Reading children's services: Council votes to take back in-house
Control of services for vulnerable children and those with special needs will be taken over by a council.Brighter Futures for Children (BFfC) was set up as an independent, not-for-profit-company by Reading Borough Council in 2018, following an inadequate Ofsted rating.Now the council has voted unanimously to bring children's services back under its direct control.BFfC was created with the aim of gaining a good Ofsted rating, which the authority said the company had been unable to achieve.
Leader of the Labour-controlled council, Liz Terry, said there was "good progress" made by the organisation in its eight years of operation.She said: "The council and BFfC had come closer together and were working well together and we had to reach a decision on whether to extend the contract past March 2026."
The latest Ofsted rating for BFfC was requires improvement to be good, which Rob White, leader of the opposition Green Party group, said meant it had "failed in its main goal"."As councillors, we are all corporate parents, and have a duty to children in care."Green councillors didn't support the setting of BFfC as we didn't think this was the best way of improving Reading council's children's services," he added.He went on to describe the setting up BFfC as a "costly endeavour" costing taxpayers £2.8 million to set up and £600,000 to wind up.
'Abdicating responsibility'
Ms Terry said the setup fee for BFfC was paid for by the Department for Education.Anne Thompson, of the Liberal Democrats said her party also supported the idea of bringing BFfC back in house."We feel that not doing so would be abdicating responsibility to Reading's children," she said.Councillors unanimously approved the decision to bring children's services back under local authority control at a meeting on Tuesday.The decision means BFfC will close on March 31, 2026, with all staff being retained and employed by the council.
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Oil industry could see job cuts like Grangemouth every fortnight, report warns
That level of job losses would be the same as the closure of the Grangemouth oil refinery every two weeks, according to research by Aberdeen's Robert Gordon University. It said in 'low-case scenarios', where the UK makes 'slower progress' as the country transitions towards renewable energy, jobs in the oil and gas workforce would drop from 115,000 at present to 'as low as 57,000 by the early 2030s'. The report added this would be a 'reduction of around 400 jobs – equivalent to the closure of the Grangemouth refinery – every two weeks'. With almost one in 30 Scottish workers currently employed in either the offshore energy sector, or an industry which supports it – compared to one in 220 across the UK – it highlighted how the 'potential risks for Scotland's supply chain and workforce are substantial'. Figures for 2024 show there were 154,000 people employed in the offshore energy sector – with 75% in the oil and gas sector and the remaining 25% in renewables. The Striking The Balance report noted the production of oil is now down by 'almost 75% from its peak' in 1999-2000, when it produced the equivalent of 4.5 million barrels of oil per day. This has now dropped to 1.09 million barrels of oil equivalent a day, with the report noting that without new licences being granted 'the oil and gas industry is forecast to decline by around 95% by 2050 from 2024 levels'. The report said: 'Depending on which scenario will play out, the direct and indirect UK oil and gas workforce is expected to fall from 115,000 to between 57,000 and 71,000 by the early 2030s, with further declines to between 33,000 and 48,000 by 2035.' SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn challenged Westminster to act in the wake of the report. He said: 'The independent expert advice is clear, we will see a Grangemouth scale of job losses each and every fortnight if the UK Government does not shift from its misguided position and protect the energy industry of today, so that the workforce can use their skills and expertise to develop the net zero industries of tomorrow. 'The opportunities of net zero are enormous but they will not be realised if the Labour Government continues with its current fiscal regime that deters stability, confidence and investment in existing industries and we therefore lose our best people, and world-class supply chain, to nations elsewhere.' Scottish Conservative energy spokesman and North East Scotland MSP Douglas Lumsden insisted however that both the Scottish and UK governments need to change their approach. He said the 'alarming' report 'lays bare the economic vandalism caused by both Labour and the SNP's opposition to oil and gas'. He added: 'John Swinney and Keir Starmer have disgracefully sat back while jobs continue to be lost throughout the sector as both remain totally oblivious to the fact that renewables alone can't yet satisfy