenty of perfectly safe nations where people can decamp for the summer, most of which are concentrated in Europe, per the Index. Clocking in at number one was Iceland (18.23), followed by Singapore (19.99), then Denmark (20.05). Meanwhile, Austria (20.31) and Switzerland (20.51) rounded out the top five. The top ten safest nations Iceland (18.23) Singapore (19.99) Denmark (20.05) Austria (20.31) Switzerland (20.51) Czech Republic (21.19) Slovenia (21.44) Finland (21.81) Ireland (22.49) Hungary (22.87)
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new travel ban leaves narrow openings for challengers
The Trump administration's travel ban presents a complex case for immigration advocates who have challenged previous efforts by President Trump to close the U.S. to certain foreigners. Trump needed multiple bites at the apple during his first term before the Supreme Court upheld the third version of his so-called Muslim ban in 2018. His latest version is more sweeping, targeting 19 countries instead of seven. It's also more narrow in the exceptions that would allow people to skirt the new restrictions. Trump's Supreme Court-approved travel ban was finally able to win over the courts with the argument it was needed on national security grounds. But his latest travel ban also points to visa overstay rates as a rationale for blocking citizens from U.S. travel. That addition is something that could provide an opening to legal challenges, said experts interviewed by The Hill. 'The rationales that are given in the order go far beyond national security-related justifications,' said Ahilan Arulanantham, co-director of the Center for Immigration Law and Policy (CILP) at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law. He noted that when the Supreme Court upheld Trump's first travel ban, 'they were focused almost exclusively on national security-related justifications.' 'These are justifications that are not in any way national security related. They're just immigration policy rationales. … That's definitely an area of potential legal vulnerability.' Trump's travel ban places full restrictions on citizens from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also places partial restrictions on seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. For some countries, the Trump administration's latest ban cites faulty 'screening and vetting measures' inhibiting U.S. Embassy staff from reviewing visa candidates. But the executive order repeatedly references countries' visa overstay rates — the percentage at which a country's citizens remain in the U.S. beyond the time period allowed under their visa. 'It's just collective punishment. None of the people who are banned under this proclamation are banned for anything that they did wrong, or any actual individual suspicion that they will do something wrong,' said Adam Bates, a counsel at the International Refugee Assistance Project. 'It's just this kind of collective punishment. 'We don't trust your country. We don't trust your government. We don't trust you based on no other reason than where you were born — not because of anything you did or have done or will do.'' Raha Wala, vice president for strategy and partnerships for the National Immigration Law Center, said those inconsistencies will likely factor in the lawsuit. 'One of the real legal defects of this new, expanded ban is that it's completely arbitrary. You know, folks from Canada have one of the highest visa overstay rates, but they're not on this ban list,' he said. In issuing the new ban, the administration highlighted an Egyptian man arrested in an attack on demonstrators in Boulder, Colo., calling for the release of hostages held by Hamas. The man, Mohamed Soliman, filed for asylum shortly after arrival but overstayed his initial visa. Yet the administration did not include Egypt on its travel ban, which Wala argued shows it is an 'arbitrary and capricious, expanded ban' designed to 'ban or restrict individuals from countries that President Trump, perhaps personally, just doesn't like.' He added that the ban would disproportionately hit 'lots of countries of Black folk, brown folk, Asian folk and Latino folk.' Trump has defended the exclusion of Egypt. 'Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control. The countries that we have don't have things under control,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office earlier this month. Arulanantham said litigation will likely include a review of visa overstay rates for countries not included in the ban. 'I think it's highly problematic to assume that, 'Oh, because some people from Burundi overstay, therefore we should assume that the others will and ban them all.' It's obviously highly problematic from a moral perspective. It's discriminatory. But if you're going to take that kind of approach that you have to ask the question like, 'OK, well, are these really outlying countries?'' he asked. Trump has already moved to lift protections on citizens from a number of the countries on the travel ban list, such as Afghanistan, Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela. Former President Biden designated Temporary Protected Status (TPS) — protections from deportation — for migrants from Afghanistan, Venezuela and Haiti. He also started a parole program that granted entry for two years and work permits to citizens from Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela and Nicaragua if they could secure a U.S.-based financial sponsor. Trump has since scrapped the parole program while terminating TPS for countries now included in the travel ban. Those moves have been challenged in court. In stripping TPS, Trump has argued Afghans, Haitians and Venezuelans no longer merit the temporary refuge the protections give for those fleeing civil unrest or natural disasters. All three countries are currently roiling from various political controversies and are facing severe food insecurity. 'For the purposes of terminating TPS, Afghanistan is a safe, stable, secure country. And for the purpose of banning Afghans from getting visas, Afghanistan is a terrorist-run failed state,' Bates said. 'They're self-contradicting.' State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott defended the ban as a national security measure as well as 'broader action from this administration on a whole host of visa issues.' 'This is a national security imperative,' he said during a briefing earlier this month. 'Do we have the ability to vet people coming in, and this, again, has been that priority from the beginning of this administration. Can we say with confidence that people coming to the United States have been properly vetted? Is there essential authority in these countries that can confirm that? Can we trust what they're telling us?' While immigration advocates felt confident the new travel ban was discriminatory, they hedged on whether any challenge would be successful in court. 'It's certainly possible, it's very possible, the Supreme Court upholds this,' Arulanantham said, noting that such a move would have 'very dramatic impacts on immigrant communities' and separate families. Wala also expressed some doubts. 'I don't want to oversell the case, so to speak,' he said. 'Are we super confident this particular Supreme Court is going to come down the right side of this one? Well, not necessarily, because they upheld what we viewed and still view to be a very unconstitutional ban the prior time.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.