our energy needs.' Pressed on the issue in Holyrood, Scottish climate action minister Alasdair Allan vowed ministers will 'learn' from the report, saying: 'We hope the UK Government will too.' While some areas regarding energy are devolved to Holyrood, he added that others are reserved to Westminster and 'we must get helpful decisions from the UK Government'. He said the UK Government could provide a 'full funding package' for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project in Aberdeenshire in next week's comprehensive spending review. A spokesperson for the UK Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'We have taken rapid steps to deliver the next generation of good jobs for North Sea workers in a fair and orderly transition as part of our Plan for Change, including by making the biggest investment in offshore wind and two first-of-a-kind carbon capture storage clusters. 'This comes alongside Great British Energy, headquartered in Aberdeen, which has already announced a £300 million investment into British supply chains, unlocking significant investment and helping to create thousands of skilled jobs
South Wales Guardian
26 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Fact check: Reform UK migrants claim and minister's inflation mix-up
Has Labour 'allowed the biggest influx of migrants in British history'? Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice MP claimed in a newspaper column a few weeks ago that 'the statistics show without a doubt that this Labour government has allowed the biggest influx of migrants in British history'. It's not clear which figures Mr Tice was basing this claim on – we've asked him and Reform UK, and haven't had a response. But the statistics we've been able to check – both those available at the time Mr Tice made his claim, and those published since – don't appear to support it. And when we asked Oxford University's Migration Observatory about Mr Tice's claim, it told us: 'We cannot identify any data that support the assertion that the current government has been responsible for the biggest influx of migrants in British history, and we are unclear how Mr Tice came to this conclusion.' Mr Tice referred only to 'migrants' and did not specify that he was talking about any particular group of migrants, but some on social media have suggested he intended to refer solely to Channel crossings, which have been at record levels this year and hit the headlines again this weekend after almost 1,200 migrants were recorded as arriving via small boat on Saturday. Between January 1 2025 and April 27 2025 (the day Mr Tice's article was published), government statistics show 9,885 migrants were detected crossing the English Channel in small boats, and between January 1 and May 31 this figure was 14,812. Both these figures are higher than for equivalent periods in other years going back to 2018, when statistics for this measure began. But they don't support the claim Mr Tice made – firstly because they only refer to a small proportion of all migrants, and secondly because they don't cover Labour's full time in office. In the time between Labour forming a government on July 5 2024 and April 27 2025, 33,127 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel on small boats, according to government statistics. This isn't a record – the equivalent total between July 5 2022 and April 27 2023 was 38,600. In terms of overall migrant numbers, there are various different sets of data, but one of the most commonly cited is the estimate of long-term international migration published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The most recent such figures cover the year to December 2024, when 948,000 people are estimated to have moved to the UK. (Over the same period 517,000 people left, so total net migration that year is estimated to have been 431,000.) These figures can't tell us exactly how many have arrived under Labour, as they cover roughly six months of the last Conservative government and the first six months of Labour. The next set of figures, which will cover the year ending June 2025 and are expected to be published in the autumn, will more reliably tell us about the change under Labour. But overall the figures for 2024 were significantly down on the year before. In the year ending December 2023 around 1,326,000 people were estimated to have moved to the UK – a record high. (And 466,000 people left, so net migration that year was an estimated 860,000.) Net migration is estimated to have reached a record high of 906,000 in the year ending June 2023, when 1,320,000 people moved to the UK and 414,000 people left. So while the ONS migration estimates can't tell us specifically what the change in the number of immigrants coming to the UK has been under Labour, they appear to suggest that the 'biggest influx' of migrants on record so far took place under the previous Conservative government. The Migration Observatory believes this is the case, telling us: 'Data clearly show that the 'biggest influx of migrants in British history' took place under the previous administration.' School standards minister mixes up inflation and interest rates Speaking about the cost of living in an interview on Friday, school standards minister Catherine McKinnell MP claimed 'we've seen inflation coming down'. That's not what the latest inflation figures show, however, and the Department for Education has since told us she'd intended to refer to interest rates. While the Bank Rate – which is set by the Bank of England to influence the interest rates charged by banks – is currently one percentage point lower than it was when Labour came into government on July 5 2024, inflation (the change in prices for goods and services over time, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, or CPI) is higher than it was when Labour entered government. In the 12 months to June 2024 – the last full month of the previous Conservative government – inflation stood at 2%, while in the 12 months to July 2024 – the month Labour formed a government – it was 2.2%. As of April 2025, annual CPI inflation was 3.5%, 0.9 percentage points higher than the previous month's figure. Other commonly used measures of inflation show similar trends. This isn't the first time we've seen government ministers confuse interest rate and inflation figures. Earlier this year we fact checked the Prime Minister and Home Office minister Seema Malhotra MP after they both wrongly claimed interest rates had been at 11% under the previous government. As Ms Malhotra later made clear in an edited post, the 11% figure actually referred to the peak rate of CPI inflation in 2022.
South Wales Argus
32 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Plaid Cymru criticise Labour on two-child benefit cap
The criticism follows First Minister Eluned Morgan's call for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to scrap the policy, which limits child benefit payments to the first two children in a family. Plaid Cymru's social justice and early years spokesperson, Sioned Williams MS, said: "This is staggering hypocrisy from Labour. "Just last Christmas, Eluned Morgan derided Plaid Cymru for demanding the two-child cap be scrapped. "As recently as last October, Labour MSs voted against our calls in the Senedd to stand up for children in poverty and end this cruel cap. "Meanwhile in Westminster, not a single Welsh Labour MP backed our efforts to scrap it – and Keir Starmer suspended his own MPs for voting to protect children. "Now, suddenly, Labour are changing their tone. "One would be forgiven for thinking this isn't about principle, but panic – driven by polling, not values." The two-child benefit cap has come under renewed scrutiny amid reports that the UK Government may consider scrapping it ahead of its spending review. First Minister Ms Morgan has urged the Prime Minister to remove the cap, which campaigners argue increases child poverty. However, Ms Williams said Labour's position lacked consistency. She said: "Plaid Cymru has been consistent from the start. "We've fought to scrap the two-child cap because it's the right thing to do for thousands of children growing up in poverty. "In Wales, we led the way on universal free school meals. "And in government, we pledge to deliver a Welsh Child Payment – a direct weekly payment to offer real, targeted help to support families who need it most." The policy has become a flashpoint within the Labour Party, exposing internal divisions and prompting criticism from across the political spectrum. Darren Millar MS, leader of the Welsh Conservatives, questioned Labour's promises to voters. Mr Millar said: "Labour promised that having two governments working at either side of the M4 would deliver for Wales, but all we've seen is a party at war with itself and a First Minister who clearly holds no sway with the Prime Minister. "The reality is that eliminating the two-child benefit cap would come at a financial cost, ultimately borne by hardworking taxpayers. "While the state should always support the most vulnerable, any extra costs must be weighed against the principle of fairness for the taxpayer." Ann Davies MP, Plaid Cymru's work and pensions spokesperson, criticised both Labour and the Conservatives for maintaining the policy. Ms Davies said: "The Tories are choosing to defend a policy that pulls 109 children into poverty every day. "There's nothing fair or responsible about that. "Ending the two-child limit would lift 350,000 children out of poverty across the UK instantly – more effectively and at lower cost than any alternative. "That is why Plaid Cymru have tabled motions in both Westminster and the Senedd calling for it to be scrapped, which have sadly been voted down by Labour consistently. "The Conservatives are once again proving just how out of touch they are with the daily struggles faced by people across Wales." Welsh Labour did not respond to a request for comment.